Five-day Hands-on Classroom Training

Similar documents
University of North Carolina TEACCH Autism Program Professional Certification

Autism Program Checklist for Parents

MICHIGAN TEST FOR TEACHER CERTIFICATION (MTTC) TEST OBJECTIVES FIELD 062: HEARING IMPAIRED

Belmont Public Schools Special Education Programs

National Academy of Sciences Committee on Educational Interventions for Children with Autism

Foundations of the Montessori Method (3 credits)

Al Ahliyya Amman University Faculty of Arts Department of Psychology Course Description Special Education

THE FRAMEWORK FOR AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS PROGRAM ENDORSEMENT GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric

SECTION 9: SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES SPECIAL EDUCATION PLACEMENTS PROVIDED BY THE BOARD

Examples of IEP Goals and Objectives

Schmoga: Yoga-based self-regulation programming for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the school environment Kara Larson, OTD/S

Autism Speaks Grant Report Title of Project: Educating for Excellence: Training Paraprofessionals in ASD Best Practices

ATTLEBORO PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Office of Special Education

behavioural intervention & autism support programming UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK LESSEN THE IMPACT WITH EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES

ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES

Special Education Program Descriptions

PRESCHOOL PLACEMENT CATEGORIES

TREATMENTS FOR AUTISM

Educating Students with Autism

MSc Applied Child Psychology

Chapter 4: Planning Support for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Dr. Sloane Burgess. Assistant Professor LDES

Service Delivery Models

roviaence Neurodevelopmental Center for Children

Special Education Program Descriptions School-Based Program Delivery Model

Marcia E. Humpal, M.Ed., MT-BC Ronna S. Kaplan, M.A. MT-BC. Journal of Music Therapy

National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities

Strategies for Inclusion of Children with Multiple Disabilities, including Deaf-Blindness. Barbara Purvis

Target Audience: Special Education Teachers, Related Service Providers, School Psychologists.

Alberta. Alberta Education. Special Programs Branch. Essential components of educational programming for students with autism spectrum disorders.

College of Education. Special Education

OCR Levels 2 and 3 in Supporting Teaching and Learning in Schools. Unit 39 Support pupils with communication and interaction needs

MENTAL HEALTH ATTENTION DEFICIT/ HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER

ABA AND RDI. Therapy vs. RDI Life Style ABA

School-based Support Personnel

ONLINE TRAINING in AUTISM

SCAN Program (Supporting Children with Additional Needs)

TEXAS STATEWIDE LEADERSHIP FOR AUTISM TRAINING ONLINE TRAINING

Behavior Impedes Learning

Academic Catalog

Task Analysis: Steps for Implementation

Autism Center Nord-Bo

ADEPT Glossary of Key Terms

Individualized Educational Support Strategies for Students with Autism in Inclusive Classroom Settings

Starting School. Guidelines for Parents/Guardians of Children with Special Educational Needs

The Context of Special Needs in Ireland

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

NEW TSPC SPECIALIZATION: AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER. Q and A. May 24, 2012

Haringey Learning Disabilities Partnership. Social Stories.

A Personal Project: Caring for Animals

GUIDANCE CRITERIA FOR ADDITIONAL NEEDS AND STATUTORY ASSESSMENT

Section 2.8: Special Education Placements Provided by the Board

EXCEPTIONAL NEEDS SPECIALIST

Running head: AUTISM AND TEACHING IN THE CLASSROOM 1

College of Education. Special Education

Register of Students with Severe Disabilities

Congressional Briefing on Autism

Preschool For All Program Evaluation TEACHER SELF EVALUATION

Newton Public Schools. Guide to Special Education Programs and Related Services

Mindfulness in adults with autism spectrum disorders

College of Education. Special Education

DSM-5. Presented by CCESC School Psychologist Interns: Kayla Dodson, M.Ed. Ellen Doll, M.S. Rich Marsicano, Ph.D. Elaine Wahl, Ph.D.

