Capital Region of Denmark. Capital Region of Denmark REGIONAL CYCLING REPORT

Similar documents
Green Mobility - an action plan for the way forward

Denmark - on your bike!

11. Monitoring Performance monitoring in LTP2

A Greener Transport System in Denmark. Environmentally Friendly and Energy Efficient Transport

Informal meeting of EU ministers for Transport Luxembourg, October 7th, Declaration on Cycling as a climate friendly Transport Mode

Case study summary TISSÉO - SMTC France

Copenhagen City of Cyclists. Bicycle Account 2010

PRESS KIT Green cities - fit for life

The Danish Transport System. Facts and Figures

For businesses and other organisations, developing a walk-if-you-can culture can help:

The Road to Health Care Parity: Transportation Policy and Access to Health Care

Copenhagen City of Cyclists BICYCLE ACCOUNT 2012

Policies and progress on transport access, including access for the rural population and low-income households

Bridging the gap - the use of methods from research results for implementation of Sustainable Urban Transport Plans with the example from Lund, Sweden

Transport planning in the Stockholm Region

Article. Commuting to work: Results of the 2010 General Social Survey. by Martin Turcotte

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND EVALUATION MEASURES

Residential Development Travel Plan

The Way We move. transportation master plan September 2009

Copenhagen, Denmark - Trends in Public Perception

The Oslo Pass - Oslo (Norway)

INTEGRATION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND NMT PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION IN AN EAST AFRICAN CONTEXT

Why build the Silvertown Tunnel?

Tripp Umbach developed a detailed survey with input from the PDP and distributed the survey to six Downtown Pittsburgh market segments:

Mobility Management for Companies

Appendix E Transportation System and Demand Management Programs, and Emerging Technologies

Urban Transport and the Environment, London, UK

Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility

Two miles per day may not seem like much, but do the math.

Fast Track to a Bicycle City in Light of the BICY Project: Infrastructure Investment Strategy and Cost Benefits

Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology 13, No 2, (2012)

About the Model. Unit. Cost Structure. Modal Characteristics

What are the physical characteristics of York? Why problems do you think there could be in York use map evidence.

Cycling & Society Symposium 14/9/15

Ticketing and user information systems in Public Transport in Thessaloniki area

Transport Demand Management

SUSTAINABLE TRAFFIC CONCEPT IN MUNICIPALITY OF NEA KYDONIA

GTA Cordon Count Program

Getting people on board!

136 deaths in 2007 (Latest figures available) UK (129 in England) 2,458 serious injuries in 2007 in the UK source- National Office of Statistics

TRANSPORT IMPACTS OF THE COPENHAGEN METRO

Bus Users in Sydney. Transport Data Centre ISSUES PAPER 2002/02 DECEMBER 2002 ISSN ISBN

Renewable Choice Energy

The European, Local and Regional Bicycle Route Planner for More Fun Cycling

Impact of main road investments in Bergen and Oslo

Bicycle and Public Transport Dream Team or Rivals? The Berlin Experience

The challenge: tranform the Urban Mobility model to make Milano a more Livable city. Agency for Mobility, Environment, Territory - City of Milan

Fleet management system as actuator for public transport priority

Recommendations for regional cycling developments of Budapest metropolitan area

A targeted market strategy for tram and metro in Oslo?

Transitways and the RouteAhead for Calgary Transit

SUPPORTING COMPANIES AND CITIES TOWARDS DECARBONISATION AND GREEN MOBILITY AUSTRIAN SHOWCASES NATIONAL KLIMAAKTIV MOBIL PROGRAM

8.7.O Integration and quality improvements of sustainable modes in Odense City: Odense Project: MOBILIS Measure number: 8.7

National Travel Surveys in Finland

Copenhagen Congestion Charging

GOVERNMENT POLICY STATEMENT ON LAND TRANSPORT 2015/ /25

HLJ Review 2/11. Helsinki Region Transport System Plan HLJ March Abstract.

City of Vantaa New Plans and Projects

USING ALTERNATIVE FUEL SOURCES TO REDUCE EMISSION POLLUTANTS

Innovation, entrepreneurism and sustainability spur Stockholm. staying. People are coming from other parts of Sweden, and other countries.

