The Importance of Agriculture for Kentucky

Similar documents
ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURE AND AGRIBUSINESS

Farm Credit s Mission to serve Young, Beginning, and Small Farmers. New loans made in 2010 to: Young: $7.3 billion Beginning: $10.

Statistical Profile of Lunenburg County

STATISTICAL PROFILE OF CAPE BRETON. Prepared By: Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture

Presented by D. R. Khanal Chairman Institute for Policy Research and Development (IPRAD)

Inteligencia-Economica-exportaciones-por-naics

Issues In Agriculture

New England Cash Receipts 2012

Missouri Soybean Economic Impact Report

AGRICULTURE CREDIT CORPORATION CASH WHEN YOU NEED IT MOST

Value-Added Agriculture in Tennessee: A Summary of 2012 Census Results December 2014 SP 769

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF IMMIGRATION ON U.S. DAIRY FARMS

Member States Factsheets I R E L A N D CONTENTS. Main figures - Year inhabitants Area km 2

Member States Factsheets I T A L Y CONTENTS. Main figures - Year inhabitants Area km 2

Farms, Farmers and Agriculture in Ontario an overview of the situation in 2011 by the National Farmers Union, May 2011

Managing Specialty Crop Risk in North Carolina: A Working Paper

All Canadian provinces, territories and

AIC Farm Bill Brief #1

Appendix A: Glossary

VII. DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND INDUCED ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF UC SAN DIEGO

Outlook for the 2013 U.S. Farm Economy

Agriculture: occupational employment and wages

Characteristics of Women Farm Operators and Their Farms

Tennessee Agricultural Production and Rural Infrastructure

The 2010 Economic Impact of the Nebraska Agricultural Production Complex

Financial Impacts from Farmland Value Declines by Various Farm Ownership Levels (AEC )

U.S. Agriculture and International Trade

Contents. Acknowledgements... iv. Source of Data...v

Regional Economic Impact Analysis

industry industry_label 0 All NAICS Industry Groups 1111 Oilseed and Grain Farming 1112 Vegetable and Melon Farming 1113 Fruit and Tree Nut Farming

U.S. Farm Income. Randy Schnepf Specialist in Agricultural Policy. February 28, Congressional Research Service

Total Income from Farming in the United Kingdom. First estimate for 2015

298,320 3, ,825. Missouri Economic Research Brief FARM AND AGRIBUSINESS. Employment. Number of Agribusinesses.

THE ROLE OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN THE CHILEAN ECONOMY: RESULTS FROM AN INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS 1

Farming in the. A modern business. Occupational Outlook Quarterly Spring 2005

The Economic Contributions of U.S. Mining (2012)

IT FEELS GOOD to be recognized for our

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

2011 Economic Contribution Analysis of Washington Dairy Farms and Dairy Processing: An Input-Output Analysis

IMPLICATIONS OF THE NAFTA FOR THE NORTH AMERICAN FOOD INDUSTRY

The 20% Shift. The Economic Benefits of Food Localization for Michigan and The Capital Required to Realize Them. By Michael H. Shuman.

Agricultural Production and Research in Heilongjiang Province, China. Jiang Enchen. Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Northeast

In the case of Group Applications, one entity completes Section 1 and each additional entity completes Section 6.

The Property Tax in Missouri

CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES IN 2014

Lesson Title: Cooperatives in the Community (Chapter 3) Standards: Social Studies Unit Outcomes Addressed by this Lesson

Village/Town/City Province Postal Code. Telephone No. Cellular Phone No. Fax No. Address

Appendix A Sections 1R-2R

A TPP Agreement: An Opportunity for Hawaii. Trade & Investment with TPP Countries Is Good for Hawaii. Jobs Exports Investment 64%

Farm Tax Record Book SAMPLE

The Role of Agriculture in Nigeria s Economic Growth: A General Equilibrium Analysis. Simeon Ehui

Impact of Debt on Ontario Swine Farms

growing sources of employment in the country. In

Map of proposed GRI Business Activity Groups to Thomson Reuters Business Classification (TRBC)

Preliminary draft. Please do not quote nor cite. Comments welcome.

