IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
|
|
- Milton Byrd
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE; ET AL., Plaintiffs, Civil No JO v. O R D E R SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, being sued as Gale Norton; ET AL., Defendants. v. STATE OF WYOMING; ET AL., Intervenor-Defendants. Brian B. O'Neill Elizabeth H. Schmiesing Richard A. Duncan Colette Routel FAEGRE & BENSON, LLP 90 South Seventh Street, Suite 2200 Minneapolis, MN
2 Stephanie M. Parent PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY CENTER S.W. Terwilliger Boulevard Portland, OR Attorneys for Plaintiffs Kristen L. Gustafson Jimmy A. Rodriguez WILDLIFE & MARINE RESOURCES SECTION Environment & Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice Ben Franklin Station, P. O. Box 7369 Washington, D.C Attorneys for Defendants Jay A. Jerde Michael R. O'Donnell WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE 123 Capitol Avenue Cheyenne, WY Suzanne C. Lacampagne MILLER NASH, LLP 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Portland, OR Anna M. Seidman SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL nd Street N.E. Washington, D.C Elizabeth E. Howard CHURCHILL LEONARD LODINE & HENDRIE, LLP 605 Center Street, N.E. Salem, OR Steven W. Strack IDAHO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE P. O. Box Boise, ID David A. Bledsoe 2 - ORDER
3 3 - ORDER PERKINS COIE, LLP 1120 N.W. Couch Street, 10 th Floor Portland, OR David F. Hensley L. Michael Bogert STATE OF IDAHO Office of the Governor 700 W. Jefferson Boise, ID Martha Williams Robert N. Lane MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE P. O. Box Helena, MT JONES, Judge: Attorneys for Intervenor Defendants As prevailing parties in this action, plaintiffs have petitioned this court for an award of attorneys' fees and costs under the Endangered Species Act (ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1540(g(4. The ESA authorizes district courts to award costs and attorneys' fees when a court finds that such an award is "appropriate." Id. For the reasons that follow, this court grants in part Plaintiffs' Petition for Costs, Including Attorney Fees (Attorney Fee Petition (#185 and awards plaintiffs $260, in attorneys' fees and $12, in costs. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs commenced this action on October 1, 2003, seeking to invalidate the United States Fish & Wildlife Service's Final Rule to Reclassify and Remove the Gray Wolf from the list of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in Portions of the Conterminous United States, 68 Fed. Reg. 15,804 (April 1, 2003 (Final Rule. On January 31, 2005, this court granted plaintiffs'
4 motion for summary judgment, enjoining and vacating the Final Rule. Plaintiffs, as prevailing parties, now request attorneys' fees in the amount of $333, and costs in the amount of $14, The federal defendants do not refute that plaintiffs are entitled to attorneys' fees and costs. They do, however, challenge the amount of fees requested on the grounds that 1 plaintiffs' requested hourly rates are unreasonably high; 2 plaintiffs may not recover attorneys' fees from the federal defendants for time devoted to defendant-intervenors; 3 plaintiffs may not recover attorneys' fees for time devoted to press releases; and 4 plaintiffs may not recover attorneys' fees for time spent that is unnecessary, duplicative, or excessive. The federal defendants also object to plaintiffs' request for costs relating to travel expenses for non-participating attorneys and non-essential paralegals. Because plaintiffs have not made any request for attorneys' fees or costs from the defendant-intervenors, the defendantintervenors have taken no position on the Attorney Fee Petition. STANDARDS In an action brought under the ESA, the court "may award costs of litigation (including reasonable attorney and expert witness fees to any party, whenever the court determines such award is appropriate." 16 U.S.C. 1540(g(4. Under the ESA, the award of attorneys' fees must be reasonable and appropriate. It is the court's duty to determine what fee is reasonable. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983, Gates v. Deukmejian, 987 F.2d 1392, 1401 (9th Cir "The most useful starting point for determining the amount of a reasonable fee is the 4 - ORDER
