Philadelphia Regional Port Authority. Channel Deepening Briefing to the Delaware Valley Goods Movement Task Force Our Port Our Legacy

Similar documents
Women who are Moving Ohio into a Prosperous New World. Ohio s Maritime Vision

A SOLUTION FOR THE NEW YORK HARBOR TODAY. A LEADER FOR THE SHIPPING WORLD TOMORROW.

The Dynamics of the US Container Market and Shifting Trade Patterns Implications for East Coast and Gulf Coast Ports March 15, 2012

Fact Sheet RITA. Atlantic Coast U.S. Seaports. By Matthew Chambers. Select Atlantic Coast U.S. Seaports. Figure 1: Atlantic Coast U.S.

2040 Southeast Florida Regional Freight Plan

The Coos Bay Rail Line Preserving Rail as an Intermodal Link for Marine and Industrial Sites in Southwest Oregon

Port of the Americas Rafael Cordero Santiago

Index. Coumbia-Snake River System 356 dairy 64 exports 66 regional changes 64 supply and demand 66 DDGS 127, 130

Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project

Gulf Intracoastal Waterway

The National Gateway I-81 Corridor Coalition November 15, 2010

Southern California International Gateway Project Description

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary 1-3. Introduction 4-6. Illustrative Site Plan 7. East-West Streets 8. Cooper Street Market Street 11-14

Capturing the Value of Transportation to Finance Transportation: Case Studies from Texas

SECURING FLORIDA S FUTURE Securing Florida s

The world s delivery system for consumer goods, components, and commodities is overloaded.

American Fast Freight

Connecticut s Bold Vision for a Transportation Future

SIMPLIFYING LOGISTICS: THE BENEFITS OF RAIL IN A MULTIMODAL SHIPPING SYSTEM

Development of a Freight Transportation Network Optimization Strategy An Overview

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PORTS OF LOUISIANA AND THE MARITIME INDUSTRY

The Heartland Corridor: Crossing Mountains, Crossing Sectors

BAKER COUNTY FREIGHT & LOGISTICS OVERVIEW FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Philadelphia County. Land Use and Growth Management Profile

Maritime Trade and Transportation by the Numbers

PORT of TAMPA. Presentation to: Tampa Bay Applications Group May 2, 2013

P u b l i c P o l i c y D i v i s i o n

Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n :

Studied Rail Infrastructure Improvements in the Port of Morehead City Area. Prepared by:

Cuyahoga County s Clean Ohio Revitalization Fund Round 5 Application Great Lakes Shipyard Expansion Project Attachment A1 Application Summary Document

Development of a Freight Transportation Network Optimization Strategy An Overview

Panama Canal Expansion Study. Phase I Report: Developments in Trade and National and Global Economies

Class I Railroad Statistics

2007 Trade Statistics 2008 port of new york and new jersey

18.1 million people 1 billion tons of goods moved 2.5 billion dollars of trucking congestion costs

TRANSPORTATION. Georgia s Strength in Transportation 4 TRANPORTATION SYSTEMS IN GEORGIA. Highways 2 Airport 3 Railroads 4 Ports 5. Inside this issue:

U.S. Logistics & Multimodal Transport Presentation

IN DEFENSE OF THE JONES ACT

Overview of the U.S. Freight Transportation System

The Trucks Are Coming What Growing Truck Traffic Will Mean for New Jersey s Quality of Life

APPENDIX A: Scope of Work for the 2016 Master Plan

Executive Summary. Literature/Community Review. Traffic Flows and Projections. Final Report Truck Route System for Miami-Dade County CORRADINO

DVRPC/District 6 ROP Projects

Florida Transportation Commission: A Meeting of the Modes

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Florida Redevelopment Association Annual Conference October 24-26, 2012

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF PORTS AND SHIPPING

Why infrastructure is so important

Section 4 Vessel Charges/Cargo Charges

VRE SYSTEM PLAN SUMMARY

Multi-Modal Logistics Hub (MMLH) in Yanbu

The A in America s ACE 6/26/2015

INTRODUCTION TO THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION AND THE U.S. SHIPPING ACT OF 1984

Navy Inactive Ships Program

ECT, shaping your gateway to Europe Opening Euromax Terminal and Delta Barge Feeder Terminal

United States House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Subcommittee on Highways and Transit

OUR CONVERSATION TODAY

PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY Self-Evaluation Report Submitted to Texas Sunset Advisory Commission September 2011

CGR TARIFF NO 01b Supplement 6 CANCELS CGR TARIFF NO. 01b, Supplement 5 IN ITS ENTIRETY. CG Railway, Inc.

