Ohio Department of Transportation. Geotechnical Consultant Workshop

Similar documents
GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY

Kentucky Lake Bridge Pile Load Testing Overview Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Columbus, Ohio 10/28/2015

Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles

DRIVEN PILE COST COMPARISON FOR TWO LARGE WISCONSIN DOT BRIDGE PROJECTS

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions

SECTION 700 STRUCTURES SECTION 701 DRIVEN PILING MATERIALS Materials Materials shall be in accordance with the following:

CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

Design, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils

PILE FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

Proceedings of the ASME 28 TH International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2009 May 31 June 5, 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

PROVA DINAMICA SU PALI IN ALTERNATIVA ALLA PROVA STATICA. Pile Dynamic Load test as alternative to Static Load test

Step 11 Static Load Testing

STATIC PILE LOAD TEST MANUAL. GEOTECHNICAL CONTROL PROCEDURE GCP-18 Revision #4

MICROPILE FOUNDATIONS IN KARST: STATIC AND DYNAMIC TESTING VARIABILITY

How to Design and Build a Fence/G traverse Bridge or Graffiti Project

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Driven Concrete Pile Foundation Monitoring With Embedded Data Collector System

Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load

Dynamic Pile Analysis Using CAPWAP and Multiple Sensors Camilo Alvarez 1, Brian Zuckerman 2, and John Lemke 3

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A LARGE SCALE PILE LOAD TESTING PROGRAM IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DEVELOPED LRFD PARAMETERS. Reference

INSTALLATION SPECIFICATION FOR DRIVEN PILES

The Installation and Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE

Offshore Dynamic Pile Load Testing & Pile Driving Monitoring Services

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

DESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION

High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

Table of Contents 16.1 GENERAL Overview Responsibilities

DYNAMIC TESTING OF MICROPILES. COMPARISON OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC TEST RESULTS

Instrumented Becker Penetration Test for Liquefaction Assessment in Gravelly Soils

Two driven pile load tests for use in Missouri LRFD guidelines

Anirudhan I.V. Geotechnical Solutions, Chennai

Instrumentations, Pile Group Load Testing, and Data Analysis Part II: Design & Analysis of Lateral Load Test. Murad Abu-Farsakh, Ph.D., P.E.

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

How To Model A Shallow Foundation

Page B-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 LOAD TESTS

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

RECENT ADVANCES IN THE DESIGN OF PILES FOR AXIAL LOADS, DRAGLOADS, DOWNDRAG, AND SETTLEMENT

Foundation Underpinning Process and Relationship with Groundwater in West- Central Florida

Design and Construction of Auger Cast Piles

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

Pile Driving Analysis Via Dynamic Loading Test

SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS

BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM

Table of Contents. July

METHOD STATEMENT HIGH STRIAN DYNAMIC TESTING OF PILE. Prepared by

The unit costs are based on the trend line of the 3 low bids for the average quantity.

5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction

Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility

PILE TESTING SPECIFICATION

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations

Disputes and Claims. 3 Processes Dispute Resolution and Administrative Claims Process

Pro-Lift Steel Pile Foundation Repair

An Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test

NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS FOR STANDARD PENETRATION TESTING FOR LIQUEFACTION EVALUATIONS. Jeffrey A Farrar M.S.

Up-Down Construction Utilizing Steel Sheet Piles and Drilled Shaft Foundations

USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES. by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

The International Workshop on Micropiles, 2007

UNDERPINNING OF NEW STUDENT HOUSING BUILDING USING MICROPILES, NORTH CAROLINA USA

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Bridge, Culvert, and Retaining Wall Construction Manual. Georgia Department of Transportation

Pile Driving Contractors Association & Pile Dynamics, Inc.

Offshore Pile Testing Campaign Wikinger

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

VERTICAL MICROPILE LATERAL LOADING. Andy Baxter, P.G.

INSITU TESTS! Shear Vanes! Shear Vanes! Shear Vane Test! Sensitive Soils! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:!

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

ITEM # OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFT

Copyright 2015 Pecivilexam.com all rights reserved- Breadth Exam 120 solved Problems.

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Outline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.

