HPP ON RAW CHICKEN MEAT

Similar documents
Olive polyphenols (encapsulated in maltodextrin) derive from olive fruits by physical treatments only.

50 C 51 C 53 C 55 C 57 C 59 C 60 C 61 C 63 C 65 C 67 C 69 C 71 C 72 C

The effect of 31 vs. 38 degree holding temperature on meat quality.

The Process of Conducting a Shelf Life Study

Extending Shelf-Life of Beef Cuts Utilizing Low Level Carbon Monoxide in Modified Atmosphere Packaging Systems

Predictive microbiological models

Safe Storage of Raw Animal Foods

Fresh Meat Processing. Objective

, \ Irradiation ofred Meats

Use of Antimicrobials to Extend Shelf Life in Fresh Catfish Fillets

National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System - Enteric Bacteria. A program to monitor antimicrobial resistance in humans and animals

CONTROLLING MICROBIAL GROWTH IN WINE

TRAINER: Read this page ahead of time to prepare for teaching the module.

AFDO 2010, Norfolk, VA James Marsden Regents Distinguished Professor Jasdeep Saini Kansas State University

Q&A on the carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat

I. NACHEVA, D. MITEVA, Y. TODOROV, K. LOGINOVSKA and Tsv. TSVETKOV Institute of Cryobiology and Food Technologies, BG Sofia, Bulgaria

Shelf life testing. Use-by dates for food safety NSW/FA/FI065/1002

How clean is your kitchen?

10-ml Graduated cylinder 40 ml 3% Hydrogen peroxide solution (found in stores) Straight-edged razor blade Scissors and Forceps (tweezers)

STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS

The sterilisation of spices, herbs and vegetable seasonings: Understanding the options

INTRODUCTION. Such chemical substances which are added to food materials to prevent their spoilage are known as chemical preservatives.

Chapter 2 Validation of Control Measures 1

4. HOUSE RULES TEMPERATURE CONTROL

Lesson # 9: Poultry Processing

Chicken. Beef. Pork. Mutton. agriculture, forestry & fisheries. Department: Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

FHT Flour Heat Treatment.

Raw Milk Quality Tests Do They Predict Fluid Milk Shelf-life or Is it time for new tests?

Food Safety at the Grocery Store

Maricopa County. Food Code References for Produce. Receiving. Storage

WHITE PAPERS Trends & Predictions

Human Services Career Cluster Food Science Course Number:

Yeast bread outline. Yeast. Functions of other yeast bread ingredients Yeast bread cookery Spoilage of baked goods. Compressed Dry active

MICROBIAL HAZARDS. Eating food contaminated with harmful microorganisms. These

The National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS)

Practice Test. 1. Which of the following statements is true? After touching raw ground beef, it is important to:

Food delivery & storage

The functional properties of sugar

ABU DHABI FOOD CONTROL AUTHORITY. Food Poisoning

HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION GUIDELINES ADOPTED. August 14, 1997

The Way Forward McGill & Food Safety

Vacuum Packaging Food Safety Principles

Top Ten Things You Must Know When Moving From Small To Large Scale Production

GUIDELINES FOR THE VALIDATION OF FOOD SAFETY CONTROL MEASURES CAC/GL

General food hygiene rules

SUBJECT: RULES AND REGULATIONS ON THE HYGIENIC HANDLING PRACTICES OF MECHANICALLY DEBONED MEAT (MDM)

Restaurant Grading in New York City at 18 Months Public Recognition and Use of Grades

THESES OF DOCTORAL (PH.D.) DISSERTATION DEVELOPMENT OF A FUNCTIONAL DAIRY FOOD ENRICHED WITH SPIRULINA (ARTHROSPIRA PLATENSIS)

National Food Safety Standard Fermented Milk

Understanding Foodborne Illness (Food Poisoning)

Front face fluorescence analysis to monitor food process contaminants

Why iron and haemoglobin are important

This quick guide provides a summary of food safety and labelling advice for small scale home producers of chutneys, pickles, flavoured oils and jams.

