Effects of row spacing, seed rate and maturity group on late planted soybean under irrigated and dryland conditions in Oklahoma

Similar documents
GRAIN SORGHUM PERFORMANCE TRIALS IN OKLAHOMA, 2011

Irrigation Scheduling on Small Grains using AZSCHED for Windows - Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

Federal Crop Insurance RISK MANAGEMENT. Chris Eddy Dell s Insurance Agency

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

Grain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

2014 Flax Weed Control Trial

Ukraine Crop Update. Spring Sowing Ahead of Average. CROP-UKR14-01 May 8, 2014

Soybean roulette: improving the odds for maximizing soybean yields

Soybean Marketing & Production College, Minneapolis, MN. isafarmnet.com

2015 WISCONSIN SOYBEAN VARIETY EVALUATION PROGRAM Department of Agronomy University of Wisconsin - Madison

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement.

Nitrogen uptake in cotton+greengram intercropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management

ABSTRACT: 142 EFFECT OF STORAGE ON SOYBEAN SEED VIGOR AND EMERGENCE

Institute of Ag Professionals

3.3 Real Returns Above Variable Costs

Rain on Planting Protection. Help Guide

Summary: Objective: Materials and Methods:

4.5 CSA Crop Planning

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

Crop residue management (CRM), a cultural practice that

Remote Sensing Applications for Precision Agriculture

MICRONUTRIENTS AS STARTER AND FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN

Summary: Objective: Materials and Methods:

Grains and Oilseeds Outlook

How Crop Insurance Works. The Basics

igrow Soybeans Best Management Practices for Soybean Production

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Soybean Growth and Development

Both the House and Senate farm bills include two new supplemental crop insurance programs:

The Relationship Between Grain Yield and Silage Yield in Field Corn in Northern Illinois INTRODUCTION

Mid-Atlantic Grain and Forage Journal

Using Enterprise Budgets in Farm Financial Planning

Evaluation of Foliar Fungicides for the Control of Stripe Rust (Puccinia striiformis) in SRWW in the Northern Texas Blacklands

IHARF Box 156 Indian Head, SK. S0G 2K0 Ph: (306)

How To Make A Drought Tolerant Corn

INSECT MANAGEMENT (Roberts & McPherson)

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Comparison of Weed Management Strategies with Roundup Ready Corn. J. A. Ferrell and W. W. Witt

Establishing a website to aid growers in harvesting and irrigation decisions: PeanutFARM

Using Technology and Big Data to Improve Profits. Matt Darr, Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering

Number 389 February 15, 2013

ANSWERS TO COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUE IN KANSAS

SOYBEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS

Group Risk Income Protection Plan and Group Risk Plans added in New Kansas Counties for Updated 3/12/05

2016 FIELD CROP BUDGETS Publication 60

Modern Soil Fumigation Research and Education for Michigan Potato Production

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

S-SERIES COMBINE CALIBRATION GUIDE CLICK THE ARROW TO GET STARTED

Practical Uses of Crop Monitoring for Arizona Cotton

Will It Sprout? Seed Germination Test

Delayed Planting & Hybrid Maturity Decisions

Precision Ag and Weather Impact on WI Soybeans Shawn P. Conley, J Gaska, A Roth, A Gaspar, D Marburger, E Smidt, and S Mourtzinis State Soybean and

various P levels for the past two years. Treatments were a one time application

2015 Kentucky Soybean Variety Performance Test Nomination Form University of Kentucky

Weather Indexed Crop Insurance Jared Brown, Justin Falzone, Patrick Persons and Heekyung Youn* University of St. Thomas

Harvesting Dry Bean John Nowatzki, NDSU Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

Mississippi MISSISSIPPI AGRICULTURAL & FORESTRY EXPERIMENT STATION MELISSA J. MIXON, INTERIM DIRECTOR

GROUNDWATER BANKING AN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR WATER SECURITY IN CALIFORNIA

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

TEXAS SMARTSCAPE Landscape Design

COVER PAGE. PROJECT TITLE: Evaluation of small grains in California (UC Regional Cereal Evaluation Program and production research)

Humidtropics Kiboga/Kyankwanzi Soybean production training

Goldmine Report : pg132aventisharvestaid. Cotton Harvest Aid Demonstration Chris Bubenik, 2001

Grains and Oilseeds Outlook

Novel Endophyte Varieties: What s the Difference

EFFECT OF AVAIL ON CORN PRODUCTION IN MINNESOTA

Big Data & Big Opportunities

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

Required Trial Management Software Features. Gylling Data Management, Inc.