Incorporating Innovative Materials for Seismic Resilient Bridge Columns

LEADSYSTEMS. Vertical Configuration. Aft Batter Below Grade. Side Batter. Forward Reach. Raised Leads Above Grade. Forward Batter

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

The advantages and disadvantages of dynamic load testing and statnamic load testing

for reliable prediction ofpile capacity after the end of

A DEEP FOUNDATION COMPARISON: DRIVEN vs BORED PILES. Professor s Driven Pile Institute Logan, UT June 26, 2013

Engineered, Time-Tested Foundation Repairs for Settlement in Residential and Light Commercial Structures. The Leading Edge.

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

USE OF CONE PENETRATION TEST IN PILE DESIGN

Underpinning Systems 14.1 FOUNDATION REPAIR. Helical Piles

POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns)

Figure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate

Method Statement. Static Pile Load Test

Use and Application of Piezocone Penetration Testing in Presumpscot Formation

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

Design and installation of steel open end piles in weathered basalt. Luc Maertens*

Designed and Engineered to Perform

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

Testing Procedures. Note: Please refer to Table 2 for a list of completed borings.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 6

Winnipeg Water Treatment Program

Electronic Soil Test Logging. Strategic Advantage or Unnecessary Headache?

Transcription:

Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Geotechnical Consultant Workshop May 8, 2012

PILE LOAD TEST CASE HISTORIES Stephen Slomski, P.E. Foundation Engineering Coordinator Office of Structural Engineering Geotechnical Consultant Workshop May 8, 2012 2

Projects CUY-90 WB High strain dynamic test of H-piles Define refusal on bedrock FRA-71/670 Static load test of an H-pile Determine pile set-up 3

I-90 Project Walsh Construction HNTB Shannon & Wilson 4

Main Viaduct Bridge Length: 4347 ft Piers 2 through 11: 3092 ft Span Lengths: 303 to 380 ft Deck Heights: 100 to 142 ft 5

Soil Profile 6

Pile Types Investigated Friction Pipe Piles Closed Ended 16 to 24-in Open Ended 30 to 72-in End Bearing Piles Standard Sizes HP 14x89, HP 14x117 Jumbo Sizes HP 16x141, HP 18x204 Economy & Schedule Considerations Selected Pile: HP 18x204, 60 ksi Steel, Refusal on Bedrock 7

Pile Properties HP18x204 Area (in 2 ) I xx (in 4 ) I yy (in 4 ) HP10x42 t = 0.42 12.4 210 71.1 HP14x117 t = 0.81 34.4 1220 443 HP18x204 t = 1.13 60.0 3450 1119 HP10x42 Increase Over HP14x117 1.74X 2.83X 2.53X 8

Pile Footing Layouts Footing Sizes - 30 x 38 to 41 x 44 Pier 7 24 piles/ftg Pier 9 14 piles/ftg 9

Pile Foundations Piles per Column Footing : 12 to 24 Factored Axial Loads : 1183 to 1917 K Pile Lengths : 150 to 215 ft Total No. of Viaduct Piles : 284 Equivalent number of HP14x117 with 50 ksi steel : 25 to 32 10

Pile Driving Initial driving with vibratory hammer to its refusal Final driving with open ended diesel hammer: D80-23 Rated at 198 kip-ft 18.0 kip ram weight Max. stroke 13 ft 11

Defining Refusal [606.1-1] PILES TO BEDROCK: Drive piles to refusal on bedrock. The Department will consider refusal to be obtained by penetrating weak bedrock for several inches to a minimum resistance of 20 blows per inch or by contacting strong bedrock and the pile receiving at least 20 blows. Select the hammer size to achieve the required depth to bedrock and refusal. Instead of driving to refusal, the Contractor may perform dynamic load testing according to C&MS 523 to establish a driving criteria for each pile type and capacity. Establish the driving criteria to achieve an Ultimate Bearing Value (UBV) that is 1.5 times the total factored load given below for the piles. Payment for dynamic load testing performed at the Contractor s option is included in the unit price pay item for piles driven. 12

Refusal Plan Note Refusal Considerations 20 Blows / inch Drive Logs Depth to Bedrock PDA/CAPWAP Analyses Required Pile Capacity Not Achieved High Strain Dynamic Testing Mobilize & Redrive with Larger Hammer 13

High Strain Dynamic Testing Max. UBV = 2876 K GRL APPLE IV 80-kip ram 9-ft max. drop Test device, not a pile driving hammer 14

Pier 9 Initial Testing Factored Axial Load = 1747 kips UBV = 2620 kips Top of Rock @ 143.7 Top of Coring @ 150.0 15