5 number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate." Hensley, 461 U.S. at 433. This is the lodestar approach. DISCUSSION 1. Reasonableness of the Hourly Rate Plaintiffs contend that they should be paid their normal hourly billing rate. This rate ranges from $490 for a senior partner with a great deal of trial experience to $210 for a junior associate. The federal defendants claim that plaintiffs' requested rates are unreasonably high. This court will use the Oregon State Bar Economic Survey (OSB Survey 1 as a starting point for determining what is a reasonable rate in assessing attorney fee petitions. See "Message from the Court re attorney fee petitions," available at Upon request, the court, in its discretion, may adjust the fee upward from the OSB Survey based on any number of factors if counsel provide ample justification for the upward departure. Id. The OSB Survey gives average and median rates in various forums across the state, including the Portland metro area, based on number of years practiced. Id. The OSB Survey also provides hourly rates at the 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles. Id. Generally, courts will determine a reasonable hourly rate based on comparable rates of attorneys in the forum market. Mendenhall v. Nat'l Transp. Safety Bd., 213 F.3d 464, 471 n.5 (9th Cir The forum market is the location where the case was litigated. See Interfaith Cmty. Org. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., 426 F.3d 694, (3d Cir (answering the question 1 T h e O S B s u r v e y c a n b e f o u n d a t : The most recent survey was published in ORDER
6 of "whether a court should look to prevailing rates in the attorney's home community or the locus of the litigation in determining the appropriate compensation for an out of town attorney". Courts have found exceptions to this general rule. A court may consider another market if counsel shows that there were no attorneys in the forum that could have taken the case. Gates, 987 F.2d at 1405; Interfaith Cmty., 426 F.3d at 705. Similarly, a court may consider another market if special expertise is needed. Interfaith Cmty., 426 F.3d at 705. In this case, Portland, Oregon is the forum market. Plaintiffs have made no showing that an exception applies, and in fact, specifically sought Portland based counsel. Plaintiffs did not demonstrate to the court that there were no firms in the Portland market that could have handled this particular case. Therefore, the rates charged in the Portland market are the appropriate starting point for determining a reasonable hourly rate. While plaintiffs acknowledge that the rule in this district is to use the OSB survey for the Portland market, the attorneys argue that they should receive the higher rates in this case because of their extensive experience in this kind of environmental litigation, because they achieved complete success with national impact, and because they spent a great deal of pro bono time on this case. On the other hand, the federal defendants argue that a reasonable rate for attorneys' fees in this case is the 75th percentile rate listed in the 2002 OSB Survey for attorneys with comparable experience, adjusted for inflation based on the CPI. 2 I agree. Compensating plaintiffs' counsel at the 75th percentile rate accommodates their experience and expertise in a 2 The U.S. Department of Labor does not give a CPI for Portland. The closest comparison would be Seattle. 6 - ORDER
7 specialty area, and the amount of time and effort spent on this case. This sets the hourly rate as follows: Name Years of Experience Brian B. O'Neill 30+ $267 $270 $275 Richard A. Duncan 16 $263 $266 $271 Elizabeth H. Schmiesing 12 $234 $236 $241 Stephanie M. Parent 12 $234 $236 $241 Anne E. Mahle 3 $161 $163 $166 Colette Routel 3 $161 $163 $166 Plaintiffs request an hourly rate of $125 for Collette Adkins-Giese (summer law clerk, Richard Cox (paralegal, and Susan Lahr (paralegal. The OSB Survey does not give rates for law clerks or paralegals and the requested rate for these persons is not disputed by the federal defendants. Therefore, I find that a rate of $125 per hour for Adkins-Giese, Cox, and Lahr is not an unreasonable rate. For the foregoing reasons, this court denies plaintiffs' petition for an award of attorneys' fees to the extent they request their normal billing rates, and concludes that plaintiffs are entitled to attorneys' fees at the rates listed above. 2. Reasonableness of the Number of Hours While the lodestar is a starting point for determining a reasonable fee, district courts have an independent duty to review the fee petition and exclude from the initial calculation hours that were unreasonably spent. Hensley, 461 U.S. at While the party petitioning for fees has the initial burden of documenting and providing support for the hours expended, the opposing party bears the burden of submitting to the court evidence that the hours spent are unreasonable. Hensley, 461 U.S. at 433; Gates, 987 F.2d at ORDER
