Load Serving Entity Definition Refinement Issue Paper & Straw Proposal

Similar documents
Informational Report of the California Independent System Operator Corporation

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

NYISO Tariffs: MST Section 5 Control Area Services: Rights and Obligations. NYISO Tariffs. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.

August 27, 2007 Advice Letter 2146-E. Advice Letter 2146-E is effective August 31, Thank you for your time.

Natural Gas Pipeline Penalty Recovery Issue Paper

Overview of Reliability Demand Response Resource

Alternative Options for the Availability Standard and Replacement Rule components of the Standard Capacity Product II Initiative March 18, 2010

Business Requirements Specification

131 FERC 61,148 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ON COMPLIANCE FILING. (Issued May 20, 2010)

Network Upgrades andSIAs Under California Tariff Clarifications

The remainder of this memo provides a summary of market performance and trends in 2014 through November.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. California Independent System ) Docket No. ER Operator Corporation )

California ISO Straw Proposal. Ancillary Services Procurement in HASP and Dispatch Logic

ELECTRIC SCHEDULE E-1 Sheet 1 RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

ELECTRIC SCHEDULE ET Sheet 1 MOBILEHOME PARK SERVICE

146 FERC 61,180 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

104 FERC 61,128 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

CALIFORNIA ISO BUSINESS PRACTICE MANUAL (BPM) FOR GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION AND DELIVERABILITY ALLOCATION PROCEDURES (GIDAP)

ALCOA POWER GENERATING INC. Long Sault Division. Open Access Transmission Tariff

How To Settle Day Ahead Energy, Loss, And Loss For A Day Ahead Market

ESDER Implementation and TeMix Comments

PJM Overview and Wholesale Power Markets. John Gdowik PJM Member Relations

April 29, The ISO sent its proposed tariff amendment to the Commission via overnight delivery on December 23, 2009.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Electric Creditworthiness Standards ) Docket No.

California Independent System Operator Corporation - A Case Study

135 FERC 61,068 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR TEMPORARY WAIVER. (Issued April 22, 2011)

Renewable Energy Transmission Planning Process (RETPP) Second Draft Final Proposal

Convergence Bidding Stakeholder Conference Call

CALIFORNIA ISO. Pre-dispatch and Scheduling of RMR Energy in the Day Ahead Market

THE FERC STANDARD MARKET DESIGN GIGANOPR: RESEARCH NEEDS

Proposal to Modify Bad Debt Loss Allocations and Working Capital Rebalancing Methodologies. Mary K. McGarvey Management Committee November 29, 2006

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Transmission Owner Tariff (TO Tariff) FERC Electric Tariff Volume No. 5

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Customer Service Business Unit Tariff Programs & Services. Leading the Way in Electricity TM

SAN DIEGO DISTRIBUTED SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAICS IMPACT STUDY. Final Report

Stakeholder Process: Integrated Balancing Authority Area (IBAA)

Course notes for EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing

SINGLE MARKET-BASED RATE TARIFF

2014 EIA Energy Conference. Edward Randolph Director, Energy Division California Public Utilities Commission

Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC Release No ; File No. S ; RIN 3235-AL07

Applicability and Eligibility

Business Practice Manual for Credit Management & Market Clearing. Version 9 8

LAUREA MAGISTRALE - CURRICULUM IN INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, LEGISLATION AND SOCIETY. 1st TERM (14 SEPT - 27 NOV)

Key Take Away : There are 4 types of MISO transmission transactions : 1) Drive- In, 2) Drive-Within, 3) Drive-through, and 4) Drive-Out

Docket No. ER ISO Service Agreement No. 1464, Non-Conforming Large Generator Interconnection Agreement

Energy in the Wholesale Market December 5, :30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Irving, Texas Robert Burke, Principal Analyst ISO New England

151 FERC 61,108 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ACCEPTING PROPOSED TARIFF REVISIONS. (Issued May 11, 2015)

140 FERC 62,085 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER AUTHORIZING DISPOSITION OF JURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES

ELECTRICITY PROCUREMENT PLAN

September 29, Docket No. ER Amendment to CAISO FERC Electric Tariff to Eliminate Annual External Operations Review

Demand Response FAQs

A new electricity market for Northern Ireland and Ireland from Integrated Single Electricity Market (I-SEM)

FERC Workshop on Price Formation: Scarcity and Shortage Pricing, Offer Mitigation, and Offer Caps in RTO and ISO Markets (Docket. No.

