The influence of transition from vegetation to gravel bed and vice versa in open channels using the PIV method

Similar documents
Experiment (13): Flow channel

NUMERICAL STUDY OF FLOW AND TURBULENCE THROUGH SUBMERGED VEGETATION

2.0 BASIC CONCEPTS OF OPEN CHANNEL FLOW MEASUREMENT

Open channel flow Basic principle

Chapter 9. Steady Flow in Open channels

Head Loss in Pipe Flow ME 123: Mechanical Engineering Laboratory II: Fluids

Broad Crested Weirs. I. Introduction

For Water to Move a driving force is needed

Backwater Rise and Drag Characteristics of Bridge Piers under Subcritical

Experiment 3 Pipe Friction

CEE 370 Fall Laboratory #3 Open Channel Flow

Practice Problems on Boundary Layers. Answer(s): D = 107 N D = 152 N. C. Wassgren, Purdue University Page 1 of 17 Last Updated: 2010 Nov 22

HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS IN A 3D SQUARE CHANNEL LAMINAR FLOW WITH USING BAFFLES 1 Vikram Bishnoi

Chapter 13 OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW

Open Channel Flow. M. Siavashi. School of Mechanical Engineering Iran University of Science and Technology

ANALYSIS OF OPEN-CHANNEL VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS COLLECTED WITH AN ACOUSTIC DOPPLER CURRENT PROFILER

Topic 8: Open Channel Flow

Natural Convection. Buoyancy force

Open Channel Flow 2F-2. A. Introduction. B. Definitions. Design Manual Chapter 2 - Stormwater 2F - Open Channel Flow

CHAPTER 9 CHANNELS APPENDIX A. Hydraulic Design Equations for Open Channel Flow

4.What is the appropriate dimensionless parameter to use in comparing flow types? YOUR ANSWER: The Reynolds Number, Re.

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

Evaluation of Open Channel Flow Equations. Introduction :

Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk

EXAMPLES (OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW) AUTUMN 2015

Exercise (4): Open Channel Flow - Gradually Varied Flow

CHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS

du u U 0 U dy y b 0 b

Sediment Entry Investigation at the 30 Degree Water Intake Installed at a Trapezoidal Channel

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF WIND ON BUILDING STRUCTURES

Numerical Investigation of Angle and Geometric of L-Shape Groin on the Flow and Erosion Regime at River Bends

BED LOAD TRANSPORT OF FINE SAND BY LAMINAR AND TURBULENT FLOW

The Viscosity of Fluids

What is the most obvious difference between pipe flow and open channel flow????????????? (in terms of flow conditions and energy situation)

Abaqus/CFD Sample Problems. Abaqus 6.10

Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II)

Chapter 8: Flow in Pipes

Lecture 24 Flumes & Channel Transitions. I. General Characteristics of Flumes. Flumes are often used:

Simulating Sedimentation Model in Balarood Dam Reservoir Using CCHE2D Software

Basic Equations, Boundary Conditions and Dimensionless Parameters

Chapter 12 - HYDROLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

Proceeding of International Seminar on Application of Science Matehmatics 2011 (ISASM2011) PWTC, KL, Nov, 1-3, 2011

FLOW PATTERNS AND EXCHANGE PROCESSES IN DEAD ZONES OF RIVERS VOLKER WEITBRECHT & GERHARD H. JIRKA

Hydraulic losses in pipes

Lecture 6. Jump as energy dissipation Control of jump.

FLOW CONDITIONER DESIGN FOR IMPROVING OPEN CHANNEL FLOW MEASUREMENT ACCURACY FROM A SONTEK ARGONAUT-SW

Experimentation and Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling of Roughness Effects in Flexible Pipelines

Course Plan Day 1: Introduction and Overview Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology Day 2: Fieldwork on the Braid Burn Alan Jones

Chapter 2. Derivation of the Equations of Open Channel Flow. 2.1 General Considerations

Appendix 4-C. Open Channel Theory

Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

Basic Principles in Microfluidics

Open Channel Flow Measurement Weirs and Flumes

DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA

OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW. Free surface. P atm

CHAPTER 4 FLOW IN CHANNELS

1.72, Groundwater Hydrology Prof. Charles Harvey Lecture Packet #2: Aquifers, Porosity, and Darcy s Law. Lake (Exposed Water Table)

Interpretation of clogging effects on the hydraulic behavior of ion treated geotextiles

Hydraulics Laboratory Experiment Report

Significance of Different Flow, Channel and Bed Conditions in Estimation of Open Channel Flow Resistance

