Ch 9 Live Cattle Evaluation, Grading, and Pricing

Similar documents
United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef

BeefCuts. Primal & Subprimal Weights and Yields 1300-pound Steer Choice, YG3 Dressing Percentage: 62% Chuck Rib Loin. Round. Brisket. Plate.

Cattle Growth Dynamics and Its Implications

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

Beef Cattle Breeds and Biological Types Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Beef Cattle Frame Scores

MARKET LAMB & GOAT SELECTION & EVALUATION. Aaron Renfroe Extension Assistant Sheep and Goat Texas AgriLife Extension Service San Angelo, Texas

A comparison of beef breed bulls for beef production & carcass traits. Future cattle production -seminar Viikki Campus

HOW TO PREPARE THE PERFECT PRIME RIB

MCDONALD S SUSTAINABLE BEEF PILOT Information Sharing Initiative Report April 7, 2016

FEEDLOT MANAGEMENT Matching Cattle Type and Feedlot Performance

In many areas of the country, the Holstein

Final Report. Submitted to National Cattlemen s Beef Association, Centennial, CO. April 2012

Home Slaughtering and Processing of Beef

US Imported Beef Market A Weekly Update

Beef Primal Cuts OUTSIDE FLAT 2050 OUTSIDE 2030

Australian Santa Gertrudis Selection Indexes

COMPARISON OF DAIRY VERSUS BEEF STEERS

EBLEX BEEF BRP MANUAL 4. Beef production from the dairy herd

Understanding Grid Marketing: How Quality Grades and Grid Conditions Affect Carcass Value. By Pete Anderson Ag Knowledge Services

H.A. DePra, J.D. Duggin, D.R. Gill, C.R. Krehbiel, J.B. Morgan, D.C. Bietz, A.H. Trenkle, R.L. Horst, F.N. Owens. Story in Brief

Kansas State University Lean Value Marketing Program

SHEEP. The Value of Independence CARCASE AUTHENTICATION AND VERIFICATION SERVICES MEAT AND LIVESTOCK COMMERCIAL SERVICES LTD (MLCSL)

Mean EPDs reported by different breeds

Meat Goats. January Kent Orrell Extension Educator, Kiowa Co. Okla.

Terms: The following terms are presented in this lesson (shown in bold italics and on PowerPoint Slides 2 and 3):

IOWA STATE FAIR * AUGUST 11-21, 2016 * FFA BEEF CATTLE

SHOW STEER SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

Effects of Supplemental Vitamin E with Different Oil Sources on Growth, Health, and Carcass Parameters of Preconditioned Beef Calves 1

Swine EPD Terminology

Carcass Traits and Merit

Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources Career Cluster Agriculture Meat and Dairy Product Processing

PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM Figure 1

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

SYSCO Branded Premium Pork Products Produced By

Grid Base Prices and Premiums-Discounts Over Time

S P E C I F I C GRAVITY AS A MEASURE PORK CARCASS LEANNESS

DAIRY BEEF PRODUCTION PAST, PRESENT & FUTURE

THE EVALUATION OF DISTILLERS CO-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY BEEF PRODUCTION

CHARACTERISTICS OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS CONTAINING MECHANICALLY DEBONED MEAT 1

** ANIMAL ID NUMBERS MUST BE DESIGNATED IN **

VMC Body Fat / Hydration Monitor Scale. VBF-362 User s Manual

Meat processing is a complicated business, with tight

Consumer Health and Safety

How To Run A Blade Farming Scheme

U.S. Beef and Cattle Imports and Exports: Data Issues and Impacts on Cattle Prices

Organic SOP-Grazing describes the procedures that ensure the organic requirements are met with regard to cattle grazing.

ANIMAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE

Selecting, Feeding, Fitting, Grooming and Showing Beef Cattle

Beef Cattle Handbook

Beef Cattle. Production MP184 DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE R E S E A R C H & E X T E N S I O N

FUTURES TRADING OF LIVE BEEF CATTLE (HEDGING) by Clarence C. Bowen

Livestock Judging Manual Table of Contents

Investing in genetic technologies to meet future market requirements and assist in delivering profitable sheep and cattle farming

Swine Feeding and Fitting Guidelines. Ryan Harrell Dec. 2008

Increasing Profitability Through an Accelerated Heifer Replacement Program

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

Electrical Stimulation Purpose, Application and Results

Body Fat Scale Instructions for use

FACILITIES FOR FEEDING HOLSTEIN AND BEEF CATTLE

Lesson # 9: Poultry Processing

This Little Piggy Math in the Pig Barn

Reviewed.March.2010 SHOW LAMB SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

LUMBAR LAMINECTOMY AND DISCECTOMY. Basic Anatomical Landmarks: Posterior View Lumbar Spine

WORLD BANK STUDY Livestock and Slaughter Waste Management. Presentation 2 Conditions at Slaughterhouses

Recipe For Marbling. Page 1 of 12. Quality grade continues to generate largest grid premiums

Locating Common Bones*

By Anne Wasko Gateway Livestock, Market Analyst

Name Class Date Laboratory Investigation 24A Chapter 24A: Human Skin

Chapter 11. What are the functions of the skeletal system? More detail on bone

CHAPTER 9 BODY ORGANIZATION

Fish: One-of-a-kind Animals (30 minute activity)

Human Body Scavenger Hunt Activity

LOCOMOTION AND MOVEMENT

Breeds of Swine. Berkshire. Chester White

GROSS MARGINS : HILL SHEEP 2004/2005

Understanding and Using Cattle Basis in Managing Price Risk

BASIC BODY COMPOSITION SCALE

Artificial Insemination (AI) in Cattle

Managing cattle for the kind of beef you want your kids to eat.

In this on-farm study, Ron Rosmann

Net feed intake: Potential selection tool to improve feed efficiency in beef cattle

Introduction. I. Objectives. II. Introduction. A. To become familiar with the terms of direction and location.

Divisions of the Skeletal System

Review of the situation on the EU Beef and Veal Market. "Single CMO" Management Committee 19th January 2012

Body Analyzing Scale. User's Manual

BEEF ARM HALF Approved Name

Premium Interface Component

Understanding and Using Basis for Livestock Producer Marketing Management 1

Live, In-the-Beef, or Formula: Is there a Best Method for Selling Fed Cattle?

Applied Agricultural Science and Technology Animal Growth and Development Class Notes Key

FXA UNIT G485 Module Ultrasound. Candidates should be able to :

TOC INDEX. Breakeven Analysis for Feeder Cattle. Alberta Agriculture Market Specialists. Introduction. Why Breakevens?

Area of Parallelograms, Triangles, and Trapezoids (pages )

Beef Quiz Bowl Questions

Session 1. Body Systems and Structures. Teacher Notes. Body Systems and Organs: Descriptions and Functions. Intermediate ENGLISH FOR YOUR HEALTH

Analysis of the determinants of prices and costs in product value chains

Animal Science Research Centre - Beef Unit Trial Results 2005 (a) Evaluation of head-cut whole crop wheat and barley for beef cattle

AS 1-2 October Managing Beef Cattle for Show

Instructions for Drawing Blood Samples

Transcription:

Ch 9 Live Cattle Evaluation, Grading, and Pricing Dr. Fa-Jui Tan 1 U.S. Prime U.S. Choice U.S. Select U.S. Standard U.S. Commercial U.S. Utility U.S. Cutter U.S. Canner 2 1

Questions before class What is evaluation? Why evaluation? Based on what criteria? Who does the job? When does the job be done? How the job be conducted? 3 Purpose of live cattle evaluation Live market cattle evaluation an estimation of carcass characteristics vs. Specific characteristics evaluated An indication of amount of fat/muscle (cutability) quality grade carcass value live value Quality vs. Quantity Importance Species specific? Or applying to all species? 4 2

Weight The actual weight of the cattle at the time of evaluation or immediately prior to slaughter (why?) to determine cutability? and/or value to calculate yield grade? carcass weight hot carcass wt. (wt. of dressed carcass? just prior to chilling) chilled carcass wt. (wt. after carcass chilling) HCW=101.5% CCW 5 Uses of Live weight of cattle Characteristics Easy to obtain The most commonly used characteristic for determining value But, not a very precise estimate of cutability? Live cattle, carcasses, and beef cuts are bought and sold largely on a wt and grade Producers use wt to calculate production efficiency (i.e., weight per day of age) Wt is normally combined with several carcass characteristics to determine cutability and/or value. Live wt: actual wt vs. carcass wt: actual wt. or estimated wt.? 6 3

