Michigan Sugar Company

Similar documents
Strawberry Production Basics: Matted Row

various P levels for the past two years. Treatments were a one time application

Estimated Costs of Crop. Production in Iowa File A1-20 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, Ag Decision Maker

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

Culture in field conditions - Challenges A South American point of view Roberto Campos Pura Natura, Argentina

COVER CROPS FOR RASPBERRY PLANTINGS

Maize is a major cereal grown and consumed in Uganda and in the countries of Kenya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda

Improve and protect your soil

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

ROCKY MOUNTAIN CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER. Local Performance Objectives For Exams and Continuing Education Programs

What Size Farm Tractor Do I Need?

Agronomic and Economic Considerations on Michigan Farms

How can information technology play a role in primary industries climate resilience?

2016 Iowa Farm. Custom Rate Survey File A3-10 Many Iowa farmers hire custom machine work. Ag Decision Maker. Average Charge. Median Charge Range

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

NO-TILL AND NITROGEN FIXING INOCULANTS

Commercial Fruit Production. Essential Commercial Fruit Production Decisions

Turfgrass Management of Bermudagrass Football Fields

Remote Sensing Applications for Precision Agriculture

GROUNDWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

Section II: Problem Solving (200 points) KEY

Radishes as biofumigants and weed suppressant cover crops. Joel Gruver Western Illinois University

Ecologically based weed management! Chuck Mohler! Cornell University!

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF OHIO. Dual MAGNUM. EPA Reg EPA SLN No. OH

BENEFITS OF USING IPM

Fayette County Appraisal District

Erosion and Storm Water Management Unit Mail Stop John Ireland Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155

TABLE 1. Basic cost information for Dell City area, Otero County, Item

Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is a

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

Negotiating New Lease Arrangements with the Transition to Direct Seed Intensive Cropping Systems

Hand-held and Backpack Sprayers for Applying Pesticides

Source control targeting measures for arable tillage in the Wensum Demonstration Test Catchment, Norfolk

Agro-One Soil Analysis

Soybean Marketing & Production College, Minneapolis, MN. isafarmnet.com

Soybean roulette: improving the odds for maximizing soybean yields

Corn and Soybean Production Calendar

WEED MANAGEMENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES

2014 Flax Weed Control Trial

BioDrill for many. Calibration takes a few minutes. The test bag is pushed up under the Fenix housing through a springloaded

SAMPLE MULTI-YEAR LEASE AGREEMENT

Onion & Leek Planting Guide

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

Adapt-N Guided Hands-on Exercise

Irrigation Scheduling on Small Grains using AZSCHED for Windows - Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

Economics of Alfalfa and Corn Silage Rotations. Ken Barnett 1 INTRODUCTION

So far the effort, outlined in the state s Nutrient Reduction Strategy to reduce hypoxia in the Gulf, has been voluntary.

CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. Implementation of Sustainable Agricultural Initiatives

Forage Bermudagrass: Selection, Establishment and Management. Introduction

Manure Spreader Calibration

for Sweet Corn Joe Masabni UKREC Princeton, KY Joe Masabni

Visit to Ted and Nicoline Vaalburg s farm at:

Humidtropics Kiboga/Kyankwanzi Soybean production training

Circular 390 Rev. November Soil Judging & Land Treatment

Phone: x 304 Caro MI URL: aslagh@tisd.k12.mi.us

Incorporating rice straw into soil may become disposal option for growers

igrow Soybeans Best Management Practices for Soybean Production

Is Lower Priced Urea a Bargain?

OBJECTIVES: To understand decisions farmers must make in order to stay in business and how the government actions can impact these decisions.

Biodegradable Mulch Product Testing 2006

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

SOYBEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS

Cercospora Leaf Spot Control and Other Research Updates

Crop residue management (CRM), a cultural practice that

Agricultural Production and Research in Heilongjiang Province, China. Jiang Enchen. Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Northeast

Operators Manual SOIL COMPACTION TESTER

CRANBERRY ETNA. Etna is a cranberry bean with early maturity, high yield potential and a large seed size.

