(C-09-04) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Staple use in Liberty Link systems. Phone No:

Similar documents
Investigator: David R. S. Rourke. General Trial Information

2014 Flax Weed Control Trial

Comparison of Weed Management Strategies with Roundup Ready Corn. J. A. Ferrell and W. W. Witt

Goldmine Report : pg132aventisharvestaid. Cotton Harvest Aid Demonstration Chris Bubenik, 2001

Irrigation Scheduling on Small Grains using AZSCHED for Windows - Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

for Sweet Corn Joe Masabni UKREC Princeton, KY Joe Masabni

2001 Canola and Crambe Fungicide Trials in Minnesota and North Dakota

GRAIN SORGHUM PERFORMANCE TRIALS IN OKLAHOMA, 2011

Summary: Objective: Materials and Methods:

Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides for the Control of Stripe Rust (Puccinia striiformis) in SRWW in the Northern Texas Blacklands

for Tomato Joe Masabni UKREC Princeton, KY Joe Masabni

WEED CONTROL IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO Charles S. Johnson, Extension Plant Pathologist, Tobacco

Soybean roulette: improving the odds for maximizing soybean yields

SOYBEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS

TEA IN TURKEY Hamit Vanli

COTTON WATER RELATIONS

College of Agriculture, P.O. Box Tucson, Arizona

Summary: Objective: Materials and Methods:

GRAIN SORGHUM. Preemergence

How can information technology play a role in primary industries climate resilience?

IHARF Box 156 Indian Head, SK. S0G 2K0 Ph: (306)

Weed Control in Field Corn with Postemergence Herbicides

Sulfur Fertilization of Corn. Jeff Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center December 2013

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

Grain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee

Corn and Soybean Production Calendar

Using Web-based Software for Irrigation and Nitrogen Management in Onion Production: our Research Plan for 2013

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF OHIO. Dual MAGNUM. EPA Reg EPA SLN No. OH

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

GPS Applications in Agriculture. Gary T. Roberson Agricultural Machinery Systems

Influence of Cotton Breeding on Yield and Fiber Quality Problems

Radishes as biofumigants and weed suppressant cover crops. Joel Gruver Western Illinois University

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

Harvesting Dry Bean John Nowatzki, NDSU Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

RESULTS FROM THE USDA IR-4 MBA FIELD TRIALS IN CALIFORNIA STRAWBERRIES

USDA IR- MBA Field Trials in CA and FL StRAWBERES M.D.S.R.S. pesticide Preparation

Agro-One Soil Analysis

ESP-SMT Smart Modular Control System. Installation & Operation Guide

Sample Lab Report. Effect of the Hormone Gibberellic Acid on the Growth of Dwarf Peas

Blaine Hanson Department of Land, Air and Water Resources University of California, Davis

Evaluation of Combination Phosphorus Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

Strawberry Production Basics: Matted Row

SUGGESTIONS WEED CONTROL

PESTICIDE RATE AND DOSAGE CALCULATIONS

Soybean Marketing & Production College, Minneapolis, MN. isafarmnet.com

Preliminary Examination of the Population Dynamics and Control of the Lettuce Aphid on Romaine

Drip Irrigation for the Yard and Garden

Nitrogen uptake in cotton+greengram intercropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management

Purpose: To determine the dew and point and relative humidity in the classroom, and find the current relative humidity outside.

Required Trial Management Software Features. Gylling Data Management, Inc.

Spray Drift. Spray drift is becoming an increasingly. How Drift Occurs

Sprayers and Other Equipment for Orchard Maintenance

Mississippi MISSISSIPPI AGRICULTURAL & FORESTRY EXPERIMENT STATION MELISSA J. MIXON, INTERIM DIRECTOR

Adapt-N Guided Hands-on Exercise

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

COVER CROPS FOR RASPBERRY PLANTINGS

Soybean Physiology: How Well Do You Know Soybeans?

