Effect of N, P, K Fertilizers on Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Ca and Mg Content s and Yields in Rice

Similar documents
Sampling and preparation of heterogeneous waste fuels?

PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND MINOR ELEMENT FERTILIZATION

K component in recycled NPK fertilizers

Potassium ion charge would be +1, so oxidation number is +1. Chloride ion charge would be 1, so each chlorine has an ox # of -1

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

Quality requirements for wood ash as K component in recycled NPK fertilizers

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

Periodic Table, Valency and Formula

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

Agronomic and Economic Considerations on Michigan Farms

CLASS TEST GRADE 11. PHYSICAL SCIENCES: CHEMISTRY Test 6: Chemical change

B I N G O B I N G O. Hf Cd Na Nb Lr. I Fl Fr Mo Si. Ho Bi Ce Eu Ac. Md Co P Pa Tc. Uut Rh K N. Sb At Md H. Bh Cm H Bi Es. Mo Uus Lu P F.

EFFECT OF SOME SECONDARY AND MICRO NUTRIENTS ALONG WITH ORGANIC AMENDMENTS ON T. AMAN

Comparative Studies of the Chemical Constituents of Green Tea

Sample Problem (mole-mass)

A dozen. Molar Mass. Mass of atoms

MICRONUTRIENTS AS STARTER AND FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN

EFFECTS OF A SOIL FULVIC ACID ON THE GROWTH AND NUTRIENT CONTENT OF CUCUMBER (CUCUMIS SA TIVUS) PLANTS. by B. S. RAUTHAN and M.

Heavy Metals in Cocoa

Dinamica degli inquinanti

2014 Spring CHEM101 Ch1-2 Review Worksheet Modified by Dr. Cheng-Yu Lai,

Neutralization of Acid Mine Drainage Using Stabilized Flue Gas Desulfurization Material

MODERN ATOMIC THEORY AND THE PERIODIC TABLE

Naming Compounds Handout Key

Chem 115 POGIL Worksheet - Week 4 Moles & Stoichiometry Answers

ALS TRIBOLOGY Engine Coolant Reference Guide

MATH 110 Landscape Horticulture Worksheet #5

Composition of Fecal Waste from Commercial Trout Farms in Ontario: Macro and Micro Nutrient Analyses and Recommendations for Recycling

Chem 1100 Chapter Three Study Guide Answers Outline I. Molar Mass and Moles A. Calculations of Molar Masses

Topic 4 National Chemistry Summary Notes. Formulae, Equations, Balancing Equations and The Mole

SCH 4C1 Unit 2 Problem Set Questions taken from Frank Mustoe et all, "Chemistry 11", McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001

How to read your Oil Analysis Report

Decomposition. Composition

47374_04_p25-32.qxd 2/9/07 7:50 AM Page Atoms and Elements

Answer, Key Homework 6 David McIntyre 1

Molecules, Atoms, Grams and Mole Calculation Practice

1332 CHAPTER 18 Sample Questions

Complexometric Titrations

Distribution of Chemical Elements In Urban Sediments in Slovenia (Extended Abstract)

Unit 2: Quantities in Chemistry

Chemical Proportions in Compounds

Danish research results in blackcurrants

REVIEW QUESTIONS Chapter 8

CHAPTER 2 ATOMS AND THE ATOMIC THEORY

Portable X-ray fluorescence Spectroscopy. Michael A. Wilson Research Soil Scientist USDA-NRCS National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, NE

Wipe Analysis to Determine Metal Contamination on Critical Surfaces

3. What would you predict for the intensity and binding energy for the 3p orbital for that of sulfur?

Organic matter, sulfur and Thiobacillus sp. affected yield and yield components of canola (Brassica napus L.var. Hyola- 401)

Chemical Composition Review Mole Calculations Percent Composition. Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 8 1

CALL FOR OFFER. Győr Distillery Co. Ltd. (H-9027 Győr, Budai u. 7.) hereinafter referred to as Investor calls for offers in subject matter below

Chapter 3 Mass Relationships in Chemical Reactions

Name: Worksheet: Electron Configurations. I Heart Chemistry!