1. Fluids Mechanics and Fluid Properties. 1.1 Objectives of this section. 1.2 Fluids

AN ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR WATER PROFILE CALCULATIONS IN FREE SURFACE FLOWS THROUGH ROCKFILLS

SIMULATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY CHANGE IN LARGE RIVER SYSTEMS. Stephen H. Scott 1 and Yafei Jia 2

7.2.4 Seismic velocity, attenuation and rock properties

PHYSICAL QUANTITIES AND UNITS

Using CFD to improve the design of a circulating water channel

LAPLACE'S EQUATION OF CONTINUITY

Training programme on flow measurements

Open Channel Flow in Aquaculture

Collision of a small bubble with a large falling particle

The Viscosity of Fluids

Fluids and Solids: Fundamentals

Numerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil

Groundwater flow systems theory: an unexpected outcome of

Design Charts for Open-Channel Flow HDS 3 August 1961

Mathematics and Computation of Sediment Transport in Open Channels

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

Heat Transfer Prof. Dr. Ale Kumar Ghosal Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Figure CPT Equipment

Principles of groundwater flow

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

CE 6303 MECHANICS OF FLUIDS L T P C QUESTION BANK PART - A

AN EFFECT OF GRID QUALITY ON THE RESULTS OF NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE FLUID FLOW FIELD IN AN AGITATED VESSEL

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF SEEPAGE THROUGH EMBANKMENT DAMS (CASE STUDY: KOCHARY DAM, GOLPAYEGAN)

Basic Principles of Channel Design

Civil Engineering Hydraulics Open Channel Flow. Adult: Where s your costume? What are you supposed to be?

POURING THE MOLTEN METAL

Flow Over Weirs. By John Fuller. Fluid Mechanics Lab. Wednesday(1-345pm) Group member: Abdur Rahaman

HYDRAULICS. H91.8D/C - Computerized Open Surface Tilting Flow Channel - 10, 12.5, 15 and 20 m long

Swissmetro travels at high speeds through a tunnel at low pressure. It will therefore undergo friction that can be due to:

METHODS FOR ACHIEVEMENT UNIFORM STRESSES DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE FOUNDATION

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

Copyright 2011 Casa Software Ltd. Centre of Mass

EFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY, SANTA MARGARITA RIVER, CALIFORNIA

Lecture 6 - Boundary Conditions. Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics

Urban Hydraulics. 2.1 Basic Fluid Mechanics

oil liquid water water liquid Answer, Key Homework 2 David McIntyre 1

FLUID FLOW STREAMLINE LAMINAR FLOW TURBULENT FLOW REYNOLDS NUMBER

Transcription:

Water Utility Journal 1: 37-43, 215. 215 E.W. Publications The influence of transition from vegetation to gravel bed and vice versa in open channels using the PIV method E. Keramaris 1 and G. Pechlivanidis 2 1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece, e-mail: ekeramaris@civ.uth.gr 2 Department of Civil Infrastructure Engineering, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, Greece, e-mail: gpexliva@cie.teithe.gr Abstract: Key words: In this study the influence of transition from vegetation to gravel bed and vice versa in open channel is investigated experimentally. This experimental investigation is based on the 2D Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) method, which allows data acquisition at fine spatial-temporal resolution. For the simulation of the two porous beds: a) a grass-like vegetation and b) gravel bed of 2cm height were used to represent the permeable bed, since these conditions are typical of flows encountered in sediment transport problems. In total, 24 experiments were carried out. The experiments were conducted in a horizontal channel of 6.5m length, 7.5cm width, and 25cm height. The velocity is measured above the permeable bed and at two different discharges (.735 and.97lt/s) and three different flow depths (4, 7 and 1cm). The experiments were performed in four different locations of the channel (over the vegetated bed, in the transition point from vegetated to gravel bed, over the gravel bed, and in the transition point from gravel bed to vegetated bed). Results show that the influence on the turbulent characteristics of transition from vegetation to gravel bed is different in comparison with those of transition from gravel to vegetated bed. This is due to the fact that the presence of gravel bed increases the turbulent characteristics of the flow in regard to the vegetated bed due to the great roughness which is observed near the interface gravel bed-water because of the presence of the gravel bed and this increase the turbulence. Turbulent flow, particle image velocimetry, permeable bed, velocity distribution. 1. INTRODUCTION The transition from permeable to another different permeable bed on turbulent flow in an open channel has particular importance. In nature it is observed a growth of vegetated or gravel beds both in rivers and open channels in small or large lengths. The presence of a permeable bed in an open channel has as a result the change of depth flow and velocity. Also the presence of different permeable beds (for example vegetated and gravel bed) has a great influence in the turbulent characteristics of the flow. Initially in an experimental study, Beavers and Joseph (1967) used a porous block with high permeability in a closed channel and found an empirical relationship for the interfacial slip velocity which takes into account the Darcy velocity within the porous region, the permeability of porous medium and a slip parameter assumed to be independent of velocity. The study of turbulent flow over and within a permeable layer is rather limited since there are further difficulties because of the turbulence. Stephan and Gutknecht (22) investigated the resistance of submerged flexible aquatic vegetation on the flow. They described the flow resistance of the natural macrophytes used by means of equivalent sand roughness and they found out that the latter as well as the zero plane displacement of the logarithmic velocity profile were of the same order of magnitude as the mean deflected plant height and increased with increasing plant height. Carollo et al. (25) conducted experiments in a grass-like vegetation flume in order to analyse flow resistance for flexible submerged elements. The authors concluded that a flow resistance equation, linking the friction factor with the shear Reynolds number, the depth-vegetation height ratio and the inflection degree can be established. Pokrajac and Manes (29) presented an experimental investigation of the interaction between

