JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS (CPMP) ANNUAL EMPLOYEE EVALUATION TOOL Comprehensive Form

Similar documents
MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATIVE - SUPERVISORY

POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM

Sample Performance Appraisal

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP

Classified Employee Performance Assessment

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer. Hire Date: Period Covered:

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review

Employee Development Plan

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Performance Appraisal Form

PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE

Utica College Performance Review Form

Cherokee Town and Country Club Front Desk Receptionist. Administrative Employee Performance Evaluation Form

Annual Performance Review

Sample Internship Forms

TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Employee Input

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)

DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Reviewer has no direct knowledge of employee's behavior in this area. Job Knowledge Score: / 5.0

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

Date Started Current Position. Instructions

Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013

Performance Evaluation for Exempt Employees Employer Instructions

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

City of Sunset Valley Employee Performance Evaluation Form

University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:

2. Describe this employee s important accomplishments during the past year. Please provide examples.

Manager / Supervisor Performance Review

EMPLOYEE INFORMATION

ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY Performance Evaluation Process Performance Evaluation

CITY OF ROGUE RIVER EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Ball State University PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM FOR NONEXEMPT STAFF PERSONNEL. Evaluation Period: March 1, 2012, to February 28, 2013.

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

INTERNSHIP HANDBOOK. Nonprofit Administration REC 496

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS Planning Guide/Performance Agreement and Review Position Data

Number of employees who report to level of evaluated:

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

JOB PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Monroe County Community College Administrators. Name: Position: Supervisor: Evaluation Period:

PERFORMANCE REVIEW NON- UNIT PROFESSIONAL

CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

APPENDIX TOWN OF MONTAGUE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM GUIDELINES

STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation

Executive Assistant to CEO

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

How To Work For A College Of Technology

PEI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM MINISTRY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Staff Performance Evaluation

Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT

Employee Performance Review

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors

University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form

Tacoma Pierce County Health Department Employee Development and Performance Review

If contract or probation indicate start date: end Date:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT EXAMPLE

LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR INTERVIEW QUESTIONS TEMPLATE (Suggested Questions for Personal or Telephone Interviews - Rating Criteria Follows)

Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

RECREATION LEADER Training Needs Assessment Evaluation Form. Personal/Position Information

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

PERFORMANCE PLANNING WORKSHEET FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES (PS-35LC)

Amherst College Office of Human Resources PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS GUIDE

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees

JOB PERFORMANCE NORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COLLEGE

Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff Employee Form

Support Services Evaluation Handbook

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Administrator Performance Appraisal Forms

Clinical Social Work Team Leader

Transcription:

JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS (CPMP) ANNUAL EMPLOYEE EVALUATION TOOL Comprehensive Form EMPLOYEE NAME (FIRST, MI, LAST): J#: DATE OF HIRE: JOB TITLE: DATE ASSIGNED TO POSITION: DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PERIOD OF EVALUATION: From: TO: PART I - INSTRUCTIONS TO EVALUATOR Attached below are five performance factors, seven behavioral traits, and five leadership/supervisory skills that are important in the performance of the employee s job. Performance factors and behavioral traits must be completed for all employees. The leadership/supervisor skills form should be utilized to address both leadership skills and supervisory responsibilities. NOTE: A rating of Unacceptable (1) Needs Improvement (2) or Superior (5) requires comments. The overall performance evaluation should reflect the employee s total performance, including the performance factors as related to the employee s responsibilities and duties as set forth in the job description, behavioral traits and leadership/supervisory factors, if applicable.

MARKING INSTRUCTIONS The supervisor should indicate the employee s performance by using check box next to the appropriate level of performance. The following rating scale guide is being provided to assist the evaluator in assigning the most appropriate measurement of the employee s performance factors, behavioral traits and supervisory factors. 1 = UNACCEPTABLE - Consistently fails to meet job requirements; performance clearly below minimum requirements. Immediate improvement required to maintain employment. 2 = NEEDS IMPROVEMENT Occasionally fails to meet job requirements; performance must improve to meet expectations of position. 3 = MEETS EXPECTATIONS Able to perform 100% of job duties satisfactorily. Normal guidance and supervision are required. 4 = EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS Frequently exceeds job requirements; all planned objectives were achieved above the established standards and accomplishments were made in unexpected areas as well. 5 = SUPERIOR Consistently exceeds job requirements; this is the highest level of performance that can be attained. DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS 1. Return the original form with required signatures to Human Resources Z.T. Hubert Building/Box 17028. 2. Maintain one copy for your departmental records. 3. Distribute one copy to the employee. Page 2 of 12 pages

PART II - PERFORMANCE FACTORS 1. Knowledge, Skills, Abilities Consider the degree to which the employee exhibits the required level of job knowledge and/or skills to perform the job and this employee s use of established techniques, materials and equipment as they relate to performance. 2. Quality of Work Does employee complete assignments and meet quality standards? Consider accuracy, neatness, thoroughness and adherence to standards and safety rules. 3. Quantity of Work Consider the results of the employee s efforts. Does the employee demonstrate the ability to manage several responsibilities simultaneously; perform work in a productive and timely manner; meet work schedules? 4. Work Habits To what extent does employee display a positive, cooperative attitude toward work assignments and requirements? Consider compliance with established work rules and organizational policies. 5. Communication Consider job related effectiveness in dealing with others. Does the employee express ideas clearly both orally and in writing, listen well and respond appropriately? Page 3 of 12 pages