The Contribution of the Dairy Industry to the Idaho Economy: 2011 and Analysis for. Idaho Dairymen s Association.

Economic Impact of the Queen of Peace Hospital and Related Health Sectors of Scott County

Cost of Production. Cost of Production. Cost of Production!

Investing in Sustainable Food Security

FARM BUSINESS RECORDS:

Introduction. Introduction, Contd. Introduction, Contd.

Food Industry Costs, Profits, and Productivity

Risk Management for Greenhouse and Nursery Growers in the United States

Afghanistan Statistical Yearbook

Agricultural Income and Finance Outlook

REMI Industries for v9 Models

Understanding and Misunderstanding Retail Multipliers

Robert G. Anderson, Extension Floriculture Specialist

WASHINGTON, D.C

Assess Your 2011 Tax Situation By: Bart Peters. Kentucky Farm Business Management Program

The economic impact of Minnesota State University, Mankato

CRS Report for Congress

3.2 Extent of food losses and waste

Acquiring Working Capital. Presented by Allen Lash, CEO AgriSolutions Inc. Top Producer Seminar January 22, 2009

China and the WTO: Implications for Grain Trade. Dr. Thomas I. Wahl IMPACT Center Washington State University

Date 1/2/2014. Prepared for. Virginia Land Investments Patterson Ave., Suite 200 Richmond, VA Cleveland, Ohio. Richmond, Virginia

Food Market Diversification Approach Lithuanian case

Future Food Security: Who Will

July 9, Economic Impact Study of the Ontario Veterinary College at the University of Guelph Final Report

IE principal dimensions

GDP ESTIMATES REBASED TO 2009/10

Economic Impact Analysis of School Facility Construction

Canadian Agricultural Outlook

The Economic Contribution of the Dairy Industry in Virginia

Entrepreneurship Development Agency

Compiling the Gross Domestic Product: The Myanmar Experience

ESCONDIDO GROWERS FOR AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION Presents Agriculture in Escondido Contributions, Challenges and Opportunities

Energy Consumption. in the. Canadian Agricultural and Food Sector. Final Report

AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT

San Jacinto County Appraisal District PO Box 1170 Coldspring, Texas (Fax)

U.S. Farm Policy: Overview and Farm Bill Update. Jason Hafemeister 12 June Office of the Chief Economist. Trade Bureau

U.S. Farmland and other Real Assets. A Research Note

Estimating emission inventories of French farms using the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN)

Prepared for Prepared by

MBA PROGRAMMES MBA (AGRIBUSINESS)

AGRI- BUSINESS IN ARGENTINA A SEMINAR ON INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES

Forest Nurseries and Gathering of Forest Products Logging Timber Tract Operations Miscellaneous Agribusiness

AGRICULTURAL PROBLEMS OF JAPAN

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax Reductions in North Carolina

Transcription:

The Importance of Agriculture for Kentucky February 2015 Shaheer Burney and Alison Davis, Ph.D. Department of Agricultural Economics University of Kentucky