MILESTONE CLEAN CHEMISTRY LINE DUOPUR TRACECLEAN ULTRA-TRACE INSERTS. A Breakthrough in Reduction and Control of the Analytical Blank MILESTONE

SCP SCIENCE Certified Reference Materials. Materials

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

Stoichiometry Review

= 11.0 g (assuming 100 washers is exact).

The Basics of Fertilizer Calculations for Greenhouse Crops Joyce G. Latimer, Extension Specialist, Greenhouse Crops; Virginia Tech

Analyses on copper samples from Micans

Calculations and Chemical Equations. Example: Hydrogen atomic weight = amu Carbon atomic weight = amu

Find a pair of elements in the periodic table with atomic numbers less than 20 that are an exception to the original periodic law.

Ionizing Radiation, Czech Republic, CMI (Czech Metrology Institute)

APPENDIX B: EXERCISES

Agro-One Soil Analysis

Electrochemistry - ANSWERS

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

Elemental composition of commercial seasalts

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

N-Way Analysis of Variance

Visa Smart Debit/Credit Certificate Authority Public Keys

Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of SAE 1025 Steel: Analysis by one-way ANOVA

Lead Testing and On Site Calibration for Water Testing Detection Range: 2 100ppb

Chem 115 POGIL Worksheet - Week 4 Moles & Stoichiometry

5.111 Principles of Chemical Science

Chemistry Post-Enrolment Worksheet

EXPERIMENT 7 Reaction Stoichiometry and Percent Yield

Soils and Underground Water Contamination & Remediation In China. Presented by Tom Ward Beijing, July 23, 2013

ELECTRON CONFIGURATION (SHORT FORM) # of electrons in the subshell. valence electrons Valence electrons have the largest value for "n"!

Molar Mass Worksheet Answer Key

Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Titration. Lecture # 8. Titrations in Analytical Chemistry. Other Forms of Titration. End Point vs. Equivalence Point. Minimizing Titration Error

The Mole. Chapter 2. Solutions for Practice Problems

1. When the following equation is balanced, the coefficient of Al is. Al (s) + H 2 O (l)? Al(OH) 3 (s) + H 2 (g)

Chemistry 122 Mines, Spring 2014

Long-term studies find benefits, challenges in alternative rice straw management

Electron Configurations, Isoelectronic Elements, & Ionization Reactions. Chemistry 11

The Effect of Phosphate Fertilizer on Heavy Metal in Soils and Amaranthus Caudatus

atm = 760 torr = 760 mm Hg = kpa = psi. = atm. = atm. = 107 kpa 760 torr 1 atm 760 mm Hg = 790.

CHEMICAL REACTIONS. Chemistry 51 Chapter 6

CHAPTER 9 Part 1. = 5 wt% Sn-95 wt% Pb C β. = 98 wt% Sn-2 wt% Pb. = 77 wt% Ag-23 wt% Cu. = 51 wt% Zn-49 wt% Cu C γ. = 58 wt% Zn-42 wt% Cu

The ECN Concept for Quality Assurance of Compost

CHAPTER 21 ELECTROCHEMISTRY

Nomenclature of Ionic Compounds

Unit 10A Stoichiometry Notes

CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. Implementation of Sustainable Agricultural Initiatives

Fertilization of Strawberries in Florida 1

CHAPTER Naming Ions. Chemical Names and Formulas. Naming Transition Metals. Ions of Transition Metals. Ions of Transition Metals

All answers must use the correct number of significant figures, and must show units!