Connecticut s Bold Vision for a Transportation Future

FHWA s Freight Fluidity Program

Center for Secure and Resilient Maritime Commerce

THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES JOBSPORTFOLIO

STRATEGIC ASSET MANAGEMENT POLICY. For Real Property Assets

In Place. In Sight. Always.

The 40-Foot CONTAINER. Containers await transfer in the marshalling yard at Port Elizabeth, New Jersey.

Vessels reporting duties on the NSR

How To Fund A Rail Bank

JUNE 13-14, 2016 HOUSTON, TX

Overview of the Grand Advantage:

The Training Material on Multimodal Transport Law and Operations has been produced under Project Sustainable Human Resource Development in Logistic

PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO STRATEGIC PLAN. To increase the volume of cargo shipping. To efficiently manage and improve all Port property.

History and Impact of the Intermodal Shipping Container

Statement of Feasibility and Feasibility Report

One Region. One Voice. One Future. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Current Trends and the Potential for Automation in International Transportation Management. Current Trends. Automation

TRANSPORTATION & COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK

Rail Intermodal Container Access

Railway Demand Forecasting and Service Planning Processes. Prepared for: Rail Freight Service Review

SEA Europe input on future EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

Tracking Truck Flows for Drayage Efficiency Analysis

Executive Summary UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA PAGE 7

Freight (Rail) Transportation in the State of Michigan

-1- GATEWAY TERMINALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Scale Of Rates GTI or Terminal means GATEWAY TERMINAL INDIA PVT. LTD.

Freight Project Financing Four Case Studies*

Technology Implementation at the Port of Los Angeles Moving from Current to Emerging Technologies

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

Partnering Infrastructure Development to Meet Hemispheric Growth AAPA Port Commissioners Seminar

Contents. Deep Water Sea Ports.. Commercial Airports. Class 1 Railroads Intermodal Rail Facilities. International Border.. Exports Logistics Workforce

Welcome To St. Lucie County

Chapter 9: Transportation

The Preservation of Local Truck Routes: A Primary Connection between Commerce and the Regional Freight Network

Logistics and Infrastructure

Asset Utilization Potential of Building a Trucking & Rail Mega Intermodal Hub in the Saint Louis Region

MAP 21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda

Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Catapult Whitepaper: Understanding Freight Rates in the Global Supply Chain

Container Terminal Operation and Cargo Handling

2.1 Prior Richmond to South Hampton Roads Rail Service

Nashville Freight Model. Max Baker, Nashville MPO Rob Bostrom, WSA July 17, 2008 Tennessee MUG

Port Corpus Christi Awarded $10M from USDOT 2012 TIGER Grant Grant Will Help Fund the Port s New Main Interchange Rail Yard

Transcription:

Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Channel Deepening Briefing to the Delaware Valley Goods Movement Task Force Our Port Our Legacy April 19, 2006

Philadelphia Regional Port Authority The Philadelphia Regional Port Authority (PRPA) is an Independent Agency of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The PRPA s mission is to enhance waterborne trade and commerce within an established regional port zone along the Delaware River. PRPA owns seven marine cargo facilities.

PRPA 2005 Cargo Statistics Tioga Marine Terminal (Below) 317, 596 Metric Tons (Fruit, Steel, Wood, Paper & Pulp) 10,540 Containers (TEU s) Packer Avenue Marine Terminal (Above) 937,727 Metric Tons Breakbulk (Steel, Military, Lumber, Project) 194,372 Containers (TEU s)

Cargo Statistics (Cont d) Pier 84 Cocoa Facility (Below) 202,058 Metric Tons Cocoa Beans Piers 38-40; 78-80 Forrest Products Facility (Above) 764,695 Metric Tons (Paper, Wood, Steel, Lumber & Pulp)

Economic Impact PRPA Terminals Impacts Total Port and Port Related Jobs 23,109 Total Income $290,734,000 Business Revenue $300,765,000 Local Purchases $17,438,000 State and Local Taxes $30,064,000 PRPA Terminals in 2002 Source: 2003 Martin & Associates

Delaware River Channel Deepening Project Facts Increase the depth of the Main Channel from 40 ft to 45 ft from the mouth of the Delaware Bay to the Ben Franklin Bridge 102 miles 27 million cubic yards of dredged material Approximately $300 million project; local match of $76 million 7

Who Pays? Federal Government has authorized $200 Million and has already spent $53 Million DRPA set aside $50 Million in 1999 and has spent $10 Million Pennsylvania $15 Million New Jersey $8 Million Delaware $2 Million 8

