Antenna Placement and Isolation Guideline

Similar documents
Isolation between antennas of IMT base stations in the land mobile service

BSA Technical Information

The main purpose of the study was to answer the three following questions:

5. ANTENNA TYPES. Figure 5. The vertical dipole and its electromagnetic equivalent, the vertical monopole

A. Jraifi, R. A. Laamara, A. Belhaj, and E. H. Saidi Lab/UFR-groupe Canal Propagation Radio PHE, Faculté des Sciences, Rabat, Morocco

FREQUENCY ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LAND MOBILE SERVICE

Selecting Receiving Antennas for Radio Tracking

A comparison of radio direction-finding technologies. Paul Denisowski, Applications Engineer Rohde & Schwarz

Antenna Basic Concepts

MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF RF EME LEVELS FROM MOBILE TELEPHONE BASE STATIONS LOCATED AT LEICHHARDT, NSW

Characteristics of terrestrial IMT-Advanced systems for frequency sharing/ interference analyses

Omni Antenna vs. Directional Antenna

HUMAN EXPOSURE TO EMR: ASSESSMENT OF AMATEUR RADIO STATIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ACA REQUIREMENTS

Avaya WLAN 9100 External Antennas for use with the WAO-9122 Access Point

Cellular Wireless Antennas

Antenna Deployment Technical Brief

Understanding Range for RF Devices

Antenna Properties and their impact on Wireless System Performance. Dr. Steven R. Best. Cushcraft Corporation 48 Perimeter Road Manchester, NH 03013

Digital Active Indoor Antenna SRT ANT 10 ECO

'' EGGBEATER '' ANTENNA VHF/UHF ~ PART 2

AN INTRODUCTION TO TELEMETRY PART 1: TELEMETRY BASICS

Technician Licensing Class

MICROWAVE ANTENNA PATTERN WITH DIFFERENT PARAMETER EVALUATION IN MOBILE ENVIRONMENT

700 and 800 MHz Band Slot Antennas

Pillbox Antenna for 5.6 GHz Band Dragoslav Dobričić, YU1AW

FURTHER READING: As a preview for further reading, the following reference has been provided from the pages of the book below:

DVB-T and Wireless Microphone Exclusion Area Computation Through Interference Analysis

Evaluation of Co-existence interference between CDMA 1900MHz & WCDMA 2100MHz

International Civil Aviation Organization

Maximizing Receiver Dynamic Range for Spectrum Monitoring

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM Measuring sideband emissions of T-DAB and DVB-T transmitters for monitoring purposes

EMC Standards: Standards of good EMC engineering

MANAGEMENT OF BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIERS IN THE LAND MOBILE SERVICE IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 29.7 MHz TO 520 MHz

PROTECTION OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICE FROM BROADCASTING SATELLITE SERVICE TRANSMISSIONS IN THE BAND MHz

Information Paper. FDMA and TDMA Narrowband Digital Systems

COMPATIBILITY STUDY FOR UMTS OPERATING WITHIN THE GSM 900 AND GSM 1800 FREQUENCY BANDS

Embedded FM/TV Antenna System

The front end of the receiver performs the frequency translation, channel selection and amplification of the signal.

REPORT ITU-R M Rep. ITU-R M (2004)

SHARING BETWEEN TERRESTRIAL FLIGHT TELEPHONE SYSTEM (TFTS) AND RADIO ASTRONOMY IN THE 1.6 GHz BAND. Paris, May 1992

Divvela.Santhosh Raghava Rao [1],Sreevardhan cheerla [2]

Marine HF SSB Installation and Grounding. Anatomy of the Best Tour 2006

RX-AM4SF Receiver. Pin-out. Connections

CABLES CABLES. Application note. Link Budget

COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN CERTAIN RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS OPERATING IN ADJACENT BANDS EVALUATION OF DECT / GSM 1800 COMPATIBILITY

VE3MLB Phased Double V Antenna for 75/80 Meter Band

Technical Note. Radiating Cable (RCL/RCH) Performance Test & Design Guidlines. Document Code: TN02-RadiatingCable-14 Date: March 6, 2014

Guide for Performing a Wireless Site Survey. 2.4 GHz IEEE g/802.11b/

Potential Effects of Wind Turbine Generators on Pre-Existing RF Communication Networks SEAN YUN. June Software Solutions in Radiocommunications

APPLICATION NOTE. RF System Architecture Considerations ATAN0014. Description

APPLICATION NOTES POWER DIVIDERS. Things to consider

REPORT ITU-R BO Broadcasting-satellite service earth station antenna pattern measurements and related analyses

Amplification of the Radiation from Two Collocated Cellular System Antennas by the Ground Wave of an AM Broadcast Station

AM Radio Field Strength Measurements with Confidence November 2004

T = 1 f. Phase. Measure of relative position in time within a single period of a signal For a periodic signal f(t), phase is fractional part t p

Instruction Sheet ACS-101. General Description. Specifications. Amplified Broadband UHF Combiner-Splitter. Overall. Antenna Splitter.

