Underground Excavation Design Classification

Similar documents
Nuevas tendencias de la Minería Subterránea profunda Planeación, operación y estabilización del macizo rocoso

COMBINING THE RMR, Q, AND RMi CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS

SYDNEY SANDSTONE AND SHALE PARAMETERS FOR TUNNEL DESIGN

DIMENSIONING TUNNEL SUPPORT BY DESIGN METHODOLOGY

Pennsylvania State University Department of Mineral Engineering University Park, Pennsylvania Approved For Public Re;tas,,

THE TRANSITION FROM OPEN PIT TO UNDERGROUND MINING: AN UNUSUAL SLOPE FAILURE MECHANISM AT PALABORA

USE AND MISUSE OF ROCK MASS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE Q-SYSTEM

A methodology for evaluation and classification of rock mass quality on tunnel engineering

Numerical analysis of boundary conditions to tunnels

Validation of Cable Bolt Support Design in Weak Rock Using SMART Instruments and Phase 2

ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY

Risk oriented design and construction of tunnels

Dip is the vertical angle perpendicular to strike between the imaginary horizontal plane and the inclined planar geological feature.

Numerical Modelling for Shallow Tunnels in Weak Rock By Evert Hoek Unpublished Notes

3D MODELLING OF GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES FOR UNDERGROUND CAVERNS : A NEW AND SIMPLE METHODOLOGY

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ROCK MECHANICS CHAMBER OF MINES OF SOUTH AFRICA CERTIFICATE IN ROCK MECHANICS PART 1 ROCK MECHANICS THEORY

Mine Wide Risk Assessment What is the State of your Arteries. L.Human, J Doolan and L Potts Xstrata Zinc

Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

Critical Assessment of RMR based Tunnel Design Practices: a Practical Engineer s Approach

Advanced Natural Gas Storage (ANGAS) Project and Verification Tests of Experimental Lined Rock Cavern in Japan

RocSupport. Tutorial Manual. Rock support interaction and deformation analysis for tunnels in weak rock Rocscience Inc.

Estimation of Adjacent Building Settlement During Drilling of Urban Tunnels

Why measure in-situ stress?

USING TOPOLOGY OPTIMISATION IN TUNNEL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN

Development of Tunnel Electrical Resistivity Prospecting System and its Applicaton

Design Guidelines for Sequential Excavations Method (SEM) Practices for Road Tunnels in the United States

REGULATIONS FOR THE POSTGRADUATE DIPLOMA IN EARTH SCIENCES (PGDES)

Engineering geological assessment of the Obruk dam site (Corum, Turkey)

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

DESIGN OF EXCAVATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR THE ÇUBUKBELİ TUNNEL IN ANTALYA

Establishing a site specific mining. geotechnical logging g atlas?...

WATERVIEW CONNECTION PROJECT. Ground Settlement WATERVIEW CONNECTION TEAM

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ROCK MECHANICS CHAMBER OF MINES OF SOUTH AFRICA CERTIFICATE IN ROCK MECHANICS PART 4

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

Earthquakes. Earthquakes: Big Ideas. Earthquakes

1 of 37 Erik Eberhardt UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition

Amendment to OPSS 415 (Nov 2008) Construction Specification for Pipeline and Utility Installation by Tunnelling

Forensic engineering of a bored pile wall

Geotechnical risks on large civil engineering projects. Evert Hoek and Alessandro Palmeiri

Program COLANY Stone Columns Settlement Analysis. User Manual

Chapter 2 Basis of design and materials

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

Proceedings 2005 Rapid Excavation & Tunneling Conference, Seattle

Modelling the Discharge Rate and the Ground Settlement produced by the Tunnel Boring

Working Drawing and Assemblies. Chapter 10

A study on the causes of troubles in shield tunneling site with numerical analysis

GUIDANCE NOTES FOR DEVELOPMENTS OR ENGINEERING WORKS IN THE VICINITY OF SPT SUBWAY INFRASTRUCTURE JULY 2005

Relationship between the percentage of clay with liquid limit, plastic limit and plastic index in four different soils texture class

LABORATORY TWO GEOLOGIC STRUCTURES

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

Seismic Risk Prioritization of RC Public Buildings

GEOLOGIC MAPS. PURPOSE: To be able to understand, visualize, and analyze geologic maps

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

Virtual Reality Scientific Visualisation - A Solution for Big Data Analysis of the Block Cave Mining System

Impacts of Tunnelling on Ground and Groundwater and Control Measures Part 1: Estimation Methods

Copyright 2011 Casa Software Ltd. Centre of Mass

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

Trench Rescue by Buddy Martinette

Tremie Concrete CM 420 CM 420 CM 420 CM 420. Temporary Structures. Tremie Concrete

