Reading the CogAT Report. A Parent s Guide

Similar documents
The test uses age norms (national) and grade norms (national) to calculate scores and compare students of the same age or grade.

Parents Guide Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)

Gifted and Talented Information For Parents of Kindergarten Students

Closed High School Placement Test (HSPT ) HSPT E-Score. Pre-HSPT. Level: Grades Working Time: 2 hours, 30 minutes

Cognitive Abilities Test 7 (CogAT7)

The Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (Hammill, Pearson, & Wiederholt,

Interpretive Report of WAIS IV Testing. Test Administered WAIS-IV (9/1/2008) Age at Testing 40 years 8 months Retest? No

WHY DO YOU USE THE NNAT2. NNAT2 Data Interpretation: Part Three. Agenda: BRIEF review of ability. What is the NNAT 2.

Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4)

Glossary of Terms Ability Accommodation Adjusted validity/reliability coefficient Alternate forms Analysis of work Assessment Battery Bias

Understanding Your Child s ERB Scores

Which WJ-III Subtests Should I Administer?

STUDENT PLACEMENT GUIDE: DETERMINING PLACEMENT WITH GRADE LEVEL PROFICIENCIES

Gifted & Talented Program Description

LAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, ENGINEERING, AND COMPUTER SCIENCE

Overview of Gifted and Talented Programs: A Handbook for Parents

Guidance and Information for Teachers

Welcome To GATE Parent Information Night

BRIGHT CHILD GIFTED CHILD

Interpretive Guide for the Achievement Levels Report (2003 Revision) ITBS/ITED Testing Program

COGNITIVE ABILITIES TEST: FOURTH EDITION. Sample Reports SECONDARY.

Place Value (What is is the Value of of the the Place?)

INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTIVITY WITH CELF 4 SOFTWARE! SAMPLE REPORTS. To order, call , or visit our Web site at

Cecil R. Reynolds, PhD, and Randy W. Kamphaus, PhD. Additional Information

Hands-On Data Analysis

TEST REVIEW. Purpose and Nature of Test. Practical Applications

BOARD OF EDUCATION R2464.DR Page 1 of 8 Gifted & Talented Students (K-8)

Scatter Plots with Error Bars

Gifted Accelerated Program Fayette County Public Schools

Interpretive Report of WMS IV Testing

A s h o r t g u i d e t o s ta n d A r d i s e d t e s t s

ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Whitnall School District Report Card Content Area Domains

UNDERSTANDING ASSESSMENT How, when & why we assess your child

Transcript: What Is Progress Monitoring?

Analysis of School Assessment Data Using Pivot Charts

DRP Report Interpretation Guide

Schools Value-added Information System Technical Manual

Prettygate Junior School. Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy. Date: Summer 2015 Review: Summer 2018

Estimate a WAIS Full Scale IQ with a score on the International Contest 2009

Interpreting and Using SAT Scores

Interpreting Reports from the Iowa Assessments

Georgia Department of Education Kathy Cox, State Superintendent of Schools 7/19/2005 All Rights Reserved 1

Any Town Public Schools Specific School Address, City State ZIP

Differential Aptitude Test (D.A.T.s)

Interpretive Report of WISC-IV and WIAT-II Testing - (United Kingdom)

Understanding Types of Assessment Within an RTI Framework

Descriptive Statistics

Elementary Gifted and Talented Referral and Assessment

Formal and informal Assessment

Writing learning objectives

Mathematics Objective 6.) To recognize the limitations of mathematical and statistical models.

Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests Revised, Normative Update (WRMT-Rnu) The normative update of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests Revised (Woodcock,

Creating Pathways to Math Success at a Liberal Arts College. Maria Belk and Lauren Rose Bard College

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN NEW YORK CITY. credo.stanford.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Ohio Homeschool Notification

Understanding Your Test Record and Profile Chart for the PSB-Nursing School Aptitude Examination (RN)

Preschool Development Assessment

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN FLORIDA. credo.stanford.edu.

Single Word Spelling Test (SWST) Digital

CHAPTER 12 TESTING DIFFERENCES WITH ORDINAL DATA: MANN WHITNEY U

PHILOSOPHY OF THE MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT

EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR GIFTED STUDENTS.

6.4 Normal Distribution

Demonstrating Understanding Rubrics and Scoring Guides

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ARIZONA. credo.stanford.edu.

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES (SLD)

Indiana Statewide Transfer General Education Core

Aviation Selection Test Battery (ASTB)

Study Guide for the Mathematics: Proofs, Models, and Problems, Part I, Test

ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL 3160 Northside Parkway, NW Atlanta, GA LEARNING LAB Middle School/High School Questionnaire

Sample Letters. Sample Letters Promotion & Placement

Clinician Portal: Enabling a Continuity of Concussion Care

This unit will lay the groundwork for later units where the students will extend this knowledge to quadratic and exponential functions.

IEP goals Numeracy Support

Assessment Policy. 1 Introduction. 2 Background

Language Skills in a Multilingual Society Syed Mohamed Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board

Understanding Your ACT Aspire Results FALL 2015 TESTING

Accelerated Booklet. BBHMS Accelerated Booklet {1

Cleveland State University NAL/PAD/PDD/UST 504 Section 51 Levin College of Urban Affairs Fall, 2009 W 6 to 9:50 pm UR 108

Solving Systems of Linear Equations Substitutions

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION About the Mathematics Assessment Anchors

1 J (Gr 6): Summarize and describe distributions.

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY

Foundations of the Montessori Method (3 credits)

High School Functions Interpreting Functions Understand the concept of a function and use function notation.