Summary of Technical Information

Wireless Ethernet LAN (WLAN) General a/802.11b/802.11g FAQ

Broadband over Power Line (BPL) Test Procedures and Equipment Authorization

Co-siting solutions. Introduction

Evolution of Satellite Communication Systems

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M (Question ITU-R 88/8)

Project 25 Compliance Assessment Program Summary Test Report Icom IC-F9000 Series Portable Subscribers STR-Icom-F

EMC STANDARDS STANDARDS AND STANDARD MAKING BODIES. International. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)

Antenna Trainer EAN. Technical Teaching Equipment INTRODUCTION

The road and the buildings on each side of the road can

MIMO Antenna Systems in WinProp

Tower Mounted Amplifiers, Diagnostics and Isolation Measurements

Mine Communications in the 21 st Century

COMPATIBILITY AND SHARING ANALYSIS BETWEEN DVB T AND RADIO MICROPHONES IN BANDS IV AND V

Site Survey Report MAH

Broadband Slotted Coaxial Broadcast Antenna Technology

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

RF SYSTEM DESIGN OF TRANSCEIVERS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS

In 3G/WCDMA mobile. IP2 and IP3 Nonlinearity Specifications for 3G/WCDMA Receivers 3G SPECIFICATIONS

EMIT. RF Cosite and Coexistence RFI Modeling and Mitigation

Planning Terrestrial Radio Networks

EE4367 Telecom. Switching & Transmission. Prof. Murat Torlak

Design and Certification of ASH Radio Systems for Japan

Antenna Glossary Before we talk about specific antennas, there are a few common terms that must be defined and explained:

Methods for Embedding DTV antennas into Notebook PC enclosures

communication over wireless link handling mobile user who changes point of attachment to network

INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND TRANSMISSION MEDIA

AN Application Note: FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz. FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz

is the power reference: Specifically, power in db is represented by the following equation, where P0 P db = 10 log 10

FOR EXISTING 254-FOOT COMMUNICATIONS TOWER Skyline Drive La Habra Heights California

WiFi Antenna Installation Best Practices Design Guide

CHAPTER 4. Electromagnetic Spectrum

MHz. Band IV/V (UHF) TV Slot Antennas. RD Series BROADCAST & HF ANTENNAS

12. INDOOR INSTALLATION

Nexus Technology Review -- Exhibit A

Mobile Phones: Jargon Explained

PGA103+ Low noise, high dynamic range preamp for VHF and UHF

ENTERPRISE. Functionality chart

Antenna Diversity in Wireless Local Area Network Devices

Advances in High-Performance Ceramic Antennas for Small-Form-Factor, Multi-Technology Devices

Correlation between OATS, Fully Anechoic Room and GTEM Radiated Emissions

Fundamentals of Interference in Mobile Networks

GSM frequency planning

An Engineer s Guide to Full Compliance for CAT 6A Connecting Hardware

Transcription:

Antenna Placement and Isolation Guideline March 2015 Document Reference: 4-3-2-001

Related Policies and Documents Report Reference Number Issuer Reference Document Name Wireless Communications Systems Performance [1] Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) TSB-88.3 in Noise and Interference Limited Situations Part 3: Recommended Methods for Technology Independent Performance Verification [2] ITU-R [3] ITU-R [4] Ericsson [5] Telstra ITU-R M.2244 ITU-R M.2141 14/100 56- HSD 101 02/5 Rev A Trunk Radio Tech Rept 125-TR Isolation between antennas of IMT base stations in the land mobile service Study of the isolation between VHF land mobile radio antennas in close proximity Guideline for Interference Considerations in Co- Existence Mt Budawang : Co-Siting of Police and GRN [6] Motorola Solutions Report Mt. Gibraltar - Interference Investigation Report [7] Bird Technologies [8] RFI Application Notes Presentatio n Antenna Location is not an Architectural Decision Passive Intermodulation PIM and Peak Instantaneous Power PIP [9] Rodhe & Schwarz 11356Cat VHF/UHF Filters/Multicouplers Overview 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline v1.0.docx 1

Contents 1 Introduction... 3 1.1 Overview... 3 1.2 Purpose... 3 1.3 Scope... 3 1.4 Audience... 3 2 Guideline... 4 2.1 Antenna Isolation... 4 2.2 Antenna Separation... 5 2.2.1 Horizontal Antenna Separation... 5 2.2.2 Vertical Antenna Separation... 6 2.2.3 Antenna separation from infrastructure... 7 2.3 Stacked Antenna configurations... 11 2.4 General rules for antenna placement... 12 2.5 When Antenna Separation is not achievable... 12 2.6 Antenna Separation calculator... 13 3 Appendix... 14 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 2