Live wt range Extreme range: 800~1700 lb (360~770kg) Normal range: 950~1500 lb (430~680kg) Average: 1150 lb (520kg)` HCW Yield grade (why?) % retail cuts Fatness (at the same wt): Heifer > steer > bullock 7 Dressing percentage Definition: (chilled carcass wt / live wt) 100 Extreme range: 45~68% Normal range: 55~67% Average: 62% DP varies with grade, type, degree of muscling, condition of the cattle being evaluated Extremely thin, dairy cow: < 45% Vs. Prime steer > 65% why? 8 4

Factors affecting the DP the amount of fill (stomach and intestine contents) degree of muscling wt of hide, head, feet degree of fatness (finish) grade Type Condition of the cattle being evaluated 9 Comparison btwn steer, heifer, bullock of the same live wt. Comparison DP of steer, heifer, bullock of the same live wt. P.88 Why? Comparison wt of steer, heifer, bullock of the same carcass fat amount P.88 Why? P10 10 5

Table 9.1 Dressing percentage of cattle by quality grade Quality grade Average dressing % Prime 64 Choice 62 Select 60 Standard 57 Commercial 57 Utility 53 Cutter 49 Canner 45 Why? 11 Fat thickness Definition: Depth of fat in tenths of inches over the ribeye muscle at the 12th rib at a point 3/4 of the lateral length of the ribeye muscle from the split chine bone P.90 Figure 9.1 A, B, C 12 6

Measured location of fat thickness Fig 9.1 at a point 3/4 the lateral length of the ribeye muscle perpendicular to the outer surface of the fat Estimated approx. 4.5-5 in. (11.4-12.7 cm) from the dorsal midline 13 Fat thickness Extreme range 0.05 1.1 inch (0.13 2.79 cm) Normal range steers and heifers (0.15 0.8 inch 1.15 2.03 cm) bullocks (0.05 0.5inch 0.13 1.27 cm) Average 0.5 inch (1.3cm) Choice steers and heifers 0.35 inch (0.89cm) Choice bullocks 14 7

Fat thickness If too thick waste, retail yield If too thin excessive carcass shrink 0.08 inch (0.20cm)/100 lb carcass: most desirable 0.2 inch of fat at the 12th rib is necessary to protect the carcass against excess carcass shrink, discoloration during storage 12th rib fat thickness to calculate yield grade (p.89, p.123) YG = 2.5 + (2.5 adjusted fat thickness, 12 th rib) + (0.0038 hot carcass wt) + (0.2 % KPH) - (0.32 ribeye area) assessment of external fat on the carcass Fat thickness, retail yield Yield vs. Yield grade? 15 Ribeye area Area of the longissimus muscle measured in square inches at the 12th rib 1 inch 2 2.54 2.54 6.4516cm 2 Extreme range 7.0 19.5 in 2 (45cm 2 126cm 2 ) Normal range 10 18 in 2 (65cm 2 116cm 2 ) Average 12.6 in 2 for 1150 lb steers Bullock, 1 in 2 steers, 1 in 2 > heifers (at the same wt) Estimation and adjustment of RA 1.1 inch 2 /100lb (live wt 900 1250 lb for steer), And then adjusted 16 8

Ribeye area widely used as an indicator of beef carcass muscling (Why?) easily measured largest muscle in carcass most valuable (why?) block beef (P. 119) to calculate yield grade To assess muscling REA vs. YG vs. % retail cuts? 17 Kidney, Pelvic and Heart Fat (KPH) Definition The internal carcass fat associated with the kidney, pelvic cavity, and heart expressed as a % of chilled carcass wt functions? KPH fat as of chilled carcass wt extreme range: 0.5 6 normal range: 1.0 4.5 Average: 3% 18 9

Average: 3% KPH For 1150 lb. live wt or 700 lb carcass with 0.5 in. fat (DP?) Heifer > steer > bullock (1%) P91 Small framed > intermediated framed > large framed (1%) Dairy type (1.5%) > beef type 19 KPH Purpose One of the factors to calculate yield grade YG = 2.5 + (2.5 adjusted fat thickness, 12 th rib) + (0.0038 hot carcass wt) + (0.2 % KPH) - (0.32 ribeye area) KPH fat yield grade retail cuts an assessment of internal fat in the carcass Boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts? P91 20 10