PART III - BEHAVIORAL TRAITS 1. Dependability Consider the amount of time spent directing the employee. Does the employee monitor projects and exercise follow-through; adhere to time frames; is on time for meetings and appointments; and responds appropriately to instructions and procedures? 2. Cooperation How well does the employee work with co-workers and supervisors as a contributing team member? Does the employee demonstrate consideration of others; maintain rapport with others; help others willingly? 3. Initiative Consider how well the employee seeks and assumes greater responsibility; volunteers for special projects; performs task well with little supervision; does not wait to be directed. 4. Adaptability Consider the ease with which the employee adjusts to any change in duties, procedures, supervisors or work environment. How well does the employee accept new ideas and approaches to work, respond appropriately to constructive criticism and to suggestions for work improvement? 5. Judgment Consider how well the employee effectively analyzes problems, determines appropriate action for solutions, and exhibits timely and decisive action; thinks logically. Page 4 of 12 pages

6. Attendance Consider number of absences, use of personal (vacation) and sick leave in accordance with University policy.****attendance should be coded as follows: Ranges( 1-2)=Unsatisfactory Ranges( 3-5)=Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Satisfactory 7. Punctuality Consider work arrival and departure in accordance with departmental and University policy. Punctuality should be coded as follows: Ranges 1-2 (Unsatisfactory) Ranges 3-5 (Satisfactory) Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Page 5 of 12 pages

PART IV CUSTOMER SERVICE 1. Service Oriented Generally provides quality understands the importance of providing service to customers (i.e. faculty, staff, students, external stakeholders) 2. Accessible Available to meet with and address customer needs/concerns. 3. Responsive Responds to customer requests in a timely manner. (i.e. telephone, email, other written correspondence) 4. Friendliness is courteous and thoughtful toward customers. 5. Knowledgeable Knows unit operations well enough to resolve problems.. Page 6 of 12 pages

6. Resourceful Leverages institutional resources to address customer needs/concerns. 7. Effective Resolves problems in an appropriate manner. Page 7 of 12 pages

PART V LEADERSHIP/SUPERVISORY FACTORS (IF APPLICABLE) 1. Leadership Consider how well the employee demonstrates effective supervisory abilities; gains respect and cooperation; inspires and motivates subordinates; directs work group toward common goal. N/A 2. Delegation How well does the employee demonstrate the ability to direct others in accomplishing work; effectively select and motivate staff; define assignments; oversee the work of subordinates? N/A 3. Planning and Organizing Consider how well the employee plans and organizes work; coordinates with others, and establishes appropriate priorities; anticipates future needs; carries out assignments effectively. N/A 4. Administration How well does the employee perform day-to-day administrative tasks; manage time; administer policies and implement procedures; maintain appropriate contact with supervisor and utilize funds, staff or equipment? N/A Page 8 of 12 pages

5. Personnel Management Consider how well the employee serves as a role model; provides guidance and opportunities to their staff for their development and advancement; resolves work-related employee problems; assists subordinates in accomplishing their work-related objectives. Does the employee communicate well with subordinates in a clear, concise, accurate, and timely manner and make useful suggestions? N/A Page 9 of 12 pages

PART VI PERFORMANCE SCORING SHEET Performance Factors Behavioral Traits Customer Service Leadership/Supervisory Knowledge, Skills, & Abilities Dependability Service Oriented Leadership Quality of Work Cooperation Accessible Delegation Quantity of Work Initiative Responsive Planning/ Organization Work Habits Adaptability Friendliness Administration Communication Judgment Knowledgeable Personnel Mgt. Attendance Punctuality Resourceful Effective Total Score Total Score Total Score Total Score Average Score Average Score Average Score Average Score Overall Performance Score (Average of all Categories) Please Note: Attendance and Punctuality should be coded using: Ranges (1-2) = Unsatisfactory Ranges (3-5) = Satisfactory Page 10 of 12 pages

PART VI - OVERALL PERFORMANCE Please use this space to describe the overall performance rating. The overall rating should be a reflection of the performance factors, behavioral traits and supervisory factors. SIGNATURES Supervisor/Evaluator Signature: Date: Department Head/Director: Date: Vice President: Date: PART VII EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: I have been advised of my performance ratings. I have discussed the contents of this review with my supervisor. My signature does not necessarily imply agreement. My comments are as follows (optional) (attach additional sheets if necessary): Signature: Date: Page 11 of 12 pages

APPENDIX 1: OUTLINE UP TO FOUR MAJOR RESPONSIBILITIES AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS FOR THE UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR (FY 2013-2014) Attach a copy of this completed form to the performance evaluation. MAJOR RESPONSIBILITIES/SPECIAL ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2013-2014 EVALUATION PERIOD: 1. 2. 3. 4. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS: CURRENT CAREER LADDER/LEVEL: 1. 2. 3. 4. Supervisor s Signature: Date: Employee s Signature: Date: NOTE: A mid-point review of goals and overall employee performance should be conducted at 6-months. Page 12 of 12 pages