TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE SITE CN OAKVILLE SUBDIVISION...1

Similar documents
CHAIR AND MEMBERS - PLANNING COMMllTEE MEETING ON JUNE 19,2006 GENERALMANAGEROFPLANNINGANDDEVELOPMENT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DRAFT APPROVAL

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT. BOA File No West Avenue- Multifamily Building

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning. State Planning Policy state interest guideline. State transport infrastructure

SECTION 5 RESIDENTIAL R1 ZONE

Fence By-law. PS-6 Consolidated May 14, This by-law is printed under and by authority of the Council of the City of London, Ontario, Canada

An Installers Guide to

Drainage By-law. WM-4 Consolidated April 18, This by-law is printed under and by authority of the Council of the City of London, Ontario, Canada

BUILDING A FENCE? THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE REQUIRES THAT ALL FENCES WITHIN THE CITY CONFORM TO THE REGULATIONS OF FENCE BY-LAW

REGULATIONS FOR CELLULAR ANTENNA TOWERS AND CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

SWIMMING POOL, SPA, & HOT TUB GUIDELINES

INTER-NOISE DECEMBER 2006 HONOLULU, HAWAII, USA

As a minimum, the report must include the following sections in the given sequence:

G.

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD, TENNESSEE, AS FOLLOWS:

New Home Construction Packet

Maximum Floor Area and Maximum Development Area

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH. THEREFORE the council of the Corporation of the City of Guelph enacts as follows:

Stouffville Corridor Rail Service Expansion

Agenda Item # Page iy PLANNING COMMITTEE R. PANZER GENERAL MANAGER OF PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT

5. Specific Use Regulations

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North

Achat 208 HL / 208 HR passive mid-range speaker. user manual

In addition to the terms defined in this By-law, the following terms shall have the corresponding meanings for the purposes of this Section:

Council Policy for New Telecommunication Facilities

Kingston Rd Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application Final Report

Section 13 Urban Residential Zones

Format for scrutinising the Hill Station Building Applications ( Current File No /2001-HSBA) The application shall be accompanied by

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Construction noise and vibration monitoring on the web

Development Variance Permit Application Package

Lineside Signal Spacing and Speed Signage

DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA CHAPTER 48 SMALL WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS ORDINANCE FOR THE UNINCOPORATED AREA OF DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA

Public Hearing. City Council Study Session. February 11, 2013

Easement instrument to grant easement or profit a prendre, or create land covenant (Sections 90A and 90F Land Transfer Act 1952)

Charter Township of Shelby Harry Reese Building Director

3 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION

Architectural Processing and Inspections for Home Mortgage Insurance

Kirkland Zoning Code

State of New Hampshire. General Auto Sales, Inc. Docket No.: ED REPORT OF THE BOARD

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

Lineside Signal Spacing and Speed Signage

KRUGER ENERGY CHATHAM WIND PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. Appendix E. Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

BEACON AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 WHAT CAN A PLANNING OBLIGATION DO? 2 3 FORMALITIES 3 4 GOVERNMENT POLICY 3 5 PLANNING OBLIGATIONS AND CIL 5 6 COMMON PROVISIONS 5

1 Flexitank/Container Combination Rail Impact Test Criteria

CPED STAFF REPORT Prepared for the City Planning Commission

Developer s/consultants Field Services Guidelines

Planning requirements for heliports and helicopter landing sites

Mass Loaded Vinyl A review of the performance and cost in acoustical applications

1. It would create hazardous effects of storm water run-off. 3. It would increase hazardous driving conditions on the public road.

Planning Railway Safety in Canada

Acceleration of Gravity Lab Basic Version

Acoustic Design Guide. NR and NC Curves CIBSE Noise Ratings Environmental Noise Control Maximum Air Velocities in Ducts Privacy in Cellular Offices

The APT-WORM (Wheel flat and Out of Roundness Monitoring) system

Site Development Information Worksheet for single family residential development

Access onto roof from Center Block

Environmental Noise Assessment. Proposed Retail Development. Bacchus Marsh Road, Corio. Report Number #R2.

Cellular Antenna Towers for Cellular Telecommunications Service or Personal Communications Services

The Pipelines Regulations, 2000

Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application

Prince Edward Island announces transitional rules for harmonized sales tax

The siting of a BTS on the proposed site will markedly increase the cellphone coverage in this area.

Noise Design Advice. Noise can be a major factor to consider in any new development.

