Standard Test Procedures Manual

Similar documents
NorthEast Transportation Training and Certification Program (NETTCP) Course Registration Form

Standard Test Procedures Manual

DETERMINING ASPHALT CONTENT FROM ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES BY THE IGNITION METHOD

Standard Test 1. SCOPE Description of Test

Oh No, We Got an Airport Job! Contractor Quality Control. Investment in Staff, Labs and Equipment. We ve Come A Long Way.

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATES

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON ROAD SURFACE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPRESSWAYS AND HIGH SPEED ROADS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO T 85

Inspections: Central Laboratory of the Regions

NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

Standard Test Procedures Manual

6 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 2 AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PROGRAM

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM (QAP) City Rohnert Park

Otta Seal BACKGROUND GENERAL DESCRIPTION DESIGN ASPECTS. Category : Technical Information/On-carriageway/

SEAUPG Annual Meeting Williamsburg, VA Thursday, November 19, 2015

Best Practices for RAP Management. 60th Annual Asphalt Paving Conference Asphalt Pavement Association of Michigan March 29, 2016 Kalamazoo, MI

SECTION 334 (Pages ) is deleted and the following substituted: SECTION 334 SUPERPAVE ASPHALT CONCRETE

COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TEXAS GYRATORY COMPACTOR (TGC) PART I COMPACTING SPECIMENS USING THE TGC. Test Procedure for

DryWeight BulkVolume

Standard Test Procedures Manual

Field Density Determination of Asphalt Concrete by the Coring Method

AGREGADOS RECICLADOS MITOS Y REALIDADES

Principles of Resolving Test Result Differences. Presented by Cindy Rutkoski Rocky Mountain Asphalt Education Center Instructor

Chapter 8 Design of Concrete Mixes

COMPACTING BITUMINOUS SPECIMENS USING THE SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC)

Bailey Tool for Gradation Control in Superpave Mix Design

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS AASHTO Designation T 88 (Mn/DOT Modified)

Performance of Asphalt Mixes Containing RAP

South Dakota QC/QA Asphalt Concrete Training Manual January 2015

Erosion Resistance Performance Comparison Of Natracil, Stabilizer And Envirobond s Organic-Lock

Mix design and performance of asphalt mixes with RA

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL

Recycled Concrete Pavement and Other Recycled Materials in Concrete Pavements

Rutting Based Evaluation of Asphalt Mixes

ITEM 330 LIMESTONE ROCK ASPHALT PAVEMENT

Schedule of Accreditation Issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

CHAPTER 2 AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PROGRAM

Estimated emissions and CO2 savings deriving from adoption of in-place recycling techniques for road pavements

Shotcrete Quality Control and Testing for an Underground Mine in Canada

EVALUATION OF SASOBIT FOR USE IN WARM MIX ASPHALT

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 888 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT USING QC/QA.

CHAPTER 4 CONCRETE TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONPROGRAM

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATES FOP FOR AASHTO T 27 (11)

SECTION 403 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT

CONCRETE: CONTRACTOR S QUALITY CONTROL PLAN

Hot Mix Asphalt Test Result Verification and Dispute Resolution

ATT-72/94, SALT SIEVE ANALYSIS. This method describes the procedure for determining the gradation of salt.

Florida Method of Test for TESTING OF GROUND TIRE RUBBER Designation: FM 5-559

A View From The Bureau of Materials & Physical Research. IAPA March 2015 Matt Mueller, PE BMPR Illinois Dept of Transportation

GRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK

APPENDIX 2 MIX DESIGNS. Chapter 4: mix design calculation sheet for 40 N/mm 2 strength)

Construction Practices and Techniques

HUBER The Partner for Paper Industry

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES RESISTANT TO FUEL

Quality Assurance Program. June by Texas Department of Transportation (512) all rights reserved

FHT Flour Heat Treatment.