Submission to the Assembly Regional Development Committee Inquiry into Sustainable Transport. September 2009

Introduction to. Aalborg s Sustainability Strategy

London Underground Environment Strategy

TRANSPORT IMPACTS OF THE COPENHAGEN METRO

National program for investing in sustainable mobility: Lessons learned of the Austrian klimaaktiv mobil showcase

INTEGRATION AND REGULATORY STRUCTURES IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT CASE STUDY BRUSSELS CAPITAL REGION

FACTS ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE

HIGHWAYS ENGLAND STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN OVERVIEW

BICYCLE TRANSPORT AND MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN RELATION TO ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION TYPES

21 世 纪 的 绿 色 交 通 模 式 : 自 行 车 自 行 车 与 丹 麦 人

Data Collection and Sampling issues -Preparing Low Carbon Mobility Plan

Managing the Transit Network A Primer on Key Concepts

TRAVEL HABITS NOW AND THEN

consumerlab CITy life

Train Fund Denmark. Electrification of the main railway lines Realisation of the 1 Hour Model vision. 1 Hour. Transportministeriet

Submission from Living Streets Aotearoa Wellington City Public Transport Spine Study

After a turnaround, DSB is ready to pursue topline growth

Welcome to Hillerød Municipality. Part of Greater Copenhagen

Mobility Management plan of The CITY OF BELGRADE

Focus. Assessing the benefits of public transport. 1. Why focus on appraisal?

Velo-city Global. June 22-25, 2010

Cycling Promotion and Cycling Safety: Is there a conflict? C.Woolsgrove *

PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SMALL TOWNS AN AREA WITH GREAT POTENTIAL

City of Helsinki City Planning Department. Light rail. Public transport for the future Helsinki.

Creating Growth, Cutting Carbon. Making Sustainable Local Transport Happen

Feasibility of Car-Sharing Service in Hangzhou, China

Drive It Green. Time Frame: 3 class periods

Toll ring around Oslo: How car owners help paying for improved mobility, and better environment too

CITY CLIMATE LEADERSHIP AWARDS

This document is part of a series of Building a Stronger South Australia policy initiatives from the Government of South Australia.

NEWS FROM NATIONALBANKEN

Integrated Public Transport. Planning. National workshop on promoting sustainable transport solutions for East Africa

Multifamily Housing: Sustainable Development in Efficient, Walkable Communities

Taxi Anytime, Anywhere

Introduction to the town of Vinge. Vibrant town. Ever-present nature 1

GLOBAL PEERS TRANSPORTATION PLANS

Cork City & County Supporting More Sustainable Transport and Mobility Management. Ian Winning

Traffic Light Coordination - Impacts on mobility

Traffic system, space demand and urban structure.

The potential role of cycling in Iceland

Transcription:

Capital Region of Denmark Capital Region of Denmark REGIONAL CYCLING REPORT

Content 50 Foreword 60 Regional differences: we cycle in the Capital Region of Denmark 10 Cycling is healthy 13 Cycling reduces traffic congestion 14 Cycling helps the climate 18 Statistical Report for 2012 20 Capital Region of Denmark: a strong cycling region 2 3

Foreword This is the first regional cycling report ever published in the world. The report provides key figures and knowledge about regional cycling trends and improves our ability to monitor and influence developments in the area of cycling. In the Capital Region of Denmark, our vision is to become a green, innovative metropolis with good conditions for cycling, to benefit high growth and quality of life. Our objective is to increase bicycle commuting by 38% from 2012 to 2020. In 2012, 30% of all commuter trips in the Capital Region were made by bicycle. We want to increase this to 41% by 2020. The Regional Cycling Report focuses on regional cycling patterns, possibilities and challenges. It confirms our belief that cycling is a win win cause. The figures speak for themselves read them for yourself. Cycling accounts for 20% of all trips within the Capital Region, and the number of bicycle trips increased by 9% in the period 2007 2012. As a result, we save one million days of sick leave a year. Our daily cycling trips improve our health, our ability to concentrate and our productivity. The many kilometres we cycle, instead of taking the car, bus or train, reduce carbon emissions to the atmosphere by 110,000 tonnes a year. Increasing the bicycle s market share from 6.8% to 7.8% would save an additional 16,000 tonnes a year. We are not really complaining. But we do have room for improvement, and there is quite a way to a bicycle commuting percentage of 41%. Most bicycle trips are short, i.e. less than 5 km. Could we increase the number of medium to long trips? And could we become even better at combining the use of the bicycle with bus, train, metro or shared car? It would also be preferable if the cycling percentages didn t fall so sharply outside the Capital Region. Just how big a difference can there be between someone living in Copenhagen proper, someone in North Zealand and someone in Greater West Copenhagen. Perhaps we could encourage more suburban cycling by improving and boosting cycling conditions and the cycling culture even more? The alarm bells are ringing: our roads don t have the capacity for more cars, our hospitals are bulging with patients suffering from lifestyle ailments, and the air we breathe must not become more polluted than it already is. In two years, we will update the cycling report, and we hope to have raised the bar slightly in the interim. In addition to this brief edition of selected figures from 2007 2012, a comprehensive background report has also been prepared, containing all the statistics for our cycling report, should you have the desire to delve deeper into the details. Sophie Hæstorp Andersen Chairwoman of the Regional Council 4 5