RESIDENTIAL ROOF TRUSS INSTALLATION PROCEDURES

SECTION 6 COMMERCIAL ZONES

Case 1:01-cv BLW Document Filed 01/18/11 Page 111 of 152 EXHIBIT H TELECOMMUNICATIONS CABLE SYSTEM EASEMENT DEED

4 SPADINA SUBWAY EXTENSION UPDATE

City Code of ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Chapter 55 Zoning

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

Rural dwellings including bed and breakfast accommodation

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER AND SEWER PIPELINES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE

City of Auburn Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan for Curb Ramps, Sidewalks, and Pedestrian Signals ADA TRANSITION PLAN

V1504 Vertical Platform Lift OWNER S MANUAL

INFRASTRUCTURE POLICIES

FREE FALL. Introduction. Reference Young and Freedman, University Physics, 12 th Edition: Chapter 2, section 2.5

M25 DBFO LUS Section 2

Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance Chapter 14 Nonconformities

ENERGY NETWORKS ASSOCIATION. Electricity Industry EMF Measurement Protocol for High Field Areas

APPENDIX G. California Coastal Commission & Conservancy Accessibility Standards

Cellular Antenna Proposal Form

Wastewater & Stormwater By-law

CHAPTER 5 - "R1" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

#1258. WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the Township of Haddon has determined the following:

RESIDENTIAL WOOD DECKS

MINIMUM PARKING STANDARDS DRIVEWAY WIDTH AND SLOPE TABLES

Acoustic design according to room shape

PERMISSION A GUIDE FOR EXTENDING A DETACHED OR SEMI-DETACHED HOUSE

AREA: 2.37 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF. Single-family, Non-conforming machine shop

ACCELERATION OF HEAVY TRUCKS Woodrow M. Poplin, P.E.

DeSoto County is not a water service provider and does not operate any

SCHEDULE 16 TO THE SPECIAL USE ZONE. Shown on the planning scheme map as SUZ16. BALLARAT RAILWAY STATION PRECINCT. Purpose

Terms of Reference for Vibration Monitoring of Quarry Blasting. Public Consultation

V1504 Vertical Platform Lift OWNER S MANUAL

ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Calgary Alberta

SYSTEMWIDE REQUIREMENTS

Contract Relationship Management DRAFT

VIII. Noise A. INTRODUCTION B. BACKGROUND

DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT

Transcription:

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. File: 114-357 101 Masonry Court /Burlington Vibration TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 PURPOSE...1 1.2 SITE...1 1.3 CN OAKVILLE SUBDIVISION...1 2.0 VIBRATION GUIDELINES...2 2.1 CN AND GO TRANSIT GUIDELINES...2 3.0 METHOD...2 3.1 MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS...2 3.2 TRANSDUCER PLACEMENT...2 3.3 DATA ACQUISITION...2 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS...2 4.0 RESULTS...2 5.0 CONCLUSIONS....3 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 KEY PLAN CONCEPT SITE PLAN LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A CN/GO REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX B VIBRATION TIME HISTORIES FOR RAILWAY PASS-BYS 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223 / E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. 101 Masonry Court /Burlington Vibration Update File: 114-357 Page 1 Railway Vibration Analysis 101 Masonry Court Proposed Residential Development City of Burlington 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE Measurements of railway-induced ground-borne vibration have been carried out to determine whether vibration isolation is warranted as part of building/project design. Valcoustics Canada Ltd. (VCL) previously prepared a railway vibration analysis report for the proposed development located at 101 Masonry Court in the City of Burlington. This report has been prepared to address revisions to the site plan. 1.2 SITE The site is bounded by: 1. the Canadian National Railways (CN) Oakville Subdivision, with the Aldershot GO train station and Highway 403 beyond, to the north (the CN Aldershot rail yard extends to the east of the GO station); 2. future residential development, with Waterdown Road and existing industrial development beyond, to the west; 3. Masonry Court, with existing industrial and existing residential developments beyond, to the south; and 4. vacant land, with an existing parking lot beyond, to the east. Figure 1 shows the Key Plan. This report is based on the Concept Site Plan, prepared by Icon Architects Inc., last revised September 29, 2015. Figure 2 shows the Concept Site Plan in reduced form. 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223 / E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. 101 Masonry Court /Burlington Vibration Update File: 114-357 Page 2 1.3 CN OAKVILLE SUBDIVISION The CN Oakville Subdivision is classified as a Principal Main Line. At this point, trackage adjacent to the site consists of three main line tracks with continuous welded rail in the vicinity of this site. Operations include commuter (GO) trains, passenger (VIA) trains as well as freight and way freight. 2.0 VIBRATION GUIDELINES At the present time there are no vibration guidelines in the land use approvals process in Ontario. In fact there are no universally agreed on vibration guidelines in general. 2.1 CN AND GO TRANSIT GUIDELINES The guidelines for railway induced ground-borne vibration advocated by CN and GO Transit at residential sites are contained in the CN and GO Transit documents, each entitled "Principal Main Line Requirements", dated June 2008 (CN) and August 2006 (GO Transit). The maximum overall proposed limit, in terms of vibration velocity is 0.14 mm/sec RMS. Appendix A provides the standard requirements for Principal Main Lines as contained in the above CN and GO Transit documents. 3.0 METHOD 3.1 MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS Vibration measurements were done at a location, corresponding to the closest proposed building facade to the rail line, labelled as Location A as shown in Figure 2. Note, due to access to the subject site, the vibration measurements were taken at a location approximately 150 m east of the subject at an equivalent setback distance from the railway ROW to the closest residential dwelling building. Thus, vibration magnitudes due to the railway train passbys at closest residential dwelling units to the railway are expected to be same as those at the measurement location. 3.2 TRANSDUCER PLACEMENT An accelerometer was used at Location A to measure the ground-borne vibration generated by the train pass-bys. The accelerometers were securely mounted, with a stud, onto the top surface of a heavy metal plate and placed on the paved surface at grade. 3.3 DATA ACQUISITION A total of eight railway movements were monitored on April 28, 2015. The railway movements consisted of GO commuter trains. The vertical axis signal from the accelerometer was recorded digitally, using an LMS Pimento vibration data acquisition and analysis system, and integrated from the measured acceleration to obtain the vibration velocity, in mm/sec. 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223 / E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. 101 Masonry Court /Burlington Vibration Update File: 114-357 Page 3 The accelerometers were calibrated prior to the measurements using an NMF VC20 accelerometer calibrator. 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS Time histories of the overall integrated vibration velocity produced by the train pass-bys were plotted using an RMS averaging time of one second. The analysis procedure conforms to the guidelines recommended by CN/GO. 4.0 RESULTS All train pass-bys produced maximum overall ground-borne vibration velocity magnitudes well below the CN/GO Transit guideline. Appendix B shows the measured vibration velocity time histories due to the railway train pass-bys. The train pass-bys produced overall vibration velocities ranging from 0.012 to 0.12 mm/sec. The overall levels reported on the vibration velocity time histories in Appendix B are the maximum (one second RMS averaging) that occurred for the duration of each individual pass-by. The ground-borne vibration velocity magnitudes due to the railway trains were all within CN/GO Transit guidelines. Thus, vibration mitigation measures are not needed for this development. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The ground-borne vibration velocity magnitudes due to railway trains, measured at the closest building facade from the railway right-of-way, did not exceed the CN/GO guidelines. Therefore, vibration mitigation measures are not needed for this development. SD\hd\gks J:\2014\114357\000\Reports\Vibration\101 Masonry Court Update - Vib Fnl2.wpd 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223 / E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

