Yarding-Method and Slash- Treatment Effects on Compaction, Humus, and Variation in Plantation Soils

Similar documents
Comparison of Logging Residue from Lump Sum and Log Scale Timber Sales James O. Howard and Donald J. DeMars

GROWTH POTENTIAL OF LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT: A SPACING STUDY EXAMPLE

Red Alder Kitchen Cabinets How Does Application of Commercial Stains Influence Customer Choice?

Logging Damage in Thinned, Young- Growth True Fir Stands in California and Recommendations for Prevention

Come Join Us! Pacific Northwest Research Station USDA Forest Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service


4.0 Discuss some effects of disturbances on the forest.

Financial maturity is when the rate of value

Evergreen Carbon Capture - 2

Assume you have 40 acres of forestland that was

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Managing Fire Dependent Wildlife Habitat without Fire. A Land Management Practice That: 100 Years of Fire Suppression in Ponderosa pine ecosystems

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

Effects of Log Defects on Lumber Recovery

IIIII TABLES TIRE EAR. for estimating skidder. by Cleveland J. Biller

, ~ The ResourcesAgency. Dave McNamara

Fire, Forest History, and Ecological Restoration of Ponderosa Pine Forests at Mount Rushmore, South Dakota

What is the Dirt Worth?

FEDERAL INCOME TAXES FOR TIMBER GROWERS

Are My. Pine Trees. Ready To Thin?

U.S. Forest Facts and Historical Trends

Consume 3.0 Tutorial INSTRUCTOR S GUIDE

Preserving Wild Ginseng in Minnesota

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Units of Measure and Conversion Factors for Forest Products

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

Ecosystem Workforce Program

Chapter 4. Consultation and Coordination

Overview and Example Application of the Landscape Treatment Designer

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Biomass Harvest Guidelines

4- ""X,4. f'~.'.' ..';:,'.,- ~':;:..j..~ ', ' " .~.::~:~~. ~ ~ ...,',", ~. :!.;~.j:~~.,.., ~.,7-c' ':';...;~.:. c...-::.'.. .:4'.'-;' ' ':;\ :.,.

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

Deer Exclusion Effects on Understory Development Following Partial Cutting in a Pennsylvania Oak Stand

Predicting Lightning Risk S. Ferguson MDR-FERA; JFSP 2 X Seattle Lab Implementation of an Improved S. Sandberg MDR-FERA: JFSP X X

The Wildland-Urban Interface in the United States

NOTICE OF SALE. Department of Natural Resources & Conservation Timber Sale

THE CHRISTMAS TREE INDUSTRY IN THE U.S.A. A STATUS REPORT M. L. McCormack, Jr. and Wolfgang Mieder

COMPARTMENT REVIEW RECORD OF CHANGES AND DECISIONS. Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Atlanta Management Unit Year-of-Entry

Developing a Prescribed Fire Burn Plan: ELEMENTS & CONSIDERATIONS

Procedures for Factoring Visual Resources into Timber Supply Analyses

PACIFIC SOUTHWEST. Forest and Range Experiment st&on FOREST FIRE HISTORY... a computer method of data analysis. Romain M. Mees

Cost Considerations of Using LiDAR for Timber Inventory 1

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

BEYOND THE WILD NUT: MOVING TOWARD PROFITABLE BLACK WALNUT NUT CROPS

Arbor Day Tree Trivia

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

Using Enterprise Budgets To Make Decisions about Your Farm Richar d Carkner

Chapter 201 Random Length Lumber Futures

GAO FEDERAL TIMBER SALES. Forest Service Could Improve Efficiency of Field-Level Timber Sales Management by Maintaining More Detailed Data

SYNTHETIC ROPE APPLICATIONS IN APPALACHIAN LOGGING

Habitat Management Techniques Flatwoods Salamander. USFWS Recommendations

HURRICANE IVAN Damage Appraisal & Recovery Efforts. Presentation produced by AFC (Walter E. Cartwright) WEB Address:

Science affects the way we think together. GROWING TREES WHERE TREES GROW BEST: SHORT-TERM RESEARCH SHEDS LIGHT ON LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY

Tax Savings on Timber Sales

September 25, Dear Concerned Citizen:

Wildfire Damage Assessment for the 2011 Southeast Complex Fires

Forest Stewardship Council

Objectives. Raster Data Discrete Classes. Spatial Information in Natural Resources FANR Review the raster data model

Moisture Distributions in Western Hemlock Lumber From Trees Harvested Near Sitka, Alaska

Shearing Recommendations

A Streamlined Approach to the Component Ratio Method for RGGI U.S. Forest Projects Outside of California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska and Hawaii

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

Myre-Big Island State Park

Table A1. To assess functional connectivity of Pacific marten (Martes caurina) we identified three stand types of interest (open,

Over the past several years, the Missoula Technology

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

School of Forest Resources and conservation

CRP Mid-Contract Management Option: Integrated Wildlife Management (645)

APPLICATION FOR CLASSIFICATION OF FOREST LAND

How To Know What You Want To Know

Brinkley CV Updated September 2014 WESTON BRINKLEY. Principal and Owner, Street Sounds Ecology, LLC.