8 Plaintiffs have submitted their billing records to this court. See Plaintiffs' Petition for Costs (Pls' Pet.,Tab 2. Plaintiffs also state that they have culled through their hours, eliminating time they considered to be "duplicative, inefficiently spent, or not directly related to the claims brought in the litigation." Declaration of Elizabeth Schmiesing 2. Out of nearly 1800 total hours spent on this case, plaintiffs voluntarily eliminated only 48.2 hours from their petition. See Pls' Pet.,Tab 3. As explained above, the federal defendants challenge the reasonableness of the hours claimed on several grounds: 1 plaintiffs may not recover attorneys' fees from the federal defendants for time devoted to defendant-intervenors; 2 plaintiffs may not recover attorneys' fees for time devoted to press releases; and 3 plaintiffs may not recover attorneys' fees for time spent that is unnecessary, duplicative, or excessive. I will address each in turn. A. Plaintiffs' time spent on defendant-intervenors. The federal defendants argue that the government should not be required to pay for time plaintiffs spent responding to motions filed by the defendant-intervenors. Love v. Reilly, 924 F.2d 1492, 1495 (9th Cir I agree. Therefore, I find that Richard Duncan's time should be reduced by 2.75 hours, Elizabeth Schmiesing's time by 4.25 hours, Stephanie Parent's time by.5 hours, Anne Mahle's time by 11.5 hours, Colette Routel's time by 8.25 hours, and Collette Adkins-Giese's time by hours. B. Plaintiffs' time spent on press releases. Plaintiffs have included several hours spent on public relations activities including preparation of press releases about the wolf case, an op/ed in the local newspaper, and an article for International Wolf magazine. As the federal defendants acknowledge, the Ninth Circuit does 8 - ORDER
9 allow compensation for time spent on public relations activities when those activities are "directly and intimately related to the successful representation of a client." Gilbrook v. City of Westminister, 177 F.3d 839, 875 (9th Cir In this case, however, plaintiffs have made no attempt to describe how the time spent on press activities contributed to the attainment of their litigation goals. Because plaintiffs have not established that time spent on various press activities was directly related to the litigation of this case, I find that charging the government for these hours is not reasonable. Consequently, I reduce Elizabeth Schmiesing's time by.25 hours, Anne Mahle's time by hours, and Colette Routel's time by 1.5 hours. C. Unnecessary, duplicative, and excessive time. Finally, the federal defendants challenge plaintiffs' requested number of hours on the grounds that some of the hours spent were unnecessary, duplicative, or excessive. In particular, the federal defendants claim that plaintiffs billed time for more attorneys than were necessary to attend the scheduling conference in Portland in January 2004, and oral argument on the summary judgment motion in Portland in January Anne Mahle, Elizabeth Schmiesing, and Stephanie Parent attended the scheduling conference. The federal defendants claim that it was excessive to send these three attorneys to the conference. However, the defendants have not explained why this is unreasonable, or offered any information concerning how many attorneys they sent to the conference. I find that it was not unreasonable, especially in the early stages of the case, to send a senior partner, a junior associate, and local counsel to the scheduling conference. Plaintiffs also billed time for Brian O'Neill, Stephanie Parent, Collette Adkins-Giese, and 9 - ORDER
10 Susan Lahr to attend oral argument on the summary judgment motion in January The federal defendants challenge the inclusion of Collette Adkins-Giese's time as unnecessary. I agree. Plaintiffs have provided no explanation as to why it was necessary for Adkins-Giese to fly to Portland from Minneapolis to attend oral argument; indeed, the billing records show only that she attended, not that she had any responsibilities while she was here. I find that the presence of two attorneys and one support paralegal was all that was necessary, but billing for Adkins-Giese's time was unreasonable. Accordingly, Adkins-Giese's time will be reduced by 12.5 hours. The federal defendants also challenge as excessive time spent by the plaintiffs on various tasks. For example, the federal defendants claim that the 225 hours spent drafting a joint statement of facts was excessive and suggest compensation for 160 hours as reasonable. The federal defendants have not, however, provided support for the claim that plaintiffs' time was excessive. I find that plaintiffs were judicious in the use of their resources as the majority of the time spent on this case was by junior associates and summer clerks. For that reason, and because the federal defendants have failed to provide sufficient justification to decide otherwise, I conclude that the amount of time requested by plaintiffs is reasonable, except as mentioned above. 