Exercise Naming Binary Covalent Compounds:

Transcription:

434 ( Chinese J Rice Sci), 2005, 19 (5) :434 440 http :/ / www. ricescience. org 1 2, 3 2 2 2 1 ( 1, 625014 ; 2, 625014 ; 3 ) Effect of N, P, K Fertilizers on Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Ca and Mg Content s and Yields in Rice E Sheng2zhe 1, YUAN Ji2chao 2, 3, D IN G Zhi2yong 2, YAO Feng2juan 2, YU Xiao2ping 2, L UO Fu2xiang 1 ( 1 Resources and Envi ronment College, S ichuan A g ricultural Universit y, Ya an 625014, China; 2 A gricultural College, S ichuan A gricultur2 al Universit y, Ya an 625014, China; 3 Corres ponding author) Abstract :In a field experiment, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Ca and Mg contents and yield of rice under different N, P and K fertil2 izers application levels were studied with two varieties in Xichang City, Sichuan Province. Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Ca and Mg con2 tents in rice increased first and then decreased with the increasing application rate of N fertilizer. For Diantun 502, contents and yields of Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Ca and Mg in rice reached the highest level at 90 kg/ hm 2 N and the rice grain yield at 180 kg/ hm 2 N. However, for Hexi 39, contents of Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Ca and Mg in rice reached the highest level at 180 kg/ hm 2 N and grain yield at 270 kg/ hm 2 N, which suggested that indica rice Diantun 502 was more sensitive to N fertilizer than japonica rice Hexi 39. The supply of P fertilizer reduced the contents and yields of Fe, Cu, Mn and Ca in rice, but adequate rate of P fertilizer was of benefit in increasing content and yield of Mg. Properly supply of K fertilizer could increase the contents and yields of Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn in rice. For the two rice varieties, the contents of Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn in rice attained the highest level at 90 kg/ hm 2 K2 O, but supply of K fertilizer significantly decreased the contents and the yields of Mg and Ca in rice. Key words : rice ; microelement ; nitrogen fertilizer ; phosphorus fertilizer ; potassium fertilizer :,,, 502 90 kg/ hm 2 N,180 kg/ hm 2 N ;39 180 kg/ hm 2 N,270 kg/ hm 2 N, 502 39 ;, ;, 90 kg/ hm 2 K2 O, : ; ; ; ; : Q945. 1 ; S143 ; S511. 06 : A : 100127216 (2005) 0520434207,,,, [1 3 ] 60 %,, N P K [4] [5], [6 ] [7 ], N P K, N P K, 1 1. 1 502 39 1. 2 2003 3 9 :p H 6. 54,3. 25 %, 0. 25 %, 118. 9 mg/ kg, 3. 19 %,109. 0 mg/ kg, 0. 055 %,32. 8 mg/ kg ; 28886. 09 170. 39 38. 97 3141 10 15038. 18 3902. 66 mg/ kg, 16. 81 1. 72 2. 53 8. 95 : 2004210218 ; : 2005203221 : (02N G0202003) : (1978 - ),,

: 435 1981 14 341. 32 mg/ kg,,,, 1. 3 1. 3. 1 4 ( ),0 90 180 270 kg/ hm 2 (N0 N90 N180 N270 ), ( P2 O5 ) 112. 5 kg/ hm 2, ( K2 O) 90 kg/ hm 2 1. 3. 2 3 ( P2 O5 ),0 112. 5 225 kg/ hm 2 (P0 P112. 5 P225 ), ( ) 180 kg/ hm 2 ( K2 O ) 180 kg/ hm 2 1. 3. 3 4 ( K2 O),0 90 180 270 kg/ hm 2 (K0 K90 K180 K270 ), ( P2 O5 ) 112. 5 kg/ hm 2 ( ) 180 kg/ hm 2 1. 4,3 16, 6, 18 cm, 14 cm, 666. 7 m 2 25 000, ; (N,46 %), ( P2 O5, 15 %), ( K2 O,60 %), 7 3 (), ; ;,, 3, 71 68 m 2 1. 5 : 50 g, MOW9521, 3 : J X9521 3 min : 100, 80, : 3. 00 g 50 ml,, 200 1 h, 600 5 h 6 mol/ L, 50 ml,, : AA320A 2 2. 1 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 2. 1. 1 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 1,6 1 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Fig. 1. Effect of N fertilizer level on Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Mg and Ca contents in rice.

