2010 6 218 39 ( 200433) : : :K85 :A 19 20 80 [5] : [1] 20 70 20 80 1983 : [2] 1984 [3] 20 80 [4] ; 2010-10-18 (1948~) :
40 (social actors) [8] (gender archaeology) (feminist archaeology or archaeology of women) (performance theory) [9] (sex) :(1) ;(2) (gender) [10] ;(3) () (Chumash) () (spirit-undertakers) [6] / (the : sex/gender system) [7] (essentialism ) - / [11] (sex) (gender)
2010 6 218 41 [15] [12] : : ( ) 1. [13] ( ) ; : [14]
42 : : 2. 5. 65% 35% 7:1 : 3. 6. 5000 : 4. ;
2010 6 218 43 9 : (Archaic period ) ; ; [16] [18] DNA : [17] : :(1) ;(2) (mosaic) ;(3)
44 ;(4) [19] ( ) 3 10 102 103 125 108 17 [20] 1 1. 50 65
2010 6 218 45 [21] 30 (201) 13~16 [22] [25] ( ) [26] [27] 2. [28] ; [29] : [23] ; ( ) 3. [24]
46 : ; 1.3 ; 7 251 38 ; 5 29 16 8 20 : [30] [1][9]Johnson M. Archaeological Theory An Introduction. Oxford Blackwell Publishers 2000. [2]Gero J. Gender bias in archaeology: a cross-cultural perspective. In J. Gero et al eds. The Socio-Politics of Ar- chaeology. Amberst University of Massachusetts Department of Anthropology Research Report No.23 pp.51~57. [3][5][13]Conkey M. and Spector J. Archaeology and the study of gender. In M.B. Shiffer ed. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory Vol. 7 New York Academic Press [31] 1984 pp.1~38. [4]Trigger B.G. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2nd edition 2006. [6][18]Brumfiel E.M. Method in feminist and gender archaeology: a feeling for difference and likeness. In S.M. Nelson ed. Handbook of Gender in Archaeology. Rowman and Littlefield 19 Publishers 2006 pp.31~58. [7]Rubin G. The traffic in women: notes in political economy of sex. In R.R. Reiter eds. Toward an Archaeology of Woman. New York Monthly Review pp.157~210. [8]Butler J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York Routledge 1990. [10]Conkey M. and Gero J. Tensions pluralities and engendering archaeology: An introduction to women and prehistory. In J. Gero and M. Conkey eds. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Cambridge MA: Basil Blackwell Inc. 1990 pp.3~30.
2010 6 218 47 [11][17][24]Nelson S.M. Gender in Archaeology: Analyzing Power and Prestige. 2nd edition. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers 2004. [12]Voss B.L. Engendered archeology: women men and others. In M. Hall and S.M. Silliman eds. Historical Archaeology. Oxford Blackwell Inc. 2006 pp.197~127. [14]Ortner S.B. Making Gender:The Politics and Erotics of Culture. Boston Beason Press 1996. [15]Gilchrist R. Women s archaeology political feminism gender theory and historical revision. Antiquity 1991 65: pp. 495~501. [16][26]Hayden B. Observing prehistoric women. In C. Claassen ed. Exploring Gender Through Archaeology. Madison Prehistoric Press 1992 pp.33~47. [19]S reensen M.L.S. Gender things and material culture. In S.M. Nelson ed. Handbook of Gender in Archaeology. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers 2006 pp.105~136. [20] : 91939 [21]Leroi-Gourhan A. Les religions de la prehistorie. Paris Presses Universitaires de France 1964. [22]Guthrie R.D. The Nature of Paleolithic Art. Chicago University of Chicago Press 2006. [23] : 2006 4 [25]Fluehr-Lobben C. A Marxist reappraisal of the Matriarchate. Current Anthropology 1979 20:341~359. [27] : 1 1998 Longacre W. Some aspects of prehistoric society in eastcentral Arizona. In S. and L. Binford eds. New Perspective in Archaeology. Chicago Aldine 1968 pp.89~102. [28] : 2004 [29]Harris M. Cultural Materialism: the Struggle for a Science of Culture. New York Random House 1979. [30]Wang Ying Rank and power among court ladies at Anyang. In K.M. Linduff and Yan Sun eds. Gender and Chinese Archaeology. Walnut Creek Altamira Press 2004 pp.95~ 136. [31]: 2004 Research and Inspiration of Gender Archaeology in America CHEN Chun (Department of Cultural Heritage and Museology of Fudan UniversityShanghai 200433) Abstract: With the rise of feminist movement and more interest in gender issues by social studies gender archaeology began to emerge and develop in the U.S.. The gender archaeology is a research area to explore the role of gender in specific historic context and ancient sociopolitical change by using critical perspective from ethnography material culture burial and human skeleton historical document art history and psychology. Inspired by the western gender archaeological findings Chinese archaeologist could reexamines traditional notions of gender role during the Paleolithic Neolithic and Bronze periods and of social development and provides some possible explanations which may be helpful to learn more about human behavior in prehistory. Key words: gender archaeology; concept; methodology; inspiration of case studies