3. Stephanie Parent's Hours In their petition, plaintiffs request 40 hours for Stephanie Parent. However, the billing records as submitted to the court show only 23.2 hours. Therefore, I allow 23.2 hours for time spent by Stephanie Parent, minus the.5 hours of her time spent on defendant-intervenors as 10 - ORDER
11 discussed above, for a total of 22.7 hours. 4. Costs Plaintiffs have requested $14, in costs and have submitted itemized statements of these costs to the court. The federal defendants object to $3, of these costs related to the travel expenses of Susan Lahr, Collette Adkins-Giese, and Elizabeth Schmiesing. As discussed above, I find that it was unreasonable to charge the defendants for Adkins-Giese's travel to Portland for the summary judgment hearing. Therefore, I reduce plaintiffs' costs by $1, CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons and taking into account the rate and time reductions described above, I grant in part plaintiffs' petition (#185 and award plaintiffs attorneys' fees in the amount of $260,560.50, and costs in the amount of $12, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 15 th day of November, /s/ Robert E. Jones ROBERT E. JONES U.S. District Judge 11 - ORDER
Case 5:10-cv-00206-MTT Document 18 Filed 02/10/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Case 5:10-cv-00206-MTT Document 18 Filed 02/10/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION SARAH M. STALVEY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-206
More informationCase 5:04-cv-04099-RDR Document 112 Filed 01/03/08 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 5:04-cv-04099-RDR Document 112 Filed 01/03/08 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ERIKA MEYER, vs. Plaintiff, Case No. 04-4099-RDR CHRISTOPHER NAVA, et al.,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-3834 JEFFBOAT, LLC and SIGNAL MUTUAL INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION, LTD., v. Petitioners, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION ORDER
Case 4:02-cv-00066-HL Document 136 Filed 02/10/09 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : ex rel. GLENN F. NICHOLS
More informationCase 1:06-cv-00121-BLW Document 144 Filed 05/11/09 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Case 1:06-cv-00121-BLW Document 144 Filed 05/11/09 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ALFRED R. LaPETER and SHARON R. LaPETER, TRUSTEES OF THE LaPETER 1985 LIVING
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiff 1 OPINION AND ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION 3:11-CV-1085-BR
Lenon v. Starbucks Corporation Doc. 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION SHANNON M. LENON, 3:11-CV-1085-BR v. Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER STARBUCKS CORPORATION,
More informationCASE 0:12-cv-01019-DSD-AJB Document 72 Filed 03/06/14 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No.
CASE 0:12-cv-01019-DSD-AJB Document 72 Filed 03/06/14 Page 1 of 7 Jeremy Axel, Matthew Mitchell and Keyon Cooley, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 12-1019(DSD/AJB) Plaintiffs.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:13-cv-00646-ABC-PLA Document 135 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:2352 Present: The Honorable Audrey B. Collins Angela Bridges Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present
More informationCase 2:09-cv-02402-JWS Document 153 Filed 01/27/15 Page 1 of 5
Case :0-cv-00-JWS Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Tara L. Borelli (Pro Hac Vice) LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC. 0 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 00 Atlanta, Georgia 00-0 Email: tborelli@lambdalegal.org
More informationContact Information for Participants in Remand Process in National Wildlife Federation v. NMFS, CV 01-00640-RE
Contact Information for Participants in Remand Process in National Wildlife Federation v. NMFS, CV 01-00640-RE TODD D. TRUE E-mail: ttrue@earthjustice.org STEPHEN D. MASHUDA E-mail: smashuda@earthjustice.org
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELOUISE PEPION COBELL, et al., No. 1:96CV01285 Plaintiffs, (Judge Lamberth v. GALE A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants.
