Biomechanical analysis of the javelin at the 2005 IAAF World Championships in Athletics

Similar documents
Biomechanics in javelin throwing

Athletics (Throwing) Questions Javelin, Shot Put, Hammer, Discus

4 Energy transformations in the pole vault

Comparison of Kinematic and Temporal Parameters Between Different Pitch Velocity Groups

Acceleration Introduction: Objectives: Methods:

Uniformly Accelerated Motion

KIN Biomechanics LAB: Ground Reaction Forces - Linear Kinetics

LEVEL I SKATING TECHNICAL. September 2007 Page 1

Chapter 10: Linear Kinematics of Human Movement

THE JAVELIN THROW AND THE ROLE OF SPEED IN THROWING EVENTS

Under 20 of rotation the accuracy of data collected by 2D software is maintained?

How to increase Bat Speed & Bat Quickness / Acceleration

JAVELIN TRAINING IN FINLAND

Physics 160 Biomechanics. Angular Kinematics

AUTHOR ABSTRACT. The development of velocity and acceleration in sprints A comparison of elite and juvenile female sprinters. By Stefan Letzelter

B) 286 m C) 325 m D) 367 m Answer: B

Overhead Throwing: A Strength & Conditioning Approach to Preventative Injury

Hyung - Tak KIM archeryschool@archeryschool.com tel: fax:

THE SPEED PROGRAM THE following is A list Of POinTS THAT PRODucE RESulTS in SPEED improvement: CHANGE THE GAME

Comparison of range of motion tests with throwing performance and kinematics in elite team-handball players

Throwers Ten Exercise Program

Biomechanical Analysis of the Deadlift (aka Spinal Mechanics for Lifters) Tony Leyland

Softball Pitching Technique Softball Pitching Technique FIG. 1:

Biomechanics of Overarm Throwing. Deborah L. King, PhD

Name Period WORKSHEET: KINETIC AND POTENTIAL ENERGY PROBLEMS. 1. Stored energy or energy due to position is known as energy.

MANUAL HANDLING IN OFFICES

Lab #4 - Linear Impulse and Momentum

Dynamics of Vertical Jumps

Coaching the High School Discus Throw

Pattern Characterization of Running and Cutting Maneuvers in Relation to Noncontact

Speed is one of the most sought

THE BIG SIX. Six Best Volleyball Strength Training Exercises. By Dennis Jackson, CSCS

Long Jump Mechanics THE 13 PACE RUN-UP THE LAST 3 STRIDES THE TAKEOFF

Developing Event Specific Strength for the Javelin Throw Michael Young Louisiana State University

THROWER S TEN EXERCISE PROGRAM

Basic Rowing Technique. Autor: Thor S. Nilsen (NOR) Editors: Ted Daigneault (CAN), Matt Smith (USA)

The Biomechanics of Baseball Pitching

Chapter 8: Rotational Motion of Solid Objects

The Examination...2. Pitching Mechanics...4. Core Exercises...5. Scapular Stretches...7. Scapular Exercises...8. Summary Pitch Counts...

Charles University. Faculty of Physical Education and Sport. Dissertation thesis presented by. Ziad Saleh Ali Swedan. Title

Kinematics and Kinetics of Elite Windmill Softball Pitching

WORKSHEET: KINETIC AND POTENTIAL ENERGY PROBLEMS

MOTION DIAGRAMS. Revised 9/ LC, tlo

Centripetal Force. This result is independent of the size of r. A full circle has 2π rad, and 360 deg = 2π rad.