38 E. Keramaris & G. Pechlivanidis the turbulent flow in an open channel and the turbulent flow within its very permeable bed. The bed was composed of uniform-size spheres packed in a cubic pattern. Fluid velocities were measured by Particle Image Velocimetry. They investigated the effect of bed porosity on these flow properties by comparing the results of two experimental configurations: one with an impermeable bed composed of a single layer of spheres and another with a permeable bed composed of five layers. For the latter case, PIV measurements of velocities were also carried out inside two pores adjacent to the bed surface. This data provides an insight into the mechanisms of momentum transfer between the turbulent open channel flow and the turbulent flow within its very permeable bed. Pechlivanidis et al. (212) investigated experimentally the turbulent characteristics of openchannel flow using Particle Image Velocimetry. Results show that velocity over the vegetation region is a function of the vegetation height and the total flow depth; velocity decreases as the vegetation height increases. In addition, we show that velocities above the vegetation region are much lower than velocities above an impermeable bed. This is due to the turbulent shear stresses and the existence of turbulence in the vegetation region, which reduce the mean velocity above the vegetation region. The width of the channel is only 7.5cm but does not influence the magnitude of the velocities. Keramaris et al. (213) carried out experiments to investigate the impact of lateral walls on the velocity profile in an open channel with the width of 7.5cm. Results from these experiments showed that the lateral walls influence the velocities only in a distance of.4cm from the walls. This result indicates that the wall doesn t influence the instantaneous velocities in the central area of the channel in which the velocity measurements are usually conducted. The impact of the lateral walls on the flow dynamics in the rest of the channel is negligible. Finally in the study of Pechlivanidis et al. (214) the impact of permeable to impermeable (and vice versa) bed transition on the velocity distribution of turbulent flow in an open channel is investigated experimentally. A grass-like vegetation of 2cm height was used to represent a permeable bed. The velocity is measured above the vegetation for the permeable bed and above the impermeable bed. Results show that the velocity distribution in channels with transited permeableimpermeable beds (and vice versa) is different to distributions of velocity in solely permeable or impermeable channel beds. Also there are differences between the two transitions especially in the mixing to the high velocities and in the influence of the bed friction. In this study the influence of transition from vegetation to gravel bed and vice versa in open channel is investigated experimentally. For the simulation of the two porous beds : a) a grass-like vegetation and b) gravel bed of 2cm height were used to represent the permeable bed. The velocity is measured using the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) method, which allows data acquisition at fine spatial-temporal resolution Results show that the influence on the turbulent characteristics of transition from vegetation to gravel bed is different in comparison with those of transition from gravel to vegetated bed. 2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE MEASUREMENTS For the simulation of the two permeable beds: a) a grass-like vegetation and b) gravel bed of 2cm height were used to represent the porous bed. In total 24 experiments were carried out in a laboratory of Hydraulics in the department of Civil Infrastructure Engineering of Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, Greece. The experiments were conducted in a horizontal channel of 6.5m length, 7.5cm width, and 25cm height. The velocity is measured above the permeable bed and at two different discharges (.735 and.97lt/s) and three different flow depths (4, 7 and 1cm). The experiments were performed in four different locations of the channel (over the vegetated bed, in the transition point from vegetated to gravel bed, over the gravel bed, and in the transition point from gravel bed to vegetated bed). This experimental investigation is based on the 2D Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) method, which allows data acquisition at fine spatial-temporal resolution. PIV is an optical method of fluid visualisation and is used to obtain instantaneous velocity measurements and related properties in