436 ( Chinese J Rice Sci) 19 5 (2005 9 ) 1 Fe Zn Cu Mn Ca Mg Table 1. Variance analysis of effect of N fertilizer level on the rice grain yield and Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Mg and Ca yield in rice. Source df Grain yield Fe yield Zn yield F F value Cu yield Mn yield Mg yield Ca yield Variety 1 13. 18 3 3 37. 53 3 3 70. 24 3 3 85. 49 3 3 0. 02 119. 06 3 3 3. 01 N level 3 4. 83 3 212. 59 3 3 28. 65 3 3 105. 01 3 3 7. 08 3 3 8. 08 3 3 21. 71 3 3 Variety N level 3 1. 40 15. 95 3 3 6. 16 3 3 78. 63 3 3 10. 56 3 3 4. 30 3 28. 98 3 3 Error 16 Total 23 F0. 05 (1,16) = 4. 49, F0. 01 (1,16) = 8. 53 ; F0. 05 (3,16) = 3. 24, F0. 01 (3,16) = 5. 29. 3, 3 3 0. 05 0. 01 3, 3 3 Significant at 0. 05 and 0. 01 levels, respectively. 2 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Table 2. Effect of N fertilizer level on Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Mg and Ca yields and grain yield in rice. Variety N level Grain yield / (kg hm - 2 ) / (kg hm - 2 ) Yield of t he element/ (g hm - 2 ) Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 502 Diantun 502 0 7823. 66 bcd 11. 77 d 72. 56 c 7. 53 d 12. 73 bc 1192. 23 c 246. 65 d 90 8522. 05 abc 33. 14 a 103. 63 a 21. 26 a 14. 49 a 1466. 04 b 405. 52 a 180 8950. 34 a 29. 27 b 94. 25 b 11. 90 b 14. 05 ab 1375. 39 bc 251. 86 d 270 8640. 91 ab 11. 01 d 73. 33 c 9. 38 c 11. 52 cd 1168. 03 c 257. 62 cd 39 Hexi 39 0 6953. 63 d 11. 35 d 54. 85 d 7. 79 d 10. 88 d 1549. 89 b 242. 16 d 90 7461. 42 d 33. 03 a 72. 14 c 9. 78 c 12. 57 bc 1885. 01 a 291. 14 c 180 7572. 85 cd 36. 19 a 76. 16 c 10. 33 c 14. 57 a 1969. 13 a 355. 92 b 270 8560. 40 abc 23. 07 c 68. 12 c 10. 18 c 15. 02 a 1990. 44 a 335. 88 b 0. 05, Wit hin a column for a variety, values followed by t he same small letters mean not significantly different at 0. 05 level. The same as in t he tables below., 6 502 N90 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca, 156. 25 % 30. 03 % 1571 14 % 3. 56 % 11. 95 % 49. 68 %,39 N180 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca, 195. 39 % 28. 60 % 221 82 % 24. 04 % 17. 67 % 36. 13 % Fe Mn Mg, 502 39 2. 1. 2 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 1 2,,, 502 39 ;, 502 N180,N270,39 N270, 502 39, 39 2,Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca, Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca, 502 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca N90, N180,Mg Ca N180 N270,39 Fe Zn Cu Ca N180,Mn Mg N270, N180 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 2. 2 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 2. 2. 1 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 2, Fe Cu Mn Ca, P225, 502 Fe Cu Mn Ca 4 91 94 % 49. 99 % 29. 98 % 21. 13 %, 39

