The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

Similar documents
Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

Soil Mechanics. Outline. Shear Strength of Soils. Shear Failure Soil Strength. Laboratory Shear Strength Test. Stress Path Pore Pressure Parameters

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests

DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA

Soil Mechanics SOIL STRENGTH page 1

SOIL-LIME TESTING. Test Procedure for. TxDOT Designation: Tex-121-E 1. SCOPE 2. APPARATUS 3. MATERIALS TXDOT DESIGNATION: TEX-121-E

Figure CPT Equipment

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

In-situ Density Determination by Sand Replacement Method

LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL

Standard Test Procedures Manual

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY OF GRANULAR SOILS

THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF MATERIALS USING THE VIBRATORY HAMMER COMPACTION

Soil Strength. Performance Evaluation of Constructed Facilities Fall Prof. Mesut Pervizpour Office: KH #203 Ph: x4046

GDS Triaxial Automated System (GDSTAS)

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Numerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

Procedure for the Determination of the Permeability of Clayey Soils in a Triaxial Cell Using the Accelerated Permeability Test

Tensile Testing Laboratory

PERMEABILITY TEST. To determine the coefficient of permeability of a soil using constant head method.

Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) Michael Bailey, P.G. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District

10.1 Powder mechanics

PART I SIEVE ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL RETAINED ON THE 425 M (NO. 40) SIEVE

METHOD A7 THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF GRAVEL, SOIL AND SAND

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

Dr John J M Powell Geolabs Ltd

TECHNICAL REPORT ON SCALA DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER IRREGULARITY

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service High Street, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4UN, UK

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

Geotechnical Testing Methods II

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service High Street, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4UN, UK

Table of Contents 10.1 GENERAL

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

Soil Suction. Total Suction

The Standard & Modified Proctor Density Tests

CHAPTER 7: CAPILLARY PRESSURE

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

Measurement of Soil Parameters by Using Penetrometer Needle Apparatus

Creep Characteristics and Shear Strength. of Recycled Asphalt Blends. Jeffery M. Schaper

Objectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.

DETERMINATION OF SOIL STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS PERFORMING THE PLATE BEARING TEST

Standard Test Procedures Manual

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 632 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.

EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF LIME STABILIZED SOILS AND AGGREGATES VOLUME 3: MIXTURE DESIGN AND TESTING PROCEDURE FOR LIME STABILIZED SOILS

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

Hollow Cylinder Apparatus (GDS SS-HCA)

COMPACTING BITUMINOUS SPECIMENS USING THE SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC)

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

Soil Testing 24 Compaction and CBR. Compaction Test 4.5 kg BS , , EN DD ENV

FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION

Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength and dynamic cone penetration index of Mahi, Sabarmati and Vatrak Sand

Interpretation of clogging effects on the hydraulic behavior of ion treated geotextiles

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ROCK MECHANICS CHAMBER OF MINES OF SOUTH AFRICA CERTIFICATE IN ROCK MECHANICS PART 1 ROCK MECHANICS THEORY

TECHNICAL Summary. TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades February 2003 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, SPR-2362

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS

Properties of Fresh Concrete

Solution for Homework #1

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Stress Analysis, Strain Analysis, and Shearing of Soils

Tests and Analyses on Shear Strength Increment of Soft Soil under Embankment Fill

When to Use Immediate Settlement in Settle 3D

Physics 3 Summer 1989 Lab 7 - Elasticity

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load

Evaluation of Initial Setting Time of Fresh Concrete

CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION

Program COLANY Stone Columns Settlement Analysis. User Manual

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

Geotechnical Characteristics of Two Different Soils and their Mixture and Relationships between Parameters

STRESS AND DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF LINEAR ELASTIC BARS IN TENSION

Influence of Short Polymeric Fibers on Crack Development in Clays

SNC-Lavalin Inc. Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report. October 2011

Penetration rate effects on cone resistance measured in a calibration chamber

PHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS

MASTER DEGREE PROJECT

How To Design A Foundation

EM Oct US Army Corps of Engineers ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Slope Stability ENGINEER MANUAL

SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT

S.3.6. BULK DENSITY AND TAPPED DENSITY OF POWDERS. Final text for addition to The International Pharmacopoeia

Flow Properties of Powders and Bulk Solids

Numerical analysis of boundary conditions to tunnels

Consolidation and Settlement Analysis

Comparison of the Humboldt GeoGauge With In-Place Quasi-Static Plate Load Tests. Charles R. Nelson, P.E. Mike Sondag

Overview of Topics. Stress-Strain Behavior in Concrete. Elastic Behavior. Non-Linear Inelastic Behavior. Stress Distribution.