1 Introduction 1.1 Overview The NSW Telco Authority (TA) and its Board are responsible for the strategic direction of wireless operational voice and data telecommunications in NSW. This includes determining a whole-of- Government telecommunications strategy, prioritising investment decisions, and developing and implementing state wide policy affecting planning development, operations and maintenance. Part of the TA s mandate includes establishing a set of standards, guidelines policies and procedures that can be utilised cross sector covering the design, installation, commission and operation of the operational telecommunications infrastructure. This document forms part of the overall guidelines, specifically the isolation required between antennas for radio communication. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this document is to define the required isolation between systems for co-located antennas and to establish a set of guidelines that can be used to design the Land Mobile Radio (LMR) systems (VHF and UHF). It will address the physical separation of antennas required to meet the isolation criteria and ensure minimal interference between systems sharing the same tower infrastructure. This will ensure that Government Radio Network (GRN) and other LMR networks will operate in an optimal manner. This guideline is not intended to replace the requirements for a detailed design for the antenna and filter systems on a site by site basis. 1.3 Scope The scope of this document applies to LMR radio communications systems operating in the VHF and UHF bands. The application of this guideline does not extend to other bands for mobile radio or other radio systems (broadcast, mobile etc.). The document addresses physical methods (vertical and horizontal separation) for achieving the required isolation but does not cover other aspects (filtering, polarisation, radiation patterns or consideration of the effects of the tower/structure). The recommendations are based on results of ITU-R s studies conducted specifically in the UHF and VHF bands and other documents listed in the related documents section. 1.4 Audience The intended audience for this document are designers responsible for radio planning and associated activities specifically in the VHF and UHF bands. It is expected that this guideline will be applied by the intended audience for new sites and existing sites undergoing upgrades. 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 3

2 Guideline 2.1 Antenna Isolation Antenna isolation is a key consideration in the design of any radio communications system. Sufficient isolation is required to ensure that interference between systems is kept within acceptable levels (levels at which the equipment can operate effectively). A number of techniques for achieving isolation between two antennas/ systems exist including but not limited to: Physical separation Polarisation Optimisation of antenna patterns Filtering A lack of sufficient isolation can lead to a number of undesirable effects: Intermodulation issues Receiver desensitization Transmitter noise; or Adjacent channel interference. Antenna isolation is a measure of power transfer from one antenna to another (Transmit Tx to Receive Rx), generally represented as a loss in db. As a general rule, the antenna isolation should be as large as possible to minimize interference between systems and can be maximised by: Increasing the physical separation between the antennas Using filters to reduce the received power of unwanted frequency (for systems operating on separate frequencies) Reducing the correlation coefficient between the antenna's radiation patterns - that is, have the antenna's peak radiation in different or opposite directions (azimuth and tilt changes can be used to achieve this along with antennas that meet specific design criteria) Using different polarizations The GRN and most other LMR systems used by NSW Government agencies typically uses omni directional antennas with vertical polarization, as a result of this architecture physical separation and filtering will be the main methods used to achieve the required isolation. The lowest recommended antenna isolation for co-sited (co-located) antennas is 30 db (Interferer port to victim port). This is valid for equipment on the same site, belonging to the same system as well as for all systems sharing the same site. This isolation can be achieved through the application of the following rules: 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 4

Victim Interferer Horizontal Separation Vertical Separation Rx Antenna Tx Antenna dh (m) dv(m) UHF VHF 4.5 3 UHF UHF 2 1 Table 1: Recommended Antenna Separation [2] [4] 2.2 Antenna Separation 2.2.1 Horizontal Antenna Separation As antennas are separated the amount of signal coupled from one antenna to another is reduced as a function of the distance. One way of achieving this isolation is through antenna separation in the horizontal plane. Horizontal separation tends to follow the inverse square law, which states that signal level will drop by 6 db (75%) every time you double the distance. If the distance between the antennas is doubled, the signal levels will drop by 6 db and any intermodulation products produced by those fundamental signals can drop up to 18 db ([7]). Figure 1: Horizontal Separation The table below shows isolation measurement results and the horizontal separation required to achieve specific isolation requirements for UHF and VHF. As can be seen, relatively large horizontal antenna spacing are required to achieve the required isolation values, in instances where this is not practicable other techniques for achieving isolation will need to be investigated. 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 5