Closing the Circle Some comments on design procedures for tunnel supports in rock. C. Fairhurst 1 C. Carranza-Torres 2

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

SUPPORT IN UNDERGROUND HARD ROCK MINES

Tunnelling & Underground. Specialists

Numerical Simulation on Supporting of Large Section Open-off Cut and Its Stability

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

2. Electrical resistivity methods

Improvement in physical properties for ground treated with rapid impact compaction

Miss S. S. Nibhorkar 1 1 M. E (Structure) Scholar,

Backfill for Bench Stoping Operations

Technical Data. 7. Bearing Fits. 7.1 Interference. 7.2 Calculation of interference F B LLLLLLLLL( A-54

Geotechnical Building Works (GBW) Submission Requirements

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Numerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE - FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING -BUCHAREST

USING RELATIVE DATING AND UNCONFORMITIES TO DETERMINE SEQUENCES OF EVENTS

E4055. Quiz. Soil Classification. Name: SOIL CLASSIFICATION QUESTIONS

ENGINEERING GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION OF HYDROPOWER PROJECTS CHAPTER 11 - ARCH DAMS

ROCK MASSES AS CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

How To Design A Foundation

APPENDIX 3.0-E Feasibility Geotechnical Pit Slope Evaluation Kitsault Project British Columbia, Canada

Liner system design for tailings impoundments and heap leach pads

Appendix A Sub surface displacements around excavations Data presented in Xdisp sample file

SECTION 5: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN

Name Date Class. By studying the Vocabulary and Notes listed for each section below, you can gain a better understanding of this chapter.

Laboratory #8: Structural Geology Thinking in 3D

Guide for SOLID CONCRETE BLOCK SEALS

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

Understanding BS EN 771-3: Aggregate concrete masonry units

Establishing the feasibility of your proposed mining venture

Transcription:

Underground Excavation Design Underground Excavation Design Classification Alfred Zettler a.zettler@zconsult.at

Rock Quality Designation Measurement and calculation of RQD Rock Quality Designation index (after Deer 1989)

Rock Structure Rating (RSR) Wickham et al (1972) described a quantitative method for describing the quality of rock mass and for selecting appropriate support on the basis of their Rock Structure Rating (RSR) classification. The system is historical (developed using relatively small tunnels but it was the first method which made references to shotcrete support). The significance of the RSR system: Introducing the concept of rating each of the components listed below to arrive at a numerical value RSR = A + B + C

Rock Structure Rating (RSR) 1. Parameter A, Geology: General appraisal of geological structure on the basis of: a. Rock type origin (igneous, metamorphic, sedimentary) b. Rock hardness (hard, medium, soft, decomposed) c. Geological structure (massive, slightly, faulted/folded, moderately faulted/folded, intensely faulted/folded)

Rock Structure Rating (RSR) 2. Parameter B, Geometry: Effect of discontinuity pattern with respect to the direction of the tunnel drive on the basis of: a. Joint spacing b. Joint orientation (strike and dip) c. Direction of tunnel drive drive with dip drive against dip

Rock Structure Rating (RSR) 3. Parameter C, Effect of Groundwater inflow and joint condition on the basis of: a. Overall rock mass quality on the basis of A and B combined b. Joint condition (good, fair, poor) c. Amount of water inflow (in gallons per minute per 1000 feet of tunnel) Maximum RSR = 100

RSR Parameter A: General area geology Fore example, a hard metamorphic rock which is slightly folded or faulted has a rating of A = 22.

RSR Parameter B: Joint pattern, direction of drive The rock mass is moderately jointed, with joints striking perpendicular to the tunnel axis which is being driven eastwest, are dipping at between 20 and 50. The rating for B = 24 driving with dip.

RSR Parameter C: Groundwater, joint condition The value of A + B = 46 and this means that, for joints of fair condition (slightly weathered and altered) and a moderate water inflow of between 200 and 1000 gallons per minute. The rating gives C = 16. Hence, the final value of the rock structure rating RSR = A + B + C = 62.

RSR Parameter C: Groundwater, joint condition RSR support estimates for a 24 ft (7.3m) diameter circular tunnel. Note that rockbolts and shotcrete are generally used together (after Wickham et al. 1972).

Rock Mass Rating (RMR) Rock Mass Rating (RMR) after Bieniawski (1976). It is also called Geomechanics Classification. Modifications were made. This is the 1989 version 6 parameters are used to classify the rock mass: 1. Uniaxial compressive strength of rock material 2. Rock Quality Designation (RQD) 3. Spacing of discontinuities 4. Condition of discontinuities 5. Groundwater conditions 6. Orientation of discontinuities

Rock Mass Rating (RMR) Tunnel through a slightly weathered granite with a dominant joint set dipping against the direction of the drive. Point-load strength: 8 MPa RQD: 70% The slightly rough and slightly weathered joints with seperation of < 1 mm, are spaced at 300mm. Tunnelling conditions are anticipated to be wet.