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

Nevada DOT Cold In-Place Recycling Federal Highway Administration National Review Close out meeting, August 25, 2005

Quality control: Annex-A.

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CLOGGING BEHAVIOUR OF DOUBLE LAYER POROUS ASPHALT

The AASHO Road Test site (which eventually became part of I-80) at Ottawa, Illinois, was typical of northern climates (see Table 1).

Definitions...1. Asphalt Rubber Makeup...1. Wet Process High viscosity...1 Wet Process No Agitation...2 Dry Process...2

Table of Contents. Introduction and Purpose Technician Certification Programs... 4

PART I SIEVE ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL RETAINED ON THE 425 M (NO. 40) SIEVE

AASHTO Subcomittee on Materials Biloxi, Mississippi August 4-10, 2012 Chris Abadie, P.E.

Treatment of a surface or structure to resist the passage of water in the absence of hydrostatic pressure. presence of hydrostatic pressure.

SPECIAL NOTE FOR ASPHALT WATERPROOFING MIX FOR BRIDGE-DECK OVERLAYS AND ADJACENT APPROACHES

Hello viewers welcome to lesson 4.7 which is on pavement materials part IV and in this lesson we will be covering bituminous binders.

PAVEMENT STRUCTURE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Rubber Pavements Association Draft Guide Asphalt-Rubber Plant Equipment Certification Program

PROPERTIES AND MIX DESIGNATIONS

Math Matters: Dissecting Hydrometer Calculations

NRMCA Quality Certification. Ready Mixed Concrete Quality Management System. Certification Criteria Document

Testing and appraisal of Lucobit polymer effect as an additive on asphalt mixture performance

METHOD A7 THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF GRAVEL, SOIL AND SAND

METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY OF GRANULAR SOILS

Soils and Aggregates Division

Standard Test Procedures Manual

Laboratory Evaluation of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures from Rt.33 in Rochester, NY

Sieve Analysis of Aggregates

DETERMINING DENSITY OF COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

A REVIEW OF AGGREGATE AND ASPHALT MIXTURE SPECIFIC GRAVITY MEASUREMENTS AND THEIR IMPACTS ON ASPHALT MIX DESIGN PROPERTIES AND MIX ACCEPTANCE

Construction Materials Testing. Classes of Test

RECYCLED ASPHALT SHINGLES IN ROAD APPLICATIONS An Overview of the State of Practice

Asphalt for Athletic Uses

METHOD A10 (a) THE DETERMINATION OF THE IN-PLACE DRY DENSITY OF SOIL OR GRAVEL BY THE SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

CONSTRUCTION AND PERFORMANCE OF ULTRATHIN ASPHALT FRICTION COURSE

TotTurf Interlocking Tile TotTurf Interlocking Tile Product Specifications TOTTURF a PLAYCORE company August 2012

APPENDIX B WARRANTY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR TABLES FOR VARIOUS END PRODUCTS

In-situ Density Determination by Sand Replacement Method

PROPERTIES OF FOAMED WARM-MIX ASPHALT INCORPORATING RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT FROM TWO FIELD PROJECTS CASE STUDIES

Evaluation of Permeability of Superpave Asphalt Mixtures ABSTRACT

THEORETICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

APPRAISAL ON THE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE PRODUCED WITH VARYING AGGREGATE SIZE

Hot Mix Asphalt Level II Quality Control Technician Certification Study Guide September 2005

Assessment of Air Emissions Martin Marietta Materials Facilities on Highway 34, Weld County, Colorado Project No.:

Potting Mix Choices and Recommendations

Designing a Zero-Waste Concrete Mix Testing Lab

Transcription:

