Overview: Written Language

Similar documents
Overview: Part 1 Adam Scheller, Ph.D. Senior Educational Consultant

Reading Competencies

KINDGERGARTEN. Listen to a story for a particular reason

Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses in L.D. Identification

Reading Assessment BTSD. Topic: Reading Assessment Teaching Skill: Understanding formal and informal assessment

Areas of Processing Deficit and Their Link to Areas of Academic Achievement

Technical Report. Overview. Revisions in this Edition. Four-Level Assessment Process

Any Town Public Schools Specific School Address, City State ZIP

There are many reasons why reading can be hard. This handout describes

Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening

DRA2 Word Analysis. correlated to. Virginia Learning Standards Grade 1

Strategies to improve reading fluency skills. Nancy B. Swigert, M.A., CCC/SLP The Reading Center Lexington, KY

DR. PAT MOSSMAN Tutoring

Comprehensive Reading Assessment Grades K-1

INTEGRATING THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INTO INTERACTIVE, ONLINE EARLY LITERACY PROGRAMS

Learning Today Smart Tutor Supports English Language Learners

Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure

APPENDIX B CHECKLISTS

Unit 2 Title: Word Work Grade Level: 1 st Grade Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Reading Specialist (151)

READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

LiteracyPlanet & the Australian Curriculum: Pre-School

20 by Renaissance Learning, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.

Which WJ-III Subtests Should I Administer?

Overview of Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-2 Gloria Maccow, Ph.D., Assessment Training Consultant

LEARNING DIFFICULTIES:

240Tutoring Reading Comprehension Study Material

Grade 1 LA Subject Grade Strand Standard Benchmark. Florida K-12 Reading and Language Arts Standards 27

Phonics and Word Work

Ohio Early Learning and Development Standards Domain: Language and Literacy Development

WiggleWorks Aligns to Title I, Part A

Adopted by the Board of Directors: November 12, 2002

INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTIVITY WITH CELF 4 SOFTWARE! SAMPLE REPORTS. To order, call , or visit our Web site at

The National Reading Panel: Five Components of Reading Instruction Frequently Asked Questions

Kindergarten Common Core State Standards: English Language Arts

Measurable Annual Goals

Minnesota K-12 Academic Standards in Language Arts Curriculum and Assessment Alignment Form Rewards Intermediate Grades 4-6

Choral Reading Type: Strategy Literacy Skill: Reading Domain:

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES (SLD)

Strand: Reading Literature Topics Standard I can statements Vocabulary Key Ideas and Details

TExMaT I Texas Examinations for Master Teachers. Preparation Manual. 085 Master Reading Teacher

Executive Functions and Written Expression: A Neuropsychological Perspective

Information Provided by the Qualitative Reading Inventory-5

Introducing the Woodcock-Johnson IV:

What Does Research Tell Us About Teaching Reading to English Language Learners?

Identifying dyslexia and other learning problems using LASS

Primary Curriculum 2014

Unit 1 Title: Word Work Grade Level: 1 st Grade Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Students with Reading Problems Their Characteristics and Needs

Selecting Research Based Instructional Programs

Florida Center for Reading Research RAVE-O

Language Reading Connection

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

OCPS Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment Alignment

Create stories, songs, plays, and rhymes in play activities. Act out familiar stories, songs, rhymes, plays in play activities

Office of Disability Support Service 0106 Shoemaker Fax: A Guide to Services for Students with a

Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening June 1, 2009 FINAL Elementary Standards Grades 3-8

Common Core State Standards English Language Arts. IEP Goals and Objectives Guidance: Basic Format

Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests Revised, Normative Update (WRMT-Rnu) The normative update of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests Revised (Woodcock,

Scholastic ReadingLine Aligns to Early Reading First Criteria and Required Activities

ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Literacy. Work Stations. Source: Diller, D.(2003) Literacy Work Stations, Making Centers Work

Interpreting areading Scaled Scores for Instruction

An Early Childhood Practitioner s Guide: Developmentally Appropriate Literacy Practices for Preschool-Age Children

Description of the Qualitative Reading Inventory-5

Year 1 reading expectations (New Curriculum) Year 1 writing expectations (New Curriculum)

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY

Develop Struggling Readers Skills, Grades 3 Adult

St. Petersburg College. RED 4335/Reading in the Content Area. Florida Reading Endorsement Competencies 1 & 2. Reading Alignment Matrix

Opportunity Document for STEP Literacy Assessment

Background to the new Staffordshire Grids

Overview of NEPSY-II Gloria Maccow, Ph.D., Assessment Training Consultant

Teacher's Guide to Meeting the Common Core State Standards* with Scott Foresman Reading Street 2008

