VEHICLE CRASH SAFETY



Similar documents
NCAP New Car Assessment Programme

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

COMPARISON OF BIORID INJURY CRITERIA BETWEEN DYNAMIC SLED TESTS AND VEHICLE CRASH TESTS

Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Mazda MX-5 84% 80% 64% 93% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (double), Passenger (single)

Mazda CX-3 79% 85% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Skoda Octavia 66% 82% ADULT OCCUPANT. Total 34 pts 93% Skoda Octavia 1.6 'Ambition', LHD SIDE IMPACT REAR IMPACT (WHIPLASH) 2,6 pts WHIPLASH

AUDI A3 Sportback e-tron

UPDATED REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208

Suzuki Vitara SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Assessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts. Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes

NEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS. Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager

RCAR Low-speed structural crash test protocol

Safety performance comparisons of different types of child seats in high speed impact tests

US FMVSS 202 Final Rule

Make the right choice. Vehicle safety advice for older drivers

Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews

ADSEAT. An EU funded project within the 7th Framework Programme. Adaptive Seat to Reduce Neck Injuries for Female and Male Occupants

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) FILM & PHOTO PROTOCOL

LATIN AMERICAN & CARRIBEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Latin NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION 2016

Volvo Trucks view on Truck Rollover Accidents

A Systematic Approach for Improving Occupant Protection in Rollover Crashes

The influence of passive safety systems on head injuries suffered by the vehicle s driver

The Increasing Role of SUVs in Crash Involvement in Germany

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

Working Paper. Extended Validation of the Finite Element Model for the 2010 Toyota Yaris Passenger Sedan

Factors related to serious injury in post ncap european cars involved in frontal crashes

CASPER CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS. Car Technology. SPEAKER: Britta Schnottale BASt. CASPER and EPOCh Final Workshop 13 th -15

Presented by the expert of France 55th Session of the UN ECE Working Party on Passive Safety GRSP May 2014 Agenda Items 15

Impact Kinematics of Cyclist and Head Injury Mechanism in Car to Bicycle Collision

European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Statement before Massachusetts Legislature s Joint Committee on Insurance. Institute Research on Cosmetic Crash Parts. Stephen L. Oesch.

Q dummy family. Fahrzeugsicherheit Berlin e.v. Robert Kant, Christian Kleessen (Humanetics)

Pedestrian protection - Pedestrian in collision with personal car

Supplementary restraints system


Relationship of Dynamic Seat/Head Restraint Ratings to Real-world Neck Injury Rates

The New Car Assessment Program Suggested Approaches for Future Program Enhancements

Balancing Active and Passive Safety

FIMCAR III Car-to-Car Test Results

Cyclist kinematics in car impacts reconstructed in simulations and full scale testing with Polar dummy

Car Crash Design Lab

On Predicting Lower Leg Injuries. for the EuroNCAP Front Crash

INFORMATION SUBMISSION FOR NAS. December Office Vehicle Safety Research National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

OPEL CORSA UTILITY BASE

How Do Euro NCAP Results Correlate with Real-Life Injury Risks? A Paired Comparison Study of Car-to-Car Crashes

Improving Driving Safety Through Automation

CRASH AVOIDANCE TOP SAFETY PICKS

Existing safety technology is the driverless vehicle already here? Matthew Avery Safety Research Director

WATCH THIS ICON: View this short clip from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety DVD called Understanding Car Crashes It s basic physics.

FORD FIGO (NO AIRBAGS)

How To Compare Head Injury Risk From A Front Crash Test To Head Injury From A Head Injury

VEHICLE CRASHWORTHINESS AND OCCUPANT PROTECTION

CRASH PROTECTION FOR CHILDREN IN AMBULANCES Recommendations and Procedures* Marilyn J. Bull, M.D., Kathleen Weber, Judith Talty, Miriam Manary

Sources of data. IIHS MDB (SUV) Side Impact Test at 50km/h (from 2003) NHTSA Crabbed MDB Side Impact Test at 62 km/h (from 1997)

Biomechanics of the Neck in Rear Impacts for improved Seat Design

ANCIS. The Australian National Crash In-depth Study. David Logan (MUARC)

Predicting throw distance variations in bicycle crashes

ENHANCEMENT OF SEAT PERFORMANCE IN LOW-SPEED REAR IMPACT

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

Increased cooperation for the future of electrification

Motorcycle accident reconstruction in VL Motion

PREDICTING THROW DISTANCE VARIATIONS IN BICYCLE CRASHES

Title: Reduce/ Prevent Whiplash Injuries in Car Accidents

Rear Impact Dummy Biofidelity

The SIPS (Side Impact Protection System) includes side and Inflatable Curtain (IC) airbags that protect both front and rear occupants.

