M-LVDS Signaling Rate Versus Distance

Similar documents
SDLS068A DECEMBER 1972 REVISED OCTOBER Copyright 2001, Texas Instruments Incorporated

High-Speed Gigabit Data Transmission Across Various Cable Media at Various Lengths and Data Rate

Filter Design in Thirty Seconds

Controlling TAS5026 Volume After Error Recovery

Performance of LVDS With Different Cables

Pressure Transducer to ADC Application

Reducing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) With Low Voltage Differential Signaling (LVDS)

Designing Gain and Offset in Thirty Seconds

Interfacing Intel 8255x Fast Ethernet Controllers without Magnetics. Application Note (AP-438)

Application Report. 1 Description of the Problem. Jeff Falin... PMP Portable Power Applications ABSTRACT

Optical Implementation Using IEEE-1394.b

How To Close The Loop On A Fully Differential Op Amp

Design Note DN004. Folded Dipole Antenna for CC25xx By Audun Andersen. Keywords. 1 Introduction CC2500 CC2550 CC2510 CC2511

August 2001 PMP Low Power SLVU051

PCIe XMC x8 Lane Adapter

CUSTOM GOOGLE SEARCH PRO. User Guide. User Guide Page 1

Motor Speed Measurement Considerations When Using TMS320C24x DSPs

SN54165, SN54LS165A, SN74165, SN74LS165A PARALLEL-LOAD 8-BIT SHIFT REGISTERS

Application Note. PCIEC-85 PCI Express Jumper. High Speed Designs in PCI Express Applications Generation GT/s

This paper will explain some of the more important factors on how UTP wires work; specifically it will cover the following:

Wireless Subwoofer TI Design Tests

Application Note AN107

The Evolution of Copper Cabling Systems from Cat5 to Cat5e to Cat6 Copper Cabling Standards and Technical Aspects

Calculating Gain for Audio Amplifiers

A Low-Cost, Single Coupling Capacitor Configuration for Stereo Headphone Amplifiers

APPLICATION NOTE BUILDING A QAM MODULATOR USING A GC2011 DIGITAL FILTER CHIP

Current-Transformer Phase-Shift Compensation and Calibration

Data Communications Competence Center

More Filter Design on a Budget

Transmission of High-Speed Serial Signals Over Common Cable Media

Design Note DN002. Practical Sensitivity Testing By Morten Engjom. Keywords. 1 Introduction. Receiver Testing Sensitivity

Application Report SLVA051

LM5030 LM5030 Application: DC - DC Converter Utilizing the Push-Pull Topology

RETRIEVING DATA FROM THE DDC112

Using C to Access Data Stored in Program Space Memory on the TMS320C24x DSP

THE RIGHT-HALF-PLANE ZERO --A SIMPLIFIED EXPLANATION

Wide Bandwidth, Fast Settling Difet OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIER

Application Report. 1 Introduction. 2 Resolution of an A-D Converter. 2.1 Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) Harman Grewal... ABSTRACT

1+1 PROTECTION WITHOUT RELAYS USING IDT82V2044/48/48L & IDT82V2054/58/58L HITLESS PROTECTION SWITCHING

The Effect of Network Cabling on Bit Error Rate Performance. By Paul Kish NORDX/CDT

T = 1 f. Phase. Measure of relative position in time within a single period of a signal For a periodic signal f(t), phase is fractional part t p

Texas Instruments. FB PS LLC Test Report HVPS SYSTEM AND APPLICATION TEAM REVA

6 Output With 1 kω in Series Between the Output and Analyzer Output With RC Low-Pass Filter (1 kω and 4.7 nf) in Series Between the Output

11. High-Speed Differential Interfaces in Cyclone II Devices

Signal Conditioning Wheatstone Resistive Bridge Sensors

This application note is written for a reader that is familiar with Ethernet hardware design.

Data Transmission. Data Communications Model. CSE 3461 / 5461: Computer Networking & Internet Technologies. Presentation B

How To Counter Noise Noise From A Low Voltage Differential Signaling Circuit

The Next Generation of Cable Technology. A technology primer from NORDX/CDT By, Eric d Allmen

CAN Bus Transceivers Operate from 3.3V or 5V and Withstand ±60V Faults

TECHNICAL NOTE 7-1. ARCNET Cable Length vs. Number of Nodes for the HYC9088 in Coaxial Bus Topology By: Daniel Kilcourse May 1991.