EFFECT OF AVAIL ON CORN PRODUCTION IN MINNESOTA

CROPS COSTS AND RETURNS 2014

IAC 7/2/08 Utilities[199] Ch 9, p.1 CHAPTER 9 RESTORATION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS DURING AND AFTER PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION

Sustainability in Agricultural Marketing:

Promoting Pollination Farming for Native Bees

FIELD MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

Advanced Soil Organic Matter Management

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

Simazine 4L Herbicide

Using Enterprise Budgets To Make Decisions about Your Farm Richar d Carkner

Diversified Crop Production Placement. Example Application

Using Web-based Software for Irrigation and Nitrogen Management in Onion Production: our Research Plan for 2013

Number 389 February 15, 2013

Organic Farm Yield and Profitability. from NEON, NASS, and other sources

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

Sulfur Fertilization of Corn. Jeff Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center December 2013

COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSONS

2016 FIELD CROP BUDGETS Publication 60

Farming at dairy farms (produktion på mælkelandbrug)

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement.

SCALING UP YOUR VEGETABLE OPERATION Practical Farmers of Iowa Conference 2011

Horticulture Information Leaflet 33-E

GMO CONTAMINATION PREVENTION

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

Tomato Year-Round IPM Program ANNUAL CHECKLIST (Reviewed 12/12)

Good planning is good farming

Schneps, Leila; Colmez, Coralie. Math on Trial : How Numbers Get Used and Abused in the Courtroom. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, p i.

Factors Affecting the Economic Threshold for Heterodera schachtii Control in Sugar Beef

Writing a Successful Exterior Landscape Maintenance RFP

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

U.S. SOYBEAN SUSTAINABILITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOL

Transcription:

Michigan Sugar Company YOUTH SUGARBEET PROJECT Name Signature Age Date of Birth Score Address City Zip Code Phone County Email Address Agriculturalist Years in this Project/Program This Year 20 Club Name School

Michigan Sugar Youth Project Designed specifically for youth in the sugarbeet producing areas of Michigan, the Youth Project seeks to promote education and interest in sugarbeets. The program is for all youth who wish to participate in a supervised sugarbeet project sponsored by Michigan Sugar Company. Objectives of the project are: (1) to help Youth Project members learn and effectively apply recommended cultural and production practices used toward sugarbeet production; (2) to teach members why cooperation is necessary between growers and processors, and (3) to familiarize members with the sugarbeet industry. These objectives can be obtained by participating in all components of the project. A. Project Requirements All participants are required to fill out a Registration Form located on the first page of the Youth Project booklet located on the Michigan Sugar website under Education Youth Project. Participation in an organized 4-H club or FFA chapter is optional. Youth Project Participants must be between the ages of 8 and 18 during the calendar year of the project. Participating members are required to complete any two (2) of the listed components of the Project: 1. Make an exhibit or presentation of a Poster/Presentation at a county fair. o The exhibit should consist of three uniform sugarbeets, properly cleaned, with the leaves, petioles and root hairs removed. 2. The Poster/Presentation must be on a subject pertaining to sugarbeets, i.e. growing, processing, or any other related field. Please check with your local

fair board, or in the fair book, for rules on exhibiting a poster/presentation. Excerpt from Huron County Fair Book: SECTION A - Educational Exhibits 1. An educational exhibit must include one of the following: a) Poster no larger than 14" x 22" and notebook; b) Poster no larger than 14" x 22" and display of article(s); or c) Notebook and display of article(s). Possible Score for the above = 10 if exhibiting Participants may participate in the Youth Project Field Day held at the Saginaw Valley Research & Extension Center. Youth are highly encouraged to attend this educational event to learn about research, diseases, displaying beets at a fair, etc. Possible Score for the above = 20 if attending Possible Score for the Youth Project Test given at Field Day = 0 to 20 Possible Score for the Youth Project Interview given at Field Day = 0 to 20 Participants may complete the Michigan Sugar Company Youth Sugarbeet Project booklet, posted to the Michigan Sugar website under Education Youth Project. Participants will fill out a complete and accurate record of labor, seed, fertilizer and other production costs of their crop. The cost record is to be submitted to the 4-H Leader, FFA advisor or to a Michigan Sugar Ag Office. Participants may contract one acre, or part thereof, of parent s, or