Minimizing Federal Income Tax for Forest Landowners

Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

SFI INC. LAUNCHES NEW STANDARD LEADS FOREST CERTIFICATION FORWARD

Tree and forest restoration following wildfire

Maine Forest Service Interpretations of the Maine Forest Practices Act Statute and Rules (12 MRSA 8867-A to 8888 & MFS Rules Chapter 20)

Measuring Soil Moisture for Irrigation Water Management

Beef Cattle Frame Scores

Smoke Considerations for Using Fire in Maintaining Healthy Forest Ecosystems

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Photo Size Stratification in the US Forest Survey

Forestry Reading Room

North Carolina s Forestry Present-Use Valuation (PUV) Property Tax Program

Specialized Discounted Cash Flow Analysis Formulas for Valuation of Benefits and Costs of Urban Trees and Forests

Solar Energy Implementation Proposal to Meet all of the Nation s Energy Needs

Consulting Foresters for Private Landowners

AN ENHANCED ONLINE PILED FUELS BIOMASS CALCULATOR

S I L V I C U L T U R E

Influence of Forest Management on Headwater Stream Amphibians at Multiple Spatial Scales

Increasing the Pace of Restoration and Job Creation on Our National Forests

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

The PNW-FIA Integrated Database Periodic Inventory Data

A Land Manager s Guide for Creating Fire-Resistant Forests

Testimony of Diane Vosick, Director of Policy and Partnerships

Appendix D. Estimation of Work Site and Transportation Accident Risks

IN SI UNITS. Ralph Wilson 1 ABSTRACT. fire spread, equations, Rothermel's model, the International System of Units

Natural Regeneration of Southern Pines

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Transcription:

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Research Note PNW-RN-476 June 1988 Yarding-Method and Slash- Treatment Effects on Compaction, Humus, and Variation in Plantation Soils Don Minore and Howard G. Weatherly Abstract Soil penetration-resistance and soil-humus frequency were measured on 86 progenytest plantations in southwestern Oregon to determine the effects of yarding method and slash treatment on soil compaction and humus, and a disturbance index was calculated for each plantation. Compaction and humus loss were more severe on tractoryarded, machine-piled plantations than on cable-yarded, broadcast-burned plantations. Machine piling and burning of slash did not increase compaction or humus loss significantly more than broadcast burning on tractor-yarded plantations. Within-plantation variation in soil compaction was greater on tractor-yarded, broadcast-burned plantations than on tractor-yarded plantations from where stumps were removed. Keywords: Yarding method, slash treatment, soil compaction, organic matter, disturbance. Introduction Harvest of a forest stand always affects the soil, but those effects vary with the yarding method used. Subsequent slash disposal to reduce fire hazard and prepare the harvested area for planting also affects the soil to a greater or lesser degree, depending upon the methods used. Because plantation survival and growth may be affected, comparisons of the effects of yarding methods and slash treatments on soil are important. Such comparisons are common in the literature, but most of them involve either yarding methods or slash treatments in isolation and not the combination of yarding method followed by slash treatment that usually occurs during the conversion of a mature stand to a plantation. DON MINORE is a plant ecologist and HOWARD G. WEATHERLY is a forestry technician, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. 1

