PRODUCED WATER CASE STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Similar documents
A Guide to Trouble-Free Cooling Towers

How To Clean Up A Reactor Water Cleanup

Introduction. The following is an outline of the contents of this paper: Definition of Artificial Lift Page 2. How an Oil Well is Produced Page 2

Cooling Tower Sidestream Filtration A Green, Proven Cost Reduction Technology

Mechanical Seal Piping Plans

Table 4.9 Storm Drain Inlet Protetion Applicable for

GUIDANCE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPILL AND SLUG PREVENTION CONTROL PLANS AND FACILITIES FOR THE CITY OF ATTLEBORO SEWER USERS

STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION

ADVANTAGES OF Tankless Adhesive Melting Systems For End-of-Line Packaging

Nine Industrial Scale V SEPs. Feed Tank V SEP. Feed Pumps (Three) Concentrate. Tank. V SEP Treatment System

SELECT Hg Ultra-purification of mercury from natural gas

Kompressoren. Compressed Air Filters PF/DF/MF/SF/AF

Lessons Learned, Best Practices and Observations Plant Winterization Visits

Amiad s AMF² pre-treatment technology ensures efficient and reliable nanofiltration of Scottish Highland loch water

Why and How we Use Capacity Control

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

Air Eliminators and Combination Air Eliminators Strainers

DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS

ENVIRONMENTAL CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE BATCH PLANT & ROCK WASHING OPERATIONS

SUMP PUMP. Sump Pump Backup Systems. City of Ann Arbor B A C K U P O P T I O N S. Does everyone need a backup system?

Filtration Guide. Introduction. Benefits of Clean Water

Fats, Oil and Grease. Best Management Practices Manual. Information, Pollution Prevention, and Compliance Information For Food Service Facilities

Frequently Asked Questions

CONDENSATE MANAGEMENT

ANNEX 2 Emergency / Pollution Incident Response Plan

Signature and ISX CM870 Fuel System

Heating Water by Direct Steam Injection

15/40/80CN Series Coreless Medium Pressure Filters

Benefits of Using Automation Software for Gas Production Optimization Louis Ray and Kenneth Juran, SPE, Case Services, Inc.

A discussion of condensate removal systems for clarifier and thickener drives for water and wastewater facilities.

THERMO KING TRUCK & TRAILER UNIT ALARM CODES THIS DOCUMENT SHOWS ALL CURRENT ALARM CODES FOR THERMO KING TRUCK AND TRAILER UNITS.

GUIDANCE FOR WATER UTILITY RESPONSE, RECOVERY & REMEDIATION ACTIONS FOR MAN-MADE AND/OR TECHNOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES

CERTIFYING DRAINLAYER

Protecting your private water supplies. The possible causes of contamination and their remediation to prevent this risk.

Air/Vacuum Valves. Removal of Air from Pipelines. Allow the Entry of Air into Pipelines. Application:

Enhancing Nitrification in an Oil Refinery WWTP with IFAS

COLORADO REGULATION 7

IAC 7/2/08 Agriculture and Land Stewardship[21] Ch 44, p.1

COD/BOD 5 Reduction with ROTAMAT Fine and Micro Screens

Improper storage of potential pollutants will increase the risk of water pollution that may occur because of spills.

Fuel Treatment and Conditioning Systems

WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OPERATING MANUALS )

Standard Hydraulic Piping Flushing Procedure

Zhao et al. 2.2 Experimental Results in Winter Season The analysis given below was based on the data collected from Nov to Mar. 15, 2004.

How To Make A High Co 2 Gas Blend

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Division of Water Pollution Control Class K Study Guide Industrial Wastewater Operator Certification

Extraction Oil and Gas, LLC. Diamond Valley Central Oil Terminal Waste Management Plan

ETC -SV. Class 0 oil-free compressed air through catalysis

CREATING A GREEN FUTURE THROUGH WATER REMEDIATION

AE R6 December Digital Capacity Control for Copeland Scroll Refrigeration Compressors AE R6

Homeowner s Guide to Maintaining a Sewage Treatment System

APPENDIX O. Spill Prevention and Emergency Response Plan. G3 Terminal Vancouver Port Metro Vancouver Project Permit Application APPENDIX O

Strong partners offer perfect solutions. Automatic filtration and maintenance of engine lubricating oil in diesel locomotives

Case Study: Treatment of alluvial sand, treatment of washing water and sludge.