We cycle in the Capital Region of Denmark The residents of the Capital Region of Denmark are fond of cycling. And the cycling experience differs, depending on where in the region you cycle. Cycling in Copenhagen s inner city, with 7,247 inhabitants per km2, is vastly different from cycling in Gribskov Municipality, with 145 inhabitants per km2. Cycling is doing well The number of bicycle trips in Denmark increased by 9% from 2007 to 2012. But there are big geographical differences. In Copenhagen Frederiksberg, the number of cycling trips increased by 19%. In the suburbs, the increase was 9%. In the region s other municipalities, however, there is an entirely different picture. Here, the number of cycling trips has actually decreased: by 22% from 2007 to 2012. Mill. bicycle trips per year, 2007 2012 400 350 300 250 344 315 200 150 100 50 0 2007 6 2008 2009 2010 Cph + Frb Suburbs Other Cph + Frb Suburbs Other 2011 2012 Capital Region 7

Competing modes of transport Breakdown by mode of transport in 2012, the whole region Specified by trip What mode of transport do residents of the Capital Region of Denmark choose for getting to work, school or recreational activities? The car is chosen for almost 50% of these trips, while the bicycle is used for around 22%. Geographically, the picture is clear. The further away from Copenhagen, the less the bicycle is used. In the Copenhagen Frederiksberg area, the bicycle is the preferred mode of transport for roughly 32% of the trips. In the suburbs, bicycles are used for 19% of the trips. In the region s other municipalities, the share is 10%. Car Bicycle Multimodal Walking Public transport Breakdown of trips by geographical area Cph + Frb Suburbs Other Bicycles are used for one in five trips in the Capital Region Car 8 Bicycle Multimodal Walking Public transport 9

Cycling is healthy Km per person/day The people of the Capital Region of Denmark are active cyclists The inhabitants of the Capital Region of Denmark cycled a total of 3.5 million km per day in 2012. As we cycled 2.8 million km per day in 2007, this is a 25% increase. The most active cyclists in 2012 were in Copenhagen and Frederiksberg, cycling 3.4 km per person per day. In 2007, this same figure was only 2.7 km. In the region s suburban municipalities, residents cycled 2.1 km per person per day, a slight increase from 2 km in 2007. In the region s other municipalities, residents cycled 1.1 km per day in 2012, against only 0.9 km/day in 2007. Cycling = fewer sick days This increase in the region s cycled kilometres is good, because cycling has a major documented effect on public health. One million fewer paid sick days: this is the benefit of Capital Region inhabitants being such diligent cyclists. Each time someone cycles 1,200 km, he or she reduces the average number of paid sick days by one. And it is possible for the rate of cycling to increase even more. The Capital Region is busy establishing 28 cycle superhighways and supporting regional cycling routes. When these projects are finished, the calculations show that an additional 34,000 paid sick days will be saved each year. 4 km 3 km 2 km 1 km 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Cph + Frb Suburbs Other 1,200 km = one less paid sick day 1 million fewer paid sick days due to cycling 10 11