ELECTRIC SCHEDULE E-9 EXPERIMENTAL RESIDENTIAL TIME-OF-USE SERVICE FOR LOW EMISSION VEHICLE CUSTOMERS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Southwest Power Pool, Inc. ) Docket No. ER )

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION. AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission; Securities and Exchange

Generation and Transmission Interconnection Process

133 FERC 61,224 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Arizona: Overview of Retail Competition Plan and Market Response

2017 Budget and Grid Management Charge Initial Stakeholder Meeting

ELECTRIC SCHEDULE E-1 Sheet 1 RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

Opportunities for Biogas Digesters

JEA Net Metering Policy Tiers 1-3

San Diego Gas & Electric Company ) Docket No. ER MOTION TO INTERVENE AND PROTEST OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION

CAISO Resource Adequacy Deliverability for Distributed Generation

Convergence Bidding Tutorial & Panel Discussion

Corporate Renewable Energy Procurement: Industry Insights

AGCS Gas Clearing and Settlement AG

Demand Response and Energy Efficiency in the Midwest ISO. A Primer

Contracts for Differences (Swaps): Concepts after the Dodd Frank Act

Options for Trading of Electricity Savings in Shanghai

Diverse Business Enterprises ( DBE ) Readiness Checklist to Sell Wholesale Power to SCE June 25, 2013

121 FERC 61,143 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

FERC Gas Tariff. Original Volume No. 1 RYCKMAN CREEK RESOURCES, LLC. Filed with the FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

New York State of the Market System - NYISO Success Project

ELECTRICITY SUPPLIER COORDINATION TARIFF IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NYISO Demand Response Programs: Enrollment

Aliso Canyon Gas-Electric Coordination. Issue Paper

Policy Interpretations

Reliability Options in Ireland and Northern Ireland Obligations and Penalties

2014 CHP RFO OFFERORS CONFERENCE CALL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )

Generator Optional. Timeline including the next steps. A practical example. Potential benefits of OFA? Key implications. How might OFA work?

Using Demand Response Programs to Provide Operating Reserves in Wholesale Power Markets: A Case Study of the ERCOT Market

SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 14-RA STANDBY SERVICE

Updated Guidance on Short Sale and Short-Marking Exempt Order Designations

ACER. oj L 211, , p J L 211, , p RECOMMENDATION Of THE AGENCY FOR THE COOPERATION OF ENERGY REGULATORS No 02/2014

-1- PSEG-LI Update of LIPA SGIP Full Docw-NYISO reqmts above 10 MW

ERM POWER RETAIL PTY LTD STANDARD LARGE CUSTOMER RETAIL CONTRACT

ICAP/UCAP Overview. Aaron Westcott If possible, Please mute your phones Please do not use the hold button.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

The Power Market: E-Commerce for All Electricity Products By Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D., and Ralph D. Samuelson, Ph.D.

148 FERC 61,143 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF SECURITIES. (Issued August 27, 2014)

Control Number : Item Number: 36. Addendum StartPage : 0

Generator Interconnection and Deliverability Study Methodology Technical Paper

No substantive change proposed; minor wording changes proposed to reflect new definitions Applicability.

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. Executive Summary

Response by NIE Energy (PPB)

Transcription:

August 15, 2016

Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Stakeholder Engagement... 4 3. Background... 5 Allocation of Congestion Revenue Rights to Load Serving Entities... 6 Resource Adequacy Obligations... 7 4. Issues... 7 5. Proposal... 8 6. Scope of Initiative... 9 7. Next Steps... 9 CAISO/M&IP/P. Servedio 2 August 15, 2016

Revision History Date Revision 08/15/2016 Initial Release CAISO/M&IP/P. Servedio 3 August 15, 2016

1. Introduction As suggested in a July 29, 2016, tariff waiver filing submitted to FERC, the ISO intends to update the tariff definition of Load Serving Entity (LSE) to include entities that have been granted authority pursuant to state or local law, regulation, or franchise to serve their own Load directly through wholesale purchases of electric energy. 1 2. Stakeholder Engagement The schedule for stakeholder engagement is provided below and targets presentation of the proposal to the Board of Governors October 2016 meeting, with a FERC filing requesting the amended tariff language to be effective on January 1, 2017. Date Mon 8/15/2016 Tue 8/23/2016 Fri 9/2/2016 Mon 9/12/2016 Tue 9/21/2016 Wed 10/05/2016 Event Issue paper & straw proposal posted Stakeholder call Stakeholder comments due on straw proposal Draft final proposal posted Stakeholder call Stakeholder comments due on draft final proposal 10/26/2016-10/27/2016 October Board of Governors Meeting 1 Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., Petition for Limited Tariff Waiver and Request for Expedited Consideration, FERC Docket No. ER16-2327-000 (Jul. 29, 2016). CAISO/M&IP/P. Servedio 4 August 15, 2016