Efficiency on a large scale CFB Steam Boilers

Electronic Flow Switches

HYDROCARBON REMOVAL FROM AMINES DEMONSTRATED EXPERIENCE ABSTRACT

AUTOMATIC TANK CLEANING (ATC) LITE On-the-fly automatic tank cleaning and recycling technology

ThermoSorb Desiccant Dryers

Energy Efficient Operations and Maintenance Strategies for Boilers

ESP FLOWSHEET SIMULATION APPLICATION BRIEF Downhole Oil/Water Separation

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

for Sediment Removal desired levels. The filtered water then can be chemically treated to ensure its safety. Municipal water Preliminary settling

DIESEL FUEL CONDITIONING

Fiscal Measurement Natural Gas

5.2. Vaporizers - Types and Usage

BHS CANDLE FILTER APPLICATIONS FOR CLARIFICATION / RECOVERY OF SOLIDS FROM CHEMICAL SLURRIES

Improper storage of fuel on construction sites will increase the risk of water pollution that may occur as a result of leaks or spills.

In-Line Electronic Flow Switches

Appendix J3 - Outline Fuel Spill Contingency Response Plan. Control room receives call on fuel spill from staff or public

The WOGCC has 41 full-time employees, an Assistant Attorney General, and a contracted hydrogeologist.

The Control of ph and Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) in Cooling Tower Applications By Charles T. Johnson, Walchem Corporation

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPENDIX C LIST OF E&P WASTES: EXEMPT AND NONEXEMPT

Routine and Emergency Boiler Operation

LECTURE 28 to 29 ACCUMULATORS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

COOLING WATER MANAGEMENT

Vacuum Control. Vacuum Applications. Vacuum Regulators. Vacuum Breakers (Relief Valves) Vacuum Control Devices. Vacuum Terminology

Mechanical Seal Piping Plans

Explosion of a gasoline vapour cloud formed in a hydrocarbon loaded effluents storage tank 10 December 1999 Arquata Scrivia Italy

MERCURY REMOVAL FROM NATURAL GAS AND LIQUID STREAMS ABSTRACT. Giacomo Corvini, Julie Stiltner and Keith Clark UOP LLC Houston, Texas, USA

Remediation of Water-Based Drilling Fluids and Cleaning of Cuttings

Description of the Water Conserv II Facility

Dry-out Design Considerations and Practices for Cryogenic Gas Plants

Ion Exchange Softening

Quick Guide to Injection Molding

A guide to using variable-speed drives and motors in swimming pool halls

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

RULE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS - WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND SEPARATION SYSTEMS

NATURAL GAS EXPERIENCE

Oil Spill Kit. 105 A-Wing BSEL Tech Park Opposite Vashi Railway Station Navi Mumbai Contact: WEBSITE:-

Outlet stabilization structure

Recently Completed Projects - Storage Projects

Stormwater BMPs: Secondary Containment and Spill Control. September 2012

UOP Gas Processing. Realizing the Value of Your Natural Gas and Synthesis Gas Resources

Saudi Aramco Project Development

Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

Centrifugal Fans and Pumps are sized to meet the maximum

CHAPTER 8 UPGRADING EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES

Background. 179 million gallons saved for make-up water

Stock Preparation Division: The C-bar screen basket a high-tech product

Transcription:

CASE STUDY PRODUCED WATER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pentair Porous Media has worked with a major global oil & gas producer to optimize the performance of the filtration and separation at their United States mid-continent operations located in the Wind River Basin of Central Wyoming. Their operations cover more than 42,500 net acres in Wyoming. Net gas production averages greater than 100 MMSCFD from multiple formations ranging in depth from 5,000 feet to more than 25,000 feet. The gas production wells are scattered across a large area in the Wyoming highlands. The area is a remote, high plains desert experiencing temperatures up to 100 F (38 C) in the summer and as low as -30 F (-34 C) in the winter months. The produced gas is gathered from multiple wells and treated locally at a 300 MM scfd gas processing facility. The gas plant and general topography of the production site are illustrated in Figure 1. Pentair Porous Media optimized the produced water filtration across the entire production site (~ 25,000 bbl/day produced water) to reduce filter change out frequency from up to twice a day to approximately once per month during normal operations, reducing direct filtration costs by 63%, resulting in savings of $88,320 per year. The optimization reduced operator hours dedicated to filter maintenance by 95%, saving an additional $179,520 per year in direct labor, allowing those assets to be redeployed more productively at the production site. Additionally, the solid filter waste generated was reduced by 93% eliminating over 80 cubic yards (61 m3) of waste and $4,800 in solid waste disposal costs. Total realized savings amounted to $272,604. Continued on next page ABOUT PENTAIR POROUS MEDIA Pentair Porous Media designs and manufactures advanced technologies for the high performance separation of solids, liquids and gases. These technologies are used to help facilitate balanced systems that are highly stable, reliable and robust, thereby increasing throughput, reducing operating cost and minimizing waste. The company's technologies help solve the most critical separation and extraction issues for the gas, refining, chemical and power generation industries.

Figure 1. Gas processing plant (left) and production area (right) PROCESS OVERVIEW & OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES Produced liquids are separated from the natural gas brought in from the various wells. The liquids are captured in a large skim tank and gravity separate into water and hydrocarbon condensate. The condensate is recovered and the water is pumped down a disposal well at ~1,600 psi. There are multiple produced water injection wells spread throughout the production field. Each well disposes of 2,000 bbl/day to 4,000 bbl/day of produced water. Each remote well site collects the produced water in a skim tank located at the produced water gathering and injection site. The produced water is pumped from the skim tanks through two bag filter vessels operating in parallel. Each of the vessels contains either 5 or 6 bag filters, depending on the system design. The filtered produced water is then sent to a high pressure piston style pump which generates a 1,600 psi (110 bar) discharge pressure prior to injection at the wellhead. Figure 2. Produced water injection well process flow schematic Due to the geology of the producing wells, the produced water contains considerable amounts of kaolinite as suspended solids (>20 mg/l). The produced water also contains considerable entrained hydrocarbon condensate. The hydrocarbon condensate interacted with the molded polypropylene sealing surface of the filter bags causing swelling and distortion of the filters in service. As a result, the bag filters experienced significant bypass of contaminants which accumulated as 4 6 cm of sediment in the lower section of the filter vessels (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Prior to Pentair Porous Media upgrade: Originally installed bag filters (left) and accumulated solids on the clean downstream side of the filters (right) due to bypass The elevated solids in the produced water downstream of the filters led to elevated erosionary wear in the high pressure injection pumps, caused reliability issues with valves and entered the formation adding to the potential for plugging. Operationally, the produced water filters caused maintenance and labor challenges. Due to the limited capacity of the bag filters, the filters experienced short operating life. The operating life was further constrained by the differential pressure limitations presented by the bag filters. The maintenance personnel were restricted to changing the filters at a differential pressure limit of 5 psid. Above 5 psid the bags became stuck in the vessel as the filters extruded into the support baskets, making removal by maintenance personnel very difficult and time consuming. Consequently, the filters for each disposal well were changed out every two days during normal operation and up to twice a day during frequent process excursions. This resulted in not only high costs and excessive maintenance, but also generated significant waste volumes associated with spent filters. Figure 4. Spent filter waste from one 2,000 bbl/day disposal well after several days of operation

