SOIL MECHANICS Exam #3: Shear Strength.

Similar documents
Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

Soil Mechanics. Outline. Shear Strength of Soils. Shear Failure Soil Strength. Laboratory Shear Strength Test. Stress Path Pore Pressure Parameters

Soil Strength. Performance Evaluation of Constructed Facilities Fall Prof. Mesut Pervizpour Office: KH #203 Ph: x4046

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

Soil Mechanics SOIL STRENGTH page 1

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

PART TWO GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT. Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

Figure CPT Equipment

DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

EM Oct US Army Corps of Engineers ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Slope Stability ENGINEER MANUAL

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

Ingeniería y Georiesgos Ingeniería Geotécnica Car 19 a Nº of 204 ; TEL : igr@ingeoriesgos.com

Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

Numerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

Site Investigation. Some unsung heroes of Civil Engineering. buried right under your feet. 4. Need good knowledge of the soil conditions

Table of Contents 10.1 GENERAL

Abstract. Keywords. Pouya Salari 1, Gholam Reza Lashkaripour 2*, Mohammad Ghafoori 2. * lashkaripour@um.ac.ir

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

1. ASTM C Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units 2. ASTM C 1372 Standard Specification for Dry-Cast Segmental Retaining Wall Units

CE-632 Foundation Analysis and Design

Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II)

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL

Dams and Extreme Events Reducing Risk of Aging Infrastructure under Extreme Loading Conditions

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S HOUSTON, TEXAS

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction

Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) Michael Bailey, P.G. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ROCK MECHANICS CHAMBER OF MINES OF SOUTH AFRICA CERTIFICATE IN ROCK MECHANICS PART 1 ROCK MECHANICS THEORY

System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

Tests and Analyses on Shear Strength Increment of Soft Soil under Embankment Fill

COSMOS 2012: Earthquakes in Action COSMOS 2012

SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT

PVC PIPE PERFORMANCE FACTORS

Geotechnical Investigation using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in Rangamati, Bandarban and Khagrachari Towns

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

SOIL COMPACTION BASICS

COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2

Washington ,

Liner system design for tailings impoundments and heap leach pads

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Use and Application of Piezocone Penetration Testing in Presumpscot Formation

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

Soil Classification Through Penetration Tests

SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.

Foundation Code compliance and Best Practices By Michael Coello

How To Design A Foundation

GDS Triaxial Automated System (GDSTAS)

ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY

CONSULTANCY & MATERIAL TESTING FACILITY

Ground improvement using the vibro-stone column technique

Pullout Testing of Xgrid PET PVC 40/20 IT and Xgrid PET PVC 80/30 IT In Sand

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength and dynamic cone penetration index of Mahi, Sabarmati and Vatrak Sand

Strength Determination of "Tooth-Paste" Like Sand and Gravel Washing Fines Using DMT

Geotechnical Characteristics of Two Different Soils and their Mixture and Relationships between Parameters

Dyanmic Cone. for Shallow

Introduction: Overview of Soil Mechanics

K x ' Retaining. Walls ENCE 461. Foundation Analysis and Design. Mohr s Circle. and Lateral Earth. Pressures. Lateral Earth Pressure.

Multi-stage Pseudo-static Analysis

10.1 Powder mechanics

Trench Rescue by Buddy Martinette

Numerical analysis of boundary conditions to tunnels

Consolidation and Settlement Analysis

UNDER DRAINAGE AND FILTER DESIGN

A LABORATORY STUDY ON EFFECT OF TEST CONDITIONS ON SUBGRADE STRENGTH

Basic Soil Erosion and Types

Chittagong Hill Tract Development Facilities (CHTDF) United Nations Development Programme

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION. Adelaide Street Pollution Control Plant Outlet Structure Replacement London, Ontario

Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility

Soil behaviour type from the CPT: an update

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

Slope Stability Analysis Using Finite Element Techniques

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

DIRT DWELLING. and your. Pin Foundations Inc., 2008

2009 Japan-Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata S2-6 TANAKA ERINA

DETERMINATION OF SOIL STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS PERFORMING THE PLATE BEARING TEST

Settlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills; The Influence of Construction Sequence and Structural Effects of Longitudinal Strains

