How To Conduct A Billing Rate Survey Of A Law Firm In Minnesota



Similar documents
2012 Business Partner Sponsorship Program

Rouch, Jean. Cine-Ethnography. Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press, p 238

ANNUAL REPORT CALENDAR YEAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

2015 "Best Law Firms" ALL TIER REPORT. Holland & Hart LLP

Minnesota State Bar Association Continuing Legal Education. Medical Devices: Law and Strategy

Join me in hiring a STEP-UP intern today!

BRUCE D. MALKERSON. Partner. (612) EXPERIENCE

PRESENTATIONS LAWRENCE REED MCDONOUGH ATTORNEY AT LAW

The Economics of Law Practice in Ohio in A Desktop Reference

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Hot Bankruptcy Topics. Real Estate Lawyers

VOLUNTEER ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FORM

Spring 2007: Needs Assessment Paralegals and Legal Assistants Occupations

How To Write A Law Book

If You Own Property With GAF Timberline Roofing Shingles Made Between 1998 and 2009,

2010 Law Firm Statistical Survey

Special Report Digital Bonus Distribution Closing Dates

Paralegals and Legal Assistants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF CONTINUED HEARING ON DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Alan M. Anderson Alan Anderson Law Firm LLC Suite 1260 The Colonnade 5500 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55416

Our Commitment to Diversity

JEFFREY A. LOWE, ESQ. Global Practice Leader - Law Firm Practice Managing Partner - Washington, D.C.

Business: Paralegal Studies March 2012 Needs Assessment

JOHN J. CARNEY, ESQ.

Enterprise Legal Management. Enterprise Legal Management Trends Report

MLAA General Meeting March 9, 2010

Alan is a qualified neutral (ADR) under Rule 114 of the Minnesota General Rules of Practice for the District Courts.

Joseph G. Maternowski Shareholder

MAP Reports. Teacher Report (by Goal Descriptors) Displays teachers class data for current testing term sorted by RIT score.

Fennemore Craig Earns Top Tier Ratings in the 2016 U.S. News - Best Lawyers Best Law Firms Rankings

A GUIDE TO MECHANIC'S LIENS IN MINNESOTA

Minnesota Justice Foundation. The People We Serve. Annual Report Photo Credit: Adam Przewoski

Diversified Real Estate Services, Inc.

Report to Congress. Annual Report on Self-Insured Group Health Plans. Hilda L. Solis Secretary of Labor

NORTHERN VIRGINIA. Hogan & Hartson LLP

Minnesota Judicial State Court Salaries

ValueSOLVE. Patrick R. Burns Lawyer, Arbitrator, Mediator

Legal Placements, Inc.

E-Discovery. A Practical Guide to

INVENTOR ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Morrison & Foerster LLP Rankings

Orange County Bar Association Young Lawyers Section Law Student Mentoring Program

BANKRUPTCY PARALEGAL: TRUSTEE'S COUNSEL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Health Care Compliance One of Today s Fastest Growing Industries

Copyright 2011, Working Mother Media NAFE & Flex-Time Lawyers LLC. All rights reserved.

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, Registration No. 333-

Legal Advice for International Students

APPLICATION FOR LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE IMPORTANT NOTICE

Appendix D Business Resources. Contents:

Jean Holloway, Moderator

2010 Economics of Law Practice Attorney Income and Billing Rate Summary Report

32 nd Annual Advanced* Employee Benefits Workshop

-1- Investment Funds (2012) Intellectual Property (2010) Investment Funds (2009)

MEDIA KIT. For help with a story or to set up an interview, please contact:

The Law Office of the Future: Staffing Trends and Strategies Presentation for First State ALA October 2, 2012

Health Economics Program

FIRM RANKINGS. BTI Client Service A-Team

CASE STUDY: Six Sigma Legal Services for Mortgage Loans

Report to Congress. Annual Report on Self-Insured Group Health Plans. Seth Harris Acting Secretary of Labor

Oregon state bar 2012 economic survey

LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT: The only way to potentially receive money from this Settlement.

Hamline University School of Law

Comparison of National Level Paralegal Certification Exams

Speaker Biographies. Rose Auslander panelist panel two

MINNESOTA LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY SECTION

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INTRODUCTION

APPLICATION FOR LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE

APPENDIX 1: SURVEY. Copyright 2010 Major, Lindsey & Africa, LLC. All rights reserved.