Plant Response to Irrigation Treatments in Arkansas Cotton

Hand-held and Backpack Sprayers for Applying Pesticides

EFFECT OF AVAIL ON CORN PRODUCTION IN MINNESOTA

Control of Phytophthora infestans with low copper amounts in potatoes in 2010

BREEDING AND GENETICS

Alternate wetting and drying irrigation for rice cultivation

Visit to Ted and Nicoline Vaalburg s farm at:

Maize is a major cereal grown and consumed in Uganda and in the countries of Kenya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda

MICRONUTRIENTS AS STARTER AND FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN

GROWTH POTENTIAL OF LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT: A SPACING STUDY EXAMPLE

Remote Sensing Applications for Precision Agriculture

My client has purchased a disc seeder...

Required Trial Management Software Features. Gylling Data Management, Inc.

Soybean Growth and Development

Vernonia oilseed production in the mid-atlantic region of the United States

Sprayer Calibration By Mark Halcomb, UT Extension Area Nursery Specialist (Revised )

WEED MANAGEMENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Effect of Temperature

Rain on Planting Protection. Help Guide

EPA Reg. No (Except California and New York)

EFFECTS OF VARYING IRRIGATION AND MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE APPLICATION ON COTTON HEIGHT, UNIFORMITY, YIELD, AND QUALITY. Abstract

Climatography of the United States No

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Nematode Management in Okra 1

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Climatography of the United States No

EVALUATION OF 19 DIFFERENT POST EMERGENCE HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS TO SIX DIFFERENT WARM SEASON LEGUME SPECIES.

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 2 Willamette Valley

WeatherLink for Alarm Output. Introduction. Hardware Installation and Requirements. Addendum

Climatography of the United States No

Ubiquitous Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental and Climate Data Management System

Early Season Fungicide Applications. Document Classification: PUBLIC

Key Growth Stages. Kent McKay, NCREC. Minot, ND

Practical Uses of Crop Monitoring for Arizona Cotton

Over the past two decades, advancements

AERIAL PLANT PROTECTION WORK IN AGRICULTURE IN HUNGARY (Sent to OECD as national proposal to make best practice for pesticide aerial application)

WEED MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR PEACH ORCHARDS

ennessee is one of the top livestock producing states in the country. Much of the livestock in Tennessee is raised by smaller-scale, parttime

Bacterial Diseases of Tomato: 2012

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

Modern Soil Fumigation Research and Education for Michigan Potato Production

Ecologically based weed management! Chuck Mohler! Cornell University!

Transcription:

(C-09-04) Site Description Page 1 Staple use in Liberty Link systems Trial ID: C-09-04 Location: CENTRAL CROPS (N13) Study Dir.: ALAN C. YORK Investigator: Alan C. York GENERAL TRIAL INFORMATION Study Director: ALAN C. YORK Title: PROFESSOR Investigator: ALAN C. YORK Title: PROFESSOR Affiliation: NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY Postal Code: 27695-7620 TRIAL LOCATION City: CLAYTON Trial Status: COMPLETED State/Prov.: NC Postal Code: 27520-2127 Initiation Date: May-11-04 Country: USA COOPERATOR/LANDOWNER Cooperator: CENTRAL CROPS RESEARCH STATION Address 1: 13223 US 70 WEST City: CLAYTON State/Prov: NC Postal Code: 27520-2127 Phone No: 919-553-2141 Conducted Under GLP (Y/N): N Conducted Under GEP (Y/N): N CROP AND WEED DESCRIPTION Weed Code Common Name Scientific Name 1. AMAPA AMARANTH, PALMER AMARANTHUS PALMERI S.WATS. 2. PHBPU MORNINGGLORY, TALL IPOMOEA PURPUREA (L.) ROTH 3. GGGAN ANNUAL GRASS SPECIES Crop 1: GOSHI COTTON Variety: FM 958 LL Planting Date: May-11-04 Planting Method: 2-ROW AIR PLANTER Rate: 3 SEED/FT Depth: 1 IN Row Spacing: 38 IN Seed Bed: FLAT Soil Temperature: 90 F Soil Moisture: GOOD SITE AND DESIGN Plot Width, Unit: 12.7 FT Plot Length, Unit: 30 FT Reps: 3 Site Type: RESEARCH STATION Tillage Type: CONVENTIONAL Study Design: RANDOMIZED COMPLETE BLOCK Previous Crops Previous Pesticides Year 1. COTTON VARIOUS 2003 SOIL DESCRIPTION % OM: 1.37 Texture: SANDY LOAM ph: 5.9 CEC: 5.2 MOISTURE CONDITIONS Date Time Amount Unit Type Interval Unit 1. May-01-04 0.45 IN RAINFALL 2. May-02-04 1.14 IN RAINFALL 3. May-03-04 0.44 IN RAINFALL 4. May-19-04 0.22 IN RAINFALL 5. May-22-04 0.16 IN RAINFALL 6. May-23-04 0.16 IN RAINFALL 7. May-26-04 0.01 IN RAINFALL 8. May-30-04 0.54 IN RAINFALL 9. Jun-04-04 1.36 IN RAINFALL 10. Jun-07-04 0.63 IN RAINFALL 11. Jun-09-04 0.05 IN RAINFALL 12. Jun-11-04 0.42 IN RAINFALL 13. Jun-14-04 0.03 IN RAINFALL