The disposal wells were located at remote sites requiring the use of pager notification of maintenance personnel when the pre-determined high level alarm was reached on the filter vessel pressure transmitters. This alerted the maintenance personnel of the need to change filters. The maintenance personnel would then drive to the well site to replace the filters. Due to the remote locations of the wells and the frequent filter changes, filter maintenance required the full time dedication of at least one operator every day. The filter challenges culminated eventually in an episode which led to an environmental release and temporary shut down of one injection well facility and the associated production wells. On this occasion, the maintenance burden overwhelmed the ability of the maintenance personnel to respond. Normally, in the event of the produced water filters exceeding their set high level alarm, the system would shut down the injection well and production would continue until the capacity of the skim tank was reached, at which point the fail-safe systems would shut down the producing wells until the filters could be changed, the injection well could be re-started and the tank level could be lowered; at which point production would resume. On this occasion, the high level fail-safe on the skim tank failed, resulting in overflow of the tank into the surrounding retaining dike area. By the time the maintenance personnel arrived the following morning, both the skim tank and the dike had overflowed, discharging raw produced water and condensate onto the surrounding ground. This prompted shut down of the disposal well and associated producing gas wells until the environmental remediation could be completed and regulatory authorities approved re-start of the facility. PENTAIR POROUS MEDIA UPGRADE & OPTIMIZATION OF THE PRODUCED WATER FILTRATION Pentair Porous Media was engaged to remedy the operational challenges and high costs associated with the produced water filtration at the production site. Initial site visits provided an opportunity for Pentair Porous Media s field service personnel to perform a site survey and determine the water quality at the production site. During this visit, Pentair Porous Media also evaluated the existing filtration systems and performed an engineering review of the existing bag filter vessels. Based upon the site survey and engineering review, Pentair Porous Media recommended that the bag filter vessels be upgraded to utilize Porous Media s proprietary VMAX coreless element design. The VMAX element design makes use of a tapered, high surface area element utilizing very high capacity media and an o-ring sealing mechanism. The tapered shape allows the element to release from the support cage once the o-ring seal is dislodged. Removal of VMAX elements is very easy, even when operated to differential pressures of 50 psid or greater. A conventional, cylindrical bag filter, by contrast, is difficult to remove from the support basket because the element contacts the entire length of the basket, providing significant resistance upon removal. Consequently, the VMAX design provides efficient operation across a much wider window of differential pressure relative to a bag filter, significantly increasing filter life and contaminant capacity. Figure 5. Installed VMAX support cages (left). VMAX element (right)

The VMAX upgrade of a bag filter vessel employs the fabrication and installation of a VMX cage, engineered to seal to the specific requirements of a given vessel. The VMAX support cage installs within the same envelope occupied by the bag filter support basket. In contrast to a bag filter basket, however, the VMAX cage relies on a high efficiency o-ring seal between the support cage and the filter vessel eliminating the opportunity for contaminant bypass. This seal mechanism is typically absent in conventional bag filter designs. Successful implementation of the VMAX coreless element design at the initial produced water disposal site provided the rationale for upgrading the remaining produced water disposal well filtration systems. Prior to the upgrade to VMAX, the produced water filters were changed every two days during normal operation and every 12 24 hours during frequent process excursions. The result was annual consumption of greater than 35,000 bag filters per year across the entire production site at an annual operating cost of $140,160 in direct filtration costs. The spent filters created over 86 cubic yards of solid waste annually. The filter maintenance required over 3,600 hours per year, resulting in an associated labor cost of $179,520. After successful upgrade of the produced water filtration to Pentair Porous Media s VMAX coreless element technology at eight disposal well sights in the production field, the filters required replacement on only a monthly basis, reducing direct filtration costs by 63% annually ($88,320) and reduced solid waste generation by 80 cubic yards (61 m3). The labor associated with filter maintenance was reduced by over 95% resulting in the recovery of a full time equivalent maintenance operator, which could be redeployed to more productive activities within the production site. The cumulative filter, labor and waste disposal cost reductions amounted to $272,604 annually. The implementation of the VMAX technology also increased the reliability of filter maintenance scheduling and dramatically decreased the potential for production interruptions due to shut-down of the produced water processing facilities and reduced the potential for environmental releases associated with the produced water operation. Table 1. Summary of Produced Water Filtration - Operational Costs Conventional Bag Filtration Pentair Porous Media Coreless Filter Upgrade Cost Savings Average filter Life (days) 1 30 -- Number of Filters Annually 35,040 1,152 -- Annual Waste Disposal Volume (yd 3 ) 86 6 -- Annual Labor Cost $185,640 $6,120 $179,520 Annual Filter Cost $140,160 $51,840 $88,320 Annual Waste Disposal Cost ($60/ yd 3 ) $5,160 $360 $4,800 Total Annual Savings after Pentair Porous Media Upgrade $272,604 Currently, Pentair Porous Media provides produced water filtration across the entire gas production site, as well as gas / liquid separation for the inlet separator to the glycol dehydration system and the lean glycol filtration loop at the production site. Pentair Porous Media also provides all of the process filtration and gas conditioning for the adjoining 300 MM scfd gas processing plant.