New Lawyer Experience

Financial Evaluation of the Right of Way Acquisition Loan Fund (RALF) Program

JOHN J. CARNEY, ESQ.

Twin City Fire Insurance Company Name of Insurance Company to which Application is made

2. a. Primary Location of the firm: Street Address: City: County: State: Zip: Telephone: Fax:

The Debtor is Back: Consumers Charge Forward Under The New Bankruptcy Law By Camille J. Iurillo and Sabrina C. Beavens

Nine Gould & Ratner LLP Attorneys Named Illinois Super Lawyers; Five Attorneys Named "Rising Stars" for 2013

January Report on SBLF Participants Small Business Lending Growth Submitted to Congress pursuant to Section 4106(3) of

J.D. & M.B.A. DUAL DEGREE PROGRAM CALIFORNIA WESTERN SCHOOL OF LAW SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF BUSINESS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CASE 0:10-cv DSD -JJK Document 30 Filed 04/07/11 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No.

LawFirmKPI Survey Report Comparison Sample Law Firm LLP

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

City of Philadelphia

Patent Law. Master of Science in. PAID

APPLICATION FOR LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE (CLAIMS-MADE AND REPORTED BASIS)

Berning & Heidebrecht, Ltd. Business Valuation & Litigation Support Consultants

LENOR A. SCHEFFLER, Esq. 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000 Minneapolis, MN (612) (w) (612) (c)

Case 0:08-cr RHK-AJB Document 393 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 4. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.

LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY NEW BUSINESS APPLICATION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING

Summary. Natalie Marshall. Graduation Date: MArCH Honor Society Career Profile for: Lawyer. Type: Professional Area: Legal Subarea: Lawyer

Graduate Legal Programs Master of Laws (LL.M.) Santa Clara Law

If You Have Been Reimbursed for Certain Workers Compensation Medical Bills Through a First Health PPO Provider Agreement,

Preliminary Graduate Employment Data (Unaudited)

APPLICATION FOR LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE

FIND AN ATTORNEY SEARCH. People Services News & Resources About Careers A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. Keyword.

State Bar of Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

BEDFORD UNDERWRITERS, LTD.

Transcription:

2011 Minnesota Law Firm Billing Rate Survey SAMPLE Billing Rate Data as of May 1, 2011 Conducted by: Denarius Human Resources, Inc. 2310 Stephani Ct. St. Paul, MN 55117 Tel: 651.482.8606 www.denariusinc.com

Table of Contents I. Introduction Explanation of Results II. Billing Rate Reports Overall Results a. By Position All Firms b. By Year Admitted i. Partners ii. Associate iii. Attorney iv. Combined Positions c. Statistical Estimate of Billing Rates Results By Firm Size (Total Number of Attorneys at Firm) a. By Position All Firms b. By Year Admitted i. Partners ii. Associate iii. Attorney iv. Combined Positions Results By Practice Area a. Corporate / Business Law b. Employment / Labor Law c. Family Law d. Financial Services e. Insurance & Liability f. Intellectual Property g. Litigation h. Real Estate i. Tax/Estate Planning j. Other Results By Location a. Metropolitan Twin Cities i. By Position All Years / Firms ii. By Year Admitted Partners Associate Attorney Combined Positions b. Out State III. Other Billing Practices Billing Rate Adjustments Schedule Minimum Time Charge Phone Charges Postage Charges Duplication Charges Research Charges Page IV. Alphabetical List of Participants 43 2 5 6 7 7 7 11 13 15 16 17 17 23 26 27 27 27 28 28 32 33 33 35 35 36 37 37 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 Use of this survey is intended for firms participating in and purchasing the survey report. Denarius Human Resources, Inc. gives permission to survey report purchasers to make copies for internal use only. Denarius Human Resources, Inc. does not give permission to share copies of the survey report between firms. 1