(C-09-04) Site Description Page 2 14. Jun-15-04 0.11 IN RAINFALL 15. Jun-16-04 0.03 IN RAINFALL 16. Jun-19-04 0.02 IN RAINFALL 17. Jun-24-04 0.06 IN RAINFALL 18. Jun-25-04 1.66 IN RAINFALL 19. Jun-26-04 0.08 IN RAINFALL 20. Jun-28-04 0.37 IN RAINFALL 21. Jun-29-04 0.19 IN RAINFALL 22. Jul-01-04 0.03 IN RAINFALL 23. Jul-04-04 0.26 IN RAINFALL 24. Jul-10-04 0.69 IN RAINFALL 25. Jul-11-04 0.01 IN RAINFALL 26. Jul-12-04 0.61 IN RAINFALL 27. Jul-14-04 0.12 IN RAINFALL 28. Jul-17-04 0.02 IN RAINFALL 29. Jul-18-04 0.12 IN RAINFALL 30. Jul-22-04 0.22 IN RAINFALL 31. Jul-23-04 0.66 IN RAINFALL 32. Jul-29-04 2.07 IN RAINFALL 33. Jul-30-04 0.50 IN RAINFALL 34. Jul-31-04 0.07 IN RAINFALL 35. Aug-01-04 0.01 IN RAINFALL 36. Aug-02-04 0.42 IN RAINFALL 37. Aug-03-04 0.03 IN RAINFALL 38. Aug-05-04 0.78 IN RAINFALL 39. Aug-06-04 0.15 IN RAINFALL 40. Aug-12-04 0.48 IN RAINFALL 41. Aug-13-04 0.22 IN RAINFALL 42. Aug-14-04 0.96 IN RAINFALL 43. Aug-15-04 3.74 IN RAINFALL 44. Aug-16-04 0.02 IN RAINFALL 45. Aug-21-04 0.45 IN RAINFALL 46. Aug-29-04 0.68 IN RAINFALL 47. Aug-30-04 2.76 IN RAINFALL 48. Aug-31-04 0.04 IN RAINFALL 49. Sep-06-04 0.65 IN RAINFALL 50. Sep-07-04 0.14 IN RAINFALL 51. Sep-08-04 0.44 IN RAINFALL 52. Sep-09-04 0.10 IN RAINFALL 53. Sep-10-04 0.06 IN RAINFALL 54. Sep-11-04 0.03 IN RAINFALL 55. Sep-12-04 0.02 IN RAINFALL 56. Sep-13-04 0.01 IN RAINFALL 57. Sep-14-04 0.01 IN RAINFALL 58. Sep-15-04 0.01 IN RAINFALL 59. Sep-16-04 0.01 IN RAINFALL Overall Moisture Conditions: GOOD Closest Weather Station: ON STATION Distance: 0.1 Unit: MI