STP 204-23 Standard Test Procedures Manual Section: EXTRACTION AND MOISTURE CORRECTION 1. SCOPE 1.1. Description of Test This method describes the procedure for determining the Extraction and Moisture Corrections used for adjusting the percentage asphalt determined in STP 204-2, Asphalt Content by Centrifuge Extraction. 1.2. Application of Test This test method must be used with the extraction procedures described in STP 204-2. The extraction correction is required because of the loss of fines through the filter and for asphalt absorbed into the aggregate. The moisture correction is required because the moisture in the mix is extracted as bituminous binder. The intent is for the lab sample to match the field pavement core properties. 1.3. Units of Measure The Extraction Correction and are expressed as percentage asphalt contents. 2. APPARATUS AND MATERIALS 2.1. Equipment Required 2.1.1. Extraction Correction The equipment and materials required is the same as the equipment required in the extraction procedure that you used to determine the asphalt content of the mix. 2.1.2. The equipment and materials required is described in the test procedure STP 204-1, Moisture Test by Oven Drying. Date: 1996 09 09 Page 1 of 6

3. PROCEDURE Extraction Correction A. VIRGIN MIXES (Permanent Labs only) Type 1V Extraction Correction for Testing Virgin Aggregate Aged Mixes This is the extractor correction to be used when testing the AC content of cores, check tests or other samples that have been mixed a minimum of 1 or 2 days prior to testing. Prepare mix with a known percentage of bituminous binder using aggregate and asphalt binder from the jobsite. For conventional hot mix plants use the aggregate from the coarse and fine hot bins of the plant and recombine to the stockpile average using the 5.00 mm sieve as the control. Carefully extract the mix (as soon as the sample has been prepared) using the appropriate test procedure, either STP 204-2, Asphalt Content by Centrifuge Extraction and use the difference between "percent asphalt extracted" and actual "percent asphalt added" as a correction on subsequent mixes tested. Ensure that the number of washings used in the extraction correction is the same as the number of washings used for the actual plant mix. An example is shown below: % asphalt extracted 5.60% 5.35% Extractor Correction (-)0.15% (+)0.10% The correction should be an average of three trial mixes and should be determined for each lab man and new pit on the jobsite. subtracted to any of the following tests in the manner shown: Extractor Correction 0.15% 0.10% Corrected % asphalt extracted 5.15% 5.20% Page: 2 of 6 Date: 1996 09 09

The procedure for is described in the Standard Test Procedure STP 204-1, Moisture Test by Oven Drying. Type 2V Extraction Correction for Testing Virgin Aggregate Fresh Mixes This is the extractor correction to be used when testing "fresh mixes" (i.e. extractions performed immediately after mixing, generally quality control test at the plant site). Prepare mix with a known percentage of bituminous binder using aggregate and asphalt binder from the jobsite. For conventional hot mix plants use the aggregate from the coarse and fine hot bins of the plant and recombine to the stockpile average using the 5.00 mm sieve as the control. Let the mixed sample sit at room temperature for 44 + 1 hours. After sitting for 44 + 1 hours, place the sample in an oven preheated to 120 o C. Remove the sample from the oven after 4 hours + 15 minutes. Carefully extract the mix (as soon as the sample has been conditioned) using the appropriate test procedure, either STP 204-2, Asphalt Content by Centrifuge Extraction and use the difference between "percent asphalt extracted" and actual "percent asphalt added" as a correction on subsequent mixes tested. Ensure that the number of washings used in the extraction correction is the same as the number of washings used for the actual plant mix. An example is shown below: % asphalt extracted 5.60% 5.35% Extractor Correction (-)0.15% (+)0.10% The correction should be an average of three trial mixes and should be determined for each lab man and new pit on the jobsite. subtracted to any of the following tests in the manner shown: Extractor Correction 0.15% 0.10% Corrected % asphalt extracted 5.15% 5.20% Date: 1996 09 09 Page: 3 of 6