Introduction In May, 2011, Denarius Human Resources, Inc. conducted its seventh edition of a billing rate survey of Minnesota law firms. The survey was open to all Minnesota law firms, and over 740 law firms were invited to participate. This year, 27 firms from around the state participated in the survey (see Alphabetical List of Participants on page 43.) Survey features include reporting billing rates for Equity and Non-Equity Partners and three positions which combine reported billing rates for separate positions. These include All Partners (combines billing rates of Equity and Non-Equity Partners), All Non-Partner Attorneys (combines billing rates of Associates and Attorneys), and All Attorneys (combines billing rates of Partners, Associates and Attorneys). Additionally Business Law and Corporate Law practice areas were again combined to provide more meaningful information. The remainder of this report contains the information reported by participants in summarized, tabular fashion. Results are shown if 5 or more firms reported information. We thank all of the law firms who participated in this survey. It would not have been possible without your participation! We look forward to addressing your questions and suggestions for improving this survey in future years. You can contact Chuck Lindberg or Heather Lintner at 651.482.8606. Explanation of Results Billing Rate Reports by Firm Size, Practice Area, and Location Participants reported billing rate data as of May 1, 2011 for six survey positions: Equity Partner: This position distinguishes Partners from non-equity Partners and non-partner attorneys. It also does not include Of Counsel positions. Non-Equity Partner Associate: Professional attorneys on the Partner track. Attorney: Professional attorneys in the firm not typically on the Partner track. Clerk: Law school graduates who have not taken the bar or are waiting for bar exam results. Legal Assistant/Paralegal: Prepares legal documents; gathers and analyzes research data; investigates facts; coordinates law office activity. May have an associate's degree in related field of study. Firms did not report Legal Secretaries which provide clerical and administrative support. Using data reported for the Partner, Associate and Attorney positions listed above, three additional positions were created for analysis: Equity and Non-Equity Partners Combined: This survey positions combines the billing rates for all Partners, including equity and non-equity Partners. Associate and Attorney Combined: Survey position that combines the billing rates for all non- Partner professional attorneys including Associates and Attorneys. Partner, Associate, Attorney Combined: A survey position that combines the billing rates for all professional attorneys including Partners (equity and non-equity), Associates, and Attorneys. This year s survey represents the billing rates for over 1,400 Partners (equity and non-equity), Associates, and Attorneys at Minnesota law firms. For Partners, Associates, and Attorneys, participants reported the year individuals were admitted to the bar. This information was summarized in two ways for this report: All Years: This represents the aggregate of all data reported and lists one row of statistics for a position. By Year Admitted: When sufficient data were reported (at least 5 firms reported data for an individual year) statistics were calculated for the attorney positions by year admitted to the bar. In addition to an overall summary of survey data by position and year attorney was admitted to the bar, data were summarized by firm size, practice area, and location. The following briefly describes these summaries. 2

Firm Size This category refers to firm size based on the number of attorneys at a firm. Data were categorized to provide the most relevant information given the number of survey participants, resulting in four firm size categories of almost equal size. See the graph to the right for more information. 150 or More Attorneys 19% Participants by Firm Size (Number of Attorneys) Up to 10 Attorneys 30% 41 to 80 Attorneys 26% 11 to 40 Attorneys 26% Practice Area Survey participants reported sufficient billing rate information to summarize data by position and year attorney was admitted to the bar for 10 practice areas: Corporate/Business Law: Practice area includes M&A, tax, anti-trust, securities, and governance among others. Employment/Labor Law Family Law Financial Services/Banking: Including among other areas commercial lending, bankruptcy, and collections. Insurance & Liability Intellectual Property (IP): Law firms reported data for attorneys who had passed the patent bar and are practicing Intellectual Property law. Litigation Real Estate Tax/Estate Planning Other: Represents billing rate data for all other practice areas outside of those listed above and rates for individual attorneys working in two or more practice areas. Location Location results were reported for Metropolitan Twin Cities offices. There were insufficient data reported to show results for Out State offices (need at least 5 firms reporting). Eighty-five (85) percent of participants are located in the Metropolitan Twin Cities area, with the remaining participants from out state. Below lists representative firm locations (home base): Metropolitan Twin Cities: Eden Prairie, Minneapolis and St. Paul. Out State: Brainerd, Cold Spring, Grand Rapids, and Rochester. Definition of Terms The Billing Rate Reports section of the survey uses the following information and terms: Number of Firms: This column shows the number of firms which reported data for the position. Number of Incumbents: This column shows the number of incumbents in the position. 10 th : This is the billing rate charged by the incumbent which ranked at the 10 th percentile of the reported data for the position. Ten percent of incumbents reported a billing rate below this amount. Conversely, 90 percent of incumbents reported charging more than this rate. To ensure 3

