Employees with Disabilities the Forgotten Diversity Segment: Tracking Trends

Similar documents
1. Overall, how satisfied are you working for The Company? Extremely Dissatisfied. Very Dissatisfied. Somewhat Dissatisfied.

Skanska Group Diversity and Inclusion Vision 2020 Q&A

2015 CFPB annual employee survey

Chapter 2 Theoretical Framework JOB SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES

Valuing Diversity. Cornerstones. 1. Diversity is about inclusion and engagement!

VALUING DIVERSITY & INCLUSION

SELF PACED ON-LINE COURSES

OUR WORKPLACE DIVERSITY PROGRAM. Diversity is important to AFSA.

GENDER DIVERSITY STRATEGY

Core Leadership Competencies

*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*

9Lenses: Human Resources Suite

2014 CFPB annual employee survey

Swinburne University of Technology Gender Equality Strategic Action Plan

HIRING MANAGER ONBOARDING GUIDE

UNC Leadership Survey 2012: Women in Business

Succession Planning Process

Leadership and Management Competencies

Executive Onboarding Program Helping Executives Make Rapid Transitions

Performance Management Review Process Draft for Management Consultation Review

Optimizing Rewards and Employee Engagement

Survey Results on perceptions between managers and employees

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WORKFORCE DIVERSITY IN SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING SECTORS IN INDIA

eve ge our experience Quantum leverage our experience to benefit your business human resource consulting 2011 quantumhrconsulting. All Rights Reserved

Turning Employee Survey Data into Strategic Action. An Overview of the Action Catalyst Model C A T A L Y S T

Workplace Diversity Program

H U M A N R E S O U R C E S F R A M E W O R K

Workforce Retention, Absence and Disability Management: Summary of DMEC/VCU Survey

KESSLER FOUNDATION/NOD SURVEY OF EMPLOYMENT OF AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES

Future-proofing employee engagement 5 areas of focus for 2015

Metropolitan Community College (MCC) recognizes

The Work Environment for Tenure-Track/Tenured Faculty at the University of Maryland. ADVANCE Research and Evaluation Report for CMNS

Benefits make up an important component of the employment. Employee Benefits in a Total Rewards Framework. article Business Case for Benefits

The experiences of PhD students at the division of Solid State Physics: Effects of nationality and educational background

National Standards for Disability Services. DSS Version 0.1. December 2013

Gender. Diversity Analysis. and. Discussion Paper and Lens

Manager briefing. Gender pay equity guide for managers GENDER P Y EQUITY

Organizational Culture Transformation: Leveraging Culture to Enhance Performance

Employee Engagement Survey Nova Scotia Government-wide Report

10 Steps In Finding, Hiring & Retaining Persons with Disabilities & Disabled Veterans

Millennial Disruption

The Center for Leadership Tier II: Leading with Others

Guidebook for Establishing Diversity and Inclusion Employee Resource Groups

Employees. Our Commitment. Our Approach

A Strategic Vision for Human Resources

Chapter 15 Personnel Management

Your Career At CREC. Imagining Your Professional Future

DEVELOPING AN INTEGRATED TALENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. A Human Resource Management Framework

The Final Assessment of A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: The Smeal College of Business Administration

Diversity Professionals Group Conference

THE CHANGING ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCES IN THE 21ST CENTURY AND THE HR SCORECARD

Human Resource Management: Building a Top-Quality Workforce

Supporting Women in Leadership

Human Resources Service Delivery Initiative Findings and Recommendations. Campus Update. November 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS. A. Equal Employment Opportunity Policy 41 C.F.R (a),

U.S. Office of Personnel Management 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Results for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Human Resources Division Cornell University. Strategic Plan

City and County of Denver 2015 Employee Engagement Survey

gender roles & equality IN AGRIBUSINESS 2015 SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS AGCAREERS@AGCAREERS.COM

The greatness gap: The state of employee disengagement. Achievers 2015 North American workforce survey results

Best Practices Dialogue: Faculty Recruitment and Retention

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE. Diversity Management Plan

Personal Branding. Our survey reveals the performance drivers for Brand YOU. June 2012

