Potassium Nitrate as a Superior K Source for Fertigated California Almonds. Harmen Tjalling HOLWERDA PNA Agronomy Committee

Similar documents
Three Reasons to Broaden Your Fertigation Knowledge

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 5: Choosing the best fertilizer

These calculations are on a hectare basis or for a given size of an experimental plot.

Salinity Management and Soil Amendments for Southwestern Pecan Orchards

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT WITH DRIP AND SPRINKLER IRRIGATION

Managing the Root Zone in Soilless Culture

FERTIGATION. Lawrence J. Schwankl

Blaine Hanson Department of Land, Air and Water Resources University of California, Davis

EFFECT OF AVAIL ON CORN PRODUCTION IN MINNESOTA

Using Web-based Software for Irrigation and Nitrogen Management in Onion Production: our Research Plan for 2013

FERTILIZER CALCULATIONS AND PRACTICE QUESTIONS

Drip Fertigation in Horticultural crops

Forest Nursery Notes Summer 2009

You d be mad not to bet on this horse.

USING HUMIC COMPOUNDS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF FERTILISER NITROGEN

MICRO IRRIGATION A technology to save water

Hybrid Rye for Biogas Trial Results 2012/13 KWS UK

FULL COVERAGE IRRIGATION for tree & vine crops the facts.

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

Fertigation recipes for selected crops in the Mediterranean region

Is Lower Priced Urea a Bargain?

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

Apple and pear nutrition

College of Agriculture, P.O. Box Tucson, Arizona

Irrigation Water for Greenhouses and Nurseries

Fertigation. This project is supported by Growcom, through funding from the Australian Government.

N-P-K FERTILIZERS. by M.L. Vitosh Extension Specialist, Crop and Soil Sciences

Irrigation Scheduling on Small Grains using AZSCHED for Windows - Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

Update on Nitrogen Management Field Studies with Strawberries and Leafy Vegetables

POTASSIUM. Functions of Potassium in Plants. Potassium Deficiency Symptoms

FARMING FOR THE FUTURE How mineral fertilizers can feed the world and maintain its resources in an Integrated Farming System

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Determining Amounts of Fertilizer for Small Areas

Chapter B7. Managing saline soils

Precision Farming in Practice

Design of Control System for Measurement of Ph and EC of Fertilizer Solution

Climbing the Learning Curve: What works and what doesn t for Subsurface Drip in Alfalfa?

IV. PLANT NUTRIENT ELEMENTS

The Basics of Fertilizer Calculations for Greenhouse Crops Joyce G. Latimer, Extension Specialist, Greenhouse Crops; Virginia Tech

Effect of Site Specific Drip Fertigation on Yield of Chilli

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. Steve Orloff, Steve Wright and Mike Ottman 1 ABSTRACT

Agricultural Water Conservation and Efficiency Potential in California

Testing Water for Gardening and Lawn Irrigation

Sulfur Fertilization of Corn. Jeff Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center December 2013

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

1. THE GROWER 2. GREENHOUSE STRUCTURE FEATURED 3. CROPS GROWN. Hung Nguyen: ,

Managing Irrigation Water Quality

University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Gulf Coast Research and Education Center th Street East Bradenton, FL 34203

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Drip Irrigation and Fertigation Management of Processing Tomato

The Potash Development Association Potash for Cereals

Lecture 28. Potash Fertilizers - Potassium Sulphate

Irrigation Water Quality for Greenhouse Production

Advantages and disadvantages of controlled-release fertilizers. Matt Ruark Dept. of Soil Science WI FFVC, 1/17/2012

How To Manage Alfalfa

Ion Exchange Design Hand calculation. Brian Windsor (Purolite International Ltd)

The Basic Humic Acid Products

The effect of different rates and forms of potassium fertilizers on the yield and morphine content of poppy (Papaver somniferum, L.

