Exploring AB 32 and CPP Interactions in the WECC EPRI ENV-Vision Conference Washington, DC

Similar documents
Energy and Consumer Impacts of EPA s Clean Power Plan. Prepared for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity

Implications of Technology Availability and Cost on Clean Power Plan Compliance Costs. Scott Bloomberg Vice President

Challenges to the Electricity Sector: California s Efforts at Long-term Decarbonisation

EPA Clean Power Plan: Costs and Impacts on U.S. Energy Markets

Clean Power Plan Clean Air Act 111(d) and 111(b) Rule. A Quick Comparison of What Changed

Alternate Scenarios for 111(d) Implementation in North Carolina

Alternative RE Approach Technical Support Document

Potential Energy Impacts of the EPA Proposed Clean Power Plan

Anticipating Compliance Strategies and Forecasts for Satisfying Clean Power Plan Requirements

Vectren Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Stakeholder Meeting 3 of 3. Discussion of Analysis Results September 24, 2014

Tax Credit Extension: Impact on Renewables Investment and Emissions Outcomes

Creating Incentives for Electricity Providers to Integrate DER

POWER SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCING CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS: COLORADO

The Renewable Energy Transition: A Status Report

By: Crystal Warren IMPLEMENTATION OF SOLAR PANELS ON COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND THE COST-BASED INCENTIVES

Cost-effectiveness and economic incidence of a clean energy standard

Maryland Nuclear Power Plant s Contribution to the State Economy

Comparison of CO 2 Abatement Costs in the United States for Various Low and No Carbon Resources. Total System Levelized Cost Based on EIA LCOE

California s Cap-and-Trade Voluntary Renewable Electricity Program

CO 2 Regulation and Electricity Pricing

issue brief Colorado s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution

Energy Prices, Climate Change Policy and U.S. Economic Growth

Energy Market Impacts of Recent Federal Regulations on the Electric Power Sector

FACTS THE Methane Emissions Update

CHP & ENVIRONMENTAL COMMODITIES: MARKET & POLICY UPDATE FOR MONETIZING RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDITS FROM CHP PROJECTS. Thomas Jacobsen October 2012

ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update

Clean Power Plan: MISO Analysis ADEQ/APSC Stakeholder Meeting

A Guide to Competition and Regulatory Policy During Interesting Times

Critical Policy Options to Protect Industry Competitiveness

Testimony of Jason Eisdorfer. In front of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on Environment Friday, September 11, 2015

An Overview of California s Cap and Trade Program

Smart, Efficient and Clean Why Businesses are Engaging in Energy Policy

EPA s Clean Power Plan

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT AMENDMENTS TO COMAR MD CO 2 Budget Trading Program FOR JULY 26, 2013 PREPARED BY:

Energy Projections Price and Policy Considerations. Dr. Randy Hudson Oak Ridge National Laboratory

State Clean Energy Fund Support for Renewable Energy Projects

ACORE 20 GW Plan for Kansas. Economic Revitalization through Renewable Energy: Will Kansas Reap the Benefits of this Crop?

NEVADA S ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM AND THE CLEAN POWER PLAN

Wood Pellets for Power and Heat. Gordon Murray, Executive Director

Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

PG&E s Distribution Resource Plan

First Deliverer Approach to Regulating gelectricity Imports in Cap and Trade Programs. RGGI Learning Session October 11, 2011 New York, NY

Addendum Combined Heat and Power Revisions to the CPUC GHG Calculator Revised Report


The Effect of Natural Gas Supply on Retail Electricity Prices

issue brief Nevada s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution

Levelized Cost of New Electricity Generating Technologies

Clean Power Plan Planning Tool (CP3T)

Michigan Nuclear Power Plants Contribution to the State Economy

IMPACTS OF EPA S CARBON PROPOSAL ON COLORADO

Low-Carbon Electricity Pathways for the U.S. and the South: An Assessment of Costs and Options

Electric Market National Overview

February 3, SUBJECT: Proposed Standard Scenario Results Comparison Metrics

Potential Cost Impacts of a Vermont Renewable Portfolio Standard. Presented to the Vermont RPS Collaborative

