Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Similar documents
Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator MBTI

qüé= RJjfkrqb=mboplk^ifqv=qbpqÒ=

16a. Change and keeping options open. 16b. Predictability and knowing in advance.

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Shelly Hoover-Plonk Assistant Director, Career Resources

True Colors Personality Quiz

Personality Types Of Family Nurse Practitioner Students

The Pros and Cons of Using Career Interest Inventories with Students

EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION: MOTIVATION, IMPACT AND BEING HEARD

Assumptions About Personal Styles

MBTI. Katherine C. Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers

A P C T. 3. lighthearted industrious. 5. talkative a listener. 6. quick methodical. 9. relaxed conscientious. 10. generalist detailed

What to look for when recruiting a good project manager

THE HARTMAN PERSONALITY PROFILE Name:

Steve Lee CLIMB Program Northwestern University CLIMB. 3-Part Series on developing your metacognitive skills

Personal Style Inventory

DiSC Personality Profile

The Personality Compass at a glance

Life Styles Inventory & Myers Briggs Type Indicator :

The Four True Colors. Blue Relationship Oriented. Gold Structure Oriented. Green Cognitive Oriented. Orange Impulse Oriented

Emotional Intelligence Style Report

Interpretive Feedback Report. Thomas Kolar Grade: 04 Florida gulf coast university Report Date: 21 Jul 2008 Reported Profile Type: INFZ

DiSC Assessment Results

Personality Profile Sample Report

Team Building MARZIO ZANATO

Report For: Sam Sample ACME Inc. 12/30/2009

The Science and Application of People Management

Module 3: Self-Knowledge

ESF project Support to Researches in Education (Atbalsts izglītības pētījumiem) 2011/0011/1DP/ /11/IPIA/VIAA/001 ASEM

Candidate Assessment Report. Chris Williams ABC Company

Cognitive Style Types

Aspects of Leadership

Using the Enneagram as an Aid in Creating Fictional Characters

Big 5 Personality Questionnaire (B5PQ)

Holland s Theory. Holland s Six Personality Types HOLLAND=S OCCUPATIONAL PERSONALITY TYPES

VHMA Sample Evaluation ( PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Accountability for Others being responsible for the consequences of the actions of those whom you manage.

Enneagram Types. Basketball Analogy: Referees. Basketball Analogy: Lebron James. Basketball Analogy: Kevin Durant. Basketball Analogy: Kobe Bryant

MYERS-BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR MANUAL

INDIVIDUAL CHANGE Learning and the process of change in what ways can models of

TRUE COLORS OVERVIEW ( for Counselors and Teachers)

ISTJs are characterized by decisiveness in practical affairs,

competency potential questionnaire

Extravert or Introvert? How both can Shine in the BA World

THE FIRST SESSION: Coach Men to Find Love

Conflict in Organizations

Sally Sample 24 August 2010

PERSONALITY STYLES ASSESSMENT

Role Expectations Report for Sample Employee and Receptionist

Do Personality Profiles Differ in the Pakistani Software Industry and Academia A Study

Comparison of Insights Discovery System to Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

About the Author. Contents

Issues in Information Systems Volume 15, Issue II, pp , 2014

WHAT S YOUR TYPE? A HIGH SENSE OF DUTY AN INSPIRATION TO OTHERS INFP ISFP SEES MUCH BUT SHARES LITTLE ESFP ENFP ENTP YOU ONLY GO AROUND ONCE IN LIFE

GOAL SETTING FORM. 1. What are your short term goals? (Within a year or less) 2. What are your long term career goals within the next 5 years?

A man must be big enough to admit his mistakes, smart enough to profit from them, and strong enough to correct them. J C Maxwell

Included in this resource are: 1. The Keirsey Questionnaire 2. The scoring sheet 3. A sample scoring sheet 4. An overview of the temperament types.

KEY SKILLS OF JUNIOR CYCLE

CandidateProfile REPORT. 1 From : Recruitment Edge JOBPROFILE. Profile Report FOR. Name : Sample Candidate

Medical Billing Summary

Sample Personal Profiles for CVs Handout

The Power of Color: What Does Your Color Say About You?