Sheilded CATx Cable Characteristics

Standard Linear & Logic Semiconductor Marking Guidelines

Using the Texas Instruments Filter Design Database

Timing Errors and Jitter

Designing the NEWCARD Connector Interface to Extend PCI Express Serial Architecture to the PC Card Modular Form Factor

SINGLE-SUPPLY OPERATION OF OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIERS

APPLICATION BULLETIN

Signal Conditioning Piezoelectric Sensors

IrDA Transceiver with Encoder/Decoder

Current Probes. User Manual

Audio Tone Control Using The TLC074 Operational Amplifier

Multi-Transformer LED TV Power User Guide. Anderson Hsiao

Using Pre-Emphasis and Equalization with Stratix GX

SN54HC191, SN74HC191 4-BIT SYNCHRONOUS UP/DOWN BINARY COUNTERS

Grounding Demystified

SIGNAL GENERATORS and OSCILLOSCOPE CALIBRATION

Network Design. Yiannos Mylonas

LVDS Technology Solves Typical EMI Problems Associated with Cell Phone Cameras and Displays

Discussion Paper Category 6 vs Category 5e Cabling Systems and Implications for Voice over IP Networks

Ultra640 SCSI Measured Data from Cables & Backplanes

Design Note DN304. Cebal CCxxxx Development Tools USB Driver Installation Guide By Åsmund B. Bø. Keywords. 1 Introduction

TIMING SIGNALS, IRIG-B AND PULSES

Nexus Technology Review -- Exhibit A

Common Mode Choke Filtering Improves CMRR in Ethernet Transformer Applications. Application Note. June 2011

TVP5146 SCART and OSD

Signal Integrity: Tips and Tricks

AN437. Si4432 RF PERFORMANCE AND FCC COMPLIANCE TEST RESULTS. 1. Introduction. 2. Relevant Measurements to comply with FCC

Understanding the Terms and Definitions of LDO Voltage Regulators

Application Note 83 Fundamentals of RS 232 Serial Communications

Signal Types and Terminations

RS485 & RS422 Basics

EECC694 - Shaaban. Transmission Channel

Engineering Sciences 151. Electromagnetic Communication Laboratory Assignment 3 Fall Term

DDX 7000 & Digital Partial Discharge Detectors FEATURES APPLICATIONS

Cable Analysis and Fault Detection using the Bode 100

AN2866 Application note

Amplifier for Small Magnetic and Electric Wideband Receiving Antennas (model AAA-1B)

USB 3.0 CDR Model White Paper Revision 0.5

Harmonics and Noise in Photovoltaic (PV) Inverter and the Mitigation Strategies

ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LOW VOLTAGE DIFFERENTIAL SIGNALING (LVDS) INTERFACE CIRCUITS PN May 2000

AMC1100: Replacement of Input Main Sensing Transformer in Inverters with Isolated Amplifier

Cable Discharge Event

Module 13 : Measurements on Fiber Optic Systems

Electrical Compliance Test Specification SuperSpeed Universal Serial Bus

DDX 7000 & Digital Partial Discharge Detectors FEATURES APPLICATIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Category 8 Cable Transmission Measurements Comparative Study between 4-port single wire measurements and 2-port balun measurements

AVX EMI SOLUTIONS Ron Demcko, Fellow of AVX Corporation Chris Mello, Principal Engineer, AVX Corporation Brian Ward, Business Manager, AVX Corporation

CCTV System Troubleshooting Guide

Transcription:

Application Report SLLA127 April 2003 M-LVDS Signaling Rate Versus Distance High-Performance Linear/Interface Products ABSTRACT Multipoint LVDS (M-LVDS) devices provide a new class of high-speed, low-power, and standardized interface solutions. This report gives a brief review of TIA/EIA-899 (M-LVDS) and discusses the characteristics that affect the maximum signaling rate and distance. Maximum signaling rates are measured over 3-m, 10-m, 20-m, and 40-m lengths of CAT5 unshielded twisted pair (UTP) cable using the SN65MLVD201 and SN65MLVD207 M-LVDS transceiver. Introduction TIA/EIA-899 (M-LVDS) provides a general-purpose high-speed balanced interface standard. M-LVDS general-purpose applications include multipoint LVDS operation, high-speed signaling where balanced transmission is required, signaling rates, or power requirements beyond the capabilities of TIA/EIA-485, and applications where low electromagnetic radiation and interference with other devices is required. The M-LVDS standard defines a maximum signaling rate of 500 Mbps, it does not specify a maximum distance of balanced media for applications. Instead of a distance, the standard provides a recommended loss between the driver and receiver. The standard recommends a loss of 6 db or less through the interconnect media (PCB traces, vias, connectors, cables, etc), in order to maintain noise margin. By specifying in terms of signal loss, the transmission distance is then estimated solely by the bandwidth of the interconnect and is not bound to any specific copper media. For specific uses, the quality of a data transmission circuit is most often characterized by the eye pattern. The eye pattern takes into account data pattern dependent distortion (ISI), differential noise, attenuation, and the line circuits. It is also easy to create. By establishing a minimum eye opening at the receiver output, the maximum distance or signaling rate can be determined for a given interconnection circuit. This report uses both the 6 db recommendation found in the standard, and the minimum eye opening at the receiver to plot signaling rate versus distance for the SN65MLVD201 and SN65MLVD207 transceivers. The maximum distance that provides 6 db of attenuation is calculated from the sinusoidal attenuation of the CAT-5 cable. The eye opening is used to determine the maximum signaling rate for distances less than this calculated maximum. Signaling Rate versus Distance Measurements Figure 1 illustrates the test setup used to typify distance versus signaling rate. The SN65MLVD201 is used as the line driver and receiver and the test instruments are listed in the appendix. 1

SN65MLVD201/207 SN65MLVD201/207 CAT5 Belden MediaTwist(tm) Source SCOPE SMA COAX PCB Trace 100 Ω Differential Impedance PCB Trace 100 Ω Differential Impedance Figure 1. Test Setup The cable used for this investigation was category-5 Belden MediaTwist. The cable data sheet provides capacitance, delay, and other properties. The data sheet also describes the cables attenuation per unit length as a function of frequency. The maximum attenuation in decibel per 100 meters is given by the following equation: 0.05 Attenuation = 1.808 F + 0.017 F + F 0.772 to 350 Where F is the sinusoidal frequency in MHz from The maximum distance boundary for 100 Mbps is estimated from 6 db of attenuation of a 100-MHz sine wave. Using the attenuation equation, -6 db occurs at a cable length of 30.3 m, and testing is then limited to a maximum of 40 meters with intermediate data points at 3 m, 10 m, and 20 m. At each cable length, the eye pattern is observed at the output of the receiver and the signaling rate adjusted until the peak-to-peak jitter at the 50%-amplitude crossing comprised 5%, 10%, and 20% of the unit interval. In each case, a pseudo-random bit stream (PRBS) with a pattern run length of 2 31 1 is used as the data. The results are plotted in Figure 2. Cooper Industries, Inc. trademark 2 M-LVDS Signaling Rate Versus Distance

1000 Signaling Rate (Mbps) 100 5% jitter 10% jitter 20% jitter 10 1 10 100 Distance (m) Figure 2. SN65MLVD201 Signaling Rate versus Distance In Figure 2, the two distinct regions are less than 10 m and greater than 10 m. Less than 10 m, the level of percent jitter is constant. After 10 m, the signaling rate is decreased as the cable length is increased in order to maintain a constant eye opening. This indicates that the cable has little impact on the eye-pattern jitter for lengths below 10 m, and jitter from the driver and receiver dominates. It is interesting that the TIA/EIA-899 distance guideline for 100 Mbps closely coincides with the 5% jitter curve at 30 m. This gives some credibility to this guideline and suggests it is a conservative one. The TIA/EIA-899 standard describes two types of receivers, Type-1 and Type-2. The Type-1 receiver has a differential input voltage threshold centered on 0 V, while the Type-2 receiver has an input threshold centered on 100 mv. This offset input voltage provides a valid bus state with no voltage difference and can be useful during bus faults or idle-line conditions. Figure 3 shows a comparison between the Type-1 and Type-2 threshold regions. M-LVDS Signaling Rate Versus Distance 3

Type 1 Type 2 High High 2.4 V 150 mv 50 mv 0V -50 mv Low Low -2.4 V Figure 3. Thresholds for Type-1 and Type-2 Receivers Since the signal at the input of the receiver does not change instantly, the additional time for the input to slew to the offset threshold of the Type-2 receiver is expected to induce more time jitter than a Type-1 receiver. To verify this, the Type-1 SN65MLVD201 receiver is replaced with the Type-2 SN65MLVD207 and the measurements retaken. The results are graphed in Figure 4. 1000 Signaling Rate (Mbps) 100 5% jitter 10% jitter 20% jitter 10 1 10 100 Distance (m) Figure 4. SN65MLVD207 Signaling Rate versus Distance 4 M-LVDS Signaling Rate Versus Distance