New York s Upstate Nuclear Power Plants Contribution to the State Economy

Energy Forecast UPDATE TO THE WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY PRICE FORECAST

Renewable Energy Credit (REC) Price Forecast (Preliminary Results)

Guidance for U.S. Positions on MDBs Engaging with Developing Countries on Coal-Fired Power Generation 1

Appendix D: Electricity Price Forecast Preliminary Draft

Emission Reductions and Leakage from US State Cap-and-Trade Programs

Addressing Barriers to Renewable Energy Procurement. In association with the EPA Green Power Partnership

SaskPower CCS Global Consortium Bringing Boundary Dam to the World. Mike Monea, President Carbon Capture and Storage Initiatives

Carbon Credits: An Opportunity for Forest Landowners. Hughes Simpson Texas Forest Service

Analysis of a 30 Percent by 2030 National Renewable Electricity Standard

Natural Gas Diversification Strategy for PREPA GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK FOR PUERTO RICO

Consumer Cost Effectiveness of CO 2 Mitigation Policies in Restructured Electricity Markets. Jared Moore and Jay Apt.

Security of electricity supply

EPA Clean Power Plan and Impact on Texas and the Country. Scott D. Deatherage

Portfolio Manager and Green Power Tracking

Threshold Determination: California Case Law

Clean Diesel versus CNG Buses: Cost, Air Quality, & Climate Impacts

Economic Analysis of Ohio s Renewable and Energy Efficiency Standards

Houston-Galveston Area Council Houston, Texas (by telephone) November 19, 2015

public support for climate and energy policies in november 2011

How Does Coal Price Affect Heat Rates?

How To Trade In California S Carbon Market

CCS in the Oil refining Industry System Solutions and Assessment of Capture Potential

Driving Industrial Energy Efficiency Through Energy Tax Rebates

December 1, Re: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR RGGI States Supplemental Comments on Proposed Clean Power Plan

Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2015

Evaluating the Affordability of EMR Policies: Achieving UK Carbon Reduction Targets at the Lowest Cost-Per-Tonne

ANALYSIS OF US AND STATE-BY-STATE CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS AND POTENTIAL SAVINGS IN FUTURE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE AND GLOBAL SEA LEVEL RISE

OUTLOOK FOR NATURAL GAS IN EUROPE

E N G I N E E R I N G

CRM Sample Questions

Reasons why BEF Renewable Energy Certificates are the Right Choice

Economic Outcomes of a U.S. Carbon Tax. Executive Summary

Forecast of Future Electricity Costs in California. Prepared by: Strategic Resource Advisers, LLC November 12, 2014

Transforming America s Energy Future. Kentucky. Energy Statistics. Developed by

The Cost of CCS for Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants

B O A R D M E E T I N G N a s h v i l l e, T e n n e s s e e November 6, 2014

LAW OFFICES OF SUSIE BERLIN

State Aid Analysis for Electricity Market Reform

Emissions Comparison for a 20 MW Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Power Plant

July 6, SUBJECT: Electric Vehicle (EV) and Utilities a Win-Win investment?

Gasification as a Strategic Energy and Environmental Option

Emission monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) for U.S. cap and trade programs. Jeremy Schreifels US EPA

Reasons for the drop of Swedish electricity prices

Electricity Prices Panel

Displacement of Coal with Natural Gas to Generate Electricity

Transcription:

1 Exploring AB 32 and CPP Interactions in the WECC EPRI ENV-Vision Conference Washington, DC May 11, 2016

Project Overview Analyzed power sector impacts of the Clean Power Plan (CPP) Focused on interactions between AB 32 import provisions and the CPP in the context of mass-based CPP goals Key model outputs included: CPP allowance prices Natural gas prices Wholesale electric prices Total production costs CO 2 emissions

Key Takeaways AB 32 Electricity Import Provision Drives Significant Differences in Outcomes Absent linkage, California generators face higher GHG prices than out-of-state generators GHG price differential drives large swings in NGCC generation GHG price differential does not change WECC or California in-state + import GHG emissions, but does change California in-state vs import GHG emissions Removing the AB 32 import charge reduces wholesale electricity prices and total system costs in California Removing the AB 32 import charge reduces wholesale electricity prices in the WECC, but results in higher total system costs in the WECC as California imports more power

