Road Deactivation for DU 300, 511, 510 and Duhamel Heights. By: W. Halleran P.Geo Eng. L.

Similar documents
Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES

How To Assess An Area For Erosion


DRAINAGE :: DRAINAGE CONCERN FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

ALLOW BACKCAST material to sit and drain. If not, the attendant settling will block culverts and change direction of flow in ditches.

Outlet stabilization structure

5 Most Common Planning & Management Problems in Ontario County, Canada

Jackson Gulch Outlet Canal Rehabilitation Project

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

THE OBJECTIVES OF ROUTINE ROAD CUTS AND FILLS


BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

Architectural Processing and Inspections for Home Mortgage Insurance

Guidelines for Professional Services in. the Forest Sector Forest Roads

Stabilization and Rehabilitation Measures for Low-Volume Forest Roads

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

Local Road Assessment and Improvement Drainage Manual

Riprap-lined Swale (RS)

Table 4.9 Storm Drain Inlet Protetion Applicable for

Homeowner s Guide to Drainage

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

Vehicle Tracking Control (VTC)

CHAPTER 9 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION

HOMEOWNER S GUIDE. to LANDSLIDES. and MITIGATION RECOGNITION, PREVENTION, CONTROL, Compiled by Dr. Scott F. Burns Tessa M. Harden Carin J.

Transportation and other facilities are developed to serve National Forest System lands and resource management programs.

IAC 7/2/08 Utilities[199] Ch 9, p.1 CHAPTER 9 RESTORATION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS DURING AND AFTER PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION

Trenching and Excavation Safety

Sustainable Road Drainage Asset Management Strategy and Financial Requirements

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (SSBMP) PLAN/STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) REVIEW CHECKLIST

8.1.3 General Design Guidelines. The following guidelines shall be used when designing inlets along a street section:

CHAPTER 7 DRAINAGE OF PAVEMENTS

Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Construction Site Inspection Checklist for OHC By making use of some simple Best Management Practices (BMPs) a construction site operator can

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS

Hempfield Township LOGGING/HARVESTING PERMIT APPLICATION. Per Section of the Code of the Township of Hempfield

P-23 - DEVELOPMENT OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE INSPECTION PROGRAM

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN TEMPLATE

WILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT

NJ Interception Drainage

Temporary Erosion-Control Measures

BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM

Neversink River East Branch

Definition of Tower from the Bradley County Zoning Resolution

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES

Carlton Fields Memorandum

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES

Forest Operations Compliance Audit Performance Indicators

ROAD SURVEYING Section I. RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY PREPARATION AND SCOPE

OSU Extension FACT SHEET

Forestry Operations: Water Quality & BMPs

DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR EARTH RETENTION

1. It would create hazardous effects of storm water run-off. 3. It would increase hazardous driving conditions on the public road.

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION

A perforated conduit such as pipe, tubing or tile installed beneath the ground to intercept and convey ground water. or structures.

WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM WATER ACT APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE

Forest Road Construction and Maintenance

Stream Crossing Quality Index (SCQI) Survey For 8 Sub-basins of Tree Farm License #30 Prince George Forest District

1. Carry water under the canal 2. Carry water over the canal 3. Carry water into the canal

JOE RICH CREEK CHANNEL ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION OPPORTUNITIES

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

Chapter 5: Drainage, Ditches, and Culverts

STORM DRAIN PIPE MAINTENANCE. a. Develop standard operating procedures for maintaining storm drain pipes.

There is no water, surface tension cracks, nor other environmental conditions present that reduce the stability of the excavation.

City of Paso Robles Community Development Department Construction Site Storm Water Quality Requirements

Minimizes sediment and debris from entering storm drains that lead to waterways and watercourses.

COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT LIVING NEAR INDIANA COAL MINES

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER AND SEWER PIPELINES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE

SECTION 5. Sediment Control Measures

Town of Elkton & Cecil Soil Conservation District Checklist for Joint Agency Review Stormwater Management / Erosion and Sediment Control

The Fish Forestry Interaction Project Management Model (FFIP MM)

Pavement Asset Management Guidance Section 5.3: Condition Surveying and Rating - Drainage

EXCAVATOR SAFETY TRAINING

Access Track Construction Standard and Specification

MSHA Handbook MSHA COAL MINE IMPOUNDMENT INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW HANDBOOK

Property Care White Papers. Site Drainage: Monitor and Maintain

Basements and Deep Building Construction Policy 2014

How To Check For Scour At A Bridge

2006 OFF-ROAD VEHICLE (ORV) TRAIL MAINTENANCE GRANT APPLICATION INFORMATION

Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. Cost Analysis of Low Impact Development Best Management Practices

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Beseck Switching Station Inspection

Session 3: Guardrail Design and Sitespecific. Considerations

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

NATURAL DISASTER ARRANGEMENTS JANUARY 2012 MONTH YEAR

Chapter 11 Site Rehabilitation and Stabilization

GUIDE TO FORESTRY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN TENNESSEE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DIVISION OF FORESTRY 2003

ACCEPTABLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR MAINTAINING. Water Quality ON LOGGING JOBS IN VERMONT

Welded Mesh Gabions and Mattresses River Protection Design Guide HY-TEN GABION SOLUTIONS Dunstall Hill Trading Estate, Gorsebrook Road,

SITE INVESTIGATIONS OF THE BEACH EROSION PROBLEM AT MAHO BEACH, ST. MAARTEN

DESCRIPTION OF WORK:

HOW A TRIER OF FACT REACHES DECISIONS. Donna Siers

Transcription:

Road Deactivation for DU 300, 511, 510 and Duhamel Heights. By: W. Halleran P.Geo Eng. L.