meaningful data displays, the 10 th percentile amount was not reported unless at least ten (10) firms reported data for their incumbents. (See following Analysis Example.) 25 th : This is the billing rate charged by the incumbent which ranked at the 25 th percentile of the reported data for the position. Twenty-five percent of incumbents reported a billing rate below this amount. Conversely, 75 percent of incumbents reported charging more than this rate. To ensure meaningful data displays, the 25 th percentile amount was not reported unless at least six (6) firms reported data for their incumbents. (See example below.) Average: This is the sum of the billing rates reported divided by the number of incumbents reported for the position. Average, as used in this report, has the same meaning as mean, simple average and un-weighted average which are commonly used to describe the arithmetic average of a group of numbers. The average was not reported if less than five (5) firms provided data. 50 th (Median): This is the billing rate charged by the incumbent which ranked at the 50 th percentile of the reported data for the position. Half of the incumbents reported charging below this amount and half reported charging above this amount. To ensure meaningful data displays, the 50 th percentile amount was not reported unless at least five (5) firms reported a billing rate for their incumbents. (See example below.) 75 th : This is the billing rate charged by the incumbent which ranked at the 75 th percentile of the reported data for the position. Seventy-five percent of incumbents reported charging below this amount. Conversely, 25 percent of incumbents reported charging more than this amount. To ensure meaningful data displays, the 75 th percentile amount was not reported unless at least six (6) firms reported data for their incumbents. (See example below.) 90 th : This is the billing rate charged by the incumbent which ranked at the 90 th percentile of the reported data for the position. Ninety percent of incumbents reported charging below this amount. Conversely, 10 percent of incumbents reported charging more than this amount. To ensure meaningful data displays, the 90 th percentile amount was not reported unless at least ten (10) firms reported data for their incumbents. (See example below.) Analysis Example Billing Rate $ 375 / hour 325. 90 th 290 278 265. 75 th 255 249 237 230 215.... 50 th (Median) 205 189 177 150 145. 25 th 136 125 113... 10 th 99 4

Overall Results Billing Rate Reports By Position All Firms / All Years 2010 Number of Firms Number of Incumbents 10 th 25 th HOURLY BILLING RATE Median Average 75 th Partner Equity 28 899 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $500 Partner Non- Equity 12 117 100 200 300 400 500 500 Associate 25 415 100 200 300 400 500 500 Attorney 18 148 100 200 300 400 500 500 Partner, Associate, Attorney Combined 29 1,579 100 200 300 400 500 500 Equity, Non-Equity Partner Combined 28 1,016 100 200 300 400 500 500 Associate, Attorney Combined 27 563 100 200 300 400 500 500 Clerk 10 17 100 200 300 400 500 500 Legal Assistant / Paralegal 22 260 100 200 300 400 500 500 By Position All Firms / All Years 2011 Partner Equity 27 813 100 200 300 400 500 500 Partner Non- Equity 11 100 100 200 300 400 500 500 Associate 23 390 100 200 300 400 500 500 Attorney 17 112 100 200 300 400 500 500 Partner, Associate, Attorney Combined 27 1,415 100 200 300 400 500 500 Equity, Non-Equity Partner Combined 27 913 100 200 300 400 500 500 Associate, Attorney Combined 25 502 100 200 300 400 500 500 Clerk 6 14 * 200 300 400 500 * Legal Assistant / Paralegal 24 276 100 200 300 400 500 500 Associate By Year Admitted 2002 6 13 * 200 300 400 500 * 2004 16 40 100 200 300 400 500 500 2006 14 49 100 200 300 400 500 500 2008 20 67 100 200 300 400 500 500 2010 12 41 100 200 300 400 500 500 Data not shown if fewer than 5 firms reported data. 25th and 75th data not shown if fewer than 6 firms reported data. 10th and 90th data not shown if fewer than 10 firms reported data. 90 th

Alphabetical List of Participants Best & Flanagan, LLP Briggs and Morgan, P.A. Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh & Lindquist, P.A. Charpentier & Lange Dady & Gardner, P.A. Fabyanske, Westra, Hart & Thomson, P.A. Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, PA Gray Plant Mooty Greene Espel P.L.L.P. Henson & Efron, P.A. Lano, O'Toole & Bengtson, Ltd. Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. Leonard, Street and Deinard Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L.P. Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P. Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP Moss & Barnett, PA Mulligan & Bjornnes PLLP Murnane Brandt Nilan Johnson Lewis, PA Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. Seaton, Peters & Revnew, P.A. Vidas, Arrett & Steinkraus, P.A. TOTAL PARTICIPANTS: 27 NOTE: Participant list does not include 4 firms that asked not to be listed. 43