Beef Yield Grading S T U D E N T H A N D O U T. Accompanies: Meet Judging & Grading

Similar documents
United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef

BeefCuts. Primal & Subprimal Weights and Yields 1300-pound Steer Choice, YG3 Dressing Percentage: 62% Chuck Rib Loin. Round. Brisket. Plate.

Beef Primal Cuts OUTSIDE FLAT 2050 OUTSIDE 2030

HOW TO PREPARE THE PERFECT PRIME RIB

Home Slaughtering and Processing of Beef

MARKET LAMB & GOAT SELECTION & EVALUATION. Aaron Renfroe Extension Assistant Sheep and Goat Texas AgriLife Extension Service San Angelo, Texas

BEEF ARM HALF Approved Name

Beef Cattle Frame Scores

Understanding Grid Marketing: How Quality Grades and Grid Conditions Affect Carcass Value. By Pete Anderson Ag Knowledge Services

A comparison of beef breed bulls for beef production & carcass traits. Future cattle production -seminar Viikki Campus

SYSCO Branded Premium Pork Products Produced By

Kansas State University Lean Value Marketing Program

PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM Figure 1

SUCCESSFUL FITTING AND GROOMING OF BEEF CATTLE Celina R. Johnson

Standard Deviation Estimator

Beef Cattle Breeds and Biological Types Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

SHOW STEER SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

S P E C I F I C GRAVITY AS A MEASURE PORK CARCASS LEANNESS

In many areas of the country, the Holstein

INCIDENT REPORT Smithfield Beef Group Souderton, INC., Establishment 1311 Export of Ineligible Beef to Japan Report

Division of Consumer Affairs. Regulations (N.J.A.C. 13:45A-1 et seq.) Division of Consumer Affairs N.J. Department of Law & Public Safety

US Imported Beef Market A Weekly Update

Swine EPD Terminology

Live, In-the-Beef, or Formula: Is there a Best Method for Selling Fed Cattle?

SHEEP. The Value of Independence CARCASE AUTHENTICATION AND VERIFICATION SERVICES MEAT AND LIVESTOCK COMMERCIAL SERVICES LTD (MLCSL)

Grid Base Prices and Premiums-Discounts Over Time

Chapter 5 DASH Your Way to Weight Loss

Part I. The Picture class

Final Report. Submitted to National Cattlemen s Beef Association, Centennial, CO. April 2012

Multiplying and Dividing Signed Numbers. Finding the Product of Two Signed Numbers. (a) (3)( 4) ( 4) ( 4) ( 4) 12 (b) (4)( 5) ( 5) ( 5) ( 5) ( 5) 20

Mean EPDs reported by different breeds

Session 7 Bivariate Data and Analysis

CHARACTERISTICS OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS CONTAINING MECHANICALLY DEBONED MEAT 1

Working with whole numbers

MCDONALD S SUSTAINABLE BEEF PILOT Information Sharing Initiative Report April 7, 2016

FEEDLOT MANAGEMENT Matching Cattle Type and Feedlot Performance

HFCC Math Lab Beginning Algebra 13 TRANSLATING ENGLISH INTO ALGEBRA: WORDS, PHRASE, SENTENCES

Consumer Health and Safety

Australian Santa Gertrudis Selection Indexes

SQUARE-SQUARE ROOT AND CUBE-CUBE ROOT

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

FUTURES TRADING OF LIVE BEEF CATTLE (HEDGING) by Clarence C. Bowen

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

CALCULATIONS & STATISTICS

U.S. Beef and Cattle Imports and Exports: Data Issues and Impacts on Cattle Prices

Area of Parallelograms, Triangles, and Trapezoids (pages )

Welcome to Basic Math Skills!

Chicken. Beef. Pork. Mutton. agriculture, forestry & fisheries. Department: Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Indicator 2: Use a variety of algebraic concepts and methods to solve equations and inequalities.

BEEF PORK. Whole Animal Buying Guide. and. Published by the Small Meat Processors Working Group April 2009 PM 2076

Cattle Growth Dynamics and Its Implications

6.4 Normal Distribution

Swine Feeding and Fitting Guidelines. Ryan Harrell Dec. 2008

Extending Shelf-Life of Beef Cuts Utilizing Low Level Carbon Monoxide in Modified Atmosphere Packaging Systems

LAB 24 Transpiration

Meat Goats. January Kent Orrell Extension Educator, Kiowa Co. Okla.