DU 511 DU 510 DU 300 Duhamel Heights

Terms of Reference Complete a semi- permanent deactivation plan for DU-300 from 3+060 to the end of the road (upper lift). Four wheel drive access is preferable, however quad access will also work if needed. Complete a semi-permanent deactivation plan for the Duhamel heights road and DU-511 (upper lift). Put the roads into a hydrological stable state. Leave stream crossings in and back up all culverts in addition to any work you feel is necessary. Complete a permanent de-activation plan for spur DU-510.

Objectives of Road Deactivation: 1. stabilize the road prism and clearing width 2. restore or maintain surface drainage patterns, and control subsurface drainage, consistent with natural drainage patterns 3. minimize the impact of silt and sediment transport on other forest resources.

Semi-Permanent Deactivation The intent of semi-permanent deactivation is to place the road in a self maintaining state. Regular inspections of semi-permanent deactivation works are required.

Permanent Deactivation The intent of permanent deactivation is to place the road in a selfmaintaining state that will indefinitely protect adjacent resources at risk. (Inspections not required).

Cross-ditch The purpose of a cross-ditch is to intercept, direct and disperse surface water flow off a road and ditch water across a road. Very little maintenance is required when cross-ditches are properly constructed, placed in correct locations, spaced closely, or when vehicle traffic is light. For this project cross-ditches will be constructed such that the outlet feeds onto natural surface or nonerodible material, ditchblocks will be constructed at each cross-ditch

Waterbar The purpose of a water bar is to capture and direct road surface water from the road into the ditch line or across the road surface beyond the shoulder of the road. Note: a water bar, unlike a crossditch, collects only road surface water and not water flowing down the ditch line. For this project water bars will be constructed to direct water off the road surface and back into the ditch.

Field Procedure Deactivation prescriptions were marked in the field with pink flagging stamped with Cross-ditch or Waterbar, Additional instructions were written on pink flagging with black permanent marker and recorded as waypoints using a handheld GPS. Shapefile and GPX files with attached prescription tables were provided to Kalesnikoff Lumber Company.

Road DU 300 This road was constructed in the winter of 2013, timber harvesting was completed in the winter of 2013/14.

DU 300: For cross-ditches pull the fill from the outlets. Partial road fill pullback The purpose of partial road fill pullback is to reduce the likelihood of a landslide along the road when full road fill pullback is not needed for immediate stability. Partial road fill pullback leaves the stable portion of fill intact, but it may not reduce the road fill landslide hazard to the fullest extent possible. This technique is appropriate to maintain motor vehicle access. Station 011: Partial Fill pullback.

History of Duhamel Heights Road. The original road (Duhamel Face FSR) was built in the early 1990 s and permanently deactivated in 2003(?). In 1997 there were at least 3 debris slides off or below this road. The slides are not present on the 1995 airphotos but are there on the 1997 airphotos. In 2007 Kalesnikoff contracted Perdue Geotechnical Services to provide road construction recommendations to reconstruct portions of the deactivated road to access CP 21, this road is now called Duhamel Heights Road. Perdue noted the presence of perched fills from the original road and the presence of four debris slides, of which at least three and likely all four were associated road drainage (Perdue 2007). Since reconstruction, there have been at least two (2010 and 2011) debris slides, two of which have reached Duhamel Creek.

2009 imagery showing the deactivated road and 1997 slides

Duhamel Heights Deactivation 2014: Deactivation mostly consisted of cross-ditches, waterbars, culvert back up and other drainage management measures. Perched fills were noted downslope of the middle section of the road, near the initiation zone of the 2010/11 slides. Remediation of these fills was beyond the scope of this project and would cut off access, water was directed away from these areas.

1997

Description of site: Sloughed cut, pooling water, partially blocked culvert inlet, culvert is broken currently partially discharging into fill. Prescription: Remove culvertconstruct cross-ditch, inslope road to keep water off fillslope. Stations 43-45 Culvert

2010 and 2011 debris slides According to the landslide investigations (Perdue 2010, Kalesnikoff 2011) both slides at least partially initiated within perched fills from the Duhamel Face FSR which had not been totally pulled back.

Perched Fill Station 077: Decomposing stump within old fill from the deactivated FSR. The stump is exposed in the scarp of a small slump. Adjacent to the 2011 slide.

Perched Fill Slumped fill (stump from previous photo just behind the dog). Just downslope of Duhamel Heights road. The dog is on the head of the slump. A swale upslope feeds this area, water is directed to a culvert just down the road gradient.

Slide Scarp 2011 Rock in the cutslope is parallel to the slope. There is a spring just below the road in the slide scarp. Scarp appears to be at least partially in old road fill with organics. It is possible that the spring saturated the toe of the old fill. The decomposed organics likely failed. Perched Fill Culvert Scarp

History of Road DU 510 (in block spur road) This road was constructed to access within block #5 of CP 21; Perdue 2007 provided stability assessment and road construction recommendations. According to the DTSFA there were no signs of instability. This road was deactivated in 2011, most of the culverts were removed and cross-ditches installed, the end landing had partial fill pullback and was partially recontoured.

DU 510 2014 Deactivations: All remaining culverts were removed and crossditches constructed. 7 additional cross-ditches were prescribed. Bridge crossing was removed. Some minor fill pullback.

Station 38 Over steep burnt landing, tension cracks 1m back from edge, water flows into the cracks. Improve shallow cross-ditch to direct water away from this slope. Partial pullback 2m from edge (2m x 10m x10m) place material against cut.

History of Road 511 This road was constructed off the upper lift of the Duhamel Heights road, there was no detailed terrain stability assessment completed on this road. 2014 Deactivation consisted mostly of cross-ditches and ditchline improvements.

Prescribed series of Cross-ditches Excavate ditch to direct stream to culvert. Culvert