Victim Interferer Horizontal Separation Isolation(dB) Rx Antenna Tx Antenna dh (m) UHF VHF(High) 4.5 30 VHF (low) 7.6 UHF UHF 1.62 9.11 30 45 Table 2: Horizontal separation vs Isolation [2] [3] It is recommended that a minimum horizontal separation of 2m and 4.5m is achieved for UHF to UHF and UHF to VHF installations respectively. On building roof tops where greater horizontal separation is possible 10m is recommended. 2.2.2 Vertical Antenna Separation Vertical antenna separation is a more efficient method of achieving the required isolation in space constrained environments (i.e. towers). Vertical separation provides significantly more isolation than horizontal separation. Based on industry standard isolation charts, spacing two VHF antennas 3m apart vertically will provide approximately 35 db of isolation while 3m of horizontal spacing will provide less than 20 db. Inverted mounting of antennas is another method often used to conserve tower space or to provide RF isolation (typically utilised for omni directional whip antennas). Some antennas are designed for in-field changes between upright and inverted mounting. Figure 2: Vertical Separation 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 6

The table below shows isolation measurement results for vertical separation for UHF and VHF: Interfered Interferer Vertical Spearation Isolation(dB) GRN Rx Antenna Tx Antenna dv (m) UHF VHF 3 35 UHF UHF 0.72 1.72 30 45 Table 3: Vertical separation vs Isolation [2] [3] To obtain maximum vertical isolation, the antennas must be located exactly above and below each other. Any offset will reduce the isolation. It is recommended that a minimum vertical separation of 1m and 3m is achieved for UHF to UHF and UHF to VHF installations respectively. On towers where greater vertical separation is possible a minimum of 2 m is recommended. 2.2.3 Antenna separation from infrastructure Transmitted energy coupled into other structures such as the tower or the rooftop antenna grid can be conducted along the structure and coupled into other antenna(s), thereby reducing the isolation. In many cases, depending on the coverage requirements a directional antenna array can be used to reduce the impact of installing below the tower by minimising the amount of power that is radiated in the direction of the tower (minimising the coupling affect). Figure 3: Omni Array Figure 4: Directional Array The following figures show examples of the predicted antenna pattern distortion caused by close proximity with a steel tower. 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 7

Figure 5: Simulated Antenna Pattern distortion at 1m from the tower Figure 6: Simulated Antenna Pattern distortion at 2m from the steel tower As general rule, separation distances are chosen as a multiple of wave lengths. UHF separation distance is shown in the following table, based on a wavelength of 0.75m at 400MHz. Wavelength Separation 3 2.25 m 2 1.50 m 1 0.75 m Table 4: UHF Separation from Infrastructure If the antenna cannot be installed on the top, it is recommended to place antennas at least 1.5 m from the tower for a omni array and 0.75m for a directional array. 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 8

1.5 m 0.75 m Figure 7: Tower separation for omni array and Directional array Note that this recommendation only applies if the tower is steel or metalic. For concrete poles the effect of shadowing by the tower should be taken in consideration. 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline v1.0.docx 10

2.3 Stacked Antenna configurations Typical Isolation between stacked antennas is shown below: Figure 7: Antenna Isolation for dual stacked antenna configurations [5] The dual stacked antenna configuration should comply with the minimum vertical antenna isolation requirement of 30dB. Where separation of UHF and VHF antennas are not possible, UHF and VHF stacked antennas are recommended as shown in the following figure. 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 11

Rx VHF Rx UHF TX UHF Greater VHF separation Tx VHF Figure 8: Dual band VHF and UHF stacked antenna configuration 2.4 General rules for antenna placement The isolation between transmitting and receiving antennas should be maximised. On towers, the best separation can be achieved by grouping receive antennas together on one level and installing transmit antennas on another level. Intermodulation of 3rd order products should be eliminated whenever possible. Where intermodulation (im) interference is detected or predicted, it is recommended that the frequency used by at least one transmitter is altered. Most systems utilise some amount of transmitter combination. Transmitters that produce IM must not be installed into the same combiner. 2.5 When Antenna Separation is not achievable Whenever the recommended antenna separation cannot be achieved, calculation of the antenna isolation and additional filtering [9] need to be assessed to: Suppress out-of-band interference Suppress third-order cross-modulation (PIM) Prevent desensitization (reciprocal) Prevent blocking by the attenuation 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 12

2.6 Antenna Separation calculator The Friis formula can be used to calculate isolation for any relative position and orientation of two antennas. If the antennas are located and oriented such that they are in the sidelobe region of each other, the peak gain level in the sidelobe regions can be used. Isolation = 22 + 20 log(r/ λ) (Gt,SL + Gr,SL) [2] Here Gx,SL = is the peak gain in the sidelobe region [2] This formulation is implemented in the Antenna Separation calculator.xlsx in the appendix for antenna separation estimation. Note that taking antenna mounting imperfections into account, the gain values have been chosen conservatively. 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 13

3 Appendix Calculation based on ITU-R M2244 [2] Antenna_Separation _calculatorv 1.0.xlsx Available to download as a separate document 4-3-2-001 Antenna Separation Calculator v1.0 4-3-2-001 Antenna Placement Guideline V1.0.Docx 14

END of DOCUMENT