3. Background The ISO tariff defines a Load Serving Entity as: Any entity... that (a) (i) serves End Users within the CAISO Balancing Authority Area and (ii) has been granted authority or has an obligation pursuant to California state or local law, regulation, or franchise to sell electric energy to End Users located within the CAISO Balancing Authority Area; (b) is a federal power marketing authority that serves End Users; or (c) is the State Water Resources Development System commonly known as the State Water Project of the California Department of Water Resources. Entities that have been granted authority pursuant to state or local law, regulation, or franchise to serve their own Load directly through wholesale purchases of electric energy are responsible for securing energy and transmission service to serve their own electrical demand and energy requirements. These entities are similarly situated to Load Serving Entities because their load will be subject to the Transmission Access Charges (TAC) and their scheduling coordinator will be exposed to congestion charges associated with locational marginal pricing in the day-ahead market. While these entities are similarly situated to Load Serving Entities, with one exception, they do not meet the tariff definition of the term because the current definition focuses on an entity serving end-use customers, while these entities are themselves the end-use customer. The one exception, which is stated in the definition of the term, is the State Water Project. Even though it is not a retail electric utility that serves load, the tariff specifically identifies the State Water Project as a LSE. During the tariff approval process associated with the ISO s transition to its locational marginal price-based market, the ISO explained that the State Water Project should be treated as a Load Serving Entity the same as a retail electric utility and that the term LSE itself should be interpreted broadly. 2 The Commission found the then-pending tariff definition ambiguous and ordered the ISO to offer further clarity. 3 On compliance, the ISO added the third prong of the current tariff definition, which specifically mentions the State Water Project. 4 The CAISO did not at that time offer a broader revision of the definition that would have covered other entities similarly situated to the State Water Project. Because these entities are not Load Serving Entities under the tariff definition they cannot receive allocated congestion revenue rights. 5 2 Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 116 FERC 61274, P 1131 (2006). 3 Id. at P 1138. 4 Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., Compliance Filing, FERC Docket No. ER06-615-000 (Nov. 20, 2006). 5 Candidate CRR Holder Load Serving Entity Certifications -- A Candidate CRR Holder applicant that intends to obtain CRRs through the CRR Allocation process must certify that it qualifies as a Load Serving Entity as defined in the CAISO Tariff, ISO Tariff Section 4.10.1.5.2 CAISO/M&IP/P. Servedio 5 August 15, 2016

Under a new tariff definition for LSE that includes these entities, they will be eligible to receive allocated congestion revenue rights by certifying that they are a Load Serving Entity and they will also take on corresponding resource adequacy obligations associated with their load. Allocation of Congestion Revenue Rights to Load Serving Entities CRRs are an integral component in the ISO markets. CRRs are a financial instrument settled on the difference in the marginal cost of congestion 6 between two points (the source and the sink) on the ISO s system (as determined in the ISO day-ahead market), multiplied by the MW value of the CRR the party holds between the two points. The quantity of CRRs available is based on a model of the ISO s electric system. Based on the CRRs requested, the ISO conducts a simultaneous feasibility test to determine which CRRs it will release in each round of the CRR process. The ISO releases Monthly, Seasonal, and Long Term CRRs, with one month, three month, and ten year terms, respectively. The ISO releases CRRs through both an allocation process, in which parties are awarded CRRs at no cost, and an auction mechanism, in which parties are awarded CRRs based on the market-clearing prices in an auction. The ISO conducts both an annual process, in which it allocates Seasonal and Long Term CRRs and auctions Seasonal CRRs, and a monthly process, in which it both allocates and auctions Monthly CRRs. The allocation is an iterative, multi-tier process in which internal and external Load Serving Entities are entitled to nominate CRRs based on their load-serving obligations. The auction, in contrast, is open to all registered parties wishing to obtain CRRs. Eligibility to participate in the auctions is not based on an entity s load-serving obligations. The tariff explicitly states that only Load Serving Entities may participate in the allocation. Section 4.10.1.5.2 states that an entity that intends to obtain CRRs through the CRR Allocation process must certify that it qualifies as a Load Serving Entity as defined in the CAISO Tariff. Similarly, section 36.8.2 of the tariff states that an entity that wishes to participate in the CRR Allocation process must provide information that demonstrates that it has an obligation to serve load. The rationale behind limiting allocated CRRs to Load Serving Entities is that they, on behalf of the load they serve, have paid for the embedded costs of the grid by paying transmission access charges and, thus, the ISO should allocate them CRRs to enable them to hedge the volatility in the marginal cost of congestion component of locational marginal prices. The ISO was clear in establishing this system that it was a forward-looking principle because it allocates CRRs for a future CRR term in which the Load Serving Entity will be paying access charges and 6 The marginal cost of congestion is one of the components of the ISO s locational marginal prices. CAISO/M&IP/P. Servedio 6 August 15, 2016