Rock Mass Rating (RMR)

Rock Mass Rating (RMR)

Rock Mass Rating (RMR)

Rock Mass Rating (RMR)

Rock Mass Rating (RMR)

Rock Mass Rating (RMR)

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q The system was proposed by Barton et al. (1974) at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute in order to determine the rock mass characteristics and tunnel support requirements. The numerical value of the index Q varies on a logarithmic scale from 0.001 to a maximum of 1000 and is defined by:

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q The first quotient (RQD/Jn), representing the structure of the rock mass, is a crude measure of the block of particle size, with the two extreme values (100/0.5 and 10/20) differing by a factor of 400. The second quotient (Jr/Ja) represents the roughness and frictional characteristics of the joint walls or filling materials. The third quotient (Jw/SRF) consists of two stress parameters, SFR is a measure of: 1) loosening load in the case of an excavation through shear zones and clay bearing rock, 2) rock stress in competent rock, and 3) squeezing loads in plastic incompetent rock. It can be seen as a total stress parameter. The parameter Jw is a measure of water pressure, which has an adverse effect of the shear strength of joints due to a reduction in effective normal stress. The quotient (Jw/SRF) is a complicated emperical factor describing the active stress.

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q It appears that the rock tunnelling quality Q can now be considered to be a function of only three parameters which are crude measures of: Undoubtedly, there are several parameters which could be added to improve the accuracy of the classification system: One of these be the joint orientation Structural orientation in relation to excavation axis

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q Jn, Jr, Ja appear to play a more important role than orientation, because the number of joint sets determine the degree of freedom for block movement, and the friction and dilatation characteristics can vary more than the down-dip gravitational component of unfavourable oriented joints. If joint orientation had been included the classification would have been less general, and its essential simplicity lost.

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Selection of support measurements

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q 15 m span underground mine Granite Depth: 2100m Tow sets of joints RQD: 85% - 95% Uniaxial compressive strength: 170MPa Magnitude of the horizontal stress to vertical stress: 1.5 No water flowing Jn = 4 Jr = 3 Ja = 1.0 Jw = 1.0 Depth = 2100m => vertical stress = 57MPa

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q Major principle stress = 85 MPa Uniaxial compressive strength = 170MPa Ratio sigmac/sigma1=2 => heavy rock bursts expected SRF between 10 and 20 => assumed SRF = 15

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q In relating the value of the index Q to the stability and support requirements of underground excavations, Barton et al. (1974) defined an additional parameter which they called the Equivalent Dimension, De, of the excavation. This dimension is obtained by dividing the span, diameter or wall height of the excavation by a quantity called the Excavation Support Ratio, ESR. Hence:

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q Permanent mining ESR = 1.6 De = 15/1.6 = 9.4 Q = 4.5

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q

Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q Barton et al. provided also rock bolt length: B = excavation width B L = Length of the rock bolt Maximum unsupported span:

Guideline for the Geotechnical Design of Underground Structures with Conventional Excavation by Austrian Society of Rock Mechanics Phase 1: Design Ground Types Ground Behaviour Types System Behaviour Types (SB) Geotechnical Report Phase 2: Construction Evaluation of the predicted SB

Ground Type: Ground with similar properties Ground Behaviour: Reaction of the ground to the excavation of the full profile without consideration of sequential excavation and support Behaviour Type: General categories describing similar Ground Behaviours with respect to failure modes and displacement characteristics

System Behaviour Type: Behaviour resulting from the interaction between ground, excavation, and support, separated in: System behaviour in the respective excavation section System behaviour in the supported section System behaviour in the final state Geotechnical Report including Geotechnical Design and the Baseline Construction Plan

Baseline Construction Plan: Summary of the Geotechnical Design including relevant parameters used in the design, and application criteria for the assignment of excavation and support methods

Possible events, hazards, and measurements in rock tunnelling (Girmscheid, G., Baubetrieb und Bauverfahren im Tunnelbau ) Underground Excavation Design Additional Information Alfred Zettler

Possible events, hazards, and measurements in rock tunnelling Underground Excavation Design Additional Information Alfred Zettler

Possible events, hazards, and measurements in loose rock/gravel material tunnelling Underground Excavation Design Additional Information Alfred Zettler

Possible events, hazards, and measurements in loose rock/gravel material tunnelling Underground Excavation Design Additional Information Alfred Zettler

Possible events, hazards, and measurements in loose rock/gravel material tunnelling Underground Excavation Design Additional Information Alfred Zettler

Possible events, hazards, and measurements in loose rock/gravel material tunnelling Underground Excavation Design Additional Information Alfred Zettler

Weight after Terzaghi

Weight after Terzaghi

Weight after Terzaghi