Historical Perspective A Visual Timeline 9

Historical Perspective Time Line 1983 Congress Directs Army Corps of Engineers to investigate feasibility of channel deepening 1987 Historic Meeting of Governors on the Delaware River 1992 Congress Approves Project and authorizes $200 million - $54 million has been appropriated to date 1992 Environmental Impact Statement Released 1997 Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Released 1999 The DRPA approves the project and commits $50 million 2002 GAO report questions economic benefit and calls for reanalysis; Comprehensive reanalysis conducted 2002 Independent Review process verifies economic benefit 2004 Supplement to Comprehensive Reanalysis Released 10

Environmental Review & Approvals The Corps of Engineers has largely addressed environmental concerns related to the project to the satisfaction of federal and state environmental agencies GAO Report June 2002 11

50 45 40 35 30 What other ports are doing 12 NY/NJ Miami Savanah GA Boston MA Moorhead City NC Philadelphia Norfolk VA Depth (in ft)

Dredge Material Disposal 26 Million Cubic Yards of Material to be Removed 7 Million Yards of Sand for Beach Replenishment - Delaware 19 Million Yards Silt and Rock Gov. Rendell has agreed to accept 75% 14.5 Million Yards - Pennsylvania 4.5 Million Yards - New Jersey 13

Dredge Material Disposal Beneficial Use Projects PA Mine Reclamation 550,000 yds Philadelphia Airport Runway 1,200,000 yds Tweeter Center 200,000 yds River Winds Golf and Recreation Center 149,000 yds NJ Turnpike Exit 1 Toll Plaza 180,000 yds 14

Beneficial Reuse Port Development and Expansion 15

SouthPort and Intermodal Complex Navy Yard SouthPort Abandoned Naval Housing Parcel 9A 47 Acres Pier 124 Pier 122 Packer Avenue Marine Terminal 16

SouthPort will use 6 Million Yds 17

North Port Expansion 18

Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Thank you!

Delaware Valley Goods Movement Task Force SJ PIDN: Good Public Policy Congestion Mitigation Economic Development Efficiency/Flexibility

SJ PIDN Objective Enhance Southern NJ, Philadelphia, PA & Wilmington, Del s economic redevelopment initiatives and promote job growth while providing a cost effective alternative to intermodal trucking between northern and southern New Jersey

SJ PIDN Key Elements Motivating Factors Terminal Location Market Stakeholders Business Plan Service Parameters Capital Investment Cost & Revenue Comparison Public Benefits Synergy Recommendation Next Steps

PIDN Motivating Factors Significant Volume Increases (July 2004 June 2005) Containerized Imports Via US East Coast Ports PONYNJ CPIP Forecast

PIDN Motivating Factors Roadway Congestion Annual cost of regional congestion is nearly $2 billion* As Gas Price Gap Price of Crude Oil Above $60/Barrel * Texas Transportation Institute 2003

PIDN Motivating Factors Current over the road price to shippers Phase 1 = $380.00 RT or approx $2.00 per mile excludes hidden costs Real Cost is some 2.5 times higher Generates actual transport price is upwards of $950.00 RT Source: National Geographic

PIDN Motivating Factors Forecast Increased Containerized Trade Volumes Increased Roadway Congestion Continued NJ Terminal Congestion Regional Growth Not Enough Impact: Loss of Efficiency Higher Port Costs Less Direct Cargo Less Competitive Region Less Jobs Is there a Cost Effective, Environmentally Sensitive Alternative?

Phase 1: Potential NJ Sites Broadway Terminal Gloucester City Paulsboro BP Deepwater Dupont Salem Mid Atlantic Shipping and Stevedoring

Phase 1: Broadway Terminal Site Plan Potential Expansion Area 7.5 acres Potential Expansion Area 6.5 Acres Container Handling Area 14 Acres Potential Expansion Area 9.1 Acres Potential Berth Existing Rail Infrastructure

Local Roadway Plan Access Via Broadway & Morgan Street Interchange PIDN Location > > > Local Roadway Connector Source: NJDOT Broadway Ave 9,000 ADT PIDN Add 335 boxes/wk Yr 1 increasing to 500 /wk by Yr 5 1% to 3% increase per day

Business Plan Regional Market Pennsylvania LEGEND TEUs by Zipcode Hazelton Reading, PA Allentown Pennsauken Port of NY&NJ Truck / Rail 0 2,000 2,000 7,000 7,000 16,000 16,000 594,000 Centroid of Dense Trade Cluster Total TEUs Export 137,387 Import 358,170 TOTAL 495,557 %Share by Port Hanover, PA Wilmington Philadelphia/ Camden 18% 9% 4% 45% Maryland Hanover, MD Millville 24% Delaware Delaware Bay Barge Atlantic Ocean PONYNJ Other North Atlantic West Coast (Direct) West Coast (Warehouse) Canadian Ports Source: PANY&NJ / M&N PIDN Philadelphia/Camden 1998/1999 Case Study

