Employing SNOMED CT and LOINC to make EHR data sensible and interoperable for clinical research



Similar documents
From Fishing to Attracting Chicks

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Update: Deploying SNOMED CT to provide decision support in the EHR

3M Health Information Systems

SNOMED CT Cardiology Reference Set Development, Malaysia. SNOMED CT Conference Amsterdam, The Netherlands October 2014

THE STIMULUS AND STANDARDS. John D. Halamka MD

Meaningful use. Meaningful data. Meaningful care. The 3M Healthcare Data Dictionary: Enabling effective health information exchange

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

The FDA s Mini- Sen*nel Program and the Learning Health System

Certification Guidance for EHR Technology Developers Serving Health Care Providers Ineligible for Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Payments

Public health system transformation under the Affordable Care Act

HL7 and Meaningful Use

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

patient-centered SCAlable National Network for Effectiveness Research

The i2b2 Hive and the Clinical Research Chart

Meaningful Use Objectives

HITECH MEANINGFUL USE

Stage 1 measures. The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

Understanding how to use the Quality Measure Step by Step Documents

Meaningful use. Meaningful data. Meaningful care. The 3M Healthcare Data Dictionary: Standardizing lab data to LOINC for meaningful use

Research Opportunities using the PaTH Network

The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality. At least 80% of all unique patients. seen by the EP or admitted to the

Environmental Health Science. Brian S. Schwartz, MD, MS

Common Data Model (CDM) Specification, Version Table of Contents Table of Contents

The Big Picture: IDNT in Electronic Records Glossary

Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Attestation Worksheet: Core Measures

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

Using Health Information Technology to Improve Quality of Care: Clinical Decision Support

HIE Ready 2.0 SPECIFICATIONS MATRIX. Product Name: Version Number: Preferred Message and Trigger

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.)

Open Source Software Tools for Electronic Clinical Quality Measures

What is the Certified Health Record Analyst (CHDA)?

Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas

Technical Approaches for Protecting Privacy in the PCORnet Distributed Research Network V1.0

Healthcare Data: Secondary Use through Interoperability

TEST INSTRUCTIONS FOR CROSS VENDOR EXCHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS

ehr Sharable Data Vicky Fung Senior Health Informatician ehr Information Standards Office

IHE, A Taxonomy for Electronic Medical Mdi lrecords

Health Information Exchange. Scalable and Affordable

Meaningful Use. Michael L. Brody, DPM FACFAOM CCHIT Ambulatory Workgroup HITSP Physician Perspective Technical Committee NYeHC

Standardized Terminologies Used in the Learning Health System

Problem-Centered Care Delivery

The Do s and Don ts of Medical Device integration

Quest to Attest 2014 Stage 1 Meaningful Use. Brett M. Paepke, OD Advisor, Stage 1 Meaningful Use

EHR Data Reuse through openehr Archetypes

IBM Watson and Medical Records Text Analytics HIMSS Presentation

STANDARDS. MEANINGFUL USE 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) Stage 2 Objective Edition EHR CERTIFICATION CRITERIA 45 CFR

Utility of Common Data Models for EHR and Registry Data Integration: Use in Automated Surveillance

Graph database approach to management and use of SNOMED CT encoded clinical data W. Scott Campbell, Jay Pedersen, James R. Campbell University of

Stage 1 measures. The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS

Meaningful use. Meaningful data. Meaningful care. The 3M Healthcare Data Dictionary (HDD): Implemented with a data warehouse

Theodoros. N. Arvanitis, RT, DPhil, CEng, MIET, MIEEE, AMIA, FRSM

Coding Certificate Program Competencies

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

A Semantic Foundation for Achieving HIE Interoperability

From Research to Practice: New Models for Data-sharing and Collaboration to Improve Health and Healthcare

I n t e r S y S t e m S W h I t e P a P e r F O R H E A L T H C A R E IT E X E C U T I V E S. In accountable care

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

VistA Evolution Presentation to World Vista

Tom Deas, Jr. MD, MMM. Karen Van Wagner, Ph.D. Executive Director, North Texas Specialty Physicians

Lunch and Learn IFAF 09/24/11. Michael L. Brody, DPM

Beacon User Stories Version 1.0

Eliminating Barriers to Genuine Health Information Exchange. Copyright 2014 Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. 1

Advancing Laboratory Interoperability in Health IT

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)

Transcription:

Employing SNOMED CT and LOINC to make EHR data sensible and interoperable for clinical research James R. Campbell MD W. Scott Campbell PhD Hubert Hickman MS James McClay MD Implementation Showcase October 31, 2014

Disclosure We receive no financial support from any interests vending electronic health records or vocabulary services

Agenda Interoperability for research and public health; framework of ONC Clinical research data networks: PCORI Tooling and communication protocols for big data research; i2b2 Greater Plains Cooperative and deployment of data standards Integrating SNOMED CT and LOINC observables Expectations of LOINC-SNOMED CT harmonization

Meaningful Use Vocabulary Requirements Demographics (80% stage 2): HL7/OMB code set Smoking status: SNOMED CT Problem list/encounter diagnoses: SNOMED CT, ICD* Structured lab results (55% stage 2): Lab LOINC Physical findings: LOINC, SNOMED CT observables E-prescribing (50% formulary check stage 2): RxNORM Medications: RxNORM Orders: LOINC, RxNORM Immunizations (Immunization registries): CVX, MVX Procedures: CPT, HCPCS Documents: LOINC

ONC HIT: Objectives of Interoperability Facilitate transitions of care Promote free flow of results data Engage patients and families in managing their EHR Support Public Health Contribute to research within Learning Healthcare Environment

Interoperable Learning Health Ecosystem How to merge data from the EHR into integrated, interoperable research datasets?