Krag and others (1986) used exposed mineral soil as an index of soil disturbance and found that disturbance was significantly greater on ground-skidded than on cableyarded cutovers in southeastern British Columbia. Tractor yarding compacted a greater area than cable yarding in a study conducted in the Oregon Cascades, and the compaction was greater on areas affected by tractor than those affected by cable yarding (Dyrness 1965). Cable-yarding systems in which the entire length of a log is in contact with the soil during transport may not cause major reductions in infiltration capacity or major increases in soil bulk density (Cummins and others 1984), but they tend to disturb surface soil and remove humus. Heavy equipment may compact soils by vertical loading and may modify soil-surface characteristics by mixing and altering the thickness of the A-horizon (Helms and Hipkin 1986). The soil compaction is long lasting (Froehlich 1979, Froehlich and others 1985, Wert and Thomas 1981). Slash is usually broadcast burned or machine piled and burned in the Pacific Northwest. Broadcast burning affects the soil surface by removing organic matter (Austin and Baisinger 1955, Little and others 1986). More than the surface may be affected when slash is machine piled before burning, however, and substantial quantities of topsoil may be piled along with the slash (Glass 1976); underlying soil in the B-horizon may be exposed and compacted by the tractors used. In extreme cases, where minimum soil variation and uniform spacing are sought for progeny-test plantations used for identifying superior seedlings even stumps are removed during the machine-piling operation. Stump removal is controversial, however, and some plantation owners think that soil variation is increased, not decreased, by removing stumps in a progeny-test plantation. We measured soils on many progeny-test plantations in western Oregon during a 5-year study of the effects of yarding method and slash treatment on plantation growth, and the results presented here are based on 3 years of field work. Our objectives were limited to soil effects in this portion of the study. They include a comparison of several common yarding and slash treatment combinations to determine which (if any) differ with respect to soil compaction and humus, to assess the effect of stump removal on soil variation, and to create a disturbance index that may be useful in relating the effects of yarding and slash treatment to plantation growth. Methods The soil-compaction and soil-humus data presented here were obtained on progenytest plantations in Coos, Curry, Douglas, Jackson, and Josephine Counties, Oregon, between June 1984 and June 1987. All plantations measured during that period were classified by yarding method and slash treatment. Four yarding-slash treatment categories with more than 10 plantations per class were selected for comparison: cable yarding plus broadcast burning (26 plantations), tractor yarding plus broadcast burning (15 plantations), tractor yarding plus machine piling and burning (31 plantations), and tractor yarding plus machine piling and burning plus stump removal (14 plantations). More detailed variations in yarding method and slash treatment (that is, designated skid trails versus logger's choice and machine piling onsite versus machine piling offsite) were ignored in establishing these categories. 2

Soil compaction was measured indirectly by sampling with a proving ring penetrometer to determine the average soil penetration-resistance on each plantation. Soil resistance to penetration is increased by compaction (Donnelly and Shane 1986). Total penetration-resistance encountered in the top 20 centimeters (8 in) was determined at 150 to 200 systematically located points on each plantation. Average rockfree resistance on each plantation was adjusted for differences in soil texture and season of measurement with the method described by Minore (1986), and the plantation averages thereby obtained were used in calculating a mean soil penetrationresistance for each yarding-slash treatment category. Within-plantation variation in penetration resistance was compared among treatment categories with a slightly modified version of Levine's test (Snedecor and Cochran 1980). A mean absolute deviation was computed for the rock-free penetration resistance measurements obtained on each plantation. Those mean absolute deviations were then analyzed in a one-way analysis of variance. Tukey's procedure was used to isolate differences among treatments. The presence or absence of humus in the top 20 centimeters (8 in) of soil was determined at every penetrometer sampling point by examining the color of the soil on the flat top of the penetrometer cone after each measurement of soil resistance. If any of that soil was darkened by organic matter, humus was judged to be present. Humus frequency was calculated for each plantation by summing the number of points containing humus, dividing that sum by the total number of points, and expressing the result as a percentage. A mean soil-humus frequency was then calculated for each yarding-slash treatment category. A disturbance index was calculated for each plantation by dividing the average penetration-resistance by humus frequency and multiplying the result by 100: average penetration-resistance Disturbance index = x 100. humus frequency Humus frequencies were transformed to arc sines. Completely random analyses of variance were then used to compare the four yarding-slash treatment categories with respect to mean soil penetration-resistance, humus frequencies, and disturbance indexes. When the analyses of variance demonstrated significant differences among means (significant F values at P<0.05), Tukey's HSD test was used for pairwise multiple comparisons. 3

Mean soil penetration-resistance differed significantly (P<0.01) among the four yarding-slash treatment categories (table 1). Cable yarding plus broadcast burning resulted in less compaction than tractor yarding plus machine piling. The tractoryarded categories did not differ significantly among themselves with respect to penetration resistance, however; machine piling and even stump removal resulted in only small increases in penetration resistance on plantations that had been yarded by tractor. Within-plantation variation in penetration resistance also differed significantly among the categories listed in table 1 (P<0.05). The tractor-yarded, broadcast-burned plantations had significantly more variation in soil penetration-resistance than the tractoryarded, machine-piled-and-burned plantations from which stumps were removed (P<0.05). Humus frequency declined with treatment intensity, and the percentages shown in table 1 differ significantly among categories (P<0.01). Plantations that were cable yarded and broadcast burned retained significantly more humus than those that were tractor yarded and machine piled (P<0.05). Disturbance indexes, like the penetration-resistance means and humus frequencies used in constructing them, differed significantly among categories (P<0.01). They increased with yarding and slash-burning intensity and indicate that the soil on tractoryarded, machine-piled plantations was significantly more disturbed than the soil on cable-yarded, broadcast-burned plantations (P<0.05). Table 1 Effects of yarding method and slash treatment on soil penetration-resistance and its variation, soil-humus frequency, and a disturbance index a a Based on 150 to 200 systematically located measurement points on each plantation. Values in the same column followed by a different letter are significantly different (P<0.05). b To convert to pounds per square inch, multiply by 14.223. 4