will be exposed to congestion costs to serve its load, as opposed to an entitlement based on past payment of access charges. 7 Resource Adequacy Obligations Each Load Serving Entity with demand in the ISO balancing authority area must demonstrate that it satisfies the RA provisions outlined in section 40 of the ISO tariff. Under those provisions, Load Serving Entities must procure capacity to meet their forecasted load, plus a reserve margin, local area capacity needs, and flexible resource adequacy requirements. 8 To demonstrate that procurement, under section 40.2.2.4 Load Serving Entities must submit annual and monthly Resource Adequacy Plans to the ISO. 9 4. Issues Outside of the State Water Project, entities that have been granted authority pursuant to state or local law, regulation, or franchise to serve their own Load directly through wholesale purchases of electric energy do not meet the current definition of LSE in the ISO tariff. This prevents these entities from eligibility to participate in the CRR allocation process and requirement to participate in the resource adequacy processes, even though they are similarly situated to entities that currently meet the ISO tariff definition. 7 Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., Tariff Filing to Reflect Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade, Kristov Testimony at 88-89, FERC Docket No. ER06-615-000 (Feb. 9, 2006). 8 The specific requirements are developed by the ISO in collaboration with the California Public Utilities Commission and other local regulatory authorities to develop procurement requirements to ensure that the capacity procured by the Load Serving Entities under their respective jurisdictions is adequate to meet the CAISO s operational needs and maintain grid reliability. 9 Section 40.2.2.4 applies to a Non-CPUC Load Serving Entity (which these types of entities would be), while section 40.2.3.4, which contains parallel provisions, applies to a Load Serving Entity electing Modified Reserve Sharing LSE status.... CAISO/M&IP/P. Servedio 7 August 15, 2016

5. Proposal The ISO proposes to update the tariff definition of Load Serving Entity to include entities that have been granted authority pursuant to state or local law, regulation, or franchise to serve their own Load directly through wholesale purchases of electric energy. The specific reference to the State Water Project is proposed for deletion because the State Water Project would be covered under the new category of Load Serving Entity. Keeping the current reference would be superfluous and potentially could cause confusion in the future. The current definition reads: - Load Serving Entity (LSE) Any entity (or the duly designated agent of such an entity, including, e.g., a Scheduling Coordinator), including a load aggregator or power marketer, that (a) (i) serves End Users within the CAISO Balancing Authority Area and (ii) has been granted authority or has an obligation pursuant to California state or local law, regulation, or franchise to sell electric energy to End Users located within the CAISO Balancing Authority Area; (b) is a federal power marketing authority that serves End Users; or (c) is the State Water Resources Development System commonly known as the State Water Project of the California Department of Water Resources. The proposed definition reads: - Load Serving Entity (LSE) Any entity (or the duly designated agent of such an entity, including, e.g., a Scheduling Coordinator), including a load aggregator or power marketer, that (a) (i) serves End Users within the CAISO Balancing Authority Area and (ii) has been granted authority or has an obligation pursuant to California state or local law, regulation, or franchise to sell electric energy to End Users located within the CAISO Balancing Authority Area; (b) is an End User and has been granted authority pursuant to California state or local law or regulation to serve its own Load; or (c) is a federal power marketing authority that serves End Users. For convenience, the following redline shows the difference between the current definition and the proposed definition: - Load Serving Entity (LSE) Any entity (or the duly designated agent of such an entity, including, e.g., a Scheduling Coordinator), including a load aggregator or power marketer, that (a) (i) serves End Users within the CAISO Balancing Authority Area and (ii) has been granted authority or has an obligation pursuant to California state or local law, regulation, or franchise to sell electric energy to End Users located within the CAISO Balancing Authority Area; (b) is an End User and has been granted authority pursuant to California state or local law, regulation, or franchise to serve its own Load; or (bc) is a federal power marketing authority that serves End Users.; or (c) is the State Water Resources Development System commonly known as the State Water Project of the California Department of Water Resources. CAISO/M&IP/P. Servedio 8 August 15, 2016

6. Scope of Initiative This initiative is focused on required updates to the tariff to allow the CRR and Resource Adequacy provisions to apply to entities that have been granted authority pursuant to state or local law, regulation, or franchise to serve their own Load directly through wholesale purchases of electric energy. 7. Next Steps The ISO will discuss the issue paper with stakeholders during a teleconference to be held on August 23, 2016. Stakeholders should submit written comments by September 2, 2016 to InitiativeComments@caiso.com. CAISO/M&IP/P. Servedio 9 August 15, 2016