(C-09-04) Site Description Page 3 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION A B C D E Application Date: May-11-04 May-26-04 Jun-02-04 Jun-09-04 Jun-22-04 Time of Day: 1:40 PM 7:30 AM 7:00 AM 10:15 AM 3:00 PM Application Method: BACKPACK BACKPACK BACKPACK BACKPACK BACKPACK Application Timing: PRE POST 1 POST 2 POST 3 LAYBY Applic. Placement: BROSOIL BROFOL BROFOL BROFOL BRODIR Air Temp., Unit: 85 F 76 F 68 F 85 F 89 F % Relative Humidity: 60 92 75 78 75 Wind Velocity, Unit: 6 MPH 3.5 MPH 0.5 MPH 2.5 MPH 4 MPH Dew Presence (Y/N): N N Y N N Soil Temp., Unit: 90 F 72 F 64 F 80 F 84 F Soil Moisture: GOOD FAIR GOOD WET FAIR % Cloud Cover: 10 30 5 30 85 CROP STAGE AT EACH APPLICATION A B C D E Crop 1 Code, Stage: GOSHI GOSHI GOSHI GOSHI GOSHI Stage Scale: NO CROP 2 LEAF 2-4 LEAF 6-7 LEAF 9-11 NODE Height, Unit: 4 INCH 5.5 INCH 9 INCH 19 INCH WEED STAGE AT EACH APPLICATION A B C D E Weed 1 Code, Stage: AMAPA AMAPA AMAPA AMAPA AMAPA Stage Scale: NO WEEDS 4-10 LEAF 5-20 LEAF 5-12 LEAF 2-5 LEAF Density, Unit:.5-4 INCH 3-20 INCH 2-12 INCH.5-2 INCH Weed 2 Code, Stage: PHBPU PHBPU PHBPU PHBPU PHBPU Stage Scale: COT-2 LF 2-16 LEAF COT-9 LF COT-8 LF Density, Unit:.5-3 INCH.5-7 INCH 1-12 INCH.5-6 INCH Weed 3 Code, Stage: GGGAN GGGAN GGGAN GGGAN GGGAN Stage Scale: 2-4 LEAF 2-5 LEAF DEAD 2-5 LEAF Density, Unit:.5-2 INCH 1-5 INCH 2-3 INCH APPLICATION EQUIPMENT A B C D E Appl. Equipment: BACKPACK BACKPACK BACKPACK BACKPACK BACKPACK Operating Pressure: 23 PSI 23 PSI 23 PSI 23 PSI 21 PSI Nozzle Type: FLAT FAN FLAT FAN FLAT FAN FLAT FAN FLAT FAN Nozzle Size: XR11002 XR11002 XR11002 XR11002 XR110015 Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 18 IN 18 IN 18 IN 18 IN 10.5 IN Nozzles/Row: 2 2 2 2 3 Boom Length, Unit: 54 IN 54 IN 54 IN 54 IN 31 IN Boom Height, Unit: 16 IN 16 IN 18 IN 16 IN 16 IN Ground Speed, Unit: 3 MPH 3 MPH 3 MPH 3 MPH 3 MPH Carrier: WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Spray Volume, Unit: 15 GPA 15 GPA 15 GPA 15 GPA 15 GPA Propellant: CO2 CO2 CO2 CO2 CO2 Tank Mix (Y/N): Y Y N Y Y