Water Utility Journal 1 (215) 39 fluids. The fluid is seeded with tracer particles which, for the purposes of PIV, are generally assumed to faithfully follow the flow dynamics (Wereley and Meinhart, 21). The motion of the seeding particles is used to calculate the velocity profile of the flow. PIVs use the particle concentration method to identify individual particles in an image and follow their flow; however, tracking particles between images is not always a straightforward task. Individual particles could be followed when the particle concentration is low, a method called particle tracking velocimetry, whereas laser speckle velocimetry is used for cases where the particle concentration is high. The experimental uncertainty of the measured velocity with this technique is approximately ± 2%. The measurements were conducted at a 12x1cm 2 region in a distance of 4m from the channel s entrance, where the flow is considered fully developed. The full development of the flow was evaluated comparing the velocity distributions in two vertical sections with a 6cm separation distance. The uniformity of the flow was checked measuring the flow depth with point gauges at two cross-sections (4m between the two sections). The desirable flow depth in the downstream section could be controlled using a weir at the channel s outlet. The error of the measured flow depth (1cm) with the point gauge was ±.1mm. The velocity fields were determined analysing 2 pairs of frames in each experiment. The time interval between two different pair of images of was about.675sec. The time between the two images of the same pair was about 1.5msec, that we do not focus on the time record but on the space record; however, the change in motion of the fluid elements can be monitored. The experimental apparatus is presented in Figure 1. The morphology of the permeable bed (vegetated and gravel bed) is illustrated in Figure 2. Figure 1. Experimental apparatus. Figure 2. a) Grass Vegetation of 2cm height b) Gravel Bed of 2cm height. 3. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS Experiments were performed for the flow determination and for the influence of transition from vegetation to gravel bed and vice versa on the velocity distribution. Two hundred (2) pair of pictures for each experiment were taken. The validation of the images was further based on the

4 E. Keramaris & G. Pechlivanidis INSIGHT 3G program. The velocity profiles at various positions were determined by the fields of the velocities with the use of MATLAB, which is integrated in the INSIGHT 3G program. Figure 3 illustrates the impact of permeable bed for water depth equal to h=4, 7 and 1cm on the velocity profile; hence height of permeable bed (vegetation and gravel bed) and discharge are kept constant and equal to 2cm and.97lt/s respectively. The velocities are measured over the vegetated and over the gravel bed. The velocities over the gravel bed are greater as regard the velocities over the vegetation bed. This is due to the greater penetration of the flow in the case of the grass vegetation as regards the penetration for the gravel bed. The presence of the flexible grass vegetation reduces significantly the velocities over the permeable bed. 1 8 6 y ( m m ) 4 2 h = 4 c m (g ra s s v e g e ta ti o n ) h = 4 c m (g ra v e l v e g e ta ti o n ) h = 7 c m (g ra s s v e g e ta ti o n ) h = 7 c m (g ra v e l v e g e ta ti o n ) h = 1 c m (g ra s s v e g e ta ti o n ) h = 1 c m (g ra v e l v e g e ta ti o n ) -.1.1.2.3.4 U ( m /s ) Figure 3. The effect of permeable bed on the velocity distribution. Vegetation height and discharge are constant and equal to 2cm and.97lt/s. Figure 4 illustrates the impact of transition from vegetated to gravel bed and vice versa on the velocity distribution. The velocities are measured in the transition point from vegetated to gravel bed and in the transition point from gravel bed to vegetated bed. In the transition area a significantly reduce of velocities in comparison with these over the permeable bed (vegetated or gravel) is observed. This is due to the fact that the transition from a permeable bed to another influences the velocity distribution because there is a lot of mixing which increases the turbulent characteristics of the flow and reduces the velocities. Also the velocities in the transition point from gravel bed to vegetated bed are much greater in comparison with these in the transition point from vegetated to gravel bed. This is due to the greater penetration of the flow in the case of the grass vegetation as regards the penetration for the gravel bed. Figures 5 and 6 show the dimensionless velocity profiles for the above figures. Figure 5 shows velocity profiles for flow depth 7cm and Figure 6 for flow depth 1cm. In Figure 5 for flow transition from gravel bed (profile a 1 ) to vegetated bed (profile a 2 ) a reduction of the mean dimensionless value of the velocity with a contemporaneous increase of the dimensionless flow depth it is observed. The same result for flow transition from vegetated bed (profile b 1 ) to gravel bed (profile b 2 ) it is observed. The velocity profiles (b) are better than the profiles (a), because in profiles (a) the presence of vegetation after the gravel bed reduce significantly the mean velocity of the flow. The same results in Figure 6 (profiles b and d) are observed. Also in the case of 1cm a significant approaching of the dimensionless flow depth with gravel bed (profile c 1 ) with the

