SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AT BRAMPTON FARMS, ST. CATHERINE FCS # 0853/76/C ENGINEERING REPORT



Similar documents
ENGINEERING REPORT Sewage Treatment System

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

Advanced Wastewater Treatment Process

Floating Treatment Wetland Technology: Nutrient Removal from Wastewater

Nutrient Removal at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Gary M. Grey HydroQual, Inc X 7167

Natural and Advanced Treatment Systems for Wastewater Management at Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Site in Developing Countries

Glossary of Wastewater Terms

ADVANCED LAGOON TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

OPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM MIDDLEBURY, VT. Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.

1.85 WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 20, 2005

Case Study of an Advanced On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Connected to a Single-Family Residence

Example Calculations Evaluation for Fine Bubble Aeration System. Red Valve Company, Inc. 700 NORTH BELL AVENUE CARNEGIE, PA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Sewerage Management System for Reduction of River Pollution

Alternative Options to Large