COMPARISON OF DAIRY VERSUS BEEF STEERS

Preparing and Giving Oral Reasons

Understanding and Using Cattle Basis in Managing Price Risk

Ready, Set, Go! Math Games for Serious Minds

Reviewed.March.2010 SHOW LAMB SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

1.6 Division of Whole Numbers

A Numeracy Refresher

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS. The purpose of statistics is to condense raw data to make it easier to answer specific questions; test hypotheses.

High Cholesterol and Heart Failure

Terms: The following terms are presented in this lesson (shown in bold italics and on PowerPoint Slides 2 and 3):

Easy Machining Center Setup

Beef Showmanship Guide

How to Raise and Show Pigs

WAMP MEAT PRODUCT SHOW

INNOVA. Software solutions that empower meat processors

Fractions Packet. Contents

FUNDAMENTALS OF LANDSCAPE TECHNOLOGY GSD Harvard University Graduate School of Design Department of Landscape Architecture Fall 2006

HENDRY COUNTY 4-H SWINE RECORD BOOK

The correlation coefficient

DECIMAL COMPETENCY PACKET

Stair Railing. Installation Guide

Using games to support. Win-Win Math Games. by Marilyn Burns

IOWA STATE FAIR * AUGUST 11-21, 2016 * FFA BEEF CATTLE

3.3 Addition and Subtraction of Rational Numbers

NATURAL RAILING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS

Performance Assessment Task Baseball Players Grade 6. Common Core State Standards Math - Content Standards

table of CoNteNts Chef s Notes Traditional Recipes Smokey Recipes Signature Recipes General Information Time and Temperature Chart

Digital System Design Prof. D Roychoudhry Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Hospitality Mathematics Test-Out Study Guide

Correlation Coefficient The correlation coefficient is a summary statistic that describes the linear relationship between two numerical variables 2

7-2 Solving Exponential Equations and Inequalities. Solve each equation x = 27 2x 4 SOLUTION:

INDUSTRY INFORMATION:

Special Use Commercial Properties

Section 3 Part 1. Relationships between two numerical variables

Math Journal HMH Mega Math. itools Number

A proper warm-up is important before any athletic performance with the goal of preparing the athlete both mentally and physically for exercise and

MEAT SPECIFICATION GUIDE

Numerator Denominator

Mass Loaded Vinyl A review of the performance and cost in acoustical applications

Meat processing is a complicated business, with tight

Automatic Door Selection Guide

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

Managing cattle for the kind of beef you want your kids to eat.

FACILITIES FOR FEEDING HOLSTEIN AND BEEF CATTLE

Transcription:

tep-wise Procedure for Yield Grading of Beef Carcasses Beef carcasses are divided into five yield (or cutability) grades. he term cutability refers to the percentage of carcass weight in boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts from the round, loin, rib and chuck. he following descriptions of carcasses in the yield grades may help you visualize these groups of carcasses. Yield Grade escriptions 1. Yield Grade 1 a. here is usually only a thin layer of external fat over the round, loin, rib and clod, along with slight deposits of fat in the flank, cod, udder, kidney, pelvic and heart regions. b. here is usually a very thin layer of fat over the outside of the round and over the clod. c. Muscles are usually visible through the fat in many areas of the carcass. 2. Yield Grade 2 a. he carcass is nearly completely covered with external fat, but the lean is very visible through the fat over the outside of the round, chuck and neck. b. here is usually a slightly thin layer of fat over the inside round, loin and rib, coupled with a slightly thick layer of fat over the rump, sirloin and clod. 3. Yield Grade 3 a. he carcass is usually completely covered with external fat, and the lean is plainly visible only through the fat on the lower part of the outside of the round and neck. b. here is usually a slightly thick layer of fat covering the inside round, loin and rib, plus a moderately thick layer of fat over the rump, sirloin and clod. c. here are usually slightly large deposits of fat in the flank, cod or udder, kidney, pelvic and heart regions. 4. Yield Grade 4 a. he carcass is usually completely covered with external fat, except muscle is visible in the shank, outside of the flank and plate regions. b. here is usually a moderately thick layer of external fat over the inside of the round, loin and rib, along with a thick layer of fat over the rump, sirloin and clod. c. here are usually large deposits of fat in the flank, cod or udder, kidney, pelvic and heart regions. 1