CSR. Sustainability. Report

customer-service equality standard

Leverage Your Employer Brand to Attract, Hire & Retain Top Talent

HealthStream Regulatory Script

FAO Competency Framework

Millennials at Work. Presentation at the 2013 Financial Management Institute PD Week. Presenters. Lori Watson Partner. Ryan Lotan Director

University of Georgia Libraries Diversity Plan 2013

Why Healthcare Leaders Need to Take a New Look at Diversity in Their Organizations

of various obstacles that will get in their way, like the organizational culture or their own work-life priorities

Learning and Development Hiring Manager Guide For Onboarding A New Manager

Simply put, we fear the unknown, deny the inevitable and hesitate to take action. Do any of these barriers resonate with you or your organization?

Winning leaders build winning organizations by developing other leaders. Noel Tichy

The War for Talent Retaining critical resources during outsourcing transitions

Future Leadership Shaped by the Numbers: The American College President 2012 Edition

Recruiting, Hiring and Employment Development Process White Paper

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

Our Framework Summary

POSITION DESCRIPTION

7 DRIVERS FOR BUILDING EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: FROM HIRE TO RETIRE

Northwest Louisiana Technical College Mission, Vision, and Values Statements

The Employment of PERFORMERS WITH DISABILITIES in the Entertainment Industry

Glassdoor Survey: How to Recruit Healthcare Professionals. A Strategic Guide for Talent Acquisition Professionals

2013 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Interpretation of Results

Pushing Diversity in the Legal Profession

ARB's overarching goals The Board has identified two objectives from the Act which underpin all of our work:

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Annual Employee Survey Results, 2015 (Survey Administration Period 4/27/15-6/15/15)

HR Strategy Survey Instrument for Key Leaders

Starting a Wellness Committee at Your Worksite

Schwab RIA Talent Study

Yes, the Investing in Stockport (IIS) Programme involves a number of changes to services and as such requires an EIA.

INSPIRING THE NEXT GENERATION WORKFORCE THE 2014 MILLENNIAL IMPACT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Employee Engagement FY Introduction. 2. Employee Engagement. 3. Management Approach

Ten Elements for Creating a World-class Corporate Diversity and Inclusion Program

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Annual Employee Survey Results

On-boarding. A Process for Retaining the Best Talent. MARCH 2010 Developed by Agency Human Resource Services, DHRM 1

in partnership with EMPLOYEE OUTLOOK EMPLOYEE VIEWS ON WORKING LIFE

Transcription:

Employees with Disabilities the Forgotten Diversity Segment: Tracking Trends Presented by: Pete Rutigliano, PhD Meg O Connell, PHR February 27, 2013 1

About Sirota On-Boarding Assessment Engagement and Morale Leadership Effectiveness Organization Effectiveness Exit Surveys Stakeholder Partnership 360 Surveys Other Surveys Values / Culture Human Capital / ROI Since 1972, improving key business outcomes using partnership principles, stakeholder feedback, and systematic support 2

The National Organization on Disability A 30 year old non-profit that serves as a catalyst for change in disability employment Mission: Expand the participation and contribution of America s 56 million men, women and children with disabilities in all aspects of life. Focus: Employment increase opportunity and economic selfsufficiency for the 33 million working-aged Americans with disabilities. 3

NOD Programs Our programs provide innovative approaches to improving disability employment Wounded Warrior Careers: Helping severely injured veterans transition into work Start on Success: Career opportunities for high school students with disabilities Bridges to Business: Demonstrating effective disability employment practices CEO Council: A forum for corporate leaders seeking to diversify their workforce NOD Surveys, by Sirota; by Kessler/Harris Interactive: Delivering data on disability issues/needs 4

Sirota and NOD Partnership Survey research specialists with four decades of experience helping global organizations to improve their performance by better understanding their people. We find the people solutions to business problems. NOD has three decades serving the disability community. Our primary focus is employment and our mission is to increase the employment rate of individuals with disabilities. We believe its ability, not disability, that counts. In 2010, Sirota and NOD joined forces in an effort to better understand the voice of employees with disabilities. Our efforts have been underway since then to capture, assess and understand the workplace experiences of individuals with disabilities as they compare their experiences to non-disabled colleagues. This data has not previously been shared! 5