Understanding Planes and Axes of Movement

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF AN OPTIMIZATION MODEL FOR ELITE LEVEL SHOT PUTTING

Physical Capability Strength Test: One Component of the Selection Process

Displacement (x) Velocity (v) Acceleration (a) x = f(t) differentiate v = dx Acceleration Velocity (v) Displacement x

Sports technology, Science and Coaching

Lab #7 - Joint Kinetics and Internal Forces

USA Baseball Medical & Safety Advisory Committee Guidelines: May 2006

Lecture 1 I. PURPOSE OF COURSE LEARNING THE BEST FORM A. BEGIN WITH THE END IN MIND B. BASIC STANCE USCAA

Schedule of Amendments - IPC Athletics Rules & Regulations. Rules Original rule Amended Rule Rationale

Physics: Principles and Applications, 6e Giancoli Chapter 2 Describing Motion: Kinematics in One Dimension

Pitching Drills. Our philosophies/goals

Archery: Coaching Young Athletes. Developing Fundamental Movement Skills

FIS Injury Surveillance System. Video analysis of 4 ACL injuries. 2012/13 World Cup season

Trunk Strengthening and Muscle and Coordination Exercises for Lower Limb Amputees

BESTest Balance Evaluation Systems Test Fay Horak PhD Copyright 2008

Plyometric Training for Track and Field Indiana High School Clinic 2008 Larry Judge, Ph.D. Ball State University

Ch 7 Kinetic Energy and Work. Question: 7 Problems: 3, 7, 11, 17, 23, 27, 35, 37, 41, 43

Problem Set 1. Ans: a = 1.74 m/s 2, t = 4.80 s

How to serve a volleyball is an important skill. The serve is the only skill in volleyball where the player has complete control.

Lab 8: Ballistic Pendulum

Locomotion Skills. Walking Running Horizontal Jump Hopping Skipping

MASTERS OF PHILOSOPHY (M. PHIL.) PSYSICAL EDUCATION DETAILED SYLLABUS SESSION

VARIABILITY OF BIOMECHANICAL PARAMETERS IN THE TRIPLE JUMP TECHNIQUE A CASE STUDY

Design Considerations for Water-Bottle Rockets. The next few pages are provided to help in the design of your water-bottle rocket.

Stretching for Young Athletes. Shawn P. Anderson, SPT Duke University Doctor of Physical Therapy

FUNDAMENTALS OF SHOT PUT TECHNIQUE

Human-like Arm Motion Generation for Humanoid Robots Using Motion Capture Database

CONDITIONING PROGRAM

Real sport for fit men and women!

F f v 1 = c100(10 3 ) m h da 1h 3600 s b =

Penalty Stroke in Field Hockey: A Biomechanical Study

Simple Machines. Figure 2: Basic design for a mousetrap vehicle

A proper warm-up is important before any athletic performance with the goal of preparing the athlete both mentally and physically for exercise and

Physics 2A, Sec B00: Mechanics -- Winter 2011 Instructor: B. Grinstein Final Exam

Skill Focus: Ball familiarisation Age: 6+

Speed, velocity and acceleration

Prevention & Management of ACL Injury. Ian Horsley PhD, MCSP Lee Herrington PhD, MCSP

Football Learning Guide for Parents and Educators. Overview

Wind Turbines. Wind Turbines 2. Wind Turbines 4. Wind Turbines 3. Wind Turbines 5. Wind Turbines 6

AS COMPETITION PAPER 2008

PHY121 #8 Midterm I

Track Workouts. Focusing on quality of training improves performance, quantity training decreases performance, even for endurance athletes.

VertiMax V8 Vertical Jump & Speed Training Program

THE INTERNATIONAL SKEET GUN MOUNT

Movement Animset Pro v.1.5

PHYSICAL EDUCATION IM 36

BEACH VOLLEYBALL TRAINING PROGRAM

FLAG FOOTBALL SKILLS

Physics: Principles and Applications, 6e Giancoli Chapter 4 Dynamics: Newton's Laws of Motion

Interval Throwing Program for Baseball Players Phase I

A Guide to Success on and off the Field

DISCUS DRILLS: CORRECTING THE 10 MAJOR MISTAKES SEEN IN (ALMOST) EVERY YOUNG THROWER

Conceptual Questions: Forces and Newton s Laws

Work, Energy & Momentum Homework Packet Worksheet 1: This is a lot of work!