Cleaning. By the end of this chapter, you will be able to: Introduction. Definitions. Chapter 9

Harrington s guide to serving The World s Finest Ham. & other fine smoked meats

Use of Chlorine in the Food Industry

Enzyme Lab. DEFINITIONS: 1. Enzyme: 2. Catalase: 3. Catalyze: 4. Hydrolysis: 5. Monomer: 6. Digestion: BACKGROUND INFORMATION

GOT MILK? Background. Food Processing and Preservation. Milk Processing and Preservation

Extending Shelf Life and Preserving Quality in FF&V Shipping and Storage. Product Performance and Market Benefits

Biopharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Unit 2 Student Handout. DNA Biotechnology and Enzymes

Processi della Tecnologia Alimentare - Prof. Davide Barbanti. The frying process

A Recipe for Safe Food: ISO and HACCP

Chemistry 20 Chapters 15 Enzymes

FSTC/DASC 606 Microbiology of Foods Spring, 2016

STERILIZATION AND DISINFECTION

Application of Fish Shelf life Prediction (FSLP) software for monitoring seafood quality in the cold chain

Syllabus M.Tech. Food Technology DSC- FT- 1 A: FUNDAMENTALS OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PART I

Developing a school food safety plan based on HACCP system. (for school lunch box caterers)

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts MICROBIOLOGICAL SAFETY VALIDATION OF FOOD PROCESSES

FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE S (SOP S) FOR HAZARDOUS ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) PLANS

Receiving and Storage

CHARACTERISTICS OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS CONTAINING MECHANICALLY DEBONED MEAT 1

Course: AFS 302 FOOD BIOCHEMISTRY (3 Credits Compulsory) Course Duration:15h Teaching and 45h Practical. Lecturer: OTUNOLA, Gloria A.

Quality Control A Model Program for the Food Industry

09/04 Curing and Sausage page 1

Active and Intelligent Packaging: Innovations for the Future

SHOP SMART, STORE SAFE

Superheated Steam Drying of Foods and Biomaterials

Orange Fruit Processing

Food Safety Guidelines for the Preparation and Display of Sushi. June 2007 NSW/FA/FI005/0706

Standard 5: Students will understand that microorganisms range from simple to complex, are found almost everywhere, and are both helpful and harmful.

Guidance for School Food Authorities: Developing a School Food Safety Program Based on the Process Approach to HACCP Principles

In re Docket No. OON-1351

the Fresh Keeper Instruction Booklet BVP700

Name: Hour: Elements & Macromolecules in Organisms

Microbiological safety and quality aspects in relation to the short food supply chain

23) MODIFIED ATMOSPHERE PACKAGING

Arefrigerator is one of the most important pieces of equipment in the kitchen for keeping foods safe. These

Better Training for Safer Food BTSF. Process CCP identification in cheese production and scientific safety assurance indicators.

N-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one (MBIT) New Solution for In-can Preservation

Candidate Study Guide for the Illinois Food Service Sanitation Manager Examinations

Quality Advantages of Food Grade Soybeans from the Upper Midwest: storage perspective. Sam K. C. Chang. Ph.D., Professor; IFT Fellow

Predictive modeling of microbial dynamics

A. GENERAL INFORMATION No. 33 (1) GUIDELINES FOR COMBI-OVENS

Experimental Design and Sensory Analysis

Transcription:

HPP ON RAW CHICKEN MEAT INTRODUCTION High Pressure Processing (HPP) is a non thermal food processing technology used for raw meat, either they are minced, sliced or whole pieces, with longer shelf life and safer. On this sector, the pressure range used it is between 29,000 psi (200 MPa) and 87,000 psi (600MPa) applied at refrigerated temperature. Currently, three are the main applications of high pressure processing on raw meat: Safety and shelf life of raw meat products food products is improved On the range from 400 MPa (4,000 bar; 58,000 psi) and 600 MPa (6,000 bar; 87,000 psi),, inactivating spoiling vegetative microorganisms (bacteria, yeasts and molds) and pathogens. High pressure is applied on the final package, so recontamination after processing is avoided. Tenderization: Pressures on the range from 200 MPa (29,000 psi) to 400 MPa (4,000 bar; 58,000psi) allow improving texture and organoleptic characteristics on raw pieces. Reduction of cooking losses: Pressures on the range from 200 MPa (29,000 psi) to 400 MPa (4,000 bar; 58,000psi) allow enhancing meat binding.