More informationHow To Get A $400 Attorney Fee In Portland
BRB No. 13-0356 SAM CASTILLO v. Claimant-Petitioner SUNDIAL MARINE TUG AND BARGE WORKS, INCORPORATED and SAIF CORPORATION Employer/Carrier- Respondents DATE ISSUED: Apr. 24, 2014 DECISION and ORDER Appeal
More informationCase 1:03-cv-01711-HHK Document 138-1 Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:03-cv-01711-HHK Document 138-1 Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARILYN VANN, RONALD MOON, DONALD MOON, CHARLENE WHITE, RALPH THREAT, FAITH RUSSELL,
More informationHow To Find A Non-Attorney Plaintiff In A Lawsuit Against A Plaintiff In California
Case :-cv-0-ljo-jlt Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 KEVIN MOREAU, v. Plaintiff, :-CV-0-LJO-JLT ORDER ON MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. 09-CV-956 JEC/DJS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. No. 09-CV-956 JEC/DJS TRICORE REFERENCE LABORATORIES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:06-cv-00663-JMS Document 33 Filed 07/05/07 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 268 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII SIGNATURE HOMES OF HAWAII, LLC, a Hawaii Limited Liability Company,
More informationCase 2:10-cv-05383-TON Document 24 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:10-cv-05383-TON Document 24 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN HAYWARD, et al. : CIVIL ACTION : NO. 10-5383 v. : : DELAWARE
More informationCase 6:10-cv-01071-DNH-ATB Document 76-1 Filed 08/22/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 6:10-cv-01071-DNH-ATB Document 76-1 Filed 08/22/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ONEIDA NATION OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 6:10-CV-1071
More informationCase 1:12-cv-01158-BAH Document 34 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:12-cv-01158-BAH Document 34 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., vs. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 9:08-cv-00014-DWM Document 111-1 Filed 02/22/11 Page 1 of 14 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General United States Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division SETH M. BARSKY,
More informationHow To Get The Lesser Prairie Chicken To Live Outside Of The Coon Line
Case 1:10-cv-02129-JLK Document 32 Filed 11/10/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 Civil Action No. 10-CV-02129-JLK WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, v. Petitioner, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
More information2:03-cv-74279-RHC Doc # 162 Filed 02/20/07 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 8098 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:03-cv-74279-RHC Doc # 162 Filed 02/20/07 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 8098 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 03-CV-74279-DT
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD. GARNETT F. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Agency.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 69 M.S.P.R. 299 Docket Number DC-0752-92-0316-A-1 GARNETT F. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Agency. Date: January 22,1996 Peter B.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON
LAWRENCE G. WASDEN Attorney General State of Idaho CLIVE J. STRONG (ISB No. 2207) CLAY R. SMITH (ISB No. 6385) E-Mail: csmith@ag.state.id.us Deputy Attorneys General Natural Resources Division 700 W. Jefferson,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Roger Krueger, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 11-cv-2781 Judge Susan Richard Nelson NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION
More informationCase 2:10-cv-00741-GMN-LRL Document 10 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 6
Case :0-cv-00-GMN-LRL Document 0 Filed 0//0 Page of 0 Michael J. McCue (NV Bar No. 0 Nikkya G. Williams (NV Bar No. Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0 - Attorneys for Defendants Jan Klerks and Stichting Wolkenkrabbers
More informationFOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :0-cv-0-FJM Document Filed /0/0 Page of 0 0 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plumbing and Air Conditioning Contractors of Central and Northern Arizona, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Plumbing and Air
More informationHow To Get A $1.5 Multiplier On Attorney'S Fees In Florida
Reprinted with permission from the Florida Law Weekly: [ 35 Fla. L. Weekly D1438a Insurance -- Personal injury protection -- Attorney's fees -- Paralegal fees -- Multiplier -- Circuit court did not depart
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 1 1 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE B.H., M.A., A.S.D., M.F., H.L., L.M.M.M., B.M.,
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Anthony Abbott, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lockheed Martin Corp., et al., Defendants. Case No. 06-cv-701 Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan NOTICE OF CLASS
More informationUNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION; and DIRK KEMPTHORNE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior,
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 S. JAY GOVINDAN, Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Wildlife & Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P. O. Box Washington, D.C. 00- Ph: (0) 0-0 Email: Jay.Govindan@usdoj.gov
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 3:09-cv-00729-HA Document 20 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#: 86 IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General SETH M. BARSKY, Acting Section Chief BRADLEY H. OLIPHANT, Trial Attorney (Cal. Bar
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Philecia Barnes, formerly known as : Phillip W. Barnes : : Plaintiff : : v. : : City of Cincinnati : : Defendant :
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT NORTHERN DISTRICT FRANK FODERA, SR.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT NORTHERN DISTRICT FRANK FODERA, SR. V. ARBELLA PROTECTION INSURANCE COMPANY NO. 15-ADMS-10012 In the WOBURN DIVISION: Justice:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Goodridge v. Hewlett Packard Company Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CHARLES GOODRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION H-07-4162 HEWLETT-PACKARD
More informationPLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS RESPONSE OPPOSING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
Case 3:08-cv-02117-P Document 57 Filed 02/03/2010 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al. Plaintiffs, vs. DALLAS COUNTY,
More informationThe trademark lawyer as brand manager
The trademark lawyer as brand manager This text first appeared in the IAM magazine supplement Brands in the Boardroom 2005 May 2005 For further information please visit www.iam-magazine.com Feature The
More informationCase 4:05-cv-01278-GTE Document 25 Filed 12/08/2005 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-01278-GTE Document 25 Filed 12/08/2005 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION NATIONAL WILDLIFE FED N, ARKANSAS WILDLIFE FED N PLAINTIFF
More informationCase 2:08-cv-00611-JES-SPC Document 29 Filed 03/19/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID 224
Case 2:08-cv-00611-JES-SPC Document 29 Filed 03/19/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID 224 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION JOSE MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 2:08-cv-611-FtM-29SPC
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:10cv378/MCR/CJK
Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. WEST CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, Defendant. / O R D E
More informationCase 3:13-cv-01825-ST Document 48 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1126 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Case 3:13-cv-01825-ST Document 48 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1126 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION F. ANTONE ACCUARDI, v. Plaintiff, BRAD FREDERICKS, Case No.