Hidetsugu KURODA 1, Fumiaki ARIMA 2, Kensuke BABA 3 And Yutaka INOUE 4 SUMMARY

MSD Hazards & Solutions FORCE

Transcription:

Biomechanical analysis of the javelin at the 2005 IAAF World Championships in Athletics by IAAF 21:2; 67-80, 2006 By Masatoshi Murakami, Satoru Tanabe, Masaki Ishikawa Juha Isolehto, Paavo V. Komi, Akira Ito Biomechanical research on the javelin throw has focused mainly on the release parameters. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationships between the distance thrown and kinematic parameters of the throwing movement. The best competition throws of eight male finalists at the 2005 IAAF World Championships in Athletics and forty-nine Japanese male throwers were analysed. The authors confirmed the importance of release velocity and found certain characteristics of the throwing movement that enable the finalists at World Championships to obtain higher velocity than other throwers. These include a higher approach velocity and keeping the fore knee angle in the extended position during the final phase of the throw in order to convert the approach velocity into forward rotation of the trunk. They also found that during the forward rotation of trunk, top throwers keep both the elbow joint angle and the adduction-abduction angle of the shoulder small, which enables them to effectively transfer the internal rotation velocity of shoulder joint to the grip velocity. ABSTRACT The authors work at the Osaka University of Health and Sport Sciences. During the 2005 IAAF World Championships in Athletics in Helsinki they were members of a scientific research project team led by Prof. Akira Ito. Introduction B AUTHORS iomechanical research on the javelin throw has focused mainly on the release parameters, including the initial velocity, release angle, attitude angle, attack angle and release height of javelin (BARTLETT R. et al., 1988; BARTLETT R. et al., 1996; HUBBARD M. and ALAWAYS L.W., 1987). These papers have argued that the most important factor for achieving a top performance is high velocity of the implement at the moment of release. However, the papers have not clarified the throwing 67

68 movement in detail. MERO et al. (1994) investigated the body segment contribution to the throws of competitors at the 1992 Olympic Games in Barcelona. The authors compared the mean values of many kinematic parameters of the male and female finalists and found the differences within both groups. However, the relationship between the movements and distances thrown were not established. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the characteristics of the throwing movement in the javelin by investigating the relationships between kinematic parameters of the movement and the distance thrown. Methods The javelin throwers analysed in this study were eight male finalists at the 11th IAAF World Championships in Athletics in Helsinki, Finland in August 2005 (hereinafter finalists ) and forty-nine Japanese male throwers (hereinafter others ) participating in four domestic athletics meetings. The throwing movements were recorded by two video cameras set in the stadium. The camera speeds were 200 fps (for the meetings in Japan) and 60 fps (for the World Championships). The best performance of each of the throwers was analysed. These ranged from 45.25m (for one of the domestic Japanese throwers) to 87.17m (for the gold medallist at the World Championships). We recorded nine control points on the runway using two additional video cameras (distance in the throwing direction: 7m, vertical direction: 3.5m, lateral direction: 4m) for the following threedimensional analysis. Twenty-four reference landmarks on each athlete s body and three reference landmarks on the javelin were digitised and the threedimensional coordinates were calculated using the direct linear transformation (DLT) method. The three-dimensional coordinates were smoothed using the 4th Butterworth digital filter and the cut-off frequencies, which ranged from 4.5 to 20.5Hz, were calculated by a residual analysis method (YOKOI T. and MCNITTY-GRAY J.L., 1990). With this data we calculated the following: Release parameters (initial velocity, release angle, attitude angle and attack angle), Approach velocity - calculated from the body s CM (Centre of Mass) immediately before the rear foot contact in the final phase of the throw, Pull distance and pull time (distance and time of javelin movement from the rear foot contact to javelin release, respectively), Joint and segment angles at the moment of release. In addition, we calculated the theoretical distance for each of the throws studied using the following estimate equation: where D: the theoretical distance : the initial velocity at the moment of javelin release : the release angle g: the acceleration due to gravity h: the release height The significance level was set at 5% (Peason s product-moment correlation coefficient). The symbols and in all figures indicate the finalists and others, respectively. Results Release parameters, pull distance and time, and approach run velocity Although a significant positive correlation was observed between the initial velocity of the javelin and the distance thrown (r = 0.889, p < 0.001; Figure 1), non-significant correlations were obtained between the distance thrown and the release angle, attitude angle, attack angle and release height (Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively). A significant positive correlation was observed between the distance thrown and the calculated theoretical distance (r = 0.909, p < 0.001; Figure 6).