The total economic impact of agriculture in Kentucky in 2013 equaled $45.6 billion, representing an 8.3% increase from the economic impact of $42.1 billion in 2007. Over the past five years, the total number of farms in Kentucky has fallen from 85,260 operations in 2007 to 77,064 operations in 2012. However, over the same time period, the average market value of agricultural products per operation increased from $56,586 to $65,755 and farm-related income per operation has increased from $10,395 to $17,409. In addition, total acres of Kentucky farmland decreased by roughly 6.7% to 13,049,347 in 2012 but acres per farm increased by 3% to 169 in 2012 over the last fi ve years. 1 Overall, this indicates that loss of value from decreasing number of farms has been partially off set by gains to farms that have stayed operational. Figure 1 provides an overview of the change in the value of sales of top commodities produced in the state. To determine the value of agriculture in Kentucky, an Input-Output (IO) model is constructed with 2013 IMPLAN data. This model allows the use of multipliers, which give an indication of the impact of an industry on employment, output, and income in the local economy. Multipliers measure the total change throughout the economy from a one unit change for a given sector. The model utilizes the Type II multiplier, which is most widely used in IO analysis. A Type II multiplier includes the effect of direct (initial) spending, indirect spending (transactions between businesses), and induced (household) spending. Essentially, induced effects depict employees spending on goods and services. Table 1 provides an overview of the market value for agricultural products in Kentucky. Industries have been divided into three sectors: agricultural production, agricultural processing, and agriculture-related 1 Census of Agriculture 2007 & 2012 2

industries. Agricultural production and processing sectors include all industries that directly conduct agricultural activities. The production sector involves the production of intermediate goods that need to be processed before consumption. The processing sector includes goods that utilize crops and livestock as inputs, for example frozen vegetable production. The agriculture-related industries sector is comprised of industries that either provide inputs to the primary sector or use agricultural products as manufacturing inputs. It consists of apparel, leather, and agricultural inputs industries. Note that the economic impact of the leather and apparel industries cannot be completely attributed to agricultural activities. While it is not possible to disaggregate the economic impact of agricultural activities from the total economic impact of leather and apparel, agricultural activities likely constitute a substantial portion of the value-added of apparel and leather industries. Finally, agricultural inputs include inputs to agricultural production or processing, such as fertilizer and farm equipment. In 2013, total revenue for production agriculture was $7.35 billion and total employment equaled 95,642 workers. The agricultural processing sector generated output worth approximately $23.2 billion and employed 37,210 workers. Total output for the entire agriculture industry topped $31.3 billion and employment totaled 135,797 workers. Agricultural output was about 7.9% of total revenue in Kentucky. Table 2 provides the output, employment and value-added multipliers for the three sectors mentioned above: agricultural production, agricultural processing, and agriculture-related industries. The employment multiplier is defined as the number of new jobs created from hiring an additional employee in the agricultural sector. The output multiplier depicts the turnover of the dollar or the additional dollars generated from every dollar increase in sales. The labor-income multiplier describes the additional labor income generated from every dollar of direct labor income earned. For example, consider the textiles industry. The employment multiplier is equal to 1.53. This number suggests that for every 100 new jobs in the textile industry, through direct, indirect, and induced effects, additional 53 jobs are created throughout the rest of the local economy. The output multiplier is equal to 1.43. This means that for every dollar spent in the production of textiles, an additional 43 cents is generated as a result of interactions between business, suppliers, and household spending. The income multiplier is equal to 1.55. For every $1 of income generated, an additional 55 cents of income is generated within the local economy. It is important to note that the indirect and induced effects are not constrained to the agricultural industry. Depending on the relationships between different industries and household spending, spillover effects can be felt in any industry within the local economy. Table 3 provides the final estimate of the overall economic impact of agriculture on the state of Kentucky. Including the multiplier effect, production agriculture represents approximately $9.5 billion of output, 128,855 jobs and just short of $889 million in labor income. Including other agriculture-related industries, agriculture is responsible for $45.6 billion of output, 258,605 jobs and $6.2 billion in labor income. 3