Cycling saves money Cycling saves the municipalities of the Capital Region of Denmark roughly DKK 1.5 billion a year. What s more, cycling generates an additional DKK 1.5 billion in tax revenues for the state and municipalities. DKK 1.5 billion: This is how much the Capital Region saves every year from cycling in the region Cycling reduces traffic congestion Less congestion What is the significance of cycling in terms of traffic flow and congestion in the Capital Region of Copenhagen? Enormous. Inhabitants cycling means that we make 112,000 fewer trips by car on a daily basis during rush hour. In other words, 660,000 fewer kilometres are driven by car during rush hour. If we didn t cycle How would we get around without the bicycle? Most of the shortest trips of less than 2 kilometres would be replaced by walking. But some of these trips would also be replaced by using the car or public transport. For slightly longer trips, we would primarily replace the bicycle with a car or public transport. And this would increase the congestion. Breakdown of cyclists using other modes of transport, total number of trips per AADT (annualised average daily traffic). If we didn t cycle in the Capital Region of Denmark, the car would be used for almost 7,000 additional trips of less than 2 km and 41,000 additional trips between 2 and 5 km each day. 43,000 additional trips would be between 5 and 10 km while the remaining 21,000 additional trips would be longer than 10 km. Public transport Walking Car Socio-economic benefits Your fellow citizens also benefit from the fact that you cycle. When you take the bicycle instead of the car, your fellow citizens reach their destination a little sooner. The socio-economic value of the time saved by your fellow citizens was DKK 0.8 billion in 2012. Congestion saved = DKK 0.8 billion 30% of all commuter trips in the Capital Region were made by bicycle in 2012 12 13

Cycling helps the climate Car, bus, train, walking or bicycle? Your choice of transportation has an effect on your surroundings locally and globally. When people choose the bicycle instead of other modes of transport, it is good for the climate and air quality. Buses, trains and cars in the Capital Region of Denmark emitted 2.2 million tonnes of CO 2 in 2012. Cycling reduces carbon emissions by 110,000 tonnes per year. If the residents of the Capital Region did not cycle, an additional 96,000 tonnes of CO 2 would be emitted from cars, 6,000 tonnes from trains and 8,000 tonnes from buses. Cycling also helps to reduce emissions of harmful particles and nitrogen oxides. When we cycle more Carbon emission reduction resulting from cycling in the Capital Region of Denmark Saved by cycling (110,000 tonnes) Cycling s share of all kilometres travelled in the Capital Region, 2007 2012 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.3% 5.5% 6.0% 7.3% 6.8% 6.1% 6.8% The more we choose the bicycle over a car or public transport, the more we reduce carbon emissions and thus benefit the climate. In 2007, cycling was responsible for 5.5% of the kilometres travelled by residents of the Capital Region of Denmark. This figure rose to 6.8% in 2012, a 24% increase. And this benefits the climate! Increasing the bicycle s market share from 6.8% to 7.8% would save an additional 16,000 tonnes of carbon emissions a year. If we reach 10% of the kilometres we travel, we will save more than 50,000 additional tonnes of carbon emissions a year. 110,000 Tonnes of carbon emissions/year saved by cycling Other modes of transport (2,169,000 tonnes) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Multimodal trips Bicycle Each time we increase our cycling by 1 percentage point, we reduce carbon emissions by 16,000 tonnes 14 15

16 17

2012 Statistics 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Cycling s percentage of all trips, by geographical location - Capital Region 20.3% 22.1% 22.1% 20.9% 21.7% 21.6% - Copenhagen and Frederiksberg 29.0% 31.0% 30.6% 30.3% 31.9% 31.6% - Suburbs 17.5% 19.2% 18.6% 17.0% 17.9% 19.2% - Other 12.3% 14.6% 14.6% 12.8% 12.5% 10.0% Cycling s percentage of all trips, by trip length - Less than 2 km 29.0% 32.6% 29.3% 27.3% 28.3% 29.4% - 2 5 km 31.3% 32.0% 33.6% 29.9% 33.6% 31.4% - 5 10 km 17.8% 20.2% 19.3% 22.4% 21.4% 21.4% - 10 25 km 04.7% 05.1% 05.7% 06.1% 04.7% 07.6% - More than 25 km 00.7% 00.4% 02.0% 00.8% 00.5% 00.9% Cycling s percentage of all km travelled, by geographical location - Capital Region 05.7% 06.4% 07.6% 07.2% 06.6% 07.3% - Copenhagen and Frederiksberg 10.0% 10.4% 12.2% 13.0% 11.3% 13.5% - Suburbs 05.9% 05.5% 06.7% 06.1% 06.1% 06.7% - Other 02.1% 03.4% 03.8% 02.9% 02.4% 02.6% Cycled km per year, by geographical location (mill. km) - Capital Region 1,016 1,096 1,271 1,149 1,162 1,269 - Copenhagen and Frederiksberg 1.520 1. 576 1. 680 1. 661 1. 655 1. 707 - Suburbs 1. 368 1. 331 1. 386 1. 328 1. 371 1. 397 - Other 1. 129 1. 188 1. 205 1. 160 1. 136 1. 165 Average length of cycling trips - Cycling trips only 1,63.0 1,63.0 1,63.2 1,63.3 1,63.1 1,63.3 - Multimodal transport 1,61.9 1,61.9 1,61.9 1,61.8 1,61.9 1,61.7 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Cycled km per day, by age group - All (10 84 yrs) 1,62.0 1,62.1 1,62.4 1,62.2 1,62.2 1,62.3 - Youths (10 17 yrs) 1,62.2 1,62.1 1,62.6 1,61.8 1,61.8 1,61.4 - Other (18 65 yrs) 1,62.1 1,62.3 1,62.7 1,62.5 1,62.5 1,62.8 - Elderly (66 84 yrs) 1,60.9 1,61.2 1,60.9 1,60.8 1,60.8 1,60.7 Percentage who cycle every time or with greatest frequency in different situations - To and from work or place of education 57% - Shopping 43% - To recreational activities 51% - Conveying children 27% - Going out, e.g. restaurant, theatre, etc. 34% Percentage who feel that it is important or very important that where they cycle: - there are bicycle lanes on the route 83% - there are good bicycle lanes 86% - there are good bicycle parking options 65% - that it is easy to combine cycling with public transport 46% Percentage who agree or completely agree that where they cycle: - there are bicycle lanes on the route 74% - there are good bicycle lanes 58% - there are good bicycle parking options 55% - that it is easy to combine cycling with public transport 57% 18 19