Application Example: Automotive Testing: Optical 3D Metrology improves Safety and Comfort

Types and Extent of Damage to Passenger Vehicles in Low-Speed Front and Rear Crashes. Anne T. McCartt Laurie A. Hellinga

Car Crash Compatibility: The Prospects for International Harmonization

Does the Federal government require them? No, the Federal government does not require manufacturers to install EDRs.

DEVELOPMENT OF MOVING DEFORMABLE BARRIER IN JAPAN - PART 2 -

Assessing the Female Neck Injury Risk

Best Practice Guide Vehicle Ergonomics Best Practice Guide

The Science of Pet Safety. Center for Pet Safety 2015 Pet Travel Seat Pilot Summary Report. Scope. Background. Purpose.

UNDERSTANDING YOUR VEHICLE S. What every driver and passenger should know

The Relative Safety of Large and Small Passenger Vehicles

Low Delta-V Crashes Resulting in Serious Injury. Questions

Motor Vehicle Collision Form

Vehicle Safety Systems

INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY 1005 NORTH GLEBE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA PHONE 703/ FAX 703/

EXPERIMENTAL CRASH TESTS INVOLVING PASSENGER CARS AND THE PROTOTYPE CONCRETE PROTECTIVE BARRIER

A name a commitment! These are the criteria which have characterized the development of dependable everyday cars up to the present time.

Signal Analysis, Modeling and Simulation of Vehicle Crash Dynamics

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

CRASH TESTS TO ASSESS THE SECONDARY SAFETY OF A LARGE MPV

A New Impact Scenario for P-V Tram Certification

Kuroe 1 EXPLORATORY STUDY OF AN AIRBAG CONCEPT FOR A LARGE TOURING MOTORCYCLE : FURTHER RESEARCH SECOND REPORT

Assessment of Light-Duty Vehicle Mass-Reduction Costs

SIMULATION OF VEHICULAR FRONTAL CRASH-TEST

Tram interface crashworthiness

The safety of child wheelchair occupants in road passenger vehicles

Transcription:

VEHICLE CRASH SAFETY (Computer Aided Engineering) <Contents> 1. Vehicle Crashworthiness 2. Pedestrian Protection 3. Research for Whiplash Injury 4. Research for Lower Extremity Injury 5. Advanced Research for HEAD Injury 6. RCAR (Reduction of Repair Cost) 7. Vehicle Compatibility 8. Dynamic Rollover Vehicle Crash Safety 1.1 Frontal Impact(1) NCAP : New Car Assessment Program Vehicle Crashworthiness - Structural Integrity - Body g Control - Energy Absorption + Optimization of Rest. Sys. - Dual & Advanced A/Bag - P/T & L/L Seat Belt - Collapsable Steering Sys. 1. Vehicle Crashworthiness

1.2 Offset Impact Str g System Airbag Fold g Crash Pad Seat & Belt Pedals Sled Correlation 1. Vehicle Crashworthiness 1.3 Advanced Airbag Simulation (Driver side OOP) DAB OOP 5%ile 5%ile FEMALE DAB FOLDING INITIAL RUN AIRBAG CORRELATION OOP DEPLOYMENT DUMMY INITIAL POSITION 1. Vehicle Crashworthiness - AAB

1.4 Side Impact NHTSA FMVSS 214 EUROPE S/IMPACT NHTSA SINCAP 1. Vehicle Crashworthiness 1.4 IIHS Side Impact 1. Vehicle Crashworthiness

Attachment #1 : TWG OOP Position Forward Facing Rearward Facing Outboard Facing 1.5 Fuel System Integrity (Rear Offset Impact) FMVSS 301(Current) FMVSS 301(Upgrade) 1. Vehicle Crashworthiness