PCORnet: the National Patient- Centered Clinical Research Network The goal of PCORI s Na2onal Pa2ent- Centered Clinical Research Network Program is to improve the na2on s capacity to conduct CER efficiently, by crea2ng a large, highly representa2ve, na2onal pa2ent- centered clinical research network for conduc2ng clinical outcomes research. The vision is to support a learning US healthcare system, which will allow for large- scale research to be conducted with enhanced accuracy and efficiency. PCORnet will func2on through a single, interoperable data research network, the PCORnet DRN.

What is Patient Centered Outcome Research Institute(PCORI)? Funded by trust established as part of Affordable Care act (2010); estimated $650M per year through 2019 Supports both Clinical Data Research Networks (CDRN) and Patient-powered Research networks (PPRN) Recent funding cycle concluded 2013 with 11 CDRNs and 18 PPRNS

Clinical Data Research Network Collaboration of (mostly) academic medical centers supported by network funding from PCORI Expected to standardize research data access across sites, establish query communication function and share data access across the CDRN and PCORNET Research interoperability = Reference information model + (Content standards) + Popmednet network query tools

PCORnet Common Data Model v1.0 Smorgasbord of reference content published with CDM v1 Following the lead of the Mini-Sentinel Common Data Model

Tooling for Big Data

i2b2 Out of the box

I2b2 workbench Ontology data views

i2b2 workbench Query formulation tool

i2b2 workbench Query history and datasets

CDRN 4: Greater Plains Collaborative University of Kansas U Wisconsin Madison Medical College Wisconsin Childrens Mercy (KC) Marshfield Clinic University of Iowa University of Minnesota University of Nebraska U Texas Southwestern U Texas San Antonio

GPC Architecture for Research Interoperation Research data integration and query management tooling: i2b2 Information model: Star schema Domain ontology/code sets: Demographics, Clinical findings/biometrics, Lab findings, Radiology findings, Diagnoses, Allergies, Procedures, Orders/ procedure/medications, Medications/pharmaceuticals administered, Registry data Value sets for coded data

(Some) Research Data Warehouse Requirements Organization, presentation and query data access understandable to the clinical researcher Data aggregation queries easy to do; relevant to research questions; standards driven but not requiring knowledge of the standard Query of quantitative results and conversion of data units must be supported for heterogeneous data sources Interoperability standards inherent to design but not obtrusive or confusing

Research (QA) Data Warehouse: Query use cases How many diabetics have had a glycosylated hemoglobin test? How many hypertensive patients have a recent blood pressure below 140/90? Which patients with ALS have a drooling score >5? What fraction of children who had BMI %ile >95 at any time are obese at age 30?

GPC: i2b2 Reference Ontologies

UNMC: i2b2 Clinical Ontologies

GPC: PCORI CDM Mapped Ontology

Agenda Interoperability for research and public health; framework of ONC Clinical research data networks: PCORI Tooling and communication protocols for big data research; i2b2 Greater Plains Cooperative and deployment of data standards Integrating SNOMED CT and LOINC observables Expectations of LOINC-SNOMED CT harmonization

Task: Deploy Reference Ontologies for Validation and Aggregation

Metadataxml required for units conversion and numeric queries

Local taxonomies for research user: labor intensive for LOINC

Task: Map Research Data Model to Reference Ontologies LOINC:72826-1 Race Type Pt ^Patient OMB.1997

Problems with deploying Observables Release data sets from IHTSDO and Regenstrief clumsy to deploy and not harmonized; user requirements of aggregation for i2b2 better served with transitive closure tables Organizing infrastructure with NRC for maintenance release cycles TBD Metadatasets required to manage datatype, units conversion and normals range must be developed

Research Data Requirements of LOINC SNOMED CT Harmonization Make sure the world hears about this!!! This is a clandestine op as far as the informatics community is concerned! Publish as a fully classified expression dataset that will support local ontology deployment Agreement between principles and publication of uniform identifier for ALL expression elements Grouper concepts to support aggregation by lab department, subdepartment and panel code; clinical observables organized by findings class Coordination of release datasets with NRCs to assure useful datasets (transitive closure tables) and software for deployment

Questions? Comments?

Observation fact: Race of patient Pa(ent_dimension PK Pa2ent_num Birth_date Death_date Vital_status_CD Concept_dimension PK \LOINC\CLIN\ LOINC:72826-1 Race Observa(on_fact Pa2ent_num PK Encounter_num PK LOINC:72826-1 PK Provider_ID PK Start_date Modifier= NULL Instance_num= 0 End_date Valtype_CD= T Tval_Char= A Nval_Num=NULL ValueFlag_CD= @ Loca2on_CD Visit_dimension PK Encounter_num Pa2ent_num Start_date(me End_date(me Provider_dimension PK Provider_ID PK Provider\Nurse