(C-09-04) Standardized Summary Page 4 Staple use in Liberty Link systems Trial ID: C-09-04 Location: CENTRAL CROPS (N13) Study Dir.: ALAN C. YORK Investigator: Alan C. York Weed Code Cotton Cotton Cotton Cotton Cotton PHBPU PHBPU Crop Code Rating Data Type injury injury injury injury injury control control Rating Unit % % % % % % % May-25-04 Jun-07-04 Jun-22-04 Jun-30-04 Aug-11-04 May-25-04 Jun-07-04 Crop Stage Assessed By ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ARM Action Codes L05 L05 L05 L05 L05 L05e L05e 1 0 a 0 b 0 b 0 a 0 a 0 0 (check) 2 0 b 0 b 0 a 0 a 95 a 3 13 a 4 a 1 a 0 a 99 a Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A POST 1 B 4 Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A PRE A 2 a 0 b 2 ab 2 a 0 a 17 a 48 b 5 Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A PRE A 2 a 0 b 1 b 2 a 0 a 53 a 75 a Cotoran 4 L 1.25 QT/A PRE A 6 Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A PRE A 3 a 0 b 0 b 0 a 0 a 27 a 47 b Cotoran 4 L 1 QT/A PRE A

(C-09-04) Standardized Summary Page 5 Weed Code Cotton Cotton Cotton Cotton Cotton PHBPU PHBPU Crop Code Rating Data Type injury injury injury injury injury control control Rating Unit % % % % % % % May-25-04 Jun-07-04 Jun-22-04 Jun-30-04 Aug-11-04 May-25-04 Jun-07-04 Crop Stage Assessed By ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ARM Action Codes L05 L05 L05 L05 L05 L05e L05e 7 Cotoran 4 L 1.25 QT/A PRE A 3 a 0 b 0 b 0 a 0 a 7 a 13 c LSD (P=.05) 4.6 4.4 2.6 2.8 0.0 36.7 26.5 Standard Deviation 2.5 2.5 1.5 1.6 0.0 18.4 14.6 CV 123.32 133.46 145.3 237.92 0.0 70.72 23.15 Bartlett's X2 0.069 0.0 1.532 1.445 0.0 4.594 16.295 P(Bartlett's X2) 0.995. 0.465 0.486. 0.204 0.006* Replicate F 0.822 1.000 0.000 0.360 0.000 0.967 1.918 Replicate Prob(F) 0.4735 0.3966 1.0000 0.7052 1.0000 0.4324 0.1972 Treatment F 0.795 11.791 3.211 1.104 0.000 3.539 15.359 Treatment Prob(F) 0.5607 0.0002 0.0405 0.4143 1.0000 0.0879 0.0002 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.

(C-09-04) Standardized Summary Page 6 Weed Code PHBPU PHBPU PHBPU PHBPU AMAPA AMAPA AMAPA Crop Code Rating Data Type control control control control control control control Rating Unit % % % % % % % Jun-22-04 Jun-30-04 Jun-30-04 Aug-11-04 May-25-04 Jun-07-04 Jun-22-04 Crop Stage burndown residual Assessed By ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ARM Action Codes L05e L05e L05e L05e L05e L05 L05e 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 (check) 2 98 a 100 a 94 a 94 a 100 a 98 a 3 98 a 100 a 97 a 97 a 100 a 100 a Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A POST 1 B 4 Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A PRE A 97 a 100 a 94 a 95 a 91 a 87 c 91 a 5 Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A PRE A 97 a 100 a 96 a 96 a 98 a 98 ab 98 a Cotoran 4 L 1.25 QT/A PRE A 6 Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A PRE A 97 a 100 a 94 a 95 a 94 a 92 bc 95 a Cotoran 4 L 1 QT/A PRE A