More informationHow To Decide If A Shipyard Can Pay For A Boatyard
Case 2:08-cv-01700-NJB-KWR Document 641 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ATEL MARITIME INVESTORS, LP, et al. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS CASE NO. 08-1700 SEA
More informationCase 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43
Case 3:14-cv-00137-AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43 Calvin L. Keith, OSB No. 814368 CKeith@perkinscoie.com Sarah J. Crooks, OSB No. 971512 SCrooks@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP
More informationCase 3:11-cv-01372-SI Document 248 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 7652
Case 3:11-cv-01372-SI Document 248 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 7652 Timothy S. DeJong, OSB No. 940662 Email: tdejong@stollberne.com Scott A. Shorr, OSB No. 961873 Email: sshorr@stollberne.com
More informationCase 1:09-cv-00022-REB Document 45-1 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:09-cv-00022-REB Document 45-1 Filed 06/18/10 Page 1 of 15 Daniel J. Treuden, Wis. Bar # 1052766 The Bernhoft Law Firm, S.C. 207 E. Buffalo Street, Suite 600 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 (414) 276-3333
More informationCase 5:13-cv-00982-OLG Document 108 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:13-cv-00982-OLG Document 108 Filed 08/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CLEOPATRA DE LEON, NICOLE DIMETMAN, VICTOR HOLMES, and
More informationCase 2:08-cv-01344-KI Document 75 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:08-cv-01344-KI Document 75 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORT OF ARLINGTON, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 08-1344-KI v. OPINION AND ORDER UNITED
More informationCase 2:05-cv-03340-ADS-ARL Document 101 Filed 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-03340-ADS-ARL Document 101 Filed 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------X STEPHEN R. STEINBERG,
More informationSTIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1-
STEPHANIE M. PARENT (OSB #92590) Pacific Environmental Advocacy Center 100 15 SW Terwilliger Blvd. Portland, OR 972 1 9 Phone (503) 768-6736 Fax (503) 768-6642 parentalclark. edu Attorney for Plaintiffs
More informationHow To Get A $224.05 Per Week Offset On Workers Compensation Benefits
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-1247 STATE, OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT VERSUS PATRICK RICHARD ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION. CASE NO. 3:01-cv-1275-J-25 HTS
Case 3:01-cv-01275-HLA-HTS Document 315 Filed 10/04/07 Page 1 of 11 PageID 3757 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES;
More informationSlip Copy, 2009 WL 3048451 (M.D.Fla.) (Cite as: 2009 WL 3048451 (M.D.Fla.)) Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.
Slip Copy, 2009 WL 3048451 (M.D.Fla.) (Cite as: 2009 WL 3048451 (M.D.Fla.)) Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. Tara OLESEN-FRAYNE,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: MICHAEL TODD CHRISLEY, Chapter 7 Case No. 13-56132-MGD Debtor. JASON L. PETTIE, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE
More informationCase 1:11-cv-02137-AWI-SKO Document 136 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-awi-sko Document Filed // Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEFF SILVESTER, et al., v. Plaintiffs KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of California, and DOES to
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND NICOLE MARIE CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 05-38S HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, United
More informationCase 2:13-cv-05842-JCZ-KWR Document 26 Filed 06/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:13-cv-05842-JCZ-KWR Document 26 Filed 06/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GAIL CARTER, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 13-5842 GULFSTREAM PROPERTY AND
More informationCase 3:12-cv-01348-HZ Document 32 Filed 03/08/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 144
Case 3:12-cv-01348-HZ Document 32 Filed 03/08/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 144 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION KELLY J. YOX, an individual, v. Plaintiff, No.