: 437 2 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Fig. 2. Effect of P fertilizer level on Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Mg and Ca contents in rice. 7. 91 % 12. 18 % 10. 89 % 61 02 %, 39 502 ; ( P225 ) 502 Zn,20. 09 %, 39 ; ( P112. 5 ) Mg, ( P225 ) Mg 2. 2. 2 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 3 4,, Fe Cu Mn P0,,Fe Cu Mn ( P112. 5 ) Mg, ( P225 ),Mg 39 Zn Ca, 502 Zn Ca,Fe Zn Mg, 39 Fe Zn Mg 502, 502 Fe Zn Cu Mn Ca 39, Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca, 2. 3 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 2. 3. 1 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Fe Zn Cu Mn, ( 3) K90, 502 39 Fe Zn Cu Mn 66. 54 % 9. 83 % 9. 72 % 16. 91 % 37. 64 % 18. 33 % 1. 94 % 141 24 %,Cu K90,Mg Ca, 502 39 Mg Ca 13. 72 % 38. 64 % 6. 23 % 20. 56 %, Mg Ca, Mg Ca 2. 3. 2 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca,, K180 ( 6), ( 5) Fe Zn Cu Mn Ca ( 5 6), Fe Zn Cu Mn, Fe Zn Mn K90 ;Cu

438 ( Chinese J Rice Sci) 19 5 (2005 9 ) 3 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Table 3. Variance analysis of effect of P fertilizer level on grain yield and Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Mg and Ca yields in rice. F F value Source df Grain yield Fe yield Zn yield Cu yield Mn yield Mg yield Ca yield Variety 1 2. 92 187. 60 3 3 20. 24 3 3 8. 49 3 4. 011 12. 89 3 3 3. 28 P level 2 0. 60 51. 62 3 3 13. 20 3 3 105. 36 3 3 45. 18 3 3 270. 15 3 3 16. 44 3 3 Variety P level 2 0. 14 22. 17 3 3 7. 19 3 3 50. 67 3 3 12. 27 3 3 19. 75 3 3 8. 76 3 3 Error 12 Total 17 F0. 05 (1,12) = 4. 75, F0. 01 (1,12) = 9. 33 ; F0. 05 (2,16) = 3. 63, F0. 01 (2,16) = 6. 23. 4 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Table 4. Effect of P fertilizer level on Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Mg and Ca yields and grain yield in rice. Variety P level Grain yield / (kg hm - 2 ) / (kg hm - 2 ) Yield of t he element/ (g hm - 2 ) Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 502 Diantun 502 0 9980. 61 a 21. 16 b 102. 29 a 22. 34 a 35. 27 a 611. 36 c 305. 68 a 112. 5 9920. 89 a 11. 03 c 106. 26 a 13. 94 c 24. 97 c 1103. 24 b 313. 55 a 225 9487. 58 a 10. 01 c 77. 22 b 10. 56 d 23. 33 c 666. 66 c 227. 78 b 39 Hexi 39 0 10364. 16 a 23. 74 a 108. 70 a 15. 62 b 28. 74 b 574. 66 c 312. 34 a 112. 5 10272. 21 a 21. 70 ab 110. 38 a 14. 26 bc 25. 42 c 1426. 28 a 291. 46 a 225 10157. 51 a 21. 36 b 105. 57 a 13. 43 c 25. 02 c 659. 70 c 286. 81 a 502 K180, 39 K90 502 Mg, Ca 3 3. 1 6 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca,, [8 ], [7], Fe Zn Cu Mn [6 ], Fe Zn Mn 3 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Fig. 3. Effect of K fertilizer level on Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Mg and Ca contents in rice.