The procedure for is described in the Standard Test Procedure STP 204-1, Moisture Test by Oven Drying. B. RECYCLE MIXES Type 1R Extraction Correction for Testing Recycled "Aged Mixes" (Permanent Labs only) This is the extractor correction to be used when testing the AC content of cores, check tests, or other samples that have been mixed a minimum of 1 or 2 days prior to testing. Prepare a virgin mix (no reclaim) with a known percentage of bituminous binder using aggregate and asphalt binder from the jobsite. The gradation of this virgin mix is to be the same as the gradation of the actual recycled mix (mix design or job mix formula). For conventional hot mix plants use the aggregate from the coarse and fine hot bins of the plant and recombine to the stockpile average using the 5.00 mm sieve as the control. Carefully extract the mix (as soon as the sample has been prepared) using the appropriate test procedure, either STP 204-2, Asphalt Content by Centrifuge Extraction and use the difference between "percent asphalt extracted" and actual "percent asphalt added" as a correction on subsequent mixes tested. Ensure that the number of washings used in the extraction correction is the same as the number of washings used for the actual plant mix. There are two possible cases in determining an extractor correction: CASE 1 more asphalt extracted than added due to lost fines, CASE 2 less asphalt extracted than added due to absorption The two cases are shown below: % asphalt extracted 5.60% 5.60% Extraction Correction (-)0.15% (+)0.10% The correction should be an average of three trial mixes and should be determined for each lab man and new pit on the jobsite. subtracted to any following tests in the manner shown: Page: 4 of 6 Date: 1996 09 09

Extractor Correction 0.15% 0.10% Corrected % asphalt extracted 5.15% 5.20% The procedure for is described in the Standard Test Procedure STP 204-1, Moisture Test by Oven Drying. Type 2R Extraction Correction for Testing Recycled "Fresh Mixes" This is the extractor correction to be used when testing "fresh mixes" (ie. extractions performed immediately after mixing, generally quality control tests at the plant site). Prepare a virgin mix (no reclaim) with a known percentage of bituminous binder using aggregate and asphalt binder from the jobsite. The gradation of this virgin mix is to be the same as the gradation of the actual recycled mix (mix design or job mix formula). For conventional hot mix plants use the aggregate from the coarse and fine hot bins of the plant and recombine to the stockpile average using the 5.00 mm sieve as the control. Let the mixed sample sit at room temperature for 44 + 1 hours. After sitting for 44 + 1 hours, place the sample in the oven preheated to 120 C. Remove the sample from the oven after 4 hours + 15 minutes. Carefully extract the mix using test procedure STP 204-2, Asphalt Content by Centrifuge Extraction. There are two possible cases in determining an extractor correction: CASE 1 more asphalt extracted than added due to lost fines, CASE 2 less asphalt extracted than added due to absorption. The two cases are shown below: % asphalt extracted 5.70% 5.35% Extraction Correction (-)0.25% (+)0.10% Correction for extractor error is "Type 1R" + (("difference"-"type 1R")*"the virgin aggregate ratio") Date: 1996 09 09 Page: 5 of 6

Given: Type 1R extraction correction = (-).15(CASE 1) or (+)0.10(CASE 2) Difference = (-).25(CASE 1) or (+)0.10 Virgin agg. ratio =.60 Correction for extraction error CASE 1 = (-).15 + (((-.25)-(-.15))*.60) = (-).21 CASE 2 = (+)0.10 + (((+0.10)-(-0.10))*0.60) = (+)0.10 The correction should be an average of three trial mixes and should be determined for each lab man and new pit on the jobsite. subtracted to any following tests in the manner shown: Extractor Correction 0.21% 0.10% Corrected % asphalt extracted 5.09% 5.20% The procedure for is described in the Standard Test Procedure STP 204-1, Moisture Test by Oven Drying. 4. RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS The collection of test results and calculations are done on the appropriate form as described in the standard test procedures STP 204-2, Asphalt Content by Centrifuge Extraction. 5. CALIBRATIONS, CORRECTIONS, REPEATABILITY Calibrations, corrections, and repeatabilities are stated in the appropriate test procedures STP 204-2 or STP 204-1. Page: 6 of 6 Date: 1996 09 09