Pier 9 LT Results Pile No. Test Type Tip Depth Drop Ht / Stroke Set / Blow Count Trans d Energy Case Mobil d Capacity CAPWAP Mobilized Capacity Total Toe Shaft 164 ID 144.0 9.9 43/12 - - 1249 781 468 164 EOID 146.6 11.5 25/1 68% 1918 1911 1460 451 166 APPLE 153.8 6.0 0.25 98% 2998 2899 2129 770 Note: Required UBV = 2160 kips 1.5 * UBV = 2620 kips 16

Pier 9 RT Results Pile No. Test Type Tip Depth Drop Ht / Stroke Set / Blow Count Trans d Energy Case Mobil d Capacity CAPWAP Mobilized Capacity Total Toe Shaft 178 ID 153.0 12.3 8/1 - - 1770 1135 635 178 EOID 154.0 12.3 20+/1 70% 2071 2050 1536 514 176 EOID 154.7 12.2 23/1 63% 1927 1907 1127 780 176 APPLE 154.7 6.0 0.25 97.4% 2757 2850 1749 1101 Note: Required UBV = 2160 kips 1.5 * UBV = 2620 kips 17

D80-23 Driving Criteria Greater Than 40 Blows per 2 inches Minimum Average Stroke of 11.5 feet 18

FRA-71/670 Test Pile Kokosing Construction Co. CH2MHILL E.L. Robinson Engineering of Ohio 19

Soil Profile - Shallow, Dense to Very Dense, Sands & Gravels, N 60 >50 bpf 20

Pile Foundations HP 14x73 at Piers UBV = 440 kips Short Lengths, 25 to 35 ft Uplift = 32 to 47 kips Minimum Tip Elevations 21

Pile Driving Problems Piles Running Driven 45 to 60 ft Without Achieving UBV & Required Splicing Contractor Proposed Static Load Test (SLT) Determine Pile Set-up Increase ϕ DYN to 0.80 (AASHTO) from 0.70 (BDM) Applied Only to B-11 & B-12 Pier Piles Dynamic Load Tests Before & After SLT to Recalibrate Driving Criteria (EOID & BOR) Revised UBV to 385 kips = (440 K *0.70) 0.80 22

Test Location B-11, Pier 3 Soils at Both Bridge Sites Are Geologically Similar HP14x73 Piles Pier 3 Selected as Being Most Representative 23

Soil Bottom of Footing Profile Desired Tip Elevation Test Pile Tip 24

Pier 3 Footing Test Pile #92 Driven on 1/25/12 Pileco D19-42 4.2 K Ram, 150 Stroke Est. Pile Length= 35 ft Driven Length= 44.3 ft Blow Count= 45/12 PDA/CAPWAP Analyses EOID Capacity= 355 K BOR Capacity= 560 K 25

Static Load Test Frame 26

SLT Results Quick Test Method, 5% load steps at 5-minute intervals 30-minute final hold (ASTM D1143, Procedure A) Davisson Failure Criteria to Define Ultimate Failure Load Test on February 1, 2012 Max. Load= 770 kips Max. Settlement= 0.64 Post SLT BOR = 560 kips 27

Testing Interpretation Failure Did Not Occur, Davisson criteria not met Ultimate Failure Load estimated 780 kips Test Pile Length Longer Than Desired Length 28

PDA/CAPWAP Results CAPWAP Analyses of PDA Data at Select Driving Depths & at BOR Average Unit Side Resistance Versus Depth for Driving & BOR Curves Used to Adjust Soil Properties In Static Analysis (DRIVEN) 29

Static Analysis Recalibration Avg. Side Resistance During Driving Curve & PDA Total Capacity Used to Obtain End Bearing Resistance BOR Side Resistance & End Resistance are Used to Adjust Internal Friction Angles in DRIVEN to Obtain a Total Capacity of 780 kips 30

Driving Criteria 1. Minimum Length For Uplift where the Total Capacity from the Static Analysis = 385 kips 2. Minimum Blow Count > 25 / Foot with Minimum 8.0-foot Stroke 3. Two Pile Restrikes Tests at Each Pier with BOR Resistances > 308 kips - Calibration of BOR to SLT (780/560): 1.25 * 308 kips = 385 kips 4. Static Analysis Recalibrated for Each Pier 31

Office of Construction District 6 & 12 Field Construction Personnel 32