: 439 5 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Table 5. Variance analysis of effect of K fertilizer level on the grain yield and Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Mg and Ca yields in rice. Source df Grain yield Fe yield Zn yield F F value Cu yield Mn yield Mg yield Ca yield Variety 1 0. 025 8. 21 3 3 17. 78 3 3 7. 32 3 2. 90 207. 70 3 3 14. 58 3 3 K level 3 0. 29 30. 45 3 3 8. 74 3 3 4. 15 3 11. 27 3 3 2. 22 36. 27 3 3 Variety K level 3 0. 38 11. 78 3 3 2. 78 4. 37 3 0. 11 1. 09 6. 39 3 3 Error 16 Total 23 F0. 05 (1,16) = 4. 49, F0. 01 (1,16) = 8. 53 ; F0. 05 (3,16) = 3. 24, F0. 01 (3,16) = 5. 29. 6 Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca Table 6. Effect of K fertilizer level on Fe, Zn,Cu,Mn,Mg and Ca yields and grain yield in rice. Variety P level Grain yield / (kg hm - 2 ) / (kg hm - 2 ) Yield of t he element/ (g hm - 2 ) Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca 502 Diantun 502 0 8701. 47 a 17. 32 d 86. 50 ab 13. 61 c 21. 99 bcd 796. 67 c 324. 94 b 90 8692. 66 a 28. 56 b 94. 03 a 14. 78 c 25. 44 a 680. 33 c 197. 35 d 180 8963. 73 a 26. 60 bc 91. 16 a 15. 19 bc 24. 39 ab 661. 72 c 244. 20 c 270 8917. 29 a 24. 74 c 86. 18 ab 14. 08 c 20. 48 d 718. 87 c 209. 84 cd 39 Hexi39 K 0 8821. 67 a 29. 28 b 78. 94 b 17. 13 ab 20. 98 cd 1319. 76 a 375. 52 a 90 8874. 73 a 40. 00 a 92. 72 a 17. 33 a 23. 79 abc 1228. 26 ab 296. 08 b 180 9033. 38 a 28. 17 bc 79. 38 b 15. 20 bc 23. 78 abc 1277. 55 ab 209. 85 cd 270 8388. 37 a 26. 09 bc 65. 35 c 13. 30 c 19. 19 d 1149. 58 b 229. 93 cd Mo 4,, Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca,6 502 90 kg/ hm 2 N Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca, 180 kg/ hm 2 N,39 180 kg/ hm 2 N Fe Zn Cu Mn Mg Ca, 270 kg/ hm 2 N :1) ( 6 ),, ;2),6, 502 39,,, 502 N 90 180 kg/ hm 2, 39 180 270 kg / hm 2 3. 2 6 [9 ], Fe,Fe, Fe Bierman [10 ] Cu, Cu, Fe Cu Mn Ca, Fe Cu Mn Ca, [8 ] Fe Cu Mn Ca, 502 39, Mg,, 3. 3 6 [7 ] [12 ], Fe Zn Cu Mn, [13 ],,Mg Ca,Fe Zn Cu Mn, Fe Zn Cu Mn 90 kg/ hm 2 K2 O,; Mg, K Ca K Mg [14 ]

440 ( Chinese J Rice Sci) 19 5 (2005 9 ) : 1.. :,1991. 115-120. 2,.. :, 2000. 12-110. 3.. :,1997. 34-35. 4,,..,2001,7 (4) : 391-396. 5,,..,1997, (3) :7-11. 6,. Zn Mn Fe Mg.,1995,30 (2) :71-73. 7,,..,2004,24 (1) :125-129. 8.. :,1983. 9..,1997,11 :444-450. 10 Bierman P M, Rosen C J. Phosphate and trace metal availability from sewage2sludge incinerator ash. J Environ Qual, 1994, 23 (4) :822-830. 11,..,1995, (2) :29-33. 12. Fe Zn Cu Mn.,1995,22 (3) :196-202. 13,,,..,2004,31 (1) :62-66. 14,.. :,2000. 128-130. 2006,, : ( ), 16,25 :4-523 10100, 40100, 12100 ( ) : 2901 ; :201106 ; :02126220866023175 ; E2mail : xx6 @saas. sh. cn 2006 ( ISSN 1002-1728,CN 21-1111/ S),, A4,, 64, 18, :8-21, 4. 50, 27. 00,,, :2101001500051 : 84 ; :110161 ; :024231029927 ; :024231028713 ; E2mail :LNN Y @Chinajournal. net. cn ;: ; :0801032322011