SENCo (Special Education Needs Coordinator):

DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND DISABILITY POLICY

The Road to Independence: Providing High Quality Instruction for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder

GRADUATE PROGRAMS. Education Endorsement. Certificate Programs

Short-Term Programs. A Vital Component for Students who are Blind or Visually Impaired ATLANTIC PROVINCES SPECIAL EDUCATION AUTHORITY

III. FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE)

General Information about CU-Boulder

Description of Services

SPECIAL EDUCATION AND DISABILITY POLICY (SEDP)

A Parent s Introduction to Exceptional Student Education. in Florida. Florida Department of Education

Psychology. Kansas Course Code # 04254

Student Centred Appraisal of Need

Ch. 4: Four-Step Problem Solving Model

Autism Authorization/Certificate Registration Requirements

Related Services: How Do Special Needs Education Relate to Your Child?

We are developing a Facebook page and the website is consistently being updated.

The core symptoms of ADHD, as the name implies, are inattentiveness, hyperactivity and impulsivity. These are excessive and long-term and

Special Education Programs & Resources Guide for Families

Title: Proposition to Establish a Graduate Certificate Program in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) 4/3/ unanimous

Middleborough Public Schools

General Therapies for Individuals with Autism

District Rosemount/Apple Valley/Eagan Revised May 2006 Special Education Department QUICK GUIDE OF EDUCATIONAL DISABILITIES

South Molton Community College Special Educational Needs Information Report (School Offer)

Helping Students with Autism Succeed in Regular Classrooms

St Mary s College Crosby. Special Educational Needs and Disability Policy (P46) Date of Policy September Date of Review September 2015

AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

DUBAI COLLEGE. A tradition of quality in education. Special Education Needs & Disability (SEND) Policy. Statement of Intent.

Career Paths for the CDS Major

College of Education and Human Services Exceptional Student & Deaf Education Course Descriptions

Moderate learning difficulties

Evaluation Case Study. Leadership development in special schools

Francine B. Baffa, PhD, BCBA-D, LBA

Connections Resource Guide Seamless Transitions for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Summary of Evidence Applied Behavior Analysis. Autism Technical Advisory Group 11/14/12

Assessing A Student s Need for Assistive Technology: Where to Start?

Fact Sheet 10 DSM-5 and Autism Spectrum Disorder

Comprehensive Special Education Plan. Programs and Services for Students with Disabilities

Transcription:

Five-day Hands-on Classroom Training 1) Nature of the Intervention: TEACCH developed the intervention approach called Structured TEACCHing, which is based on understanding the learning characteristics of individuals with autism and the use of visual supports to promote meaning and independence. TEACCH services are supported by empirical research, enriched by extensive clinical expertise, and notable for its flexible and individualized support of individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and their families. TEACCH developed the concept of the Culture of Autism to convey the idea that like cultures, autism spectrum disorders yield characteristic patterns of learning, thinking, communicating, and behaving. TEACCH proposes that teachers, parents, and therapists can function as crosscultural interpreters who use specialized strategies to work back and forth between the expectations of the neuro-typical world and the ways individuals with autism understand and communicate. Features of Autism that Impact Learning Style: Relative strength in and preference for processing visual information (compared to difficulties with auditory processing of language) Heightened attention to details but difficulty with sequencing, connecting, or deriving meaning from them Enormous variability in attention (Individuals can be very distractible at times but at other times are intensely focused, with difficulties shifting attention efficiently.) Communication problems which vary by developmental level, but always include impairments in the social use of language, called pragmatics Difficulty with concepts of time including completing activities too quickly or too slowly and having problems recognizing the beginning or end of an activity, how long the activity will last, and when it will be finished Tendency to become attached to routines and the settings where they are established, so that activities may be difficult to transfer or generalize from the original learning situation, and disruptions in routines can be uncomfortable, confusing, or upsetting Very intense interests and impulses to engage in favored activities and difficulties disengaging once engaged Marked sensory preferences and aversions The overall TEACCH approach is called Structured TEACCHing. The fundamental principles of Structured TEACCHing address the learning styles of individuals with ASD Individualize interventions based on the individual s learning styles, strengths, difficulties and special interests. Use of visual or written supports to supplement auditory language-based information. Make the sequence of daily activities predictable and understandable using visual supports, such as a schedule of upcoming activities. Depending on the individual s developmental level, this may take the form of objects, picture, or written words.