Again, for cable lengths under 10 m, there is little eye-pattern degradation with distance, and the top signaling rates are comparable with the Type-1 case. A steeper decline in signaling rate above 10 m in Figure 4 can be attributed to the offset threshold in the Type-2 receiver and the slower signal transitions with longer cable lengths. TIA/EIA-899 acknowledges this phenomenon by recommending Type-2 receivers for control signals and slower signaling rates than Type-1 receivers. Discussion The answer to How fast and far? is not a simple one. As the measurements show, accepting an 80% open eye-pattern can more than double the top signaling rate for a 95% open eye in these examples. A data transmission circuit s tolerance to jitter depends upon the system s timing budget and varies with application. What these measurements can provide is a basis to estimate performance of the SN65MLVD201 and SN65MLVD207 devices if the user understands the system variables and their effect on signaling rate. The electrical characteristics of the cable or other interconnecting media have an effect on the eye pattern. The results of the signaling rate versus distance are cable dependent, varying with wire size and the quality of the twist within a conductor pair. Adding an overall shield as well as the type of shield gives different results. Ultimately, the designer must know the characteristics of the specific cable and compare them to the CAT-5 cable used here to estimate the cable s impact on signaling rate or distance. If the interconnection is not a cable but a rigid circuit board, it is hard to conceive of one large or bad enough to limit the signaling rate of these devices due to distance or eye-pattern closing. Typically, other factors limit signaling rates on circuit boards. This example is an uncomplicated simplex connection with a single driver and receiver connected to the bus. Other modes of operation and physical implementations add discontinuities to the line that affect the eye pattern. Each connector, test point, solder pad, or other connection to the transmission media takes away some of the signal and changes the resultant eye pattern. Whether it is significant can only be determined for a specific bus design. TIA/EIA-899 does give some guidelines and specifications to at least maintain positive noise margin and maximize the signaling rate. Since the jitter in this investigation is dominated by the line circuits when the distance is less than 10 m, line circuits with different jitter characteristics impact the top signaling rate as well. The SN65MLVD201 and 207 data sheet specifies peak-to-peak jitter. If a device does not specify jitter, pulse skew or pulse-width distortion is the next best proxy. If neither of these is specified, measurement is the only alternative. The effects of temperature, supply voltage, and process variation on the critical characteristics of the line circuits and cables may also have a marginal effect on the ultimate signaling rate or distance. Last, but by no means least, is common-mode noise. Common-mode noise is generally not noticeable in the eye pattern but can play a big role in limiting the transmission distance. Noise coupling to the circuit has many variables and there is no safe distance guideline to give. It is known that noise coupling increases with cable length. Standard compliant M-LVDS devices operate with up to 2 V of common-mode noise, but length allowed can often only be determined at the installation, or by comparison to other known working circuits. M-LVDS Signaling Rate Versus Distance 5

Conclusion A simplex M-LVDS circuit can signal at 360 Mbps on a CAT-5 cable up to 10 m, or 200 Mbps on a 40-m cable with an 80% open eye pattern. However, different eye-pattern openings, line circuits, transmission media, bus structures, or operating conditions affect the ultimate signaling rate or distance for a particular installation. A sinusoidal signal loss of 6 db at the signaling rate in hertz is a good and conservative estimate for the maximum cable length. Aside from signal quality, common-mode noise coupling to the environment may well be the determining factor for the maximum transmission distance. A 40-m cable length operates successfully in an electronics laboratory environment, but a general guideline for common-mode noise with distance is impossible without specifying many variables. Common-mode noise is best evaluated at the actual installation. References 1. TIA/EIA-899 Electrical Characteristics of Multipoint-Low-Voltage Differential Signaling (M-LVDS) Interface Circuits For Multipoint Data Interchange 2. SLLA108, Introduction to M-LVDS (TIA/EIA-899) 3. SLLU039, Multipoint Low Voltage Differential Signaling (M-LVDS) Evaluation Module 4. SLLA053B, Performance of LVDS With Different Cables 5. SLLS463B, SN65MLVD20X High-Speed Differential 50-Ω Line Driver and Receiver 6. 07/01/02 REV. 17 MEDIATWIST - 1872A 6 M-LVDS Signaling Rate Versus Distance

