STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES RESISTANT TO FUEL



Similar documents
Testing and appraisal of Lucobit polymer effect as an additive on asphalt mixture performance

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON ROAD SURFACE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPRESSWAYS AND HIGH SPEED ROADS

Construction Materials Testing. Classes of Test

WATERPROOFING FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURES

COMPACTING BITUMINOUS SPECIMENS USING THE SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC)

AASHTO Subcomittee on Materials Biloxi, Mississippi August 4-10, 2012 Chris Abadie, P.E.

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL

Rutting Based Evaluation of Asphalt Mixes

PENETRATION OF BITUMINOUS MATERIALS

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR BITUMINOUS BINDERS

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CLOGGING BEHAVIOUR OF DOUBLE LAYER POROUS ASPHALT

Field Density Determination of Asphalt Concrete by the Coring Method

SPECIAL NOTE FOR ASPHALT WATERPROOFING MIX FOR BRIDGE-DECK OVERLAYS AND ADJACENT APPROACHES

SEAUPG Annual Meeting Williamsburg, VA Thursday, November 19, 2015

Performance Evaluation of Jet Fuel Resistant Polymer-Modified Asphalt for Airport Pavements

AFFINITY BETWEEN BITUMEN AND AGGREGATES: IMPROVEMENT OF THE EN STATIC TEST METHOD

NorthEast Transportation Training and Certification Program (NETTCP) Course Registration Form

Asphalt Pavement Association Of Michigan Selecting the Right Mix Atrium Drive, Suite 202 Okemos, MI

Otta Seal BACKGROUND GENERAL DESCRIPTION DESIGN ASPECTS. Category : Technical Information/On-carriageway/

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON THE USE OF WATERPROOFING MEMBRANES ON CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS

Test report P 7013-E. InoPaz H2O. Pazkar LTD. Alon Tavor Industrial Zone AFULA / Israel. J. Magner Dipl.-Ing. N. Machill.

Cliquez pour modifier les styles du texte du masque. Application of tonnes of Warm Mix Asphalt on a New Highway Near Strasbourg, France

The AASHO Road Test site (which eventually became part of I-80) at Ottawa, Illinois, was typical of northern climates (see Table 1).

A View From The Bureau of Materials & Physical Research. IAPA March 2015 Matt Mueller, PE BMPR Illinois Dept of Transportation

Estimated emissions and CO2 savings deriving from adoption of in-place recycling techniques for road pavements

Pavement Patching Repair for AC and PCC Pavement Surfaces. Vern Thompson

SECTION 311 PLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF CEMENT TREATED SUBGRADESOIL CEMENT BASE COURSE

Methodology and rules for design and rehabilitation of road pavement using new hot and cold recycled asphalt mixtures

PAVEMENT REHABILITATION using BITUMEN STABILISATION STATE OF THE ART

SECTION 334 (Pages ) is deleted and the following substituted: SECTION 334 SUPERPAVE ASPHALT CONCRETE

Hello viewers welcome to lesson 4.7 which is on pavement materials part IV and in this lesson we will be covering bituminous binders.

Use of Marginal Materials & Fly ash in Road Works

Engineering Road Note 9 May 2012

Mix design and performance of asphalt mixes with RA

Using Accelerated Pavement Testing to Evaluate Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement Performance

Pavement Thickness. esign and RCC-Pave Software. Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavement: Design and Construction. October 24, 2006 Atlanta, Georgia

1. Introduction Different types of asphalt pavement interlayers Fibre-rovings for asphalt pavement interlayers 5

EXPERIMENT NO.1. : Vicat s apparatus, plunger

Treatment of a surface or structure to resist the passage of water in the absence of hydrostatic pressure. presence of hydrostatic pressure.

SKER HUESKER HUESKER HUESKER HUESKER HUESKERHUES

Reinforcement HUESKER. HaTelit. Engineering with geosynthetics

NOTES TO THE PERFORMANCE BASED SPECIFICATION FOR HOTMIX ASPHALT WEARING COURSE SURFACING

Greening our Roads. Approach

Division 2 Section Section 02795

Oh No, We Got an Airport Job! Contractor Quality Control. Investment in Staff, Labs and Equipment. We ve Come A Long Way.

HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACKING TEST

Lecture Notes CT 4860 Structural Pavement Design. Design of Flexible Pavements

Nevada DOT Cold In-Place Recycling Federal Highway Administration National Review Close out meeting, August 25, 2005

CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Built-up roofing solutions with rigid insulation boards on concrete decks for new-build and refurbishment E-a5

Laboratory Evaluation of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures from Rt.33 in Rochester, NY

CREEP AND REPEATED CREEP-RECOVERY AS RUTTING PERFORMANCE TESTS FOR AIRPORT HMA MIX DESIGN

C. Section TESTING LABORATORY SERVICE.

Construction Specifications for Keyhole Pavement Coring and Reinstatement

Strain Measurement in Pavements with a Fibre Optics Sensor Enabled Geotextile

PERFORMANCE TESTING OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER

Test Report No. 48/2005. Degussa AG Paul-Baumann-Straβe Marl. Binder tests of bitumen modified with Road+

DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL GEOTECHANICAL

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 632 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

APPENDIX B. I. Background Information

Walter Gerritsen, Jacob Groenendijk, Christ van Gurp KOAC NPC pavement research & consultancy, The Netherlands

asphalt applications Construction and surfacing of parking areas including private drives mpa asphalt Asphalt Information Service

A LABORATORY STUDY ON EFFECT OF TEST CONDITIONS ON SUBGRADE STRENGTH

Solving a Hard Problem For The NYC DOT With a High Performance Thin Overlay

Wecryl Waterproofing System under surfacing supplied by others

A REVIEW OF AGGREGATE AND ASPHALT MIXTURE SPECIFIC GRAVITY MEASUREMENTS AND THEIR IMPACTS ON ASPHALT MIX DESIGN PROPERTIES AND MIX ACCEPTANCE

THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF MATERIALS USING THE VIBRATORY HAMMER COMPACTION

NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

Comparison of Results of SHRP and Conventional Binder Tests on Paving Asphalts

SERIES 800 ROAD PAVEMENTS - (11/04) UNBOUND, CEMENT AND OTHER HYDRAULICALLY BOUND MIXTURES

Cavity Drain R20 is manufactured from1.0mm thick black high density polyethylene with studs approximately 20mm high.

European technical approval

flooring sin materiali protettivi milano

DIVISION 300 BASES SECTION 304 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE DESCRIPTION MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

Asphalt in Railway Tracks

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 96 /07 Revision 1 GUIDANCE ON IMPLEMENTING RESULTS OF RESEARCH ON BRIDGE DECK WATERPROOFING

SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO T 85

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT

METHOD A10 (a) THE DETERMINATION OF THE IN-PLACE DRY DENSITY OF SOIL OR GRAVEL BY THE SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

Naue GmbH&Co.KG. Quality Control and. Quality Assurance. Manual. For Geomembranes

Performance of Asphalt Mixes Containing RAP

Expected Service Life and Performance Characteristics of HMA Pavements in LTPP

PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR HOT MIX ASPHALT

SECTION 623 CONCRETE BONDING COMPOUND, EPOXY MORTAR AND EPOXY POLYMER CONCRETE OVERLAY SECTION CONCRETE BONDING COMPOUND.

Benefits of Preventative Maintenance Pavement Sealers

Rehabilitation by cracking and seating of concrete pavement optimized by FWD analysis

SECTION 18 - CAST IN PLACE HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE (HPC)

Quality Assurance Program. June by Texas Department of Transportation (512) all rights reserved

Chapter 7: Pavement Rehabilitation 7-1 Asphalt Pavement Overlays 7-1 Surface Preparation Methods 7-2 Concrete Pavement Preparation 7-3 Recycling

SPECIAL COMPOUND FOR RHEOPLASTIC AND ANTI-CORROSION SUPERCONCRETE WITH VERY HIGH DURABILITY

ENGINEERED QUARTZ STONE

Schedule of Accreditation Issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Numerical modelling of shear connection between concrete slab and sheeting deck

ACCELERATED LOAD TESTING OF ASPHALT MIX DESIGNS FOR HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENTS IN HOT CLIMATES

Material and methods. Värmeforsk report Niklas Hansson DIANAS utilization of waste inciniration bottom ash in bound construction materials

SURFACE TREATMENT BOND TEST

Numerical Analysis of Independent Wire Strand Core (IWSC) Wire Rope

Section 300 Base Courses

Transcription:

STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES RESISTANT TO FUEL

INTRODUCTION Evaluation of the performance of asphalt mixtures applied on wearing courses of road and airport pavements when subjected to the action of fuel spillage Asphalt mixtures produced with different types of bitumen were studied. Experimental program based on the test method EN 12697-43 "Bituminous mixtures - Test methods for hot mix asphalt - Part 43: Resistance to fuel, complemented with other laboratory tests to determine the performance of asphalt mixtures The study was conducted using materials provided by Petrogal (aggregates, filler, bitumen and fuel) The asphalt mixtures were made with one type of aggregate combined with three types of bitumen: a grade pen 35/50 (conventional), a polymer modified bitumen and a bitumen especially modified for fuel resistance The resistance to fuel was determined for three different types of fuels: gasoline 95, diesel and Jet A1.