MS DATA ANALYSIS EXAM INSTRUCTIONS

A WIN-WIN SCENARIO FOR URBAN/RURAL WATER SUPPLIES 1)

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

Soybean Physiology: How Well Do You Know Soybeans?

Usual Planting and Harvesting Dates for U.S. Field Crops

I. RECOMMENDED PRACTICES BASED ON GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES (GAP) AND GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES (GMP)

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

GROWTH POTENTIAL OF LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT: A SPACING STUDY EXAMPLE

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. Steve Orloff, Steve Wright and Mike Ottman 1 ABSTRACT

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

NO-TILL AND NITROGEN FIXING INOCULANTS

Required Trial Management Software Features. Gylling Data Management, Inc.

Fred Below & Adam Henninger. Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

Ecologically based weed management! Chuck Mohler! Cornell University!

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

POTASSIUM. Functions of Potassium in Plants. Potassium Deficiency Symptoms

Digital Agriculture: Leveraging Technology and Information into Profitable Decisions

Evaluation of Combination Phosphorus Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

Federal Crop Insurance: The Basics

Soybean. Illinois is first or second among states in soybean. Soybean Plant Development

Grain Sorghum Production South and Southwest Texas

January 7, /10/2014. Genuine People. Creative Ideas. Valuable Results. Copyright Kennedy and Coe, LLC 2012 All rights reserved.

Hybrid Rye for Biogas Trial Results 2012/13 KWS UK

AN OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE IN WISCONSIN

Basic NAP Provisions. Eligible Crops for NAP Assistance. Continue - Eligible Crops. Continue Ineligible Crops. Ineligible Crops for NAP Assistance 1-1

What Percent Level and Type of Crop Insurance Should Winter Wheat Growers Select? 1

PERFORMANCE OF RYEGRASS VARIETIES IN ALABAMA,

Transcription:

Effects of row spacing, seed rate and maturity group on late planted soybean under irrigated and dryland conditions in Oklahoma A.S. Barreiro* and C.B. Godsey, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University SUMMARY POINTS: For Irrigated Soybean a plant population of 18, resulted in the highest yields. Given the harsh environmental conditions, no response was observed between treatments at the dryland location. Introduction Soybean Production has increased significantly in Oklahoma the past few years. However, some production aspects, unique to the state, still need to be addressed. A majority of the soybean acreage is double cropped after winter wheat harvest in June. This results in a soybean planting dates after June 1, which is the date that has been identified as the point when yield potential starts to decrease. This purpose of this study is determine the best planting strategies in regards to row spacing, seeding rate, and maturity group (MG) for late planted soybean under irrigated and dryland conditions in Oklahoma. This study was initiated in 211 at the Oklahoma State University Eastern Research Station in Haskell, under dryland conditions, and at the Agronomy Research Station in Stillwater, OK, under irrigated conditions. At both locations, the established plots were 1 feet wide by 25 feet long. The two soybean varieties (REV 48R22 and AG 5632) used in the study were glyphosate-resistant and were selected based on their performance from previous variety trials (www.oilseeds.okstate.edu). Row spacings of 7.5, 15, and 3 in were evaluated. Plots with 3 in row spacing were planted with a 4-row Monosem vacuum planter (Monosem, Inc. Edwardsville, KS). Plots with 7.5 and 15 in row spacing were planted with a Great Plains Drill model 3P6 (Great Plains Mfg., Salina, KS) with 7 rows spaced at 7.5 inches. Inoculants, soil