Appendix Measured Percent Eye-pattern Jitter versus Signaling Rate Signaling CAT-5 Cable Length Rate 3m 10m 20m 40m (Mbps) MLVD201 MLVD207 MLVD201 MLVD207 MLVD201 MLVD207 MLVD201 MLVD207 20 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.8% 1.0% 2.2% 40 0.7% 0.9% 0.8% 0.9% 0.8% 1.6% 1.8% 4.0% 60 1.2% 1.6% 1.7% 1.4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.6% 5.8% 80 1.8% 2.1% 2.0% 2.3% 2.0% 3.1% 3.4% 8.4% 100 2.0% 2.4% 2.5% 3.5% 2.6% 4.7% 5.6% 11.2% 120 2.9% 3.4% 3.9% 3.8% 3.7% 5.8% 7.9% 15.0% 140 5.5% 5.5% 5.0% 5.2% 5.5% 7.9% 11.3% 18.5% 160 5.5% 5.8% 6.5% 5.6% 7.8% 8.5% 13.6% 21.7% 180 6.4% 5.8% 7.3% 5.9% 7.6% 9.4% 16.0% 24.4% 200 7.3% 7.0% 9.1% 8.2% 9.8% 11.4% 19.1% 28.1% 220 8.8% 9.1% 9.1% 8.7% 12.0% 13.1% 22.9% 240 9.9% 9.5% 9.4% 9.4% 13.1% 13.9% 25.7% 260 10.2% 11.7% 11.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.9% 280 14.4% 15.2% 12.9% 14.2% 16.0% 20.5% 300 13.5% 14.8% 15.3% 16.4% 18.8% 320 19.2% 17.6% 15.5% 16.5% 21.3% 340 16.2% 17.1% 17.2% 19.8% 360 18.9% 17.9% 19.8% 21.3% 380 21.3% 21.3% 24.3% Materials The M-LVDS devices in this paper are the production released SN65MLVDS201 (Type-1 receiver) and the production release SN65MLVD207 (Type-2 receiver). All of these devices are tested on the SN65MLVD2xx EVM. The data source which provides the 2 31 1 PRBS is an HP 70841B Pattern Generator and HP70311A Clock Source. The HP 83480A Digital Communications Analyzer (DCA) was used to measure the total jitter (eye pattern measurement). The data transmission medium between the two EVMS is CAT-5 Belden Media Twist SMA connectors and 50-Ohm coaxial cables are used to carry signals from the data source to the transmitting EVM and from the receiving EVM to the DCA. The BER measurements are conducted with the HP70842B Error Detector, HP70841B Pattern Generator, HP70311A Clock Source, and HP70004A Display. M-LVDS Signaling Rate Versus Distance 7

IMPORTANT NOTICE Texas Instruments Incorporated and its subsidiaries (TI) reserve the right to make corrections, modifications, enhancements, improvements, and other changes to its products and services at any time and to discontinue any product or service without notice. Customers should obtain the latest relevant information before placing orders and should verify that such information is current and complete. All products are sold subject to TI s terms and conditions of sale supplied at the time of order acknowledgment. TI warrants performance of its hardware products to the specifications applicable at the time of sale in accordance with TI s standard warranty. Testing and other quality control techniques are used to the extent TI deems necessary to support this warranty. Except where mandated by government requirements, testing of all parameters of each product is not necessarily performed. TI assumes no liability for applications assistance or customer product design. Customers are responsible for their products and applications using TI components. To minimize the risks associated with customer products and applications, customers should provide adequate design and operating safeguards. TI does not warrant or represent that any license, either express or implied, is granted under any TI patent right, copyright, mask work right, or other TI intellectual property right relating to any combination, machine, or process in which TI products or services are used. Information published by TI regarding third party products or services does not constitute a license from TI to use such products or services or a warranty or endorsement thereof. Use of such information may require a license from a third party under the patents or other intellectual property of the third party, or a license from TI under the patents or other intellectual property of TI. Reproduction of information in TI data books or data sheets is permissible only if reproduction is without alteration and is accompanied by all associated warranties, conditions, limitations, and notices. Reproduction of this information with alteration is an unfair and deceptive business practice. TI is not responsible or liable for such altered documentation. Resale of TI products or services with statements different from or beyond the parameters stated by TI for that product or service voids all express and any implied warranties for the associated TI product or service and is an unfair and deceptive business practice. TI is not responsible or liable for any such statements. Mailing Address: Texas Instruments Post Office Box 655303 Dallas, Texas 75265 Copyright 2003, Texas Instruments Incorporated