Business Plan Target Market LEGEND TEUs by Zipcode Pennsylvania Broadway Terminal 0 2,400 2,400 8,800 8,800 19,400 19,400 37,800 Total TEUs Export 56,968 Import 251,564 TOTAL 308,532 Target Market 140,000 TEU New Jersey State Export Import Total %Share New Jersey 42,574 239,859 282,433 91.5 Pennsylvania 14,394 11,705 26,099 8.5 20 Miles Total 56,968 251,564 308,532 100.0 Source: PANY&NJ / M&N PIDN Philadelphia/Camden 1998/1999 Case Study %Share by Port 2% 22% 7% 20% 49% PONYNJ Other North Atlantic West Coast (Direct) West Coast (Whse) Canadian Ports

Business Plan Market Capture Forecast Projected Annual Volumes for South Jersey PIDN Dense Trade Cluster via the PONYNJ 180,000 Volume (TEUs) 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 Low Cargo Growth High Low High LH Low Average LA Low Low LL Medium High MH Medium Average MA Medium Low ML High High HH High Average HA High Low HL Low Market Capture High 40,000 20,000 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Year LL LA LH ML MA MH HL HA HH

Business Plan Stakeholders Private entities Shipping Line Port of NY&NJ Terminal Operator Trucking Company Warehouse & Distribution Center Shipper / Consignee Consortium Manager Container on Barge Service Provider Public Entities (NJ Focus) New Jersey DOT South Jersey Port Corp. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Delaware River Port Authority New Jersey EDA Port Authority of NY&NJ Other State Port Authorities Other State DOT s / EDA s Municipalities / Counties

Business Plan Stakeholders PUBLIC SECTOR Willing Willing PRIVATE SECTOR Semi willing $$ SJPC Willing DRPA NJEDA Willing Other Regional Agencies NJDOT / DVRPC PANY&NJ ILA Local PIDN Container on Barge Feeder Service Local Drayage Not willing $$ Terminal Operator Willing $ Tug Operator NYSA / Carrier(s) Not willing $$$$ Willing Willing Semi willing $

Business Plan SJ Arrangement SJPC / NJDOT Ocean Carrier* Manage Service Contracts Profit / Loss Responsibility Berth & Upland Facilities Profit Sharing with Carrier Feeder Barge Service (PIDN) Minimum Vol. Guarantee NJ Lift Rate & Conditions SJ Lift Rate & Conditions Profit Sharing with SJPC Est Rate Est Rate Est Rate Est Rate Est Rate PONY&NJ Terminals Stevedores on Delaware River Tug & Barge Provider Chassis Pool Local South NJ Trucking Service Contracts * or other combination of deep sea vessel operator & terminal operator Other Trucking

Why Barge In Lieu Of Rail? Rail opportunity is mid to long term not near term Hurdles for rail use include: Scheduled passenger and freight train service windows Multiple railroads: Amtrak, NJT / SNJLRL, Septa, Conrail, CSX, NS Operational issues include: Single vs. double equipment impacts road crew deadhead Height and weight limitations (i.e. lack of double stack clearance along entire route) Crewing requirements North East Corridor fees Yard concerns include: controlled access, air brake inspections, available storage tracks & train make up

Business Plan Service Parameters PONYNJ Marine Terminal(s) Modify gang size; Lock in Lifts/Hour Handling Criteria Tug & Barges maximize efficiency SJ PIDN Terminal Operator (SJPC) Stevedoring (Delaware River Stevedores) Wharfage & Dockage Storage / Demurrage Direct to In Terminal Yard or Stack Terminal Drayage (Champion Trucking) Local Drayage (Various Trucking Companies) Value Added Activity / Acreage Available SJPC, NJEDA, City of Camden VAL services may consist of: stripping / stuffing, repackaging, parts assembly, US Customs clearance, quality assurance inspections, product upgrades, installation of accessories, preparation for retail sale, commodity processing and inventory management

Business Plan Capital Requirements (minimal public $ at outset) Marine terminals and associated infrastructure: Preliminary estimate*: $0.0 million Equipment Barges $0.0 million Cranes $0.0 million Yard Equipment $1.0 million Other Equipment $0.5 million Total ± $1.5 million* * Assumes startup operations via SJPC s existing facilities and lease of major equipment, i.e., barges and cranes if necessary at a later date