Organize the physical environment and visually highlight important features of both the surroundings (such as where to sit, stand, walk, etc.) and activities (such as where to focus attention or put materials). Work specifically on flexibility and generalization by changing the sequence of activities and introducing new elements (e.g., location, materials, staff or peers, etc.). Stimulate and support meaningful, self-initiated communication (in contrast to prompted speech or rote memory). Collaborate with families, which include teaching parents Structured TEACCHing strategies as well as incorporating parents concerns, needs, and wisdom into interventions. Structured TEACCHing is appropriate for individuals with ASD at all ages and functioning levels because the general principles are applied flexibly for each individual. That is, visual answers to these questions for a young or developmentally delayed child would look very different from those for a high school student or adult with average intelligence, but the general principles of using visual or written supports to organize time and space would still apply. Structured TEACCHing can help individuals with ASD learn new skills or participate appropriately in any setting, including but not limited to schools, home, community as well as employment. The has been training professionals in the field for decades to help prepare them to use the principles and practices of Structured TEACCHing in their work settings. The most comprehensive training model is the Five-Day Hands-on Training Course. 2) Training Details: This five-day (Monday Friday, 8:00 am 4:00 pm) hands-on training course provides a theoretical foundation as well as hands-on opportunities to assess and teach children and adolescents with ASD in a classroom setting. The premise of this foundation is an understanding of the learning characteristics of individuals with ASD and the development of individualized structure. An emphasis is placed on the use of Structured TEACCHing principles to teach skills to individuals with ASD in the curriculum areas of academics (literacy and numeracy), communication, independence, social engagement, leisure, relaxation and coping strategies, and behavior management. Participants have an opportunity to apply these strategies with five students with ASD who vary by age (3 21 years), cognitive ability and severity of autism symptoms. Participants spend a small portion of each day in lecture, but the bulk of their learning takes place in small teams as they observe the TEACCH staff, develop activities for the studenttrainers, implement these activities with the student-trainers, and reflect on their collective experiences. Teams work with a different student and trainer each day, ensuring that they have broad exposure to the diversity of the autism spectrum. Most training participants report that the opportunity to teach in the model classroom and interact with the students with ASD is the most memorable and meaningful component of this training experience. Efficacy Information on the Five-Day Hands-On Classroom Training Informal program evaluation takes place at the end of the Five-Day Hands-On Classroom Training. Participants complete rating scales, answer written questions, and are generally encouraged to provide feedback to TEACCH staff. These responses have been universally positive. It is not uncommon for participants to report that their TEACCH training experience 2