Select a shape below that appeals to you the most and then scroll down to read about your personality.

APPLICATIONS GUIDE. TRACOM Sneak Peek. Excerpts from. Improving Personal Effectiveness With Versatility

The Emotional Competence Framework

The Competent Communicator Manual

Farmer Mentor Handbook Adult Learning Styles. Adult Learning Styles

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE. Distributed by: Performance Programs, Inc

Leading with Personality Type, Satir s Communication Model and the Learning Styles Inventory

CREATING COOPERATION FROM CONFLICT DON T FORCE A SOPRANO TO SING BASS HOW TO MAKE HARMONY IN THE WORKPLACE

People Development & Teamwork

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Medicine

WHAT IS SOCIAL STYLES?

HOW TO BE A MORE EFFECTIVE LEADER By Renee L. Hoekstra, CVS

Role of different personality types in software engineering team

Why Is This Topic So Important? Communication Styles: The Secret of Flexible Behavior. Considerations Regarding Communication

Supporting Exceptionality in IB Schools: Implementing Gifted Education Internationally

SAMPLE DO NOT REPRODUCE

Sam Sample 27 Mar 2013 EXPERT STANDARD REPORT PERSONALITY JTI JUNG TYPE INDICATOR. Psychometrics Ltd.

Classroom Management Plan

Medical Billing Summary

Insights Discovery Profiles. A Tour of Your Insights Discovery Profile. info.seattle@insights.com. Page 1 of 6

ICF CORE COMPETENCIES RATING LEVELS

PREPARATION: - facilitator coordinates focus of panel, introduces and summarizes - briefs panel

Behaving Intelligently: Leadership Traits & Characteristics Kristina G. Ricketts, Community and Leadership Development

Customer Experience Outlines

COMPETENCY ACC LEVEL PCC LEVEL MCC LEVEL 1. Ethics and Standards

COMMUNICATIONS STYLE INVENTORY

Core Capacity Analysis Of Top Performing Agents at Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

A Study of Personality Types Found Within the Speech-Language Pathology Profession and the Communication Sciences and Disorders Major

Conflict Management Styles Center for Student Leadership Resources

Transcription:

*Take the generic online test version at the following website: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp. It s under a different name, but it s the same exact test and go quickly don t think about the questions too much! Myers-Briggs Type Indicator What is the Myers-Briggs? The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was developed by Kathleen Briggs and Isabel Briggs-Myers as tool for determining psychological and personality types. They came to the conclusion that there are four primary ways that people differ in terms of preferences. 1. 2. The four different preference areas are similar to our own hand preferences: although we use both of our hands, most of us have a preference for using one or the other. The four different areas measure: focus/energy source, information gathering, decision making, and lifestyle.

The Four Preference Dimensions Focus/Energy Source Extroversion vs. Introversion -Extrovert: People who prefer Extroversion like to focus on the outer world of people and activity. They direct their energy and attention outward and receive energy from interacting with people and form taking action. -Introverts: People who prefer introversion like to focus on their own inner world of ideas and experiences. They direct their energy and attention inward and receive energy from reflecting on their thoughts, memories, and feelings. Extroverts -Energized by the Outside World -Prefer to Communicate by Talking -Work out Ideas by Talking them Through -Sociable and Expressive -Have Broad Interests -Readily take initiative in work/relationships Introverts -Energized by their Inner Self -Prefer to Communicate in Writing -Work out Ideas through Reflection -Private and Contained -Focus in depth on their interests -Take initiative when situation is very important to them Information Gathering Sensing vs. intuition -Sensing: People who prefer Sensing like to take in information that is real and concrete what is actually happening. They are observant about the specifics of what is going on around them and are especially attuned to reality and things that are practical. -intuitive: People who prefer intuition like to take in information by seeing the big picture, focusing on the relationships and connections between facts. They want to grasp patterns and are especially attuned to seeing new possibilities. Sensing -Oriented to present realities -Factual and Concrete -Focus on what is Real and Actual -Build carefully toward conclusions -Trust Experience -Observe and remember specifics intuitive -Oriented to future possibilities -Imaginative and Verbally Creative -Focus on patterns/meanings in data -Move quickly to conclusions -Trust Inspiration -Remember specifics when related to a pattern