Common Core Standards Pacing Guide Fourth Grade English/Language Arts Pacing Guide 1 st Nine Weeks

Ms Juliani -Syllabus Special Education-Language/ Writing

Interpretive Report of WAIS IV Testing. Test Administered WAIS-IV (9/1/2008) Age at Testing 40 years 8 months Retest? No

Methods for Increasing the Intensity of Reading Instruction for Students with Intellectual Disabilities

CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE SYLLABUS FOR DIRW 0305 PRINCIPLES OF ACADEMIC LITERACY. Semester Hours Credit: 3 INSTRUCTOR: OFFICE HOURS:

A Consumer s Guide to Evaluating a Core Reading Program Grades K-3: A Critical Elements Analysis

Research Sample (Cohort 1) Preventing Reading Difficulties Among Spanish-Speaking Children

Newsletter. This Week We Are. Reminders and Notes. August 22-26, 2016 Contact: Ms. Sobh or (678)

Reading Readiness Online

Interpretive Report of WMS IV Testing

Learning Disability Documentation Instructions Updated December, 2015

Indiana Department of Education

Scientifically Based Reading Programs: What are they and how do I know?

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt StoryTown Grade 1. correlated to the. Common Core State Standards Initiative English Language Arts (2010) Grade 1

COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY IN TEACHING READING

The child is given oral, "trivia"- style. general information questions. Scoring is pass/fail.

How To Test English Language Skills On A Touch Tablet

Directions for Administering the Graded Passages

Common Educational Tests used for Assessments for Special Education

PRE AND POST TEST TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YEARS OF ANIMATED LITERACY AND KNOWLEDGE OF LETTERS STEPHANIE, BUCK. Submitted to

Advice for Class Teachers. Moderating pupils reading at P 4 NC Level 1

LeapTrack Assessment & Instruction System

Reading Instruction and Reading Achievement Among ELL Students

Asset 1.6 What are speech, language and communication needs?

TExES Texas Examinations of Educator Standards. Preparation Manual. 191 Generalist EC 6

Using Leveled Text to Teach and Support Reading Strategies

Understanding Your Child s ERB Scores

Transcription:

Overview: Written Language Senior Educational Consultant Pearson 1 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Search for: Great Webinar Sessions on Reading & Writing Go to: www.pearsonclinical.com 1. Individual differences and Academic Achievement: What Does the Research Tell us About Written Expression? Presenter: Amy Gabel, PhD 2. Individual Differences and Academic Achievement: What Does the Research Tell Us About Reading? Presenter: Gloria Maccow, PhD 3. The Role of Executive Functions in Learning to Read and Reading Presenter: George McCloskey, PhD 4. The Neuropsychology of Reading Disorders: A Framework for Effective Interventions Presenter: Steven G. Feifer, DEd, NCSP, ABSNP 2 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 2 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

What is KTEA-3? Norm-referenced and individually administered measure of Academic Achievement. Measures achievement in reading, mathematics, written language, and oral language Allows the examiner to administer a single subtest or any combination of subtests to assess achievement in one or more domains. Provides measures of all eight specific learning disability areas identified in IDEA (2004), as well as the areas of impairment specified by DSM V. 3 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 3 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Language (Typical) Oral Language Written Language Receptive (Listening) Receptive (Reading) Expressive (Speaking) Expressive (Writing) 4 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 4 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Composites and Subtests 5 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 5 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Core Composites 6 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 6 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Reading-Related Composites 7 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 7 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Written Language Related Cross-Domain Composites 8 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 8 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Oral Language Composites 9 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 9 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Basic Reading 10 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 10 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Basic Reading Subtests Letter & Word Recognition Pre-K 12+ (Ages: 4 25) The student identifies letters and pronounces words of gradually increasing difficulty. Nonsense Word Decoding 1 12+ (Ages: 6 25) The student applies phonics and structural analysis skills to decode nonsense words of increasing difficulty. 11 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 11 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Reading Understanding 12 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 12 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Reading Understanding Subtests Reading Comprehension Pre-K 12+ (Ages: 4 25) This untimed test of silent reading comprehension includes: Early items require matching a symbol or word(s) with its corresponding picture. Subsequent items require reading a simple instruction and responding by performing the action. Later items involve reading passages of increasing difficulty and answering literal and/or inferential questions about them. The most difficult items require rearranging five sentences into a coherent paragraph, and then answering questions about the paragraph. 13 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 13 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Reading Understanding Subtests (cont.) Reading Vocabulary 1 12+ (Ages: 6 25) Early items require the student to point to one of three words with the same meaning as a picture and target word. Each of the remaining items requires the examinee to read a sentence (silently or aloud) and say or point to the word in the sentence that has a similar meaning to the target word. 14 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 14 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Reading Fluency 15 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 15 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Reading Fluency Subtests Word Recognition and Decoding Fluency Word Recognition Fluency (1 12+; Ages 6 25) The student reads isolated words aloud as quickly as possible during two 15-second trials. Decoding Fluency (3 12+; Ages 8 25) The student reads isolated nonsense words aloud as quickly as possible during two 15-second trials. 16 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 16 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Reading Fluency Subtests (cont.) Silent Reading Fluency 1 12+ (Ages: 6 25) The student silently reads simple sentences and marks yes or no in the Response Booklet to indicate whether the statement is true or false, completing as many items as possible within a two-minute time limit. 17 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 17 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Written Language 18 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 18 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Written Language Subtests Written Expression Pre-K 12+ (Ages: 4 25) Pre-K and K students trace and copy letters, and write letters, words, and a sentence from dictation. At grades 1 and higher, students complete writing tasks in the context of a grade-appropriate story format. Items at those levels include writing sentences from dictation, adding punctuation and capitalization, filling in missing words, completing sentences, combining sentences, writing compound and complex sentences, and writing an essay based on the story. 19 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 19 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