WORK PROGRAM Manufacture and compaction of asphalt mixtures with the different types of bitumen selected for the study Evaluation of resistance to fuel on asphalt specimens - EN 12697-43:2005 Complementary laboratory tests to assess the asphalt mixtures performance related - modulus, fatigue and permanent deformation - EN 12697-26:2004, EN 12697-24:2004 + A1: 2007 and EN 12697-22:2003 + A1: 2007, respectively Complementary tests for assessing the water sensitivity of bituminous specimens - EN 12697-12:2008 Prismatic specimens compacted in the laboratory - EN 12697-33:2004 + A1: 2007, using the roller compactor (5.3 of the standard test specification) Specimens for testing (4 point bending) obtained by sawing the slabs. These tests are still going on

BITUMINOUS MIXTURE COMPOSITION The manufacture of the bituminous mixtures used in the study included 10/14, 6/12 and 0/4 fractions, obtained from crushed granite rock, from the Secil Britas quarry in Penafiel. The added filler used was provided by Eurocálcio. These materials were used in the following proportions: Aggregate 10/14 19,0% Aggregate 6/12 30,4% Aggregate 0/4 42,7% Filler 2,9% Bitumen 5,0% The three different types of bitumens used in the manufacture of the asphalt mixtures were supplied by Petrogal: Penetration grade bitumen 35/50 (Galp 35/50) Polymer modified bitumen PB 1,5 with a penetration grade 35/50 (Galp PB 1,5 (35/50)) Kero bitumen, resistant to fuel, with 35/50 penetration grade (Galp Kero (35/50)) The corresponding asphalt mixtures are identified as MB 35/50, MB PB 1,5 and MB Kero.

PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS Resistance to fuel EN 12697-43:2005 Bituminous mixtures Test methods fo hot mix asphalt Part 43: Resistance to fuel 1st Phase specimen is partially immersed in fuel and its loss of mass is measured afterwards Loss of mass greater than 5% Loss of mass lower than 5% test finished and the specimen is awarded a low resistance to fuel sample undergoes a brushing procedure made with a wire brush, which constitutes the second phase of the test 1 2 3 4 1. Test samples parcialy soaked in fuel 2. After soaking in fuel 3. Samples after soaking in fuel 4. Samples after soaking and washing

PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS Resistance to fuel EN 12697-43:2005 Bituminous mixtures Test methods fo hot mix asphalt Part 43: Resistance to fuel 2nd Phase classification of the resistance to fuel performed on the basis of the average loss in mass (B) during the second phase and the average value (A) obtained in the first stage a) good resistance to fuel if A 5% and B < 1% b) moderate resistance to fuel if A 5% and 1% B < 5% c) poor resistance to fuel if A > 5% or B > 5%

PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS F U E L J E T A 1 D I E S E L G A S O L I N E 9 5 A sp h a lt m i xt u r e 1st phase (soaking in fuel) 2nd phase (brushing) Classification 1st phase (soaking in fuel) 2nd phase (brushing) Classification 1st phase (soaking in fuel) 2nd phase (brushing) Classification M B 3 5/5 0 A 1 = 2.7 A 2 = 1.5 A 3 = 2.7 B 1 = 3.0 A 1 = 1.5 B 2 = 1.2 - A 2 = 1.8 B 3 = 3.3 A 3 = 1.3 B 1 = 2.8 A 1 = 3.5 B 2 = 1.6 - A 2 = 9.0 B 3 = 1.9 A 3 = 6.2 B 1 = 2.7 - A = 2 B = 3 R M A = 2 B = 2 R M A = 6 B = 3 R F M B P B 1,5 A 1 = 2.7 A 2 = 3.8 A 3 = 2.4 B 1 = 1.4 B 2 = 3.6 B 3 = 2.5 - A 1 = 1.4 A 2 = 1.7 A 3 = 1.7 B 1 = 1.6 B 2 = 1.2 B 3 = 1.9 - A 1 = 6.4 A 2 = 6.9 A 3 = 5.5 - - -- - A = 3 B = 3 R M A = 2 B = 2 R M A = 6 - - - R F M B K e r o A 1 = 3.0 A 2 = 4.2 A 3 = 3.0 B 1 = 1.4 B 2 = 1.5 B 3 = 1.1 - A 1 = 2.1 A 2 = 2.9 A 3 = 3.1 B 1 = 0.9 B 2 = 1.2 B 3 = 1.2 - A 1 = 3.8 A 2 = 3.9 A 3 = 4.3 B 1 = 1.0 B 2 = 1.1 B 3 = 1,5 - A = 3 B = 1 R M A = 3 B = 1 R M A = 4 B = 1 R M LEGEND: A i Individual values of the loss of mass after soaking in fuel; B i Individual values of the loss of mass after the brush test; A Mean value of the loss of mass after soaking in fuel;b Mean value of the loss of mass after the brush test; RM Moderate resistance; RF Poor resistance.

PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS 7 6 MB 35/50 MB PB 1,5 MB Kero A, B (%) 5 4 3 A < 5% 2 1 0 B < 1% A (1 st phase) B (2 nd phase) A (1st phase) B (2nd phase) A (1st phase) B (2nd phase) Jet A1 Diesel Gasoline 95 LEGEND: A i Individual values of the loss of mass after soaking in fuel; B i Individual values of the loss of mass after the brush test; A Mean value of the loss of mass after soaking in fuel; B Mean value of the loss of mass after the brush test; RM Moderate resistance; RF Poor resistance.

PERMANENT DEFORMATION BEHAVIOUR Two slabs prepared in laboratory using the roller compactor - EN 12697-33:2004 + A1: 2007 Sawing and correction to obtain prismatic specimens for testing. Assessment of resistance to permanent deformation EN 12697-22:2003 + A1: 2007, small size device, procedure B, on air. The specimen submitted for testing had a thickness of 50 mm 4h < t prep slabs test < 24h Ttest = 60ºC. Bulk density - EN 12697-6:2003 + A1: 2007 (method B)

PERMANENT DEFORMATION BEHAVIOUR

WATER SENSITIVITY Water sensitivity of asphalt mixtures EN 12697-12:2008 - "Bituminous mixtures - Test method for hot mix asphalt. Part. 12 - Determination of the water sensitivity of bituminous specimens 6 cylindrical specimens of each type of asphalt mixture prepared For each type of mixture 3 specimens with similar characteristics according to their height and bulk density were assigned to two groups All specimens are compacted within the same week, and thereby have similar ages when tested, as required in the standard One of the test group conditioned in air at a temperature of 20ºC The specimens from the other group were immersed in water at 20 C and subjected to vacuum, so that the water penetrated into every pore They were subsequently kept in a water bath at 40 C, for a period of 68 to 72 h After conditioning, the specimens were tested to determine the indirect tensile strength at a temperature of 15 C, as recommended in EN 13108-20

WATER SENSITIVITY Bituminous mixtures MB 35/50 MB PB 1,5 MB Kero Quantities Dry specimens Wet specimens Mean bulk density (SSD) (kg/m 3 ) 2397 2399 ITS (kpa) 1259 1123 ITSR (%) 89 Mean wet bulk density (kg/m 3 ) 2390 2396 ITS (kpa) 1498 1074 ITSR (%) 72 Mean wet bulk density (kg/m 3 ) 2401 2397 ITS (kpa) 1378 1289 ITSR (%) 94 LEGEND: IRS indirect tensile strength ITSR - retained strength

FINAL REMARKS The use of modified bitumen specially developed to improve resistance to fuel allow for the use of asphalt mixtures in areas where fuel spillage is likely to occur. The resistance to fuel spillage of these mixtures was evaluated with EN 12697-43 test method, where 3 asphalt mixtures with different bituminous binders were compared. The improvement of resistance to fuel was more significant in the second test phase the brushing phase - which simulates the abrasive effect of traffic on the surface of the pavement layers subjected to the action of fuel. The results obtained from complementary tests showed that the use of this type of bitumen does not compromise other performance characteristics, such as permanent deformation performance or water sensitivity. In fact, MB Kero presented a better behaviour than the asphalt mixtures made with conventional bitumen or with the PB 1.5 modified bitumen.