Decision Making Thinking vs. Feeling -Thinking: People who prefer to use Thinking in decisions making like to look at the logical consequences. They want to mentally remove themselves from a situation to examine the pros and cons objectively. They re energized by critiquing/analyzing what s wrong with something to they can solve the problem. -Feeling: People who prefer to use Feeling in decision making like to consider what is important to them and to others involved. They mentally place themselves into the situation to identify with everyone in order to make decisions based on their values about honoring people. They re energized by appreciating /supporting others and looking for qualities to praise. Thinking -Analytical -Use cause-and-effect reasoning -Solve problems with logic -Reasonable -Can be tough-minded -Fair want everyone treated equal Feeling -Empathetic -Guided by personal values -Assess impact of decisions -Compassionate -May appear tenderhearted -Fair what everyone treated like an individual Lifestyle Judging vs. Perceiving -Judging: People who prefer to use their Judging process in the outer world like to live in a planned, orderly way, seeking to regulate and manage their lives. They want to make decisions, come to closure, and move on. Their lies tend to be structured and organized, and they like to have things settled. Sticking to plans/schedules is very important to them. -Perceiving: People who prefer to use their Perceiving process in the outer world like to live in a flexible, spontaneous way, seeking to experience and understand life, rather than control it. Detailed plans and final decisions feel confining to them; they prefer to stay open to new information and last-minute options. Judging -Scheduled -Organize their lives -Systematic -Make short and long-term plans -Likes things decided -Avoid last-minute stress Perceiving -Spontaneous -Flexible -Casual -Adapt, change course -Like open options -Thrive on last-minute pressures

The 16 Different MBTI Types (or Combinations) ISFJ Nurturers -Sympathetic Manager of Details/Facts -Friendly, Responsible, Conscientious -Painstakingly Accurate in Tasks -Concern for Others; Strives for Harmony -Quiet, Serious, Conscientious -Considerate caretakers who honor tradition -Mousy at times, Avoid Conflict ISTJ Duty Fulfillers -Analytic Manager of Facts/Details -Dependable, Decisive, Very Systematic -Believes you earn Success through Persistence -Not Easily thrown off Task/Distracted -Calm, Reserved, Serious -Consistent, Orderly, Traditional -Pragmatically uncaring of other s feelings ESTJ--Guardians -Practical Organizer, emphasizes Facts -Realistic, Matter-of-Fact -Organizes Projects/People Well -Clear set of Logical Plans; Leader -Conscientious and Dependable -Decisive, Outspoken, and Self-Confident -Dominating and Overpowering ENFP--Inspirers -Enthusiastic Planner of Change -Seeks to Understand/Inspire Others -Sees Life as Full of Possibilities -Relies on Quick Improv and Verbal Fluency -Personable, Perceptive, Persuasive -Enthusiastically Spontaneous, Versatile -Unable to take Criticism ESFJ--Caregivers -Sociable, Orderly, Opinionated -Attuned to Emotions/Needs of Others -Practical Harmonizer/People Person -Want to be Appreciated for Contributions -Sociable, Outgoing, Enthusiastic, Energetic -Organized, Orderly, Traditional -Intolerant of Conflicting Values ISFP--Artists -Observant, Loyal Helper -Reflective, Realistic, Empathetic -Quiet, Friendly, Sensitive, and Kind -Dislike Conflict, Won t Force Opinions -Quiet, Reserved, Hard to Get to Know -Spontaneous, Tolerant, Dry Humor -Stand-offish, sometimes Snobbish ESFP--Performers -Friendly and Easily Deals with People -Conscious of Human Feelings -Lovers of Life, People, Material Comforts -Brings Common Sense to Group Work -Resourceful and Supportive -Fun-loving, Playful -Nervously Energetic/Hard to Keep Still ISTP--Mechanics -Values Precision/Organized Data -Reflective, Cool Observer of Society -Likes to Know what makes things Work -Interested in Cause/Effect Relationships -Adaptable, Action-Oriented Risk Takers -Confident, Independent, Walks to Own Beat -Wallflowers who Listen more than Speak