Appendix A: Annotated Table of Activities & Tools

Raw Score to Scaled Score Conversions

Meta-Analytic Synthesis of Studies Conducted at Marzano Research Laboratory on Instructional Strategies

Grades 6 and 7 Math. TEKS and TAKS Daily Distributive Practice

Standardized Tests, Intelligence & IQ, and Standardized Scores

Information Technology Services will be updating the mark sense test scoring hardware and software on Monday, May 18, We will continue to score

MEASURES OF VARIATION

Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses in L.D. Identification

% ! 3 40% % Percent Cards. This problem gives you the chance to: relate fractions, decimals and percents

Transcription:

Reading the CogAT Report A Parent s Guide

Cognitive Ability Subgroups The CogAT Test measures the level and pattern of cognitive development of a student compared to age peers and grade peers. These general reasoning abilities, which start developing at birth and continue through early adulthood, are influenced by experiences gained both in and out of school. The CogAT measures three different cognitive abilities (highlighted on the sample report to the right): The verbal section measures a child s ability to remember and transform sequences of English words, to understand them and to make inferences and judgments about them. The quantitative section measures a child s understanding of basic mathematical concepts and relationships. The non-verbal section measures reasoning using pictures and geometric shapes. This section reduces the impact of language on the student s score. The composite score is a total score for all three sections.

CogAT National Age Scores The National Age Scores section of the report (highlighted on the sample report to the right) is dedicated to students age scores. Students are grouped by age in one-month intervals from 4 years 11 months through 18+ years of age. The first column in the National Age Scores shows the stanine scores. The stanine scale is a normalized standard score scale consisting of nine broad levels designated by the numbers 1 through 9. Stanines are provided to discourage over interpretation of small differences among student scores and percentile rankings. Thus, all students in the same stanine are considered similar. See the following slide for the stanine table used for the CogAT. The second column in the National Age Scores section shows your student s percentile rank for each ability subgroup and the composite. A percentile rank indicates the percentage of students in the same age group whose scores fall below the score obtained by a particular student. For example, if your student obtains a percentile rank of 90 on the verbal ability subgroup, it means that 90% of students in the standardized sample scored below your student. A percentile rank of 50 is considered average.

Stanines A Deeper Look Stanine scores range from a low of 1 to a high of 9. Stanines are groupings of percentile ranks. A higher stanine equates with a higher level of cognitive abilities development. A comparison of stanines and percentile ranks are summarized in the table below to the right. Differences in percentile scores can lead to over interpretation of small differences in scores between individual students or among scores for the same student. For example, there will be no noticeable differences in the classroom between a student who has a percentile rank of 45 and a student with a percentile rank of 55. They would both show average levels of development. On the other hand, you would see noticeable differences in the classroom for students with more than one stanine difference in their scores. For example, three different students with stanines of 9, 6, and 4 will show clear differences in the ways they approach learning and problem solving tasks. Stanine Percentile Rank Description 9 96-99 Very High 8 89-95 Above Average 7 77-88 Above Average 6 60-76 Average 5 40-59 Average 4 23-39 Average 3 11-22 Below Average 2 4-10 Below Average 1 1-3 Very Low

CogAT National Age Percentile Ranks The National Age Percentile Ranks section (highlighted on the sample report to the right) relates to your student s age scores. This is a graphic representation of your student s scores for each of the ability subgroups and the composite score given in the National Age Scores section to the left on your student s CogAT report. Scores for each section of the assessment are indicated by a diamond shape within the black score band. The score band represents the confidence interval. The confidence interval shows the possible error in scores for each student. Errors in scores can be caused by: A student responding inconsistently to items in the same ability test. For example, the student missing easy items but correctly solving difficult items could cause an error score. A student performing well on one subtest in an ability section of the test, such as the verbal section, but performing poorly on another subtest in the same battery, again in the verbal section, could cause an error score.

CogAT Raw Scores The Raw Scores section (highlighted on the sample report below) has information about the number of questions in each section of the test, the number of questions attempted by the student, and the raw score, or number of correct responses. Possibly, footnote symbols may appear next to the raw score on particular section of the CogAT report. Below is a guide to these footnotes and what they mean.

CogAT Grade Scores The Grade Scores section of the report (highlighted on the sample report to the right) is dedicated to students grade scores. The first column in this section shows the stanine. The stanine scale is a normalized standard score scale consisting of nine broad levels designated by the numbers 1 through 9. Stanines are provided to discourage over interpretation of small differences among student scores and percentile rankings. Thus, all students in the same stanine are considered similar. Please review the previous pages for descriptions of stanine scores. The last column shows the percentile rank for each section and the composite score. A percentile rank indicates the percentage of students in the same grade whose scores fall below the score obtained by a particular student. For example, if a student obtains a percentile rank of 90 on the verbal battery, it means that 90 percent of students in the standardized sample scored below that student. A percentile rank of 50 is considered average. Due to differences in ages of students within one grade level, National Age Scores are more reliable and accurate when reviewing data among groups on students. Therefore, when identifying students for the Highly Capable Program in Kent School District, National Age Scores are used as one piece of evidence to determine placement of a student.

CogAT Written Description The highlighted section on the sample report to the right is a written description of how to interpret your student s score report.

Questions? If you have questions on how to interpret your student s CogAT score report please feel free to contact Kent School District Assessment Department. Karen Forsloff Assessment Administrative Assistant Karen.Forsloff@kent.k12.wa.us Carol Johnson Data Analyst Carol.Johnson@kent.k12.wa.us Dr. Razak Garoui Executive Director of Assessment Razak.Garoui@kent.k12.wa.us