PVC PIPE PERFORMANCE FACTORS

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

Transcription:

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory 1 Triaxial Compression Test Introduction Soil is tested in axial compression or direct shear to determine shear strength parameters and axial stiffness for use in geotechnical design. Undisturbed soil samples, or test specimens prepared from disturbed samples, are tested using unconfined compression, triaxial compression or direct shear tests. The unconfined compression test has limitations though since the soil is tested under zero confining stress and the moisture condition of test specimens cannot be varied. Triaxial compression cells are designed so confining (cell) pressure can be applied to the soil and so that water and water pressure can be introduced into the specimens to saturate the specimens and to vary the pore water pressures. Thus it is possible to vary the total and effective stresses within soil specimens to simulate actual subsurface conditions and to determine the shear strength parameters (cohesion intercept and angle of internal friction) required for design. Triaxial compression test procedures can be varied in order to simulate different loading conditions by controlling the flow of water into or out of the test specimen (drainage). Valves leading to the specimen ends are used to control the flow. If cell pressure is applied to a specimen and drainage is prevented before loading (valves closed), then the soil condition is unconsolidated. If time is allowed for drainage after the cell pressure is applied and before the loads are applied (valves open), then the soil condition is consolidated. If the test specimen is loaded to failure in a short period of time and drainage is not permitted (valves closed), then the loading condition is undrained. If the specimen is loaded slowly and drainage is allowed (valves open) then the loading condition is drained. Three types of triaxial compression tests are summarized in Table 1. For this laboratory, three identical test specimens are prepared with Proctor compaction equipment and tested at different cell pressures using the triaxial compression apparatus. The results are used to plot stress-strain curves, to plot Mohr s circles and to determine the cohesion and angle of internal friction. Table 1 Triaxial Compression Tests Type of Test Consolidation Loading Condition Unconsolidated, Undrained (UU) No Undrained Consolidated, Undrained (CU) Yes Undrained Consolidated, Drained (CD) Yes Drained 1 ASTM 4767 95 Triaxial Compression - 1

Apparatus 1. Mixing tub 2. Proctor compaction equipment 3. Sample ejector 4. Specimen molds (3), Dimensions: D = 3.56 cm (1.4 in.); H 2 D. 5. Calipers 6. Balance 7. Triaxial cell 8. Pressure manifold 9. Compression machine 10. Water content tares and oven Procedure A. Preparation (Before the laboratory) 1. Obtain enough moist soil passing the #4 sieve for a Proctor sample, 2.3 kg (5.0 lbs.) 2. Slowly add water to the soil and mix until the soil will not crumble when squeezed in the hand but not so much water that the soil becomes sticky. 3. Compact the soil in Proctor mold following the standard Proctor procedure. Obtain density and moisture information from the Proctor sample. 4. Use the soil sample extruder with the specimen mold attachment to extrude the soil from the Proctor mold into three compression molds. 5. Trim the ends of the specimen perpendicular to the ends using a spatula. 6. Eject the soil from the mold, weigh the sample and measure the sample height and diameter for each test specimen. 7. Use a membrane stretcher to place a latex membrane on the test specimens. 8. Assemble the test specimens in triaxial cells and prepare for the triaxial compression tests. Preparation can include saturation and consolidation. B. Laboratory (For unconsolidated, undrained test) 1. Place the triaxial cell with the test specimen in the unconfined compression frame. 2. Apply cell pressure (σ 3 ) to the test specimen making sure that the valves to the top and bottom of the test specimens are closed. Recommended pressures are 101.3, 202.6, and 405.2 kpa (14.7, 29.4 and 58.8 psi). 3. Apply vertical loads with deformation rate setting 26.1 (0.05 in/min or 1.27 mm/min). 4. Obtain readings from the load ring gage and the deformation gage at every 20 divisions on the deformation gage until the sample fails. 5. Sketch the failed specimen. Triaxial Compression - 2