Transcription:

14.330 SOIL MECHANICS Exam #3: Shear Strength. Questions (2 Points Each - 20 Points Total): 1. Write the equation for the Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria for effective stresses in soils and detail the variables. f Where: f = Shear Stress at Failure ' = Effective Normal Stress ' = Effective Friction Angle c' = Effective Cohesion tan c 2. You have been given the results of a direct shear test on a well-graded sand (SW) sample. The Mohr-Coulomb effective stress failure criteria given to you from the test results are an effective friction angle of 33 degrees and an effective cohesion of 8.5 psi. Do you think these results are reasonable? Provide an explanation of your answer. ' = 33 is reasonable for sands. However, for sands c' 0. Therefore, a c' = 8.5 psi would not be reasonable. The soil may have been misclassified or the test was not run properly. 3. List the soil shear strength tests covered in class. Direct Shear Triaxial (CD, CU, UU) Unconfined Compression 14.330 2013 Exam 3 Solution Page 1 of 8

4. Write the equation for the Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria for total stresses in soils and detail the variables. Where: f = Shear Stress at Failure = Normal Stress '= Friction Angle c = Cohesion f tan c 5. You are given three soil samples. Soil Sample 1 is a silty sand. Soil Sample 2 is a fat clay. Soil Sample 3 is a lean clay. You are told to conduct the following triaxial tests on the samples: a slow test on Sample 1, a rapid test on Sample 2, and a quick test on Sample 3. What triaxial tests are you conducting on each sample? Provide the common test names and 2 letter abbreviations. Soil Sample 1 Slow Test = CD (Consolidated Drained) Soil Sample 2 Rapid Test = CU (Consolidated Undrained) Soil Sample 3 Quick Test = UU (Unconsolidated Undrained) 6. The direct shear test has been shown to be an effective test for determining the shear strength parameters (i.e. Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria) for coarse grained soils, especially sands. What is the major shortcoming of this test? The major shortcoming is the direct shear test forces the soil sample to fail along a fixed plane and not its preferred plane. 7. You have completed an unconfined compression test on a CL soil sample. The unconfined compression strength is 1120 psf. What is the undrained shear strength of this soil? S u = q u /2 = 1120 psf/2 = 560 psf. 8. Write the equation that relates unconfined compressive strength to undrained shear strength and detail the variables. S u = q u /2 Where: q u = Unconfined Compression Strength S u = Undrained Shear Strength 14.330 2013 Exam 3 Solution Page 2 of 8

9. Briefly describe soil sensitivity. Write any relevant equation(s) and detail the variables. Soil sensitivity is the ratio of undisturbed shear strength divided by disturbed shear strength. 10. Identify the relative density of the sands in the direct shear test results shown on Page 4. What is the major cause of the shear strength difference between the two samples if you are told that they are from the same soil deposit? Shear Stress Dilation is the difference! Dense Loose Volume Change Expansion Compression Shear Displacement Dense Shear Displacement Loose 14.330 2013 Exam 3 Solution Page 3 of 8

Problems: (1 25 points, 2-25 points, 3 15 points, 4 15 points, EC 5 Points) NOTICE: You must detail your answers (i.e. show your work) for these four problems for full credit. You must follow assignment guidelines for these problems. PROBLEM #1 GIVEN: Soil from a local contractors sand pit is proposed for use as backfill behind a retaining wall for a local project. The project specifications require that the backfill material have a minimum peak soil friction angle of 33 at the required minimum compaction (i.e. 90% Standard Proctor). The results from the direct shear testing performed at the minimum required compaction by a local testing firm are presented in Table 1: Soil Description: Silty Sand (SM). Table 1. Direct Shear Results conducted at 90% MMD (ASTM D698). Test Confining Stress ( ) (psf) Shear Stress ( ) (psf) Peak Residual 1 2000 1405 1405 2 2500 1695 1695 3 3500 2270 2270 REQUIRED & SOLUTION: Based on the provided information, answer the following: What are the peak and residual Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria this material? Peak = Residual MC Failure Criteria. ' = 30, c' = 250 psf (from Figure A). Does this material meet the project specifications regarding soil friction angle ( )? No, since residual = 30 < 33 required by project specifications Do you think this soil was tested in a loose or dense state? Briefly explain your answer. Soil was tested in a loose state since peak = residual 14.330 2013 Exam 3 Solution Page 4 of 8