592750 592800 592850 592900 592950 593000 593050 593100 593150 Location A 4795850 4795850 4795900 4795900 4795950 4795950 4796000 4796000 4796050 4796050 4796100 4796100 4796150 4796150 4796200 4796200 4796250 4796250 4796300 4796300 4796350 4796350 592750 592800 592850 592900 592950 593000 593050 593100 593150 Title Concept Site Plan Project Name 101 Masonry Court Date Sept. 29, 2015 Project No. 114-357 Figure 2 J:\2014\114357\000\Reports\Vibration\Figure 2 - updated September 30, 2015.cna Date Plotted: 30.09.15

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. File: 114-357 101 Masonry Court /Burlington Vibration APPENDIX A CN/GO REQUIREMENTS 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223 / E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

Canadian National Railway Properties 1 Administration Road Concord, Ontario L4K 1B9 PRINCIPAL MAIN LINE REQUIREMENTS A. Safety setback of habitable buildings from the railway rights-of-way to be a minimum of 30 metres in conjunction with a safety berm. The safety berm shall be adjoining and parallel to the railway rights-of-way with returns at the ends, 2.5 metres above grade at the property line, with side slopes not steeper than 2.5 to 1. B. The Owner shall engage a consultant to undertake an analysis of noise. At a minimum, a noise attenuation barrier shall be adjoining and parallel to the railway rights-of-way, having returns at the ends, and a minimum total height of 5.5 metres above top-of-rail. Acoustic fence to be constructed without openings and of a durable material weighing not less than 20 kg. per square metre of surface area. Subject to the review of the noise report, the Railway may consider other measures recommended by an approved Noise Consultant. C. Ground-borne vibration transmission to be evaluated in a report through site testing to determine if dwellings within 75 metres of the railway rights-of-way will be impacted by vibration conditions in excess of 0.14 mm/sec RMS between 4 Hz and 200 Hz. The monitoring system should be capable of measuring frequencies between 4 Hz and 200 Hz, ±3 db with an RMS averaging time constant of 1 second. If in excess, isolation measures will be required to ensure living areas do not exceed 0.14 mm/sec RMS on and above the first floor of the dwelling. D. The Owner shall install and maintain a chain link fence of minimum 1.83 metre height along the mutual property line. E. The following clause should be inserted in all development agreements, offers to purchase, and agreements of Purchase and Sale or Lease of each dwelling unit within 300m of the railway right-of-way: Warning: Canadian National Railway Company or its assigns or successors in interest has or have a rights-of-way within 300 metres from the land the subject hereof. There may be alterations to or expansions of the railway facilities on such rights-of-way in the future including the possibility that the railway or its assigns or successors as aforesaid may expand its operations, which expansion may affect the living environment of the residents in the vicinity, notwithstanding the inclusion of any noise and vibration attenuating measures in the design of the development and individual dwelling(s). CNR will not be responsible for any complaints or claims arising from use of such facilities and/or operations on, over or under the aforesaid rights-of-way. F. Any proposed alterations to the existing drainage pattern affecting railway property must receive prior concurrence from the Railway and be substantiated by a drainage report to the satisfaction of the Railway. G. The Owner shall through restrictive covenants to be registered on title and all agreements of purchase and sale or lease provide notice to the public that the safety berm, fencing and vibration isolation measures implemented are not to be tampered with or altered and further that the Owner shall have sole responsibility for and shall maintain these measures to the satisfaction of CN. H. The Owner shall enter into an Agreement with CN stipulating how CN's concerns will be resolved and will pay CN's reasonable costs in preparing and negotiating the agreement. I. The Owner shall be required to grant CN an environmental easement for operational noise and vibration emissions, registered against the subject property in favour of CN. June 2008