IPM Model Assumptions Key Similarities to EPA Modeling of Final Rule Both analyses use ICF s IPM PG&E s analysis starts with V5.13 and incorporates key updates from V5.15 Firm builds and retirements Natural gas module (results in lower gas prices) Electricity demand (lower in AEO 2015) Key Differences Reflects California s 50/50/50 Executive Order Assumes higher AB 32 allowance prices Assumes aggressive energy efficiency, renewable energy, and transport electrification policies

Cases Vary AB 32 Cap-and-Trade Regulation of Emissions from Electricity Imports Case Name CPP Policy Assumed AB 32 C&T for CA Power Plants AB 32 C&T GHG Regulation of Electricity Imports into CA Nat l Trading Imports 2x Nat l Trading Imports 1x Final Rule Mass Caps on Existing and New Sources, National Trading* Active 2016 50 2016 2050 2016 2022 * Allowance banking not modeled

CO 2 Allowance Prices Policy Case imports 2x imports 1x CO 2 Allowance Prices* (2012$/MT) State/ Region In State CA 1 46 58 74 Imports into CA 2 46 67 104 Rest of US - 9 30 In State CA 1 46 58 74 Imports into CA 3 46 11 30 Rest of US - 11 30 * Allowance banking not modeled 1 AB 32 Allowance Price Input Assumption: Preliminary 2015 IEPR GHG price projections, Modified High Case 2 Post-2022, imports into CA in the 2x case pay both the CPP CO 2 price and the AB 32 price 3 Post-2022, imports into CA in the 1x case pay only the CO 2 price in the region where power is generated (CPP Price)

California s Generation Mix 140 Gas Fired Generation Supplying CA (TWh) 120 100 80 62 67 60 98 94 108 102 40 20 58 50 0 13 17 12 imports 2x imports 1x imports 2x imports 1x 12 imports 2x imports 1x Gas Imports Gas In State

California Emissions Trajectory* * Includes emissions from all fossil generation facilities 60 CO2 Emissions (Million Metric Tons) 50 40 30 19 20 5 22 5 19 20 10 36 35 40 22 37 24 0 imports 2x imports 1x imports 2x imports 1x imports 2x imports 1x CA in state CA Imports

WECC Emissions Trajectory* * Includes emissions from all fossil generation facilities WECC CO2 Emissions (Million Metric Tons) 250 236 236 230 233 225 217 200 150 100 50 imports 2x imports 1x

US Emissions Trajectory* * Includes emissions from all fossil generation facilities US CO2 Emissions (Million Metric Tons) 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,873 1,862 1,810 1,792 1,684 1,671 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 imports 2x imports 1x

California Production Costs* * Total Production Cost = Fuel + VOM + FOM + Capital Cost + Net Import Costs CA Production Costs (Billions of 2012$) $25 $20 16 16 18 18 22 20 $15 $10 $5 $0 imports 2x imports 1x

WECC Production Costs * Total Production Cost = Fuel + VOM + FOM + Capital Cost + Net Import Costs WECC Production Costs* (Billions of 2012$) $40 $35 $30 27 27 30 31 35 36 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 imports 2x imports 1x

California Wholesale Electric Prices $90 $80 CA Average Wholesale Energy Price (2012$/MWh) 79 77 $70 $60 60 60 67 64 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 imports 2x imports 1x

WECC Wholesale Electric Prices $90 WECC Average Wholesale Energy Price (2012$/MWh) $80 $70 67 65 $60 $50 45 44 51 51 $40 $30 $20 $10 $ imports 2x imports 1x

Key Takeaways AB 32 Electricity Import Provision Drives Significant Differences in Outcomes Absent linkage, California generators face higher GHG prices than out-of-state generators GHG price differential drives large swings in NGCC generation GHG price differential does not change WECC or California in-state + import GHG emissions, but does change California in-state vs import GHG emissions Removing the AB 32 import charge reduces wholesale electricity prices and total system costs in California Removing the AB 32 import charge reduces wholesale electricity prices in the WECC, but results in higher total system costs in the WECC as California imports more power