The pull distance was correlated positively and significantly with the distance thrown (r = 0.426, p < 0.01; Figure 7), but the pull time was negatively correlated (r = 0.418, p < 0.01; Figure 8). A significant positive correlation between the distance thrown and the approach velocity was obtained (r = 0.742, p < 0.001; Figure 9). Segment angles of the throwing arm at the moment of javelin release Although significant negative correlations were observed between the distance thrown and both the elbow joint angle (r = 0.484, p < 0.001; Figure 10) and adduction-abduction angle of the shoulder joint (r = 0.474, p < 0.001; Figure 11), the horizontal adductionabduction angle of the shoulder joint showed a non-significant correlation with the distance thrown (Figure 12). Angle of trunk and front leg knee joint at the moment of release Although a significant positive correlation was observed between the distance thrown and the forward trunk rotation angle (r = 0.463, p < 0.001; Figure 13), a non-significant correlation was observed between the distance thrown and the lateral rotation angle of the trunk (Figure 14). The distance thrown and the front leg knee joint angle showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.310, p < 0.05; Figure 15). Discussion The values of the release parameters for the finalists were consistent with those of male throwers reported by MERO et al. (1994). Although a significant positive correlation was observed between the distance thrown and the initial velocity, non-significant correlations were observed between the distance thrown and the release angle, attitude angle, attack angle and release height. These results are consistent with other studies that indicate the velocity of the javelin at release is the most important factor for achieving a high performance (GREGOR, R.J., 1985; BARTLETT, R. et al., 1988). A significant positive correlation was observed between the distance thrown and the theoretical distance. Almost all the performances by the others were lower than the theoretical distances we calculated. These results suggest that environmental factors (e.g. weather, atmospheric pressure, atmospheric temperature, wind direction and speed, etc.) interfered with the flight of the javelin. However, despite the heavy rain during the World Championships final, the finalists achieved distances that were almost the same or greater than the theoretical distances. These results suggest that they have a highly developed ability to receive environmental information and react effectively to it. Compared to the others, the finalists showed higher approach run velocity, longer pull distance and shorter pull time. The results suggest that the finalists perform the large and fast throwing motion during the final phase, and that this motion is crucial to performance in the javelin throw. The finalists had a tendency towards a decreased elbow joint angle at the moment of release by a value similar to that reported by MERO et al. (1994). Theoretically, the internal rotation velocity of the shoulder joint can be transferred to the grip velocity most effectively when the elbow joint is at a right angle. In other words, having their elbow joint angle nearer to the right angle indicates that the finalists performed a more efficient movement to transfer the internal rotation velocity of the shoulder joint to the initial javelin velocity than the others. Although coaches generally instruct throwers to keep the elbow high (to keep the shoulder joint in an abducted position) and extend the elbow joint at the moment of release, the present results suggest that these instructions should be reconsidered. Further, the finalists had a tendency towards an increased forward rotation angle 69