More informationCase 2:13-cv-01419-JWS Document 413 Filed 09/25/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 2:13-cv-01419-JWS Document 413 Filed 09/25/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA LAURIE MILLER, BRIAN DIMAS, KIM MILLS, ANTHONY SOZA, BRUCE CAMPBELL, KELLIE 2:13-cv-1419
More informationto Consolidate, ECF No. 13,1 filedon August 21, 2014. Therein, Sprinkle argued that this Court
Case 2:14-cv-00251-LRL Document 21 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use ofsprinkle
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWIN TAYLOR, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : NO. 03-2216 : v. : : USF - RED STAR EXPRESS, INC., : Defendant. : ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
More informationThe following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described.
U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ENTERED TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON THE COURTS DOCKET The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect
More informationThis is the appeal of an Amended Final Judgment Awarding Costs and Attorney's
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE APPELLATE DIVISION INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: 00-14 L.T. CASE NO.: 97-769-CC
More informationCase 1:14-cv-01265-JEB Document 17 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS
Case 1:14-cv-01265-JEB Document 17 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INGA L. PARSONS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 14-1265 (JEB v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY
ATTORNEY NAME (BAR # ADDRESS Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY PLAINTIFF, v. No. XXXXXXXXX, Director, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS Arizona Health Care Cost AND AUTHORITIES IN Containment
More informationRULE 89. WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS; VISITING LAWYERS; TEMPORARY PRACTICE WITH LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS
RULE 89. WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS; VISITING LAWYERS; TEMPORARY PRACTICE WITH LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS (a) Withdrawal of Attorneys. An attorney may withdraw from a case in which the attorney appears
More informationCase 2:08-cv-00387-MJP Document 327 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 5
Case :0-cv-00-MJP Document Filed /0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS
More informationCase 4:12-cv-00442 Document 49 Filed in TXSD on 02/07/14 Page 1 of 10
Case 4:12-cv-00442 Document 49 Filed in TXSD on 02/07/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Petitioners,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DONALD LYLE STRATTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JULIE BUCK, in her individual capacity; DALE BROWN, in his individual capacity; JOHN DOE,
More informationBRB No. 12-0496 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BRB No. 12-0496 TRAVIS L. McKINNEY v. Claimant-Petitioner GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION and INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA Employer/Carrier- Respondents DATE ISSUED: 04/12/2013 DECISION and
More informationCase 4:13-cv-00171-BRW Document 118 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:13-cv-00171-BRW Document 118 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION STUART C. IRBY COMPANY, INC. PLAINTIFF VS. 4:13-CV-00171-BRW
More informationU.S. Supreme Court City of Riverside v. Rivera, 477 U.S. 561 (1986)
U.S. Supreme Court City of Riverside v. Rivera, 477 U.S. 561 (1986) City of Riverside v. Rivera No. 85-224 Argued March 31, 1986 Decided June 27, 1986 477 U.S. 561 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationCase 2:14-cv-02032 Document 2 Filed 09/15/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA MOTION
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0 Page of 0 TAMARA W. ASHFORD Acting Assistant Attorney General KAYCEE M. SULLIVAN Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box, Ben Franklin Station Washington,
More informationCASE 0:13-cv-02270-ADM-TNL Document 47 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:13-cv-02270-ADM-TNL Document 47 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 11 Kristina Nozal, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA v. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Civil No. 13-2270
More informationTENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. : (Prob. No. 542384) [Executor, Richard B. Igo, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Appellant]. : D E C I S I O N
[Cite as In re Estate of Hathaway, 2014-Ohio-1065.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT In re the Estate of : Ilobelle Hathaway, No. 13AP-152 : (Prob. No. 542384) [Executor, Richard
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION 1
The court incorporates by reference in this paragraph and adopts as the findings and orders of this court the document set forth below. This document was signed electronically on January 28, 2009, which
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioner, MEMORANDUM *
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VICTOR NASSER, to the Use of Eric A. Dupree, Phillip M. Cohen, and
More informationBRB No. 11-0762 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BRB No. 11-0762 GRANT L. WILSON v. Claimant-Petitioner HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED and CHARTIS INSURANCE COMPANY Employer/Carrier- Respondents DATE ISSUED: 06/15/2012 DECISION and ORDER