P. 91 Table 9.2 KPH vs. estimated 12th rib fat thickness 0.1 0.3 (inch) 1.5 2.5 KPH 0.4 0.6 2.5 3.5 0.7 0.9 3.5 4.5 1.0 1.2 4.5 What does this mean? 21 Marbling Definition: the intermingling of fat within the muscle (intramuscular fat). Normally evaluated in the ribeye muscle at the 12 th rib. Extreme range: devoid abundant Normal range: trace abundant Average: small modest 22 11

Marbling Used by the Federal Grading Service Average: small modest Small-Modest: Qualifies for the low to average Choice grade, P120 Modest marbling Typical of intermediate type and size steers (1000-1150 lb) Marbling: Heifer > steer > bullock (at the same wt) P92 Estimated from the amount of external fat on live animal Fatter animal vs. leaner animals Fatter animal more marbling better quality Length of time on full feed low energy Young cattle not reached the fattening phase Marbling: the most important factor affecting quality grade. Fatness: an important factor in the estimation of both yield and quality grades. 23 Marbling 1 (Abundant) 2 Moderately Abundant) 3 Slightly Abundant 4 Moderate 5 Modest 6 Small) 7 Slight 8 Traces 9 Practically Devoid 10 Devoid 24 12

Maturity Definition: An estimation of the chronological age of the animal or carcass Assessing the physiological stages of maturity of bone and muscle characteristics To assess Degree of ossification of the thoracic cartilage (button) P92 The cartilage associated with the lumbar and sacral vertebrae Shape and color of the ribs Color of lean in the longissimus muscle at the 12th rib 25 Maturity Extreme range: A E Normal range: A E A maturity Most youthful 9-30 months P113 E maturity The oldest > 96 months P113 9(A) 30(B) 42C) 72(D) 96(E) Special requirements of maturity US Prime, Choice, Select, Standard grades must A or B maturity (P.120) C, D, E maturity only US Commercial, Utility, Cutter, Canner quality grades Bullock must be A maturity Intact male > 24 months bull not for quality grade Maturity: Heifer > steer > bullock P92 26 13

Bullock must be A maturity intact male 24 m bull not eligible for quality grade At same wt or age heifer more mature than steer small framed, short bodied more mature than large framed, growthy cattle 27 Live Cattle Grading Beef Grading Quality grade (US Prime, Choice, Select ) Yield grade (1 2 3 4 5) 28 14

Quality grade (QG) To evaluate degree of marbling Cannot be accurately determined on live cattle Live quality grade largely based on an evaluation of fatness Amount of finish is evaluated to predicted marbling degree of maturity Actual maturity seldom known Live quality grading fatness evaluation Carcass quality grading marbling, maturity 29 Quality grade (QG) determined on carcass live cattle QG evaluation on of fatness Finish to predict marbling Grade is estimated to the nearest 1/3 (US Prime +, US Prime 0, US Prime - ) 30 15

P 94 Figure 9.3 31 Yield Grade (YG) P93 Yield of boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts from round, loin, rib and chuck Yield grade cutability Expressed as a percentage of carcass wt (i.e. 50 ) YG 1.0 cutability 54.6 YG 5.9 cutability 43.3 32 16

Factors to determined YG fat thickness at 12th rib ribeye area hot carcass wt KPH 33 Base Yield Grade YG 3.5 as the base YG YG 3.5 600 lb carcass with 0.6 inch fat (12th rib) 11.0 inch 2 rib eye area 3.5 KPH P93 34 17

Preliminary yield grade (PYG) PYG adjusted fat thickness Ribeye area Hot carcass wt 35 Fat thickness Table Adjusted fat thickness estimate (inch) PYG 0.1 2.25 0.2 2.5 0.3 2.75 0.4 3.0 0.5 3.25 0.6 (base) 3.5 0.7 3.75 0.8 4.0 0.9 4.25 1.0 4.5 1.1 4.75 1.2 5.0 36 18

ribeye area 11.0 inch 2 + each 1 inch 2 YG 0.3YG 11.0 inch 2 each 1 inch 2 YG 0.3YG 37 Hot carcass wt 600lb each 25lb 0.1YG 600lb each 25lb - 0.1 YG Chilled carcass wt 1.015 hot carcass wt 38 19