Initial velocity (m/s) Finalist Others Fig. 1. Relationship between the throw distance and initial velocity. ***; p<0.001 of the trunk and an extension of the front leg knee at the moment of release. The present results support the general coaching instructions to keep the knee in the extended position in order to convert the approach velocity into the forward rotation of the trunk most effectively. Conclusion The purpose of this study was to clarify the kinematic characteristics of the javelin throw movements of by studying the finalists of the 11th IAAF World Championships in Athletics and 49 japanese throwers: They approach with faster velocity and keep the fore knee angle in the extended position during the final phase of throw to change the approach velocity into the forward rotation of trunk During the forward rotation of the trunk, they keep their elbow joint angle small and adduction-abduction angle of the shoulder also small to be able to effectively transfer the internal rotation velocity of the shoulder joint to the grip velocity. 70 Our findings confirm that most important factor for achieving a high performance in the javelin is the release velocity. The characteristics of the throwing movement of the finalists at World Championships that enable them to obtain a higher release velocity than other throwers are as follows: Please send all correspondence to: Akira Ito aito@ouhs.ac.jp

Finalist Others Release angle (deg) Fig. 2. Relationship between the throw distance and release angle. 71

Finalist Others Attitude angle (deg) 72 Fig. 3. Relationship between the throw distance and attitude angle.

Finalist Others Attack angle (deg) Fig. 4. Relationship between the throw distance and attack angle. 73

Finalist Others Release height (m) 74 Fig. 5. Relationship between the throw distance and release height.

Theroretical distance (m) Fig. 6. Relationship between the throw distance and theoretical distance. ***; p<0.001 Pull angle (m) Fig. 7. Relationship between the throw distance and pull distance. **; p<0.01 75

Pull time (s) Fig. 8. Relationship between the throw distance and pull time. **; p<0.01 Approach run velocity (m/s) 76 Fig. 9. Relationship between the throw distance and approach run velocity. ***; p<0.001

Abduction-aduction angle (deg) Elbow angle (deg) Fig. 10. Relationship between the throw distance and elbow angle. ***; p<0.001 Fig. 11. Relationship between the throw distance and abduction-dduction angle of the shoulder joint. ***; p<0.001 77

Horizontal abduction-adduction angle (deg) Fig. 12. Relationship between the throw distance and Horizontal abduction-adduction angle of the shoulder joint. Fore leg knee angle (deg) 78 Fig. 13. Relationship between the throw distance and fore leg knee angle. *; p<0.05

Forward-backward rotation angle of trunk (deg) Fig. 14. Relationship between the throw distance and forward-backward rotation angle of trunk. ***; p<0.001 Left-right lean angle (deg) Fig. 15. Relationship between the throw distance and lateral rotation of trunk. ***; p<0.001 79

REFERENCES MERO, A.; KOMI, P.V.; KORJUS, T.; NAVARRO, E. ; GREGOR, R.J.: Body segment contributions to javelin throwing during final thrust phases. J. Appl. Biomech.10 (1994): 166-177. BARTLETT, R.; BEST, R.J.: The biomechanics of javelin throwing: a review. Journal of Sports Sciences. 6 (1988): 1 38. BARTLETT, R.; MÜLLER, E.; LINDINGER, S.; BRUNNER, F.; MORRISS, C.: Threedimensional evaluation of the kinematic release parameters for javelin throwers of different skill levels. J. Appl. Biomech. 12 (1996): 58 71. GREGOR, R.J.; PINK, M.: Biomechanical analysis of a world record javelin throw: A case study. Int. J. Sport Biomech.1 (1985)::73 77. HUBBARD, M.; ALAWAYS, L.W.: Optimum release conditions for the new rules javelin. Int. J. Sport Biomech. 3 (1987): 207 221. YOKOI, T.; MCNITTY-GRAY, J. L.: A threshold to determine optimum cut-off frequency in automatic data smoothing using digital filter. Proceedings of the American Society of Biomechanics (14th Annual Meeting) 1990: 209 210. 80 Goldie Sayers/Photo: Getty Images