5. Yield Grade 5 a. he carcass generally has a thick layer of fat on all external regions. xtensive fat is found in the brisket, cod or udder, kidney, pelvic and heart regions. 2

RMIIG YIL GR o facilitate the determination of the yield grade (YG) to the nearest.10 unit for a given carcass, a meat judge should follow five basic steps. tep 1: etermine the Preliminary Yield Grade (PYG) a. stimate the fat thickness of the beef carcass at three-fourths of the distance across the ribeye from the backbone. b. change of.10 inch in fat thickness changes the PYG by.25 YG Fat over Ribeye PYG Fat over Ribeye PYG.00 2.00.70 3.75.10 2.25.80 4.00.20 2.50.90 4.25.30 2.75 1.00 4.50.40 3.00 1.10 4.75.50 3.25 1.20 5.00.60 3.50 1.30 5.25 c. he PYG is often adjusted by graders. Perhaps 50 percent to 75 percent of all PYG measurements should be adjusted because the fat thickness measurement over the ribeye is not always an accurate index of the PYG of the entire carcass. wide variation exists in the outside fat distribution of beef carcasses. We will adjust the PYG of about one-third of all carcasses we grade. he maximum upward adjustment will be.40 PYG unit and the maximum downward adjustment will be.30 PYG unit. he criteria which we will use to adjust fat thickness includes fat at the rib-plate juncture, fat over the round and cod or udder fat. We will perfect this skill through practice. d. Record your adjusted PYG estimate as shown in tep five. s beef animals become heavier (especially beyond 1000 pounds in live weight or 600 pounds in carcass weight), they generally accumulate excessive amounts of external (subcutaneous) fat and seam fat (fat between the muscles). his is not true in all cases; nevertheless, the system for yield grading was designed for application to all carcasses. 3

tep 2: Carcass Weight to R djustment a. stimate the carcass muscling. stimation of expected cutability of beef carcasses must include a measure of muscling in addition to measures of fatness (fat thickness and percentage internal fat) and size (carcass weight). he area of the ribeye muscle at the interface of the 12 th rib is a valid index of carcass muscling, and can be measured using a ribeye dot grid or through visual estimation. b. he most challenging skill to master in meat judging is accurate estimation (within.3 square inch) of R. he relationship (100 pound carcass weight = 1.2 square inches) of carcass weight to ribeye area is outlined below. student estimates the difference between the actual size of the ribeye and the standard size of ribeye for its weight (i.e., the data shown below). he difference is then multiplied by three to determine the plus or minus R adjustment. n example is shown on page five. CRC WIG R CW (pounds) R CW (pounds) R 400-408 8.6 700-708 12.2 409-416 8.7 709-716 12.3 417-424 8.8 717-724 12.4 425-433 8.9 725-733 12.5 434-441 9.0 734-741 12.6 442-449 9.1 742-749 12.7 450-458 9.2 750-758 12.8 459-466 9.3 759-766 12.9 467-474 9.4 767-774 13.0 475-483 9.5 775-783 13.1 484-491 9.6 784-791 13.2 492-499 9.7 792-799 13.3 500-508 9.8 800-808 13.4 509-516 9.9 809-816 13.5 517-524 10.0 817-824 13.6 525-533 10.1 825-833 13.7 534-541 10.2 834-841 13.8 542-549 10.3 842-849 13.9 550-558 10.4 850-858 14.0 559-566 10.5 859-866 14.1 567-574 10.6 867-874 14.2 575-583 10.7 875-883 14.3 584-591 10.8 884-891 14.4 592-599 10.9 892-899 14.5 600-608 11.0 900-908 14.6 609-616 11.1 909-916 14.7 617-624 11.2 917-924 14.8 625-633 11.3 925-933 14.9 634-641 11.4 934-941 15.0 642-649 11.5 942-949 15.1 650-658 11.6 950-958 15.2 659-666 11.7 959-966 15.3 667-674 11.8 967-974 15.4 675-683 11.9 975-983 15.5 684-691 12.0 984-991 15.6 4