Yield and quality of parsley depend on water quality

Simplifying Soil Test Interpretations for Turf Professionals

Nitrogen uptake in cotton+greengram intercropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management

Irrigation Water Salinity and Crop Production

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

various P levels for the past two years. Treatments were a one time application

CHALLENGE 7. STRATEGIES AND TOOLS FOR SUSTAINABLE SOIL AND SUBSTRATE MANAGEMENT. Janjo de Haan (Wageningen UR) Alice Abjean-Uguen (CERAFEL)

GROUNDWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

Food Safety Challenges Facing the Pistachio Industry. Bob Klein, Manager Advisory Committee of Pistachios California Pistachio Research Board

Agronomic and Economic Considerations on Michigan Farms

Corporate stewardship Partnering to Improve Agricultural practices. Mumbai Randhir Chauhan

=1.0, K cp4. treatment. Statistically, while the yield with flood irrigation treatment was higher than K cp1. treatment, the yield data of K cp3

THE KILL DATE AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL TO INCREASE COVER CROPS BENEFITS IN WATER QUALITY & NITROGEN RECYCLING

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION PROJECTED COSTS TO ESTABLISH A LYCHEE ORCHARD AND PRODUCE LYCHEES

Maize is a major cereal grown and consumed in Uganda and in the countries of Kenya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

LIQUID FERTILIZER FORMULATIONS

PROPOSED CALIFORNIA RICE NITROGEN MANAGEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE

Agro-One Soil Analysis

9DORULVDWLRQRIHIIOXHQWVRIPDQXUHSURFHVVLQJ

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. W. David Smith Extension Crop Science Specialist Tobacco

SOIL TEST LEVELS AND NUTRIENT BUDGETS IN THE WESTERN U.S.

IRRIGATING TOBACCO. J. Michael Moore

For personal use only

Fertilizer. Recommendations Guide. EC750 September Cooperative Extension Service South Dakota State University U.S. Department of Agriculture

MATH 110 Landscape Horticulture Worksheet #5

Using Dairy Lagoon Nutrients to Produce High Yielding Crops: System Design and Use. Marsha Campbell Mathews 1 ABSTRACT

PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND MINOR ELEMENT FERTILIZATION

Investigator: David R. S. Rourke. General Trial Information

FERTPUNICA computer program for calculating pomegranate drip fertigation

Fertilizer Calculations for Greenhouse Crops

Periodic Table, Valency and Formula

Water Quality Management for Greenhouse Production

PERMIT TO ALLOW MINOR USE OF AN AGVET CHEMICAL PRODUCT FOR THE CONTROL OF AUSTRALIAN PLAGUE LOCUST IN TREE NUT ORCHARDS

Environmental impacts of harvesting biomass from the Nordic forests. Nicholas Clarke Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute

MICRONUTRIENTS AS STARTER AND FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN

NITROGEN IN SOIL AND FERTILIZERS James J. Camberato

Pumpkin Growth, Flowering, and Fruiting Response to Nitrogen and Potassium Sprinkler Fertigation in Sandy Soil

NITRATES POLLUTION IN WATER RESOURCES OF THE TENAGI PEATLAND IN NORTHERN GREECE

Transcription:

Potassium Nitrate as a Superior K Source for Fertigated California Almonds Harmen Tjalling HOLWERDA PNA Agronomy Committee 1

Contents 1. Principles of proper K-source selection 2. PNA trial about various K-sources in fertigated California almonds 3. PNA website content 2

Overview main K-sources - Differences are decided for by the counterion Name In short Formula Contents (minimum %) N K 2 O S Cl Potassium nitrate PN KNO 3 13 46 Potassium sulfate SOP (Sulfate of Potash) K 2 SO 4 50 17 Potassium thiosulfate KTS K 2 S 2 O 3 25 17 Potassium chloride MOP (Muriate of Potash) KCl 60 47 3

Substitution of KNO3 by alternative K and N sources Name In short Formula N-source N Derived from Potassium nitrate PN KNO 3 NO 3 - Potassium nitrate Potassium sulfate SOP (Sulfate of Potash) K 2 SO 4 Potassium thiosulfate KTS K 2 S 2 O 3 NH 4 + Urea, UAN, ammonium sulfate Potassium chloride MOP (Muriate of Potash) KCl 4