FOOD SAFETY OF RAW CHICKEN MEAT Salmonella contamination in food, especially poultry meat, is one of the relevant foodborne pathogens worldwide. HPP technology has demonstrated to be one of the suitable technologies for inactivating this pathogen in various model systems and meat products. However, research has shown that food matrix, its components and its physicochemical characteristics such as ph and water activity (a w ), plays a relevant role in the inactivation of microorganisms by HPP, exerting a protective effect on microorganisms or enhancing inactivation level by HPP. Besides the characteristics of food matrix, variation in pressure resistance among serotypes of Salmonella was reported. The research of Alpas and others (1999) showed that Salmonella enteriditis FDA and Salmonella typhimurium E21274 were the most resistant serotypes in peptone solution at 345 MPa (50,040 psi, 25 ºC (77 ºF) for 5 min, with an inactivation level of 5.45 and 5.71 log CFU/ml, respectively. Thus, this whitepaper summarizes the results of inactivation of Salmonella in HPP raw chicken meat of two scientific papers done by Kruk and others (2011) and Tananuwong and others (2012). Both studies evaluated the inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium by HPP and the impact of HPP processing on sensory quality of the product. Inactivation of Salmonella in chicken meat Tananuwong and others (2012) tested several HPP conditions: pressure level, holding time, and pressurization temperature (25, 30 and 35 ºC / 77, 86 and 95 ºF). They evaluated the instantaneous Figure 1. Inactivation of Salmonella typhimurium in HPP raw chicken breast fillets at 300 MPa (43,500 psi) at different holding time and temperature (Tananuwong and others, 2012)

inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium at the different HPP conditions (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Pressure level had a significant impact on inactivation of the pathogen in raw chicken meat. Increasing pressure level led to lower Salmonella survivals. The increase of pressure from 300 to 400 MPa (43,500 to 58,000 psi) doubled maximum inactivation levels from 2.0 to around 4.0 log CFU/g. Increasing holding time and temperature led to higher inactivation levels, as well. However, the impact of these processing parameters was lower than the increase of pressure level (< 1 log cfu/g). Figure 2. Inactivation of Salmonella typhimurium in HPP raw chicken breast fillets at 400 MPa (58,000 psi) at different holding time and temperature (Tananuwong and others, 2012) Any preservation technology should inactivate the target microorganisms and avoid the growth of the survival microorganisms. Thus, it is necessary to trace the bacteria after HPP and throughout storage. The study done by Kruk and others (2012) evaluated the evolution of Salmonella Typhimurium in HPP chicken breasts for two weeks at refrigeration at different pressure levels (300, 450 and 600 MPa / 43,510; 62,265 and 87,020 psi)) for 5 min (Figure 3). Increasing the pressure above 300 MPa (43,510 psi) improved instantaneous lethal effect of HPP on Salmonella. At 450 MPa (62,265 psi) and higher pressures HPP reached around 4 log inactivation throughout cold storage, avoiding recover of bacteria. The impact of the increase of pressure on lethality of Salmonella in raw meat is in agreement with the study of Tananuwong and others. Figure 3. Evolution of Salmonella Typhimurium in HPP chicken breast fillets during refrigerated storage (4 ºC )) (Kruk and others, 2011)

SENSORY QUALITY OF HPP CHICKEN MEAT HPP is able to break, or create, weak bonds (hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions), only present on macromolecules (Cheftel, 1992). Thanks to this phenomenon, HPP can inactivate microorganisms, denaturing their cell membrane proteins. However, pressure can affect other proteins, including those related to meat color and texture. Pressures higher than 400 MPa (58,015 psi) can lead to denaturation of proteins responsible of color and texture on meat, so changes in color of fresh meat can be observed, usually described as white/opaque appearance, as well as an increase of hardness. HPP on chicken meat color Figure 4. Difference in color (evaluated by colorimetry) of HPP chicken meat at different pressure levels compared to no HPP meat. (Difference in color for no HPP samples = 0) (Kruk and others, 2011) The discoloration of meat is due to myoglobin denaturation and/or heme displacement or release as well as ferrous oxidation caused by high pressure (Carlez and others, 1995). The content of myoglobin in chicken meat is lower than beef or pork. Therefore, the effect of pressure, especially on redness of the muscle could be not as well pronounced in chicken breast fillets. The study of Kruk and others (2011) showed that the increase of pressure entails a difference in color compared to non HPP chicken breast fillets evaluated by colorimetry (Figure 4). This instrumental technique allows the measurement of color intensity quantitatively in a higher sensitive way than human eye and reducing human perception bias. HPP processed chicken meat becomes whiter and redder compared to no HPP meat. The intensity of these changes in color is increase at higher pressures. Figure 5. Difference in color (evaluated by colorimetry) of HPP chicken meat at different pressure levels compared to no HPP meat before and after cooking (Difference in color for no HPP samples= 0) (Tananuwong and others, 2012)