Sirota and NOD Partnership Through this joint research venture our goals are to: Research the employment experience for those with disabilities in large, medium and small companies Understand differences/similarities in the data collected from employees with disabilities as it compares to employees without disabilities Sirota & NOD goals are to: 1. Raise awareness of the employment experience for workers with disabilities 2. Understand obstacles to creating a positive and successful work environment for people with disabilities and their co-workers 3. Provide information and resources that will help companies rectify inequities that may exist 6

Why is this important? 1 Approximately 20% of the US population has a disability 2 PWD s are the largest minority group in the country and the one with the greatest unemployment or underemployment 3 29-33 million working age Americans with disabilities 4 Pending OFCCP regulations will dramatically raise awareness and interest in employees with disabilities 5 EWD are less satisfied than their non-disabled employees 6 Comprehensive workplace diversity programs must include employees with disabilities; EWDs typically have been forgotten 7

Research Approach 2010 Discovery Are employees with disabilities (EWD) different than employees without disabilities? 2012 Replication Are the results from 2010 an anomaly or is there a recognized trend? Deeper Dive What can we learn? How should we respond? 8

2010 Discovery Dataset Goal Investigate attitudinal differences between EWD and EWOD employees. Analyzed engagement survey data from 6 different projects: N=267,769 Disability Status Engagement surveys included questions like: Overall, I am satisfied with the company. My manager is doing a good job. I clearly understand how my own job contributes to achieving the goals of the company Overall, I feel that my career goals can be met at XYZ 8,152 3% 259,617 97% EWD voluntarily self-identified Typically Do you consider yourself a person with a disability? Non-disabled employees EWD 9

2010 Discovery - Engagement Employees with Disabilities (EWD) are less satisfied, less proud, are less likely to recommend their company and less motivated to go beyond what is expected. Percent Favorable 100 90 80 70 60 Non-disabled employees EWD -8-7 -5-6 81 87 84 86 80 79 80 73 50 Satisfaction with company Proud of company Recommend company Motivated to go beyond what is expected 10

2010 Discovery So what? The first question people ask is --- Should an 8 point difference in Satisfaction be a concern? YES! Typically, a 5 point difference is considered notable and a call to action for employers. What differences do we see in the usual areas of investigation (e.g. gender, race, sexual orientation)? Gender Only a 1 point difference, males higher than females Race/Ethnicity No notable differences Sexual Orientation 1 point, heterosexual higher than homosexual No notable differences! 11

2010 Discovery - Other differences. Out of the 84 questions, there were no questions where EWD were more favorable than non-disabled. 12 12

2010 Discovery Forgotten Diversity Group Despite these differences, few companies are even capturing information on their employees with disabilities (the forgotten diversity segment) Out of 150 Sirota projects, only 6 inquired about disability (4%) Projects that Study Disability 6 4% 144 96% No Yes 13

Research Approach 2010 Discovery Are employees with disabilities (EWD) different than employees without disabilities? 2012 Replication Are the results from 2010 an anomaly or is there a recognized trend? Deeper Dive What can we learn? How should we respond? 14

2012 Replication Dataset Goal Replicate 2010 results are these results consistent? Analyzed engagement survey data from 7 projects (N=578,279) Disability Status EWD voluntarily self-identified Typically Do you consider yourself a person with a disability? First confirmation Similar population size, about 3% self identified as having a disability. 17,030 3% 561,249 97% Non-disabled employees EWD 15

2012 Replication - Engagement Results are consistent with 2010 findings: Across all standard measures of employee engagement, EWD are much lower. Percent Favorable 100 90 80 70 60 Employees w/o Disabilities Employees w/ Disabilities -10-7 -8-6 81 79 74 69 74 71 68 59 50 Satisfaction with company Proud of company Recommend company Motivated to go beyond what is expected 16

2012 Engagement Across All Projects Not one project showed EWD s had higher levels of engagement, 10 out of 13 projects showed notable differences of greater than 5 points difference. Non-disabled employees EWD 100 93 Percent Favorable 90 80 70 60 68 54 67 54 75 67 84 77 89 82 82 76 77 71 87 88 83 77 72 86 86 82 83 87 86 50 17 17