Table 1. Direct Effect of Agriculture on Kentucky's Economy in 2013 Industry Employment Output* Value-Added* Agricultural Production: Oilseed and Grains 13,488 $2,460,556 $20,154 Vegetables and Melons 33 $1,714 $190 Fruits and Tree Nuts 388 $8,886 $1,423 Greenhouse, Nursery, & Floriculture 2,905 $92,330 $17,654 Tobacco 995 $405,474 $79,501 All other crop farming 19,178 $691,692 $104,347 Cattle ranching 7,659 $848,306 $12,252 Dairy Cattle and Milk 3,776 $231,340 $8,394 Poultry and Egg 9,408 $1,171,104 $49,386 Animal production (including Equine) 27,214 $1,016,070 $57,363 Commercial Fishing 54 $2,484 $204 Support Activities 10,544 $424,809 $245,220 TOTAL 95,642 $7,354,766 $596,089 Agricultural Processing: Food and Beverage processing 33,684 $20,612,258 $1,930,948 Tobacco products 1,007 $2,148,202 $65,983 Textiles 2,520 $408,262 $103,944 TOTAL 37,210 $23,168,722 $2,100,874 Apparel 1,828 $211,546 $67,910 Leather 288 $35,550 $6,075 Agricultural Inputs 828 $585,047 $40,819 Total for Agriculture 135,797 $31.3 Billion $2.8 Billion Total for All Industries 2,425,747 $398 Billion $101 Billion Agriculture s Share of All Industries 5.6% 7.9% 2.8% *Thousands of Dollars 4

Table 2. Economic Multipliers for Agricultural Industries in Kentucky, 2013 Industry Employment Output Labor-Income Agricultural Production: Oilseed and Grains 2 1.96 1.44 2.11 Vegetables and Melons 1.17 8.09 1.38 Fruits and Tree Nuts 1.09 0.38 1.40 Greenhouse, Nursery, & Floriculture 1.13 0.99 1.37 Tobacco 2.87 1.09 1.51 All other crop farming 1.17 0.21 1.57 Cattle ranching 1.62 1.43 2.27 Dairy Cattle and Milk 1.27 1.48 1.87 Poultry and Egg 1.42 1.54 2.06 Animal production (including Equine) 1.10 1.22 1.34 Commercial Fishing 1.18 1.16 1.53 Support Activities 1.20 1.58 1.28 Agricultural Processing: Food and Beverage Processing 3.41 1.52 2.38 Tobacco products 5.42 1.42 4.70 Textiles 1.53 1.43 1.55 Apparel 1.56 1.61 1.60 Leather 1.57 1.64 1.99 Agricultural Inputs 2.71 1.37 2.64 Footnote1 2 Due to inconsistencies in 2013 IMPLAN data for this particular industry, we use the 2010 multiplier to measure the economic impact. The 2010 multiplier is understated relative to the 2013 multiplier and likely provides a lower bound for the economic impact of the Oilseeds and Grains industry. 5

Table 3. Total Effect of Agriculture on Kentucky's Economy in 2013 Industry Employment Output* Labor-Income* Agricultural Production: Oilseed and Grains 26,440 $3,541,771 $42,484 Vegetables and Melons 39 $13,867 $262 Fruits and Tree Nuts 424 $3,355 $1,989 Greenhouse, Nursery, & Floriculture 3,283 $91,278 $24,162 Tobacco 2,859 $442,122 $119,749 All other crop farming 22,459 $148,304 $164,098 Cattle ranching 12,428 $1,210,702 $27,823 Dairy Cattle and Milk 4,788 $343,182 $15,668 Poultry and Egg 13,349 $1,802,900 $101,920 Animal production (including Equine) 30,061 $1,239,506 $77,112 Commercial Fishing 63 $2,875 $312 Support Activities 12,663 $671,730 $313,213 TOTAL 128,855 $9,511,592 $888,791 Agricultural Processing: Food and Beverage Processing 114,877 $31,296,358 $4,586,198 Tobacco products 5,458 $3,039,965 $310,416 Textiles 3,863 $583,736 $160,872 TOTAL 124,199 $34,920,058 $5,057,486 Apparel 2,855 $340,388 $108,624 Leather 451 $58,474 $12,112 Agricultural Inputs 2,246 $802,538 $107,596 *Thousands of Dollars Total for Agriculture 258,605 $45.6 Billion $6.2 Billion 6

419 Charles E. Barnhart Building Lexington, KY 40546-0276 859-257-7272 CEDIK@lsv.uky.edu cedik.ca.uky.edu