has proven more valuable than any other training program in which they have participated. Sometimes, participants also offer constructive criticism. Suggestions are always taken seriously and have sometimes resulted in a helpful revision to the delivery of the training model. There have been two formal evaluations of TEACCH s in-service training efforts, designed to compare the relative efficacy of the Five-day Hand-on Classroom Training versus the two-day workshop that did not include a hands-on component (Grindstaff, 1998; Grindstaff, 2000). Outcomes were compared across the participants 1) knowledge of the training content, 2) attributions of controllability with regard to the extreme behavior of students with autism, 3) self-efficacy, 4) negative affect, and 5) use of structured teaching. Measures were completed at the very start of the respective training programs and again six weeks post-training. Results indicated that both training models effectively conveyed the philosophy and principles of Structured TEACCHing, but only the Five-day Hands-on Classroom training achieved the more elusive goal of helping participants apply Structured TEACCHing strategies to their classroom, clinic or other work setting. a. Trainer: The Director of the training team is a TEACCH Director who is a Ph.D. licensed clinical psychologist. The training team consists of TEACCH Autism Specialists who have served the TEACCH program for a number of years and have demonstrated mastery of the principles of Structured TEACCHing strategies and an ability to communicate effectively. The training staff may also include teachers, consultants and other autism professionals who are Certified TEACCH trainers. There is a process for becoming a TEACCH trainer that applies to TEACCH staff as well as interested professionals from other organizations. In the near future, TEACCH will be implementing a new Professional Certification Program that will include a detailed process for certifying trainers. b. Trainees: This one-week course can accommodate 25 participants. The target audience is teachers, psychologists, speech and language therapists, as well as clinicians interested in educating students with Autism Spectrum disorders in a classroom setting. There is no specific educational degree required. c. Frequency and Location of Training: Five-day Hands-on Classroom Training is offered by the in Chapel Hill, North Carolina and at other North Carolina sites during the months of July and August d. Train the Trainer: Because of the complexity and comprehensiveness of the TEACCH intervention and training models, training the trainers requires multiple experiences over a lengthy period of time under close supervision. Minimum experiences include attending the five day classroom training, followed by participation in one or more advanced topics workshops, a series of shadow trainings during which the trainer-in-training has increasing levels of responsibility in implementing the various aspects of the model. There is no set number of required shadow experiences, but they typically range from two to four trainings. Once the TEACCH Director and team verify that the trainer-intraining has met standards, the professional is considered to be qualified to provide training independently as part of a TEACCH training team. In the near future, TEACCH 3

. will be implementing a new Professional Certification Program that will include a detailed process for certifying trainers. e. Manual: Participants receive a notebook with course material, a reference and resource list, and documents for assessment and data collection. There is no published manual for this training program. 3) Evidence-base for the Intervention: Structured TEACCHing as developed by consists of visual supports and individual work systems. Visual supports are any tool presented visually that supports an individual as he or she moves through the day. Visual supports might include, but are not limited to, pictures, written words, and objects within the environment, arrangement of the environment or visual boundaries, schedules, maps, labels, organization systems, timelines and scripts. They are used across settings to support individuals with ASD (National Research Council, 2001). Visual supports meet the evidence-based practice criteria within the early childhood, elementary and middle/high school age groups. For more information: http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/content/visual-supports An individual work system visually communicates at least four pieces of information to the individual. 1. What am I supposed to do? 2. How much am I supposed to do? 3. How do I know when I am finished? (Can I see my progress?) 4. What do I do when I am finished? Structured work systems meet the evidence-based practice criteria within the early childhood, elementary and middle/high school age groups. Structured Work systems are a proven EBP per the NPDC. For more information: http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/content/structured-work-systems For information on the intervention of Structured TEACCHing please refer to these articles. Mesibov, G. B., & Shea, V. (2010). The TEACCH program in the era of evidence-based practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(5), 570-579. Ozonoff, S., & Cathcart, K. (1998). Effectiveness of a home program intervention for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 25-32. Panerai, S., Ferrante, L., Caputo, V., & Impellizzeri, C. (1998). Use of structured teaching for treatment of children with autism and severe and profound mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 367-374. Panerai, S., Ferrante, L., & Zingale, M. (2002). Benefits of the Treatment and Education of Autistic and Communication Handicapped Children (TEACCH) programme [sic] as compared with a non-specific approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 318-327. Tsang, S.K.M., Shek, D.T.L., Lam, L.L., Yang, F.L., & Cheung, P.M.P (in press). Brief report. Application of the TEACCH program on Chinese children with autism Does culture make a difference? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 4

4) Provisions for Cultural Adaptation: A major strength of the Five-Day Classroom Training Model is its adaptability to many cultures. Professionals from across the world attend the trainings and learn because there is a strong emphasis on active participation and knowledge taught through visual forms of communication. The model is portable and has been successfully implemented in many non-english speaking countries, with the help of translation. The materials are easily adapted to other cultures. 5) Contact information: Jill Thompson Training Program Manager TEACCH CB#7180, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7180 (919) 966-8151 Fax (919) 966-4127 Email: jill_thompson@med.unc.edu 5