fertility, and pest management practices were conducted according to Oklahoma State University recommended practices. Irrigated Study This experiment was planted on June 27 th, using a complete randomized block design with three replications and three variables (MG, row spacing, and seeding rate). Table 1 shows all different treatments utilized for each replication. One and a half inches of irrigation was applied weekly throughout the growing season. Table 1. Maturity groups, row spacing, and seed rates used on irrigated conditions at Stillwater, OK. Treatment Maturity Group Row Spacing Seed Rate inches seeds/acre 11 4.8 7.5 1, 12 14, 13 18, 14 3 1, 15 14, 16 18, 17 5.6 7.5 1, 18 14, 19 18, 11 3 1, 111 14, 112 18, Dryland Study

This experiment was planted on July 14 th, using the same experimental design and variables. Table 2 shows all different treatments utilized for each replication. Table 1. Maturity groups, row spacing, and seed rates used on dryland conditions at Haskell, OK. Treatment Maturity Group Row Spacing Seed Rate inches seeds/acre 11 4.8 7.5 8, 12 15, 13 13, 14 155, 15 15 8, 16 15, 17 13, 18 155, 19 3 8, 11 15, 111 13, 112 155, 113 5.6 7.5 8, 114 15, 115 13, 116 155, 117 15 8, 118 15, 119 13, 12 155, 121 3 8, 122 15, 123 13, 124 155, All plots were harvested using a Wintersteiger Delta plot combine (WINTERSTEIGER Inc., Salt Lake City, UT), at maturity. Grain yield and moisture were determined. All harvested

bu / ac bu / ac plots were collected in bags to determine seed mass. Results for irrigated soybean In 211, climate conditions were not conducive to high yielding soybean, even with irrigation. The heat was extreme during reproductive stages which limited yield potential. Yields from the irrigated location are given in Figure 1. MG 4.8 MG 5.6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 1 2 1 7.5 in 3 in 1 14 18 seeds / ac (x1) 1 14 18 seeds / ac (x1) Figure 1. Soybean yield for both MG 4.8 and 5.6 in relation to seeding rate and row spacing under irrigation. MG 4.8 (REV 48R22) soybean performed better when planted in 3 in row spacing compared to 7.5 in, regardless of plant population. No difference in yield was found between seed rate of 1, and 14, seeds/acre for both row spacing. However, plants at 18, seeds/acre had greater yield, 36.2 and 42.3 bu/ac for both row spacings compared to 1, and 14, seeds/acre, respectively. For the MG 5.6 (AG 5632), no difference in yield was observed between row spacing at the three plant populations. Similar to the MG 4.8, no difference in yield was found between a seeding rate of 1, and 14, seeds/acre for both row spacings. However, plants at 18, seeds/acre had slightly greater yield for both row spacing compared to 1, and

bu / acre bu / acre 14, seeds/acre. There was no difference in yield between MG 4.8 and 5.6 at 1, or 14, seeds/acre regardless of row spacing. MG 4.8 at 18, seeds/acre showed greater yield than MG 5.6 at the same plant population for both row spacing. Results for dryland soybean As mentioned previously, very high temperatures and extensive periods without rainfall were observed in 211. Our study under these conditions and with a late planting date provided poor soybean yields, however differences between some treatments were observed as shown in Figure 2. 2 MG 4.8 2 MG 5.6 16 16 12 12 8 4 8 4 7.5 15 3 8, 15, 13, 155, 8, 15, 13, 155, Seeds / acre Seeds / acre Figure 2. Soybean yield for both MG 4.8 and 5.6 in relation to seed rate and row spacing under dryland conditions. For all three row spacings from MG 4.8 no difference in yield was observed between seed rate 8, and 15,. Row spacings of 7.5 and 15 in had greater yields, 1 and 12.9 bu/ac, respectively, compared to 3 in at 13, seeds/acre. For both MG 4.8 and 5.6, 3 in row spacing performed better when planted at the highest population (155, seeds/acre). For MG

5.6, with exception of soybean with 3 in row spacing at the highest seed rate, there were no differences in yield among the other treatments. These studies will be expanded to more locations in 212 and hopefully we will experience better growing conditions.