(C-09-04) Standardized Summary Page 7 Weed Code PHBPU PHBPU PHBPU PHBPU AMAPA AMAPA AMAPA Crop Code Rating Data Type control control control control control control control Rating Unit % % % % % % % Jun-22-04 Jun-30-04 Jun-30-04 Aug-11-04 May-25-04 Jun-07-04 Jun-22-04 Crop Stage burndown residual Assessed By ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ARM Action Codes L05e L05e L05e L05e L05e L05 L05e 7 Cotoran 4 L 1.25 QT/A PRE A 98 a 100 a 95 a 96 a 98 a 90 c 94 a LSD (P=.05) 2.8 0.0 2.4 2.6 9.3 6.8 6.7 Standard Deviation 1.6 0.0 1.3 1.4 4.6 3.8 3.7 CV 1.6 0.0 1.37 1.51 4.86 4.74 3.84 Bartlett's X2 2.962 0.0 5.113 3.381 13.371 9.122 7.777 P(Bartlett's X2) 0.564. 0.402 0.496 0.004* 0.058 0.10 Replicate F 0.205 0.000 7.157 1.702 1.502 4.551 2.948 Replicate Prob(F) 0.8176 1.0000 0.0118 0.2311 0.2959 0.0338 0.0985 Treatment F 0.548 0.000 2.961 1.191 1.629 264.830 2.634 Treatment Prob(F) 0.7371 1.0000 0.0678 0.3791 0.2794 0.0001 0.0903 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.

(C-09-04) Standardized Summary Page 8 Weed Code AMAPA AMAPA GGGAN GGGAN GGGAN GGGAN Seed Crop Code Cotton Rating Data Type control control control control control control yield Rating Unit % % % % % % lbs/acre Jun-30-04 Aug-11-04 May-25-04 Jun-22-04 Jun-30-04 Aug-11-04 Oct-08-04 Crop Stage Assessed By ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ARM Action Codes L05e L05e L05e L05e L05e L05e L05 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 (check) 2 100 a 100 a 93 b 100 a 99 a 3003 a 3 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 2976 a Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A POST 1 B 4 Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A PRE A 96 a 98 a 77 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 2774 a 5 Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A PRE A 99 a 100 a 97 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 2805 a Cotoran 4 L 1.25 QT/A PRE A 6 Staple 85 DF 0.6 OZ/A PRE A 94 a 97 a 89 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 3236 a Cotoran 4 L 1 QT/A PRE A

(C-09-04) Standardized Summary Page 9 Weed Code AMAPA AMAPA GGGAN GGGAN GGGAN GGGAN Seed Crop Code Cotton Rating Data Type control control control control control control yield Rating Unit % % % % % % lbs/acre Jun-30-04 Aug-11-04 May-25-04 Jun-22-04 Jun-30-04 Aug-11-04 Oct-08-04 Crop Stage Assessed By ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ACY ARM Action Codes L05e L05e L05e L05e L05e L05e L05 7 Cotoran 4 L 1.25 QT/A PRE A 98 a 99 a 89 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 2908 a LSD (P=.05) 8.7 4.9 26.5 3.8 0.0 1.0 552.4 Standard Deviation 4.8 2.7 13.2 2.1 0.0 0.5 303.6 CV 4.91 2.73 15.06 2.14 0.0 0.55 10.29 Bartlett's X2 7.576 4.128 5.344 5.823 0.0 1.801 1.979 P(Bartlett's X2) 0.056 0.127 0.148 0.016*. 0.876 0.852 Replicate F 0.412 0.297 1.299 1.135 0.000 5.000 2.459 Replicate Prob(F) 0.6728 0.7495 0.3399 0.3597 1.0000 0.0313 0.1354 Treatment F 0.740 0.731 1.239 5.406 0.000 1.667 0.903 Treatment Prob(F) 0.6110 0.6166 0.3751 0.0115 1.0000 0.2298 0.5157 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.

(C-09-04) Trial Comments Page 10 Staple use in Liberty Link systems Trial ID: C-09-04 Location: CENTRAL CROPS (N13) Study Dir.: ALAN C. YORK Investigator: Alan C. York Trial Comments Soil analysis performed by NCDA Agronomic Division. In Soil Description section, % organic matter (%OM) is actually % humic matter. June 7: Grass had been controlled by Select. weed density (#/sq yd): AMAPA, 80; PHBPU, 23. June 30: Grass was still controlled completely. A moderate flush of morningglory, in cotyledonary stage, had come since the layby application. August 6: Any PHBPU rating less than 100% is due to emergence after lay-by Yield of check assumed to be zero; too weedy to harvest.