Right K-fertilizer selection KCl, SOP, KTS, KNO 3 Chloride-sensitive crops - avoid Cl-containing fertilizers (KCl) SOP, KTS, KNO 3 Salinity-sensitive crops avoid excess S (and Cl). Limit the S supply to demand of crops, grown in semi-arid/arid areas or under saline growing conditions, and when using irrigation water of poor quality Maintain the right N-balance: 75-90% N-nitrate & 25-10% N-ammonium With nitrate - cation synergism (K, Ca, Mg); anion antagonism (Cl) KNO 3 - PREFERRED K-SOURCE TO COMBAT SOIL SALINITY 5

California situation Excess sulfate = salinity problems Lack of winter rains and lack of low EC irrigation water to leach the salts out of the rooting zone will result in a continuous salt accumulation in the rooting zone. Almonds are sensitive to saline soils: 10% drop in potential yield per EC sse increase of 0,5 ms/cm! Almond Yield Potential 100% 90% 75% 50% EC saturated soil extract 1,5 2,0 2,8 4,1 Excess sulfate in the rooting zone can also cause a Ca-sulfate fixation to occur in the rooting zone, which will impair Ca uptake by the tree. Ayers and Westcot (1989): Critical soil salinity ECe for various potential yield levels in horticultural crops. 6

Trial in fertigated almond from 2011-2014 (4 years) Partners Univ. of California, Davis (Prof Patrick Brown) World s largest almond and pistachio grower and processor PNA (300.000 US$) 7

Trial in fertigated almond from 2011-2014 (4 years) Treatments 8 fertilizer treatments with different K-sources (KNO3, KTS, SOP, KCl) 2 fertigation frequencies (4 vs 22 events) 2 irrigation methods (Fan Jet microsprinkler vs drip irrigation) Statistical Design 8 Fertilizer tr.* 3 variety_irrigation system combinations Split plot design with 5 replicates; in total 120 plots Example Block - Fertilizer treatment 1 ; 3 parallel rows Plot size 15 trees in a row Nonpareil-Fanjet Tree 1.. Tree 15 Monterey-Fanjet Tree 1.. Tree 15 Nonpareil-Drip Tree 1.. Tree 15 8

Almond orchard Fertigation trial preparation in February 2011 10

Almond orchard Fertigation trial preparation in February 2011 Five Grundfos dosing pumps (150 L/h), new mainlines and manifolds are used to inject the 5 continuous fertigation treatments. 11

Almond orchard Fertigation trial preparation in February 2011 12

Almond orchard Fertigation trial preparation in February 2011 8 hectares of a set of 20 hectares were completely replumbed. New submains: 1 for each continuous feed treatment. In total: 5600 meters of pipe! 13

Almond orchard Fertigation trial preparation in February 2011 Also a replicated comparison of microsprinkler and double-line drip 2 Fan-Jet microsprinklers per tree double-line drip Fan Jet Turned off 14

Almond orchard Fertilizer application 15

Winter banding of sulphate of potash (@ 140 kg K/ha = 336 kg SOP/ha) 16

Pulse fertigation versus continuous fertigation application schedule Pulse: 4 fertigation applications per year. Continuous: 22 fertigation applications per year. Irrigation cycle: 24 hours per application. Month 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10-12 Total Nutrient mngt (%) 20 30 30 20 100 Water management (%) 5 10 15 20 20 20 10 100 Post-harvest Harvesting is done under dry soil conditions 17

Treatments overview Potassium (K) and Nitrogen (N) supplied in the 8 treatments during trial period. Freq: Fertigation frequency (nr of events), C: Continuous fert., P: Pulse fert. Trt Freq Total K SOP Band K Sources (Kg elemental K/ha) SOP Fert* KTS KCL KNO 3 Total N N Sources (Kg N/ha) KNO 3 UAN 1 P (4) 0 336 336 No K 2 P (4) 224 140 84 336 336 Growers Practice 3 P (4) 224 140 84 336 30 306 4 C (22) 224 224 336 336 5 C (22) 224 140 84 336 30 306 6 C (22) 224 224 336 80 256 7 C (22) 336 336 336 119 217 8 C (22) 336 168 168 336 60 276 *dissolved in gypsum mixer 18