Capital Region of Denmark a strong cycling region More cyclists needed In the Capital Region of Denmark, we give high priority to cycling and want to have even more residents choose the bicycle as their preferred mode of transport for getting to and from work and recreational activities. We wish to develop good cycling conditions and an innovative cycling culture in the Capital Region because this will help to create a green, innovative metropolis with high growth and high quality of life. Why should we cycle? We consider cycling to be a win-win cause. The health benefits are particularly great. At the same time, we reap other benefits, such as cleaner air, fewer cars, lower carbon emissions and less noise. The money we spend on cycling is repaid many times over in the form of better public health and higher quality of life. DKK 40 million for cycling projects Since 2009, the Capital Region has allocated more than DKK 40 million to regional cycling projects which promote collaboration, development and innovation in the area of cycling in the Capital Region. Most projects aim to promote bicycle commuting and multimodal trips combining bicycle with bus/train. In addition we lend a large number of electrical bicycles to our employees to motivate them to cycle instead of driving a car to and from work. Examples of regional cycling development projects Bicycle commuting Cycle superhighways Regional cycling fund Test-ride an electrical bicycle Innovative cycling CykelPlanen (app) Multimodal trips Bicycles free on local railways Bicycle flexi-room on local railways Bringing bicycles on buses Cycling traffic in the Frederikssund corridor Recreational cycling and tourism Øresund as a cycling region Friluftsguide (app) 20 21

The municipalities prioritise cycling To illustrate municipal efforts to promote cycling, the Capital Region of Denmark has conducted a questionnaire survey in our municipalities. We found out that more than three-quarters of the municipalities focus on cycling. The focus areas vary from school routes for children, to commuters, tourists and green traffic. Many of the municipalities already have a cycling strategy or cycling policy in place, or are in the process of drafting one. Or they have articulated their cycling plans in another way. In addition, half of the municipalities have one or more written objectives for cycling. Cycle superhighways a common flagship A joint project involving the Capital Region, the municipalities and the state is the cycle superhighways project. The aim of the project is to develop a contiguous network of high-quality bicycle commuter routes across municipal borders. This effort could potentially increase bicycle commuting in the region by more than 30%, compared to today. The total benefit of implementing the entire network of cycle superhighways is calculated at DKK 7.3 billion. By themselves, the 28 cycle superhighways under way in the region could reduce sick leave by 34,000 days a year. The map shows a plan for the network of cycle superhighways across most municipalities in the Capital Region. The routes have either been planned, adopted or constructed and are jointly funded by the municipalities and the state. 22 23

Capital Region of Denmark Centre for Regional Development Kongens Vænge 2 DK-3400 Hillerød +45 3866 5000 E-mail: regionh@regionh.dk www.regionh.dk Graphic design: RegionH Design Photos: Colourbox, Ty Stange, Nicolai Perjesi