PRINCIPAL MAIN LINE REQUIREMENTS A. Safety setback of dwellings from the railway rights-of-way to be a minimum of 30 metres in conjunction with a safety berm. The safety berm shall be adjoining and parallel to the railway rights-of-way with returns at the ends, 2.5 metres above grade at the property line, with side slopes not steeper than 2.5 to 1. B. Noise attenuation barrier shall be adjoining and parallel to the railway rights-of-way, having returns at the ends, and a minimum total height of 5.5 metres above top-of-rail. Acoustic fence to be constructed without openings and of a durable material weighing not less than 20 kg. per square metre of surface area. Subject to the review of the noise report, GO Transit may consider other measures recommended by an approved Noise Consultant. C. Ground-borne vibration transmission to be evaluated in a report through site testing to determine if dwellings within 75 metres of the railway rights-of-way will be impacted by vibration conditions in excess of 0.14 mm/sec RMS between 4 Hz and 200 Hz. The monitoring system should be capable of measuring frequencies between 4 Hz and 200 Hz, + 3 db with an RMS averaging time constant of 1 second. If in excess, isolation measures will be required to ensure living areas do not exceed 0.14 mm/sec RMS on and above the first floor of the dwelling. D. The Owner shall install and maintain a chain link fence of minimum 1.83 metre height along the mutual property line. E. The following clause should be inserted in all development agreements, offers to purchase, and agreements of Purchase and Sale or Lease of each dwelling unit within 300m of the railway right-of-way. Warning: The Greater Toronto Transit Authority, carrying on business as GO Transit, and its assigns and successors in interest has or have a right-of-way within 300 metres from the land the subject hereof. There may be alterations to or expansions of the rail facilities on such right-of-way in the future including the possibility that GO Transit or any railway entering into an agreement with GO Transit to use the right-ofway or their assigns or successors as aforesaid may expand their operations, which expansion may affect the living environment of the residents in the vicinity, notwithstanding the inclusion of any noise and vibration attenuating measures in the design of the development and individual dwelling(s). GO Transit will not be responsible for any complaints or claims arising from use of such facilities and/or operations on, over or under the aforesaid right-of-way. F. Any proposed alterations to the existing drainage pattern affecting the railway right-of-way must receive prior concurrence from GO Transit and be substantiated by a drainage report to the satisfaction of GO Transit. G. The Owner shall through restrictive covenants to be registered on title and all agreements of purchase and sale or lease provide notice to the public that the safety berm, fencing and vibration isolation measures implemented are not to be tampered with or altered and further that the Owner shall have sole responsibility for and shall maintain these measures to the satisfaction of GO Transit. H. The Owner enter into an Agreement stipulating how GO Transit s concerns will be resolved and will pay GO Transit s reasonable costs in preparing and negotiating the agreement. I. The Owner may be required to grant GO Transit an environmental easement for operational emissions, registered on title against the subject property in favour of GO. August, 2006

VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. File: 114-357 101 Masonry Court /Burlington Vibration APPENDIX B VIBRATION TIME HISTORIES FOR RAILWAY PASS-BYS 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1B9 Tel: 905-764-5223 / E-mail: solutions@valcoustics.com

Vibration Velocity Time Histories 101 Masonry Court April 28, 2015 Train Pass by # 1 Train Pass by # 2 Train Pass by # 3

Train Pass by # 4 Train Pass by # 5 Train Pass by # 6

Train Pass by # 7 Train Pass by # 8 \GD J:\2014\114357\000\Analysis\Pimento\2015-04-28