sponsor s, field in order to complete the book. An assignment for their acre may be made during contracting. B. Basis for Awards Possible Score for the above = 0 to 30 For proper recognition, the top participant in each grower district will be given suitable awards and recognition. Top individuals will be selected from those with the highest combined scores in the Cultural and Management Practices and Member s Participation sections as determined by the project score sheet. 1. Project participants who have filled out the Youth Sugarbeet Project booklet should return completed booklets to the Michigan Sugar Company district office at a time to be determined by each grower district and will have completed all questions. 2. It is recommended that the agriculturalist, other members of the Ag staff and/or a director of the local grower district Youth Advisory committee score the Cultural and Management Practices section in the participant s booklet at a time determined by the area Ag Manager. 3. It is further recommended that the participants be interviewed individually during Field Day by a member of a group which may consist of the following: a 4-H leader or FFA advisor, one or more agriculturists, one or more grower directors, and possibly other members of the Ag staff or community. The interview and written test will determine the participant s knowledge of improved cultural and production practices, the sugarbeet industry, and the processor-grower relationship. Each grower district will score participants in accordance with guidelines drawn up by the Youth

Advisory Committee. (See Member s Participation in Project Sheet) 4. Youth Project participant awards will be determined by a committee which may consist of the following: county extension office, FFA advisor, local grower district representative or Michigan Sugar Company staff. 5. Prestige and Premier Sugarbeet Growers shall be selected on the following basis: a. Prestige Growers One for each 15 participants or fraction thereof. Participant must be 12 years old. b. Premier Growers One for each 5 participants or fraction thereof. c. A participant may not receive both Premier and Prestige Grower Award. Participants should be given the opportunity to give reports of their project to their local Grower district board. d. In case of a tie between two or more participants, Grower district Prestige or Premier Sugarbeet Growers shall be determined from the following: (1) Participant completing most years in the Sugarbeet Project (2) Oldest participant. e. The winners of the Premier and Prestige awards will be those with the highest scores. Please see Score Sheet below. C. Awards Banquet 1. A district banquet will be held for each district, at which time winners will be announced and gifts will be distributed. Only participants who complete two or more components of the project will receive a participant gift at the Banquet. 2. The cost of the local banquets will be paid for by Michigan Sugar Company.

Michigan Sugar YOUTH PROJECT BOOK Cultural & Management Practices on Your Project I. Field Description Tile drainage (check one) 1. Systematic grid pattern (every 4 rods, every 50 ft., etc.) 2. Random and low spots 3. Very little tile Surface drainage (check any / all that apply) 1. Surface outlets and control structures 2. Surface ditching 3. Some undrained potholes Topography (check one) 1. Level 2. Rolling Soil type (check one) 1. Clay 2. Clay loam 3. Loam 4. Sandy loam 5. Sandy Total acres in project field II. Soil Test Report Soil test taken: Yes No Date 20 1. Test results ph Avail. Lbs. P 2 O 5 Avail. Lbs. K 2 O 2. Recommendations/soil test (lbs./acre) N P 2 O 5 K 2 O Soil Nitrate test taken: Yes No Date 20 Nitrogen Avail. lbs./acre top 2 ft Nitrogen recommendation lbs./acre

III. Crop history (fill in) Last year s crop Two years ago crop Three years ago crop IV. Type of Primary Tillage (check one) Fall plowed Chisel plowed No primary tillage Deep subsoil tillage V. Secondary Tillage (check one - if any) Fall or winter secondary tillage No spring tillage One pass tillage in spring Tilled two or more passes in spring VI. Fertilizer Program Name of Fertilizer Dealer: A. Fall application: lbs./acre Analysis Actual lbs.: N: P 2 O 5 K 2 0 /acre B. Broadcast in spring before planting: lbs./acre Analysis Actual lbs.: N: P 2 O 5 K 2 0 /acre lbs./acre Second application (if any): Analysis Actual lbs.: N: P 2 O 5 K 2 0 /acre C. Starter fertilizer: 1. In row with planter: lbs./acre Analysis Actual lbs.: N: P 2 O 5 K 2 0 Mn B /acre