Water Utility Journal 1 (215) 41 respective vegetation bed it is observed. This is due to the significant influence of the vegetation bed. 1 8 6 y ( m m ) 4 2 h= 4c m ( v eg etatio n - g rav el ) h= 4c m ( g rav el - v eg etatio n ) h= 7c m ( v eg etatio n - g rav el ) h= 7c m ( g rav el - v eg etatio n ) -.1.1.2.3.4 U ( m /s ) Figure 4. The effect of transition from vegetated to gravel bed and vice versa on the velocity distribution. Vegetation height and discharge are constant and equal to 2cm and.97lt/s. 4. CONCLUSIONS In this study the influence of transition from vegetation to gravel bed and vice versa in open channel is investigated experimentally. For the simulation of the two porous beds: a) a grass-like vegetation and b) gravel bed of 2cm height were used to represent the permeable bed. The following conclusions can be derived: The velocities over the gravel bed are greater as regard the velocities over the vegetation bed. This is due to the greater penetration of the flow in the case of the grass vegetation as regards the penetration for the gravel bed. The presence of the flexible grass vegetation reduces significantly the velocities over the permeable bed. In the transition area a significantly reduce of velocities in comparison with these over the permeable bed (vegetated or gravel) is observed. This is due to the fact that the transition from a permeable bed to another influences the velocity distribution because there is a lot of mixing which increases the turbulent characteristics of the flow and reduces the velocities. The velocities in the transition point from gravel bed to vegetated bed are much greater in comparison with these in the transition point from vegetated to gravel bed. This is due to the greater penetration of the flow in the case of the grass vegetation as regards the penetration for the gravel bed. For flow transition from gravel to vegetated bed a reduction of the mean dimensionless value of the velocity with a contemporaneous increase of the dimensionless flow depth in all cases it is observed. This is due to the significant influence of the vegetation bed after the gravel bed. The main and significant conclusion of this paper is that the kind of permeable bed influence significantly with a different way the velocities over the permeable bed. The velocities over the transition area are much lower in comparison with these over a permeable bed and this is due to the great mixing which is created in the transition area. Also loss of energy in the

42 E. Keramaris & G. Pechlivanidis transition area is observed. This is due to the fact that the reduction of the velocity is accompanied with loss of energy. 12 1 Dimensionless profiles of the mean profiles a2 b1 Q=.97 lt/sec h=7cm (y/y*)x1 3 8 6 a1 b2 4 2.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 (u/u*)x1 3 Figure 5. Dimensionless velocity profiles (a and b). 9 8 7 Dimensionless profiles of the mean profiles d1 c2 Q=.97 lt/sec h=1cm c1 (y/y*)x1 3 6 5 4 3 2 d2 1.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 (u/u*)x1 3 Figure 6. Dimensionless velocity profiles (c and d). REFERENCES Beavers, G. S., Joseph, D., D., (1967). Boundary Conditions at a Naturally Permeable Wall, J. Fluid Mech., 3(1): 197 27. Carollo, F.G., Ferro, V. and Termini, D. (25). Flow resistance law in channels with flexible submerged vegetation, J. of Hydraulic Engineering, 131(7): 554-564. Keramaris, E., Pechlivanidis, G., Pechlivanidis, I., Samaras, G. (213). The impact of lateral walls on the velocity profile in an open channel using the PIV method, 13 th International Conference on Environmental Sience and Technology (CEST 213), Athens, Greece. Pechlivanidis, G., Keramaris, E., Pechlivanidis, I. (212). Measurements of turbulent characteristics in an open channel using PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry), Global Nest Journal, Volume 14 (3): 378-385.

Water Utility Journal 1 (215) 43 Pechlivanidis, G., Keramaris, E., Pechlivanidis, I., (214). Transition from permeable to impermeable beds and vice versa in open channels: Effects on the velocity distribution of turbulent flow, Proceedings of the International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, RiverFlow 214, Lausanne, Switzerland. pp.81-87 Pokrajac, D., Manes, C., (29). Velocity Measurements of a Free-Surface Turbulent Flow Penetrating a Porous Medium Composed of Uniform-Size, Transp Porous Med, 78: 367 383. Stephan, U., Gutknecht, D., (22). Hydraulic resistance of submerged flexible vegetation, Journal of Hydrology, vol. 269, (1/2): 27-43. Wereley, S.T., Meinhart, C.D., (21). Recent advantages in micro-particle image velocimetry, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 42(1): 557-576.