3000 Shear Stress ( ) (psf) 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Peak & Residual: ' = 30, c' = 250 psf Best Fit Line ' = 30 c' = 250 psf 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Confining Stress (psf) Figure A. Shear Stress vs. Confining Stress Plot. PROBLEM #2 GIVEN: Soil from another local contractors sand pit is proposed for use as backfill behind a Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall for another local project. The project specifications require that the backfill material have a minimum residual soil friction angle of 34 at the required compaction (i.e. 95% Modified Proctor). Table 2 provides the results from the direct shear testing on this sample performed at the minimum required compaction by a local testing firm: Soil Description: Poorly Graded Sand (SP) Table 2. Direct Shear Results conducted at 95% MDD (ASTM D1557). Test Confining Stress ( ) (psf) Shear Stress ( ) (psf) Peak Residual 1 2050 1600 1350 2 2500 2000 1700 3 3350 2650 2400 14.330 2013 Exam 3 Solution Page 5 of 8

REQUIRED & SOLUTION: Based on the provided information, answer the following: What are the peak and residual Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria for this material? Peak MC Failure Criteria: p ' = 38, c' = 0 psf (from Figure B). Residual MC Failure Criteria: r ' = 35, c' = 0 psf (from Figure B). Does this material meet the project specifications regarding soil friction angle ( )? Yes, since residual = 35 > 34 required by project specifications Do you think this soil was tested in a loose or dense state? Briefly explain your answer. Soil was tested in a dense state since peak > residual Shear Stress ( ) (psf) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Peak: p ' = 38, c' = 0 psf Peak Best Fit Line Residual: r ' = 35, c' = 0 psf Residual Best Fit Line c' = 0 psf (SP) 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Confining Stress (psf) Figure B. Shear Stress vs. Confining Stress Plot. 14.330 2013 Exam 3 Solution Page 6 of 8

PROBLEM #3 GIVEN: The results from three (3) Consolidated Undrained triaxial tests conducted on samples from a normally consolidated CL soil deposit are presented in Table 3. Table 3. CU Results on normally consolidated CL sample. Test Minor Principal Stress at Failure ( ' 3f ) (psi) Major Principal Stress at Failure ( ' 1f ) (psi) Pore Pressure @ Failure ( u df ) (psi) 1 11 32 4 2 16.25 49.6 8.75 3 22.5 67.4 10 REQUIRED: Determine the Effective Stress Mohr-Coulomb Shear Strength Parameters (i.e. effective friction angle and effective cohesion) for this soil. SOLUTION: Effective Stress Mohr-Coulomb Envelope: ' = 30, c' = 0 psi. See Figure C. Shear Stress ( ) (psi) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 c' = 0 psi (NC Clay) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 ' = 30 ' 3 ' 3 ' 3 ' 1f ' 1f ' 1f 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Confining Stress (psi) Figure C. Provided vs. Plot for Problem 3. 14.330 2013 Exam 3 Solution Page 7 of 8

PROBLEM #4 GIVEN & REQUIRED: Using the CU test data provided in Problem 3, determine the Total Stress Mohr- Coulomb Shear Strength Parameters (i.e. friction angle and cohesion) for this soil. SOLUTION: Total Stress Mohr-Coulomb Envelope: = 24, c = 0 psi. See Figure C. Shear Stress ( ) (psi) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 c = 0 psi (NC Clay) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 ' = 24 ' 3 ' 3 ' 3 ' 1f ' 1f ' 1f 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Confining Stress (psi) Figure D. Provided vs. Plot for Problem 4. EXTRA CREDIT (5 points): You are building a new embankment over cohesive soils. You need to determine the shear strength parameters to conduct slope stability and bearing capacity analyses at the end of construction (i.e. when the embankment is completed). What triaxial test(s) would you select to determine the shear strength parameters for these analyses? What would the shear strength parameter(s) be? UU Unconsolidated Undrained (i.e. Quick Test). Gives you Undrained Shear Strength (S u ). 14.330 2013 Exam 3 Solution Page 8 of 8