KTEA-3 Written Expression Skills 20 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 20 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Written Language Subtests (cont.) Spelling K 12+ (Ages: 5 25) The easiest items require students to write single letters that represent sounds. The remaining items require students to write increasingly difficult (regular and irregular) words from dictation. Writing Fluency 2 12+ (Ages: 7 25) The student writes one sentence for each picture presented in the Response Booklet and completes as many items as possible within a five-minute time limit. 21 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 21 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Language Processing 22 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 22 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Language Processing Subtests Phonological Processing Pre-K 12+ (Ages: 4 25) The student responds orally to items that require manipulation of sounds. Tasks include: Rhyming Sound Matching Blending and Segmenting Phonemes Deleting Sounds 23 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 23 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Language Processing Subtests (cont.) Object and Letter Naming Facility Object Naming Facility (Pre-K 12+; Ages 4 25) The student names pictured objects as quickly as possible during two short trials. Letter Naming Facility (K 12+; Ages 5 25) The student names a combination of upper and lower case letters as quickly as possible during two short trials. 24 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 24 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Oral Language 25 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 25 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Oral Language Subtests Listening Comprehension Pre-K 12+ (Ages: 4 25) Each item requires the examinee to listen to either a sentence read by the examiner (for the early items) or a recorded passage played from the Audio CD. After listening to each sentence or passage, the student responds orally to literal and/or inferential comprehension questions asked by the examiner. 26 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 26 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Oral Expression Oral Expression Pre-K 12+ (Ages: 4 25) The student responds orally with complete sentences describing the photographs presented in the Stimulus Book. As items progress in difficulty, one or two target words are required in the student s response. The most difficult items require a response beginning with a phrase or target word(s). 27 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 27 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Oral Language Subtests (cont.) Associational Fluency Pre-K 12+ (Ages: 4 25) The student says as many words as possible in 60 seconds that belong to a given semantic category. Foods and colors in Form A; animals and games in Form B The fluency of speech and word retrieval is important for effective speaking, writing, and reading. Verbal fluency is predictive of writing quality among normally achieving students (Altemeier, Jones, Abbott, & Berninger, 2006). Verbal fluency measures can help differentiate students with dyslexia from their normally achieving peers (Brosnan et al., 2002; Reiter, Tucha, & Lange, 2005) 28 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 28 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Written Language Assessment and SLD Identification 29 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 29 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

KTEA-3 Scores That Correspond to DSM-V Areas DSM-V specific areas of impairment Corresponding KTEA 3 subtests Word reading accuracy 1. Letter & Word Recognition subtest 2. Nonsense Word Decoding subtest 3. Decoding composite Impairment in reading Reading rate or fluency 1. Word Recognition Fluency subtest 2. Decoding Fluency subtest 3. Silent Reading Fluency subtest 4. Reading Fluency composite Reading comprehension 1. Reading Comprehension subtest 2. Reading Understanding composite 30 30 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 30 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

KTEA-3 and CHC 31 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 31 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

KTEA-3 and CHC 32 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 32 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

KTEA-3 and Information Processing Approach 33 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 33 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Example of CCSS and KTEA-3 Test Map Overview of KTEA-3: Part II 34 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 34 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