Despite of the significant change in color of HPP raw chicken meat, there was no significant differences in meat color after cooking of HPP chicken meat compared to cooked no HPP meat according to Tananuwong and others (2012) (Figure 5). HPP on other sensory attributes of chicken meat Effect on meat aroma and flavor HPP induces changes in aroma profile of the chicken breast meat, delaying the development of volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), improving meat freshness (Table 1). However, HPP increased slightly lipid oxidation (TBARS) of fresh meat at 87,000 psi for 5 min (Kruk and others, 2011), which can lead to rancid flavor. Tananuwong and others (2012) found HPP kept aroma intensity of fresh raw meat evaluated by panelists (Figure 6). Similar result was found regarding meat flavor in the same study. Table 1. Comparison of quality traits of HPP chicken breast fillets and no HPP meat (Kruk and others, 2011) Physical character. Spoilagerelate volatile compound Texture No HPP 300 MPa 5 min 450 MPa 5 min 600 MPa 5 min Moisture (%) 70,3 72,2 72,7 73,8 Cooking loss (%) 31,6 30,4 33,7 37,8 VBN (day 3) 27,1 17,5 16,1 14,0 VBN (day 7) 66,3 34,3 25,9 19,6 TBARS (day 0) 0,28 0,27 0,62 1,17 TBARS (day 3) 0,48 0,43 0,66 1,75 TBARS (day 7) 0,47 0,73 0,75 2,32 Hardness 28,0 30,1 44,8 50,7 Cohesiveness 0,17 0,25 0,27 0,32 Gumminess 4,9 7,8 12,3 16,2 Chewiness 1,77 2,72 4,43 6,7 Effect on meat texture Since high pressure can modify protein structure, texture is one of the sensory attributes which can be affected in raw meat. Kruk and others (2011) found a significant increase in hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess and chewiness in HPP fresh chicken breast fillets at pressure processing above 300 MPa (43,510 psi) for 5 min (Table 1). Panelists scored the juiciness slightly lower HPP chicken meat compared to no HPP samples (Figure 6). However, the difference in juiciness was only significant in chicken meat processed at 300 MPa (43,510 psi). At higher pressures, there was no statistical difference compared to non HPP meat Figure 6. The effect of high pressure processing on flavour, juiciness and aroma intensity of chicken breast fillet evaluated by sensory panelists (Kruk and others, 2011)

(Kruk and others, 2011). The same researchers stated other sensory attributes such as meat color, texture, tenderness, aroma pleasantness and overall satisfaction were not affected by pressure. CONCLUSIONS HPP technology is a suitable processing method for inactivating Salmonella, even pressure resistant serotypes such as S. typhimurium, and other relevant foodborne microorganisms in raw chicken meat. However, if the required HPP processing conditions are intense for controlling Salmonella, HPP could induce changes in sensory attributes, mainly those related to product appearance. The other sensory attributes and the overall sensory quality are slightly or not affect by HPP processing. REFERENCES Alpas H, Kalchayanand N, Bozoglu F, Sikes A, Dunne CP, Ray B. (1999). Variation in resistance to hydrostatic pressure among strains of food borne pathogens. Applied Environmental Microbiology 65:4248 51. Carlez, A., Veciana Nogues, T., & Cheftel, J. C. (1995). Changes in colour and myoglobin of minced beef meat due to high pressure processing. Lebensmittel Wiss U Technologie, 28, 528 538. Cheftel, J. C. (1992). Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on food constituents: An overview. In C. Balny, R. Hayashi, KK. Heremans & P. Masson (Eds), High pressure and Biotecnology, Colloque INSERM (Vol. 224) 195 209 Kruk, Z.A, Yun, H., Rutley, D., Lee, E. J., Kim, Y. J., Jo, C., (2011) The effect of high pressure on microbial population, meat quality and sensory characteristics of chicken breast fillet. Food Control, 22, 6 12. Tananuwong, K., Chitsakun, T., Tattiyakul. (2012) Effects of high pressure processing on inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium, eating quality and microstructure of raw chicken breast fillets. Journal of Food Science, 77 (11) 321 327