Business Plan Revenue / Cost Comparison $800 $700 $600 $500 Unit Cost $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Year Cost } Revenue } Probable Achievable Opportunistic OTR OTR + 25% Fuel Surcharge OTR + 25% Fuel Surcharge + MT Return @ $50 OTR + 25% Fuel Surcharge + MT Return @ $50 + VAL Revenue @ $100 OTR + 25% Fuel Surcharge + MT Return @ $50 + VAL Revenue @ $100 + NYSA Assessment @ $110

Business Plan Subsidy Costs Cumulative Subsidy $160.00 $140.00 $120.00 $100.00 $ (million) $80.00 $60.00 $40.00 $20.00 $0.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Probable $11.68 $24.19 $37.01 $50.16 $63.67 $77.55 $91.84 $106.55 $121.88 $137.63 Achievable $9.68 $19.91 $30.39 $41.14 $52.19 $63.53 $75.20 $87.24 $99.79 $112.68 Opportunistic $7.76 $15.82 $24.04 $32.43 $41.00 $49.76 $58.73 $68.03 $77.72 $87.65 Year Probable Achievable Opportunistic

FMC Public Benefits Full Marginal Cost Costs from additional traffic movements Direct Operating Cost Direct Travel Time Cost Congestion Cost Accident Cost Infrastructure Cost Air Pollution Cost Noise Cost

Public Benefits Quantified Total Social Cost Savings: 1 Container = 3 Cars Total FMC (RT) Container Throughput Per Year Number of Cars Removed From Traffic Due to Barge Operation Total Social Cost Savings (million)/year $246.0 (VOT=$7.6) 18,720 56,160 $13.81 $492.0 (VOT=$32.3) 18,720 56,160 $27.63 Total Social Cost Savings: 1 Container = 4 Cars Total FMC (RT) Container Throughput Per Year Number of Cars Removed From Traffic Due to Barge Operation Total Social Cost Savings (million)/year $246.0 (VOT=$7.6) 18,720 74,880 $18.42 $492.0 (VOT=$32.3) 18,720 74,880 $36.84 Minimum = $13.8 million per year Average = $20.7 million per year

Benefits Locale Specific Southern NJ PIDN Node Job Generation Marine Terminal VAL Warehousing Wage & Business Taxes Delaware Valley DRPA Waterfront Master Plan Potential New Terminals Paulsboro Greenwich Carney s Point Southport Others (PA / DE) NJTP I95 Reduced VMTs Reduced Congestion Reduced Wear and Tear Reduced Accidents Air Quality Improvement Northern NJ PIDN Hub Job Generation Marine Terminal Tug & Barge Reduced Congestion On Terminal Roadway Air Quality Improvement

Business Plan Synergies VAL Integration with PA & DE maritime nodes ( 8 loop) Backhaul These are medium to long term opportunities; however, they will have a catalyst effect in the short term

Market Business Plan Wrap Up At a minimum, 140,000 TEUs 82,500 containers 20% capture is 315 boxes/week Once weekly service $10 MM subsidy $ 4 MM oper. revenue vs. $14 MM oper. costs Twice weekly service $13.5 MM subsidy $ 4 MM oper. revenue vs. $17.5 MM oper. Costs If 2 year service, then $21.5 $28.5 MM investment Benefits are $27.5 $41.5 MM Go / No Go fork in the road/river

Considerations for No Go Principal users are non committal seemingly have other priorities Transport policy environment is not yet ready Requires combined alignment of highproductivity, low costs and VAL services Key question: Stakeholders need to determine by means of a comparative analysis whether available funds could generate even more incremental public benefits via other initiatives.

Considerations for Go B/C Ratio > 1 = Good Public Policy Regional congestion relief w/out local impacts Creates regional multi modal competition Builds upon existing SJ economic and residential base Has potential to attract new SJ investment Enhances SJ economic development and job generation initiated by other programs NJEDA s focus on warehouse / distribution / port Initiatives and potential identification of a revenue allocation district Southern NJ waterfront master plan (DRPA) City of Camden s master plan Camden s ERB renaissance initiative Enables multi agency buy in in NJ / PA / DE Enhances regional redundancy

If Go Target Issues Institutional issues to be integrated are: Adopt uniform ILA and terminal handling PIDN provisions Plan terminal operations with flexibility to assure negotiated PIDN lift rates are maintained Necessity of VAL to cover shortfalls Disincentives to reduce truck traffic Pursue short haul rail opportunity as more northern NJ facilities come online Modify NYSA s tonnage assessment process and / or terminal lease provisions

Delaware Valley Goods Movement Task Force SJ PIDN: Good Public Policy Congestion Mitigation Economic Development Efficiency/Flexibility