Harvesting Almond shaking 19

Harvesting Almond raking 20

Harvesting Almond separation 21

Harvesting Almond harvester 22

Harvest Almond subsample collector (bucket) 23

Results 24

Cumulative yield 2012-2014 Fan Jet microsprinkler Cum yield 2012-2014 increase in the total number of nuts no change in average nut size + 9% + 22% + 18% Economics Kernel (edible part) @ 2,75 US$/lb = 6 US$/kg Gross income increase T5-T2: yearly average 3.000 US$/ha T2: banded SOP + fertig KTS; 4X (grower s practice) T3: banded SOP + fertig PN; 4X T4: only fertig SOP; 22X T5: banded SOP + fertig PN; 22 X Columns labeled with the same letter are not significantly different (LSD, 10%). Calculation 1.500 kg/ha/3 yrs * 6 US$/kg = 9.000 US$/ha/3 years 3.000 US$/ha/year 25

Cumulative yield 2012-2014 Drip irrigation Cum yield 2012-2014 T2: banded SOP + fertig KTS; 4X (grower s practice) T3: banded SOP + fertig PN; 4X T4: only fertig SOP; 22X T5: banded SOP + fertig PN; 22 X Columns labeled with the same letter are not significantly different (LSD, 10%). 26

Significant increase in nitrogen recovery using Fanjet continuous vs Fanjet pulse fertigation (only analyzed in year 2013) Consequence of both: higher nitrogen content in the harvested fruit, as well as higher yields 27

Significant increase in nitrogen recovery using Fanjet continuous vs Fanjet pulse fertigation (only analyzed in the year 2013) 400 N-rec 350 Nitrogen export (kg N/ha) and N-recovery, based on fertilizer N input of 336 kg N/ha 75 % 70 % 73 % 93 % 300 250 200 150 314 252 235 246 Identical K input: banded SOP (336 kg/ha) + fertigated PN (220 kg/ha) Drip Drip Fanjet Fanjet Pulse Continuous Pulse Continuous Nitrogen recovery is the product of total fruit nitrogen in all fruit parts (hull, shell, kernel) multiplied by yield 29

Main conclusions ( 4 R Principles) 1. Right Source: Microsprinkler-applied PN always outperformed KTS and SOP under comparable conditions or when compared with current practice, although yield increases were not always stat sign different. Greatest yield was found at 60% of required K as banded SOP and 40% of required K as continuous fertigated PN. 2. Right Rate: In these experiments application of 224 kg K/ha resulted in the highest yields; no benefit from applications of K at greater rates. 3. Right Time: Continuous fertigation (22 events) gave greater yield than pulse fert (4 events). Proportion of nutrients applied according to demand: Feb-Mar: 20%. Apr-May: 30%. Jun-mid-Jul: 30%. early PH (Sept): 20% 4. Right Place: a) Yield of Fan jet irrigated trees was modestly higher compared to drip irrigated trees under almost all treatments and fertiliser sources. b) Nitrogen use efficiency (per hectare) of Fan jet irrigated trees increased from 73% with pulse to 93% with continuous fertigation. 30

Fertilizer recommendation for fertigated California almonds for superior yield and greatest total nitrogen recovery Fertilization programme Moment Application Source Dose N K Continuous Fan jet microsprinkler fertigation Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha February Basal SOP 336 140 March - early Microsprinkler - UAN 1020 306 post-harvest fertigated PN 220 30 84 Fertilizers to be applied in as many split applications as possible to retain nitrogen in the shallow root zones in order to prevent leaching Proportion of nutrients applied according to demand: Feb-Mar: 20%. Apr-May: 30%. Jun-mid-Jul: 30%. early PH (Sept): 20% The injection of the fertilizer in a fertigation event be concentrated toward the end of the irrigation event (last few hours). 31

PNA website www.kno3.org 32

PNA Website - scientific library 155 abstracts in English, Spanish, Chinese 33

PNA library news E-mail blast 2 articles/15 days 34

PNA newsletter Once a year. Next edition will cover wheat trial Italy (2014) and almond trial (2015) 35

PNA website (m.kno3.org) Easy reading on mobile device 36

Potassium Nitrate as a Superior K Source for Fertigated California Almonds Harmen Tjalling HOLWERDA PNA Agronomy Committee 37