More informationCase 4:04-cv-03526 Document 84 Filed in TXSD on 02/02/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:04-cv-03526 Document 84 Filed in TXSD on 02/02/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ALEXANDER WARDLAW, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-04-3526
More informationthe seal of the National Archives and Records Administration, that the attached reproduction(s) is TiTLE Regional Administrator, Pacific Alaska Region
1 k NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION ly virtue of the authority vested in me by the Archivist of the United States, I certify on his behalf, the seal of the National Archives and Records Administration,
More informationCase 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 136 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:14-cv-00645-ST Document 136 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 5 Michael J. Estok, OSB #090748 Email: mestok@lindsayhart.com 1300 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Portland, Oregon 97201-5640 Phone: 503-226-7677
More informationCase 3:12-cv-08123-HRH Document 521 Filed 10/27/14 Page 1 of 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 3:12-cv-08123-HRH Document 521 Filed 10/27/14 Page 1 of 7 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) TOWN OF COLORADO CITY,
More informationHow To Resolve A Fee Dispute In A Personal Injury Action In N.Y.S.A.U.S
Case 3:10-cv-00559-MAD-DEP Document 73 Filed 12/19/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EMESE M. VARGA, Plaintiff, Civ. Action No. 3:10-CV-0559 (MAD/DEP)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON LANE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT NO. 16-11-09273
July 7, 2015 01:37 PM IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON OLIVIA CHERNAIK, a minor and resident of Lane County, Oregon; LISA CHERNAIK, guardian of Olivia Chernaik; KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA,
More informationCase 5:10-cv-01025-OLG Document 150 Filed 11/12/12 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:10-cv-01025-OLG Document 150 Filed 11/12/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Hon. Orlando Garcia ERIC STEWARD, by his next friend
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION BERMUDA CLUB MANAGEMENT COUNSEL, INC.,
More informationCASE 0:05-cv-01578-JMR-JJG Document 59 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 05-CV-1578(JMR/JJG)
CASE 0:05-cv-01578-JMR-JJG Document 59 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 05-CV-1578(JMR/JJG) State of Minnesota ) ) v. ) ORDER ) Robert B. Beale, Rebecca S.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA DECLARATION OF MARY ELLEN SIGNORILLE
CASE 0:11-cv-02781-SRN-JSM Document 611 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 7 ROGER KRUEGER, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA v. Plaintiffs, No. 11-CV-02781 (SRN/JSM) AMERIPRISE
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals No. 13-1186 For the Seventh Circuit IN RE: JAMES G. HERMAN, Debtor-Appellee. APPEAL OF: JOHN P. MILLER Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
More informationCase 08-01176-AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION
Case 08-01176-AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION In re: JOSE SANCHEZ Case No.: 01-42230-BKC-AJC and FANNY SANCHEZ, Chapter
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #14-1072 Document #1499134 Filed: 06/24/2014 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT National Association of Broadcasters, Petitioner, v. No. 14-1072
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO In re: ALAN GREENWAY, Bankruptcy Case No. 04-04100 dba Greenway Seed Co., Debtor. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Appearances: D. Blair Clark, RINGERT,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:07-cv-00172-MJR-CJP Document 8-1 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, Plaintiff, and PEARLE PHILLIPS,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:13-cv-11370-GCS-RSW Doc # 45 Filed 03/28/14 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 672 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Catherine Phillips, et al. Case no. 2:13-cv-11370 Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CP-00404-COA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CP-00404-COA TYRONE SANDERS APPELLANT v. AMBER C. ROBERTSON AND MISSISSIPPI FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLEES DATE OF JUDGMENT:
More informationCase 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1312 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1312 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION - HOA CARLA BONTEN, SHIRLEY BARRICK, and
More informationCase 10-10619 Doc 143 Filed 02/04/11 Entered 02/04/11 11:49:09 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In re ALINA GOMEZ, Chapter 13 Debtor Case No. 10-10619-JNF ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More informationUnited States District Court
Case:-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 AUDIO MARKETING SERVICES, v. Plaintiff, MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant.
More informationCase 1:10-cv-22300-KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:10-cv-22300-KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION Plaintiffs, V. W. CRAIG FUGATE, Administrator, Federal Emergency
More informationCase 3:14-mc-00009-B Document 9 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID 332 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:14-mc-00009-B Document 9 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID 332 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, V. No.
More information