Conclusions Cable yarding results in less soil compaction than tractor yarding, and broadcast burning of slash results in less soil compaction than machine piling of slash. If tractors are used in yarding, however, the resulting soil compaction is usually great enough to make subsequent differences in slash treatment insignificant with respect to further compaction. Nevertheless, some slash treatments do remove significant amounts of humus, and both machine piling and stump removal result in the redistribution and probable loss of large amounts of soil organic matter. Tractor yarding followed by broadcast burning increases the variation in soil density within a plantation. Tractor yarding followed by machine piling and stump removal decreases that variation. Stump removal, therefore, may be a useful tool if plantation uniformity is desired without regard to probable site degradation. That uniformity is attained by decreasing the number of uncompacted growing sites, however, and it may be undesirable if optimal seedling growth is desired. Soil disturbance is accompanied by compaction and loss of humus. The index presented here combines these variables to express the amount of disturbance in a single number that can be used to compare disturbed areas. This index should be useful in relating soil disturbance to seedling growth. Acknowledgments Financial support for this research was provided by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, under the auspices of the Southwest Oregon Forestry Intensified Research (FIR) Program. 5

Literature Cited Austin, R.C.; Baisinger, D.H. 1955. Some effects of burning on forest soils of western Oregon and Washington. Journal of Forestry. 53(34): 275-280. Cummins, Leo K.; Stark, Nellie M.; Zuuring, Hans R. 1984. Cable logging the relationship of log-transport angles to ground surface transformations and the effects on forest-site productivity. In: New forests for a changing world: Proceedings of the convention of the Society of American Foresters; 1983 October 16-20; Portland, OR. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters: 238-242. Donnelly, J.R.; Shane, J.B. 1986. Forest ecosystem responses to artificially induced soil compaction I. Soil physical properties and tree diameter growth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 16(4): 750-754. Dyrness, C.T. 1965. Soil surface condition following tractor and high-lead logging in the Oregon Cascades. Journal of Forestry 63(4): 272-275. Froehlich, H.A. 1979. Soil compaction from logging equipment: effects on growth of young ponderosa pine. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 34(6): 276-278. Froehlich, H.A.; Miles, D.W.R.; Robblns, R.W. 1985. Soil bulk density recovery on compacted skid trails in central Idaho. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 49(4): 1015-1017. Glass, George Graham, Jr. 1976. The effects from rootraking on an upland piedmont loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L) site. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University School of Forest Resources; Tech. Rep. 56. 44 p. Helms, John A.; Hipkin, C. 1986. Effects of soil compaction on tree volume in a California ponderosa pine plantation. Western Journal of Applied Forestry. 1(4): 121-124. Krag, R.; Higginbotham, K.; Rothwell, R. 1986. Logging and soil disturbance in southeast British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 16(6): 1345-1354. Little, Susan N.; Ottmar, Roger D.; Ohmann, Janet L. 1986. Predicting duff consumption from prescribed burns on conifer clearcuts in western Oregon and western Washington. Res. Pap. PNW-362. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 29 p. Minore, Don. 1986. Effects of site preparation on seedling growth: a preliminary comparison of broadcast burning and pile burning. Res. Note PNW-RN-452. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 12 p. Snedecor, George W.; Cochran, William G. 1980. Statistical methods. 7th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. 507 p. Wert, Steve; Thomas, Byron R.1981. Effects of skid roads on diameter, height, and volume growth in Douglas-fir. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 45(3): 629-632. 6 GPO 591-132/82005

The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation's forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives as directed by Congress to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Applicants for all Department programs will be given equal consideration without regard to age, race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. Pacific Northwest Research Station 319 S.W. Pine St. P.O. Box 3890 Portland, Oregon 97208

U.S. Department of Agriculture BULK RATE Pacific Northwest Research Station POSTAGE + 319 S.W. Pine Street FEES PAID P.O. Box 3890 USDA-FS Portland, Oregon 97208 PERMIT No. G-40 Official Business Penalty for Private Use, $300 do NOT detach label