2.1 EURO-NCAP(Pedestrian Protection) 1 Adult Headform 2 Child Headform 3 Upper Leg 4 Lower Leg 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 3 1 2 4 4 2. Pedestrian Protection 3.1 Seat Modification for Whiplash Injury Reduction C1 Design Parameter Backset Neck Injury Criteria NIC = a 0.2 + v rel 2 rel NICmax T1 머리와 headrest 수직거리 Headrest 구조 / 재질 백폼두께 / 재질 프레임구조 a rel v rel 연결부위구조 Headrest requirements IIHS RCAR 가속도변화영향변수 Backset Headrest. 높이빽폼두께빽프레임구조빽폼재질연결부위구조 (Chest, T1) - - 두꺼울수록유리탈거시유리최적물성치강성약할수록유리 (Head, C1) 작을수록유리높을수록유리 - - - - 3. Research for Whiplash Injury

3.2 Active Headrest System Modeling of Front Seat with Active Headrest and Evaluation of Whiplash Injury Finding the mechanism of active head restraint and making a numerical model Comparison of the Neck Injury Criteria value between seats with and without active head restraint Modification of existing AHR and Development of new HYUNDAI system < Seat with AHR > Modified System < AHR Mechanism > New HYUNDAI System 3. Research for Whiplash Injury 4.1 THOR-LX Finite element modeling of THOR - LX Certification Tests Assembly level Dynamic Heel Impact Test Dynamic Ball Impact Test 4. Research for Lower Extremity Injury

4.2 H-MODEL LX - Foot and Ankle of Human Structure of Foot and Ankle 4. Research for Lower Extremity Injury 4.3 Lower Extremity of H-III Dummy Tibia and Ankle of H-III dummy (M R ) C = 225Nm, (F Z ) C = 35.9kN 4. Research for Lower Extremity Injury

5.1 H-MODEL HEAD Fig.1 Median Section through the Skull Front View Posterior View Fig.2 Anatomy of Human Brain Fig.3 Overview of H-Head Model (Quarter Sectional View) 5. Advanced Research for HEAD Injury 5.2 H-MODEL HEAD Application Fig.4 Brain Components inside the skull (sagittal sectional view) 1. 누적변형률손상척도 (Cumulative Strain Damage Measure-CSDM) 2. 상대운동손상척도 (Relative Motion Damage Measure-RMDM) 3. 체팽창손상척도 (Dilatation Damage Measure-DDM) 5. Advanced Research for HEAD Injury

6.1 RCAR (Test Condition) FRONT TEST CONDITION Velocity : 15 km/h(~16km/h) Rigid Barrier U = Offset 40% R = 150mm const. Radius 10 Angled Barrier from 06.1.1 REAR TEST CONDITION Moving Rigid Barrier U = Offset 40% R = 150mm const. Radius H=700 ±10mm Barrier Height Mass of MDB = 1000 ±10kg Vehicle Condition : Stop (Handbrake off) NEW RESEARCH AREA Bumper Over-ride/Under-run Rear Bumper Test Review 6. RCAR (Body Repairability) 6.2 Body Damageability and Repairability RADSUPT RADSUPT Collapse Zone S/FRAME FRT MTG BRKT S/FRAME FRT MTG S/FRAME FRT MTG 200mm Cutting line Integral Split 6. RCAR (Body Repairability)

7.1 Hyundai Autonomous Crash Vehicle Sys. Alternating Current(12 khz) 30m 700~800m Emergency Remote Controller Vehicle No.1 1 km Vehicle No.2 Vehicle No. 1 Main Controller Data Recording System Communicating System Braking System Accelerating System Lead Antenna Speedometer Steering System System Configuration 7. Vehicle Compatibility 7.2 Mid vs Mid, Mid vs Mini Car-to-Car Offset Crash Mid vs Mid Mid vs Mini Mid Mini

7.3 Other Study 질량 Mass 강성 Stiffness 형상 Geometry 7. Vehicle Compatibility 8.1 Dynamic Flip Rollover Crash Test (60kph) 1 4 2 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 8. Dynamic Rollover (Flip)

8.2 Dynamic Flip Rollover Site Map after Crash 5.0m RAMP 71.75cm QTR PNL RH CONTACT FENDER RH CONTACT ROOF, HOOD CONTACT FINAL POSITION 23.2m FRT REVERSED 0.70m 60 kph 3.4m 7.2m 12.0m 23.4m 4.4m 3.10m 3.72m 1.71m 8. Dynamic Rollover (Flip)