The 16 Difference MBTI Types (con t) INFP--Idealists -Imaginative; Independent Helpers -Idealistic; Loyal to Personal Values -Curious, Interested in Possibilities -Flexible unless Values are Threatened -Sensitive, Introspective, and Complex -Original, Individualistic, Deep -Difficult to Understand; Abstruse INTP--Thinkers -Reflective, Independent, Curious -Managing Ideas over People -Logical Explanations for Everything -Skeptical, Analytical, Sometimes Critical -Quiet, Self-Contained, Calm, Detached -Independent, Creators of Harmony -Difficult to Know and Understand ENFJ--Givers -Expressive, Orderly, Opinionated -Finds potential in everyone; wants to help -Loyal/Responsive to Praise/Criticism -Facilitates Social Groups Well -Sociable, Gracious -Expressive, Responsive, Persuasive -Talker who can go on a bit about opinions ENTJ--Executives -Frank, Decisive; readily assumes leadership -Enjoys long-term planning/goal setting -Forceful in pushing new ideas -Analytical, Confident -Direct, Challenging, Stimulating -Objective, Fair, Decisive -Intolerant of those viewed less intelligent ESTP Do-ers -Realistic Adapter to Material World -Good-Natured, Easy-Going -Spontaneous; Immediate Results -Learn best by Doing; Here and Now -Fun-Loving, Spontaneous -Adventuresome; Risk-Taker -Scatter-Brained; Non-Traditional ENTP--Visionaries -Enthusiastic, Independent, Impulsive Energy -Quick, Ingenious, Stimulating, Outspoken -Good at Reading Others -Bored with Routine; Prefers alternating tasks -Independent, Creative, Lively, Energetic -Assertively outspoken and enthusiastic -Abrasive and Argumentative INTJ--Scientists -Critical, Serious, Highly Independent -Organized, Determined, Stubborn -Sees broad patterns in events and ideas -Skeptical, High Standards -Private, Reserved, Hard to Get to Know -Conceptual, Original, Independent -Aloof, perhaps Conceited INFJ--Protectors -Serious, quietly forceful and persevering -Seeks meaning/connectivity in ideas -Conscientious/Committed to Firm Values -Desire to know what motivates others -Private to the point of mysterious -Intensely Individualistic -Standoffish, but you wouldn t want to cross them

Team Predictions The more similarity between individual types on a team, the sooner the team members will come to understand each other; the more different the types, the slower the understanding. Groups with very similar members will reach decisions more quickly but may make more errors because not all viewpoints are represented. Groups with many different types will reach decisions more slowly (and painfully) but may reach better decisions because more viewpoints are included. Team members may choose tasks that fit the gifts of their type. Leadership roles may shift as the tasks to be done require the skills of different types on the team. Team members who are opposite on all four preferences may have trouble achieving an understanding; members who share two preferences from each of the opposites may act as translators. The person who is the only representative of a certain preference (ex. The only Introvert) may be seen as different from the other team members. Team members who come to appreciate and work with different types maybe help to diffuse conflict. Successful teams with many different types promote the personal development of team members by encouraging learning from the gifts of other types. Teams that are one-sided (ex. Have few types) will succeed if (a) team members use different types outside the team as resources, or (b) they make an effort to use their own less-preferred preferences as the tasks require. Extroverts may dominate discussions, and perhaps decision making, unless they make special effort to involve introverts; Introverts may need to make a special effort to be heard. Feeling types may be more concerned with harmony and team-ness; Thinking types may be more concerned with truth and task. Good decisions will be made when the basic facts and realities have been taken into account (Sensing), when useful new possibilities have been opened up (intuition), when inconsistencies or consequences have been analyzed (Thinking), and when important values have been considered (Feeling).