Research Approach 2010 Discovery Are employees with disabilities (EWD) different than employees without disabilities? 2012 Replication Are the results from 2010 an anomaly or is there a recognized trend? Deeper Dive What can we learn? How should we respond? 18

Deeper Dive Dataset Goal Investigate the major differences between EWD and EWOD Analyzed engagement survey data from 13 projects (N=846,048) Disability Status Now with enough data, we can look for larger trends and get a deeper understanding 25,182 3% 820,866 97% Non-disabled employees EWD 19

Deeper Dive - Largest Differences Relationship with Company Many of the largest differences were around the relationship between the employee and the company. 100 Non-disabled employees EWD Percent Favorable 90 80 70 60 50 40-11 -10-10 -10 63 52 Company communicates to employees on matters that affect them 54 44 We do not compromise on quality in order to meet other targets 72 62 I have enough information to do my job well 77 67 Satisfication with physical working conditions 20

Deeper Dive - Largest Differences-Personal Performance Some of the greatest differences, however, were related to encouragement and opportunity to achieve in their position. Non-disabled employees EWD 100 90-12 -12-12 -11 88 Percent Favorable 80 70 60 50 67 55 76 64 52 59 48 40 I have been given an opportunity to improve my skills I have the freedom to use my own judgment in my job Employees can express themselves without fear of retribution Satisfaction with opportunity for advancement 21

Deeper Dive - Smallest Differences Local Environment Most of the smallest differences were around local environment variables like compensation, team and manager. Percent Favorable 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 55 52 I am compensated fairly Non-disabled employees 46 42 The better my performance, the more I will be rewarded 81 EWD -3-4 -5-5 76 My supervisor is doing a good job 73 68 Teamwork and cooperation exist here 22

Deeper Dive What makes an Engaged EWD? What are the key factors that distinguish engaged EWD from those not engaged? Feel communicated to from management Have the opportunity to learn and get training Have satisfaction with work-life balance Feel involved in decisions Job makes good use of their skills and abilities Feel that managers will act on survey results These are the same key areas that drive ALL employee engagement! 23

Can We Make Change? One Company Results Tracking & Measuring Matters: By measuring this difference and attending to it, we can make change. Non-disabled employees EWD 100-6 -4-3 Percent Favorable 90 80 70 77 71 86 86 82 83 60 50 Time 1 Time 2 Time 3 24

What we know from this company? In our sample company, we see that as they begin to track and measure the overall satisfaction of employees with disabilities and employees without disabilities we see an increase in overall satisfaction, bridging the gap between employees with disabilities and employees without disabilities What did this company do differently? Dedicated diversity manager with a new focus on disability issues Since tracking disability data the company has increased its focus on disability employment initiatives Disability employment initiatives yielding the greatest results are: Setting hiring goals & measuring progress Diversity commitment (internal & external) Recruiting materials discussing disability as diversity Employee Resource Groups Trained managers, recruiters and staff on how to proactively discuss disability in the workplace 25

What we know 1. You can t track (or even understand) what you don t measure: NOD has been encouraging employers to better understand all your employees including those with disabilities 2. Incremental change takes time start now: Change doesn t happen overnight we know that disability employment is a journey and understanding where you are in that journey is a key to success 3. Employers are changing the conversation on disability: Disability conversations in the workplace are moving from taboo to mandatory for better success and increasing diversity (How are your conversations going?) 4. Assess your current state: Where are you? Have you reviewed your employment lifecycle? What diversity initiatives can you include EWD s? Where do you need help? Know where to find that help? 5. What is your plan?: You can t plow a field by turning it over in your mind. Know your next steps, how you are going to get there, and by when 6. Know who you are, and craft your message: Every employer has a brand, ensure that your brand matches the messaging on disability employment initiatives 26

As you continue on your journey to be more inclusive Think Differently Be Deliberate It s ability, not disability that counts Leave your perceptions behind what you think you know about disability is likely wrong Establish a plan and drive forward Know what success looks like and don t aim too low Be Dedicated Disability employment happens in a movement not a moment Dedicate time, talent &resources similar to all other diversity programs 27 27

Questions? Pete Rutigliano, PhD Vice President and Team Leader prutigliano@sirota.com Meg O Connell, PHR Vice President, Corporate Programs oconnellm@nod.org 28