CRC WIG R JM Carcass R R R Weight eeded stimated djusted 600 11.0 10.7 +.1 524 10.0 13.0 -.9 876 14.3 10.6 +1.1 708 12.2 17.5-1.6 tep 3: djust for Percent KP deviations from a base of 3.5 percent Carcasses also accumulate various amounts of fat which protect certain vital organs. Fats surrounding the reproductive system in the pelvic cavity, kidneys in the abdominal cavity and heart in the thoracic cavity are routinely left in beef carcasses slaughtered in.. plants. hus, for accurate estimation of YG, the percentage of carcass weight represented by internal fats (kidney, pelvic, heart) must be estimated. Carcasses with greater than 3.5 percent kidney, pelvic and heart (KP) fat are penalized. Likewise, carcasses with less than 3.5 percent are credited, according to the official Beef Yield Grade tandards. a. change in KP of 1 percent alters the PYG by.20 YG KP fat, percent PYG djustment.5 -.6 1.5 -.4 2.5 -.2 2.5 one 4.5 +.2 3.5 +.4 b. KP estimate of 2.75 percent would require a -.15 PYG adjustment; 3.75 percent would require a +.05 PYG adjustment. c. ballpark figure for KP percentage of carcasses weighing 500 to 700 pound is 2.5 percent + 1 percent (in most cases); whereas the standard for carcasses weighing over 750 pound is 2 + 1 percent. d. KP will range from about.5 percent to 5.5 percent 5

tep 4: Complete Procedure for etermining the Final Yield Grade a. evelop a chart with nine columns as show below. ote that: 1. PYG adjustment values can be cancelled to prevent arithmetic errors. 2. Lines divide the carcass data into groups of three to avoid recording errors. 3. ü appears after each FYG value to indicate addition and/or subtraction has been verified. JM PRLIMIRY YIL GR Carcass PYG R R R KP o. PYG adj. CW needed est. adj. adj. FYG 1 3.0 -- 750 12.8 14.8 -.6 -- 2.4 ü 2 2.5 2.4 600 11.0 11.0 -- -.2 2.2 ü 3 3.4 3.6 596 10.9 11.9 -.3 +.1 3.4 ü 4 4.0 -- 638 11.4 10.0 +.4 -- 4.4 ü 5 3.7 4.2 854 14.0 14.0 -- +.1 4.3 ü 6 2.3 -- 608 11.0 16.2-1.5 -- 1.0 ü b. With more practice, you will wish to use an easier table with five columns: Carcass dj. dj. dj. o. PYG R KP FYG 1 2.6 -.4 +.3 2.5 2 2.9 +.8 -.3 3.4 3 4.5 -- -- 4.5 c. his chart shows representative factors from each of the yield grades, so you can gain a better idea of what constitutes a typical carcass from that grade level. YPICL FCR FR CRC RPRIV F C YIL GR Factors Yield Fat Carcass a Grade thickness weight b R c KP 1.5.2 605 14.0 3 2.5.3 675 12.5 3½ 3.5.6 700 12.0 3½ 4.5.9 750 11.5 3 5.5 1.0 800 10.0 3½ 6

a s YG increases in numeric value (decreased carcass cutability), carcasses generally increase in external fat thickness. b s YG increases in numerical value, carcasses generally increase in weight. c s YG increases in numerical value, carcasses generally decrease in R. ationally competitive collegiate yield graders completely master the mathematical portion of yield grading on paper prior to spending much time in the cooler practicing on specific carcasses. Following an understanding of the simple arithmetic adjustments, extensive practice on yield grading on at least 500 carcasses will develop a person s subjective evaluation skills to a competitive level. skilled meat grader also must learn how to consistently grade carcasses in different beef coolers varying widely in lighting, temperature, rail height, type of cattle and quality of dressing workmanship. ow it s time to put your pencil to the paper and see how well you understand the concepts you have read about and viewed. ry this grading exercise for practice. Good luck! Carcass Fat R R R KP o. K. PYG Wt. needed est. adj. KP adj FYG 1.40 600 11.0 3.5 2.20 725 12.1 1.5 3.40 545 8.6 2.5 4.60 625 13.0 3.5 5.05 705 12.7 2.0 6.25 500 9.4 2.5 7.90 850 16.2 4.5 8.10 625 12.5 2.0 9.80 835 13.4 4.0 10 1.2 800 8.7 2.5 7