2. Broadcast starter: lbs./acre Analysis Actual lbs.: N: P 2 O 5 K 2 0 Mn B /acre D. Additional nitrogen applied: Form of nitrogen: Anhydrous 28% Dry lbs./acre Analysis Actual lbs.: Nitrogen /acre E. Total fertilizer applied to crop: Actual lbs.: N: P 2 O 5 K 2 0 Mn B /acre F. Manure applied (tons/acre): VII. Planting A. Date of planting project: B. Seed Variety Description: Seed size/treatment C. Seeds per acre: D. Depth seed planted: inches E. Seed spacing in each row: inches F. Row width: inches G. Planter type: No. rows: VIII. Soil Quality/Wind/Erosion control (check any that apply) A. Planted in rough seedbed B. Planted in fall-seeded cover, etc. C. Planted in spring-seeded cover, etc. D. Planted between permanent wind breaks E. Planted between temporary wind breaks F. Spring-seeded grain between rows of sugarbeets G. Early cultivation H. Rows planted north and south I. Beets planted on soil not subject to blowing J. Oil seed radish

K. Clover IX. Stand Beets per 100 of row At first cultivation At harvest X. Pesticides used (list all used) Preemergence (weed control) Postemergence (weed control) Insecticide Fungicide XI. Weed control (check any that apply) A. Excellent Good Fair Poor B. How controlled 1. By herbicide 2. By hand labor 3. By cultivation fill in number of times cultivated XII. Crop Stress (check any that apply) A. Insect damage B. Disease: 1. Seedling disease 2. Leafspot - Cercospora 3. Rhizoctonia 4. Rhizomania C. Nematodes D. Herbicide damage E. Wind F. Crusting G. Moisture: 1. Too little

2. About right 3. Too much H. Frost XIII. Harvest Results (complete) A. Recoverable white sugar per ton (RWST) B. Tons per acre C. Recoverable white sugar per acre (RWSA) D. Percent sugar E. Percent clear juice purity (CJP) F. Percent tare G. Date of harvest

XIV. Financial Report (all income and cost in dollars per acre) A. Income (gross dollar per acre) $ B. Expenses (dollar per acre) 1. Total fertilizer $ 2. Seed $ 3. Herbicides $ 4. Insecticides $ 5. Fungicides $ 6. Labor a) Plow $ b) Seed bed preparation $ c) Plant $ d) Spray (application only) $ e) Crust bust $ f) Cultivate $ g) Topping $ h) Harvest $ i) Hauling $ j) Other $ k) Other $ l) Other $ 7. Land cost (dollar per acre) a) Rent $ b) Interest on investment $ c) Property taxes $ Total Expenses $ C. Net profit or loss $

Member s Participation in Project Score Sheet Possible Score Participant s Score Test 20 Interview 20 Quality and detail of completed report and story: A. Excellent 30 B. Good 20 C. Fair 10 Field Day 20 Fair or Sugarbeet Exhibit 10 Total Possible Points 100 Total Participant s Points Date Signed Ag Manager

Plot of Your Farm N W E S Acreage for your Sugarbeet Project should be accurately plotted from KNOWN REFERENCE POINTS on the map above. (If in a larger field, the description of your acreage might read: rows 20-40 from the west side of the southwest quarter; or all sugarbeets from the north boundary of Field G to a point 200 from this boundary; or any way to designate your project acreage in relation to home farm.) County: Township: Section: Description: Contract Number:

Project Report Write a brief story explaining what you have done during project year.

Project Report (continued)

Michigan Sugar Company 2600 S. Euclid Avenue Bay City, MI 48706 2000 Michigan Sugar Company Printed in U.S.A. Revised 1/2014