How to decide which tests to administer Guidance is given in the manual. 35 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 35 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Referral for Reading Difficulties Strongly Recommended Subtests: Letter & Word Recognition, Reading Comprehension For word recognition weaknesses: Phonological Processing, Nonsense Word Decoding, Spelling, Word Recognition Fluency, and Letter Naming Facility (to evaluate rapid automatic naming); and Associational Fluency (to evaluate possible word retrieval problems) For comprehension weaknesses: Listening Comprehension, Reading Vocabulary For fluency weaknesses: Silent Reading Fluency, Word Recognition Fluency, and Decoding Fluency (these three combine to form the Reading Fluency composite); and Math Fluency, Writing Fluency, and Decoding Fluency (which combine to form the Academic Fluency composite) 36 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 36 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Additionally For all reading referrals: Evaluate verbal reasoning, perceptual reasoning, verbal working memory, and areas of executive functioning, such as inhibition, by using behavioral observations on the KTEA 3 and/or administering other norm-referenced tests. 37 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 37 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Sample Referral Questions Related to KTEA-3 Reading Subtests Letter & Word Recognition How well does the student read real words under untimed conditions? Compare performance on sight words and words with unpredictable patterns with regular words. Reading Comprehension How well does the student comprehend literal and inferential information from written narrative and expository passages? 38 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 38 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Sample Referral Questions Related to KTEA-3 Reading Subtests If Reading Comprehension skills are weak, also administer: Listening Comprehension How well does the student comprehend literal and inferential information from oral narrative and expository passages? Are comprehension weaknesses general or specific to reading? Reading Vocabulary How well can the student identify or infer the meaning of words he or she reads? If performance is weak, consider evaluating oral receptive vocabulary as well 39 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 39 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Sample Referral Questions Related to KTEA-3 Reading Subtests Phonological Processing Does the student demonstrate weaknesses in areas of phonological processing that might be contributing to decoding and spelling problems? Nonsense Word Decoding How well is the student able to decode unfamiliar words? Associational Fluency Are there weaknesses in fluent word retrieval that might be contributing to reading problems? Word Recognition Fluency How fluently (quickly and accurately) can the student read real words under timed conditions? Are weaknesses in word identification primarily in speed, accuracy, or both? 40 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 40 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Sample Referral Questions Related to KTEA-3 Reading Subtests Decoding Fluency How fluently (quickly and accurately) can the student decode nonsense words under timed conditions? Spelling How well can the student spell regular and irregular words? Do spelling errors suggest weaknesses in phonological and/or orthographic awareness? Silent Reading Fluency How quickly and accurately can the student read and comprehend words in context? Choose based on age or letter knowledge: Letter Naming Facility Does the student have a rapid naming weakness that contributes to word identification and reading fluency problems? or Object Naming Facility (preferred if letter names are not well-learned) For preschool/young elementary grades: is the student at risk for learning disabilities or reading disorder? 41 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 41 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Remember: Subtests with Similar Formats Help with Comparative Analyses Pairs of subtests Reading Comprehension and Listening Comprehension, and Written Expression and Oral Expression were developed to have similar formats to enable useful comparisons to be made between each pair of subtests. These comparisons will help you distinguish specific problems in reading or writing from more general language problems. 42 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 42 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Coming Soon Q-global Scoring and Reporting Combo report (WISC-V, KTEA-III, WIAT-III) Q-interactive Fall 2014 A digital system that streamlines the entire assessment process. The clinician can create client profiles, choose and develop batteries, and review scored data through a secure web-portal. Administration occurs using two tablets that "talk" to each other via Bluetooth connection. The clinician uses one to administer instructions, record and score responses, take notes, and control visual stimuli. The client uses the other to view and respond to stimuli. 43 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 43 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Upcoming AWESOME Tech www.helloq.com 44 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 44 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Listed References Altemeier, L., Jones, J., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2006). Executive functions in becoming writing readers and reading writers: Note taking and report writing in third and fifth graders. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 161 173. Brosnan, M., Demetre, J., Hamill, S., Robson, K., Shepherd, H., & Cody, G. (2002). Executive functioning in adults and children with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2144 2155. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3 30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reiter, A., Tucha, O., & Lange, K. W. (2005). Executive functions in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 11, 116 131. doi:10.1002/dys.289 45 Copyright 2014 Pearson. All rights reserved. 45 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

For more information Customers in the USA 1-800-627-7271 www.pearsonclinical.com Customers in Canada 1-866-335-8418 E-mail: cs.canada@pearson.com www.pearsonassess.ca 46 / Copyright 2014. Pearson, Inc., and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.