Calculations Stress and strain are computed as defined in Equations 1 through 4, however the stress required for triaxial compression is the deviator stress. The applied stress is computed using the load ring calibration shown below and the cross-sectional area A, corrected for sample strain. σ = A' P A' A = 1 ε L ε = (3) L o L = (Deformation Gage Reading Initial Reading) x 0.001 inch/div (4) (1) (2) 4000 Load Ring Calibration Load (N) = 4.83 N/Div x Dial Divisions Load (N) 3000 2000 1000 0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0 800.0 900.0 Dial Divisions Deviator stress is the difference between the vertical stress (σ 1 ) and the horizontal stress (σ 3 ), where the horizontal stress is equal to the applied cell pressure. For the triaxial compression test, the load that is computed from the initial load ring reading after the cell pressure is applied is due to the fluid pressure acting on the loading piston. The net load (P net ) is computed by subtracting the initial load (P init ) from load (P). This load corresponds to the vertical load that is applied in excess of the load imparted to the piston from the cell pressure. Deviator stress is computed by dividing the net load by the corrected area. σ 1 and σ 3 are the maximum and minimum principal stresses. The stress-strain curve is plotted in Figure 2 using deviator stress and axial strain. Mohr s circle are plotted for each test in Figure 3 using the maximum and minimum principal stresses at failure in order to determine the cohesion intercept and angle of internal friction. P net = P - P init (5) Deviator Stress = σ 1 - σ 3 = P net / A (6) Triaxial Compression - 3

Results Use Table 1 to compute stress and strain and Figure 2 to plot the stress-strain curves. Determine the modulus of elasticity for each test. Use Figure 3 to plot the Mohr s circle and to obtain the cohesion intercept the angle of internal friction. Conclusions How does the modulus of elasticity vary with confining pressure? Are the cohesion intercept and the angle of internal friction representative for this soil? Triaxial Compression - 4

Table 2 - Triaxial Compression Test Triaxial Compression Test Group Date Soil Description: Sample Mass: (g) Sample Length: (cm) Sample Diameter: 3.56 (cm) Sample Area: 9.93 (cm 2 ) 9.93 (10-4 ) (m 2 ) Load Ring Calibration: 4.83 (N/division) Deformation Gage Calibration: 0.00254 (inch/division) Cell Pressure: (kpa) Load at Zero Strain, P init : (N) Deform. Sample Sample Load Net Corrected Deviator Gage Length Strain, Ring Load, Load, Area, Stress, Reading Change ε Reading P P net A σ 1 σ 3 (Div.) (cm) (%) (Div.) (N) (N) (m 2 ) (kpa) Mass of Tare (g) Tare + Wet Soil (g) Tare + Dry Soi (g) Water Content (%) Wet Density (kg/m 3 ) Dry Density (kg/m 3 ) Sketch of Failed Specimen Triaxial Compression - 5

Table 3 Triaxial Compression Test Summary Table Sample No. 1 Sample No. 2 Sample No. 3 σ 3 = σ 3 = σ 3 = Deviator Deviator Deviator Stress, Strain Stress, Strain Stress, Strain σ 1 σ 3 ε σ 1 σ 3 ε σ 1 σ 3 ε (kpa) (%) (kpa) (%) (kpa) (%) Triaxial Compression - 6

Axial Stress (lbf/in 2 ) Axial Strain (%) Figure 2 Stress-Strain Curves, Triaxial Compression Test 300 Shear Stress (kpa) 200 100 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Normal Stress (kpa) Figure 3 Mohr s Circles Triaxial Compression - 7

Picture 1 Triaxial Compression Cell and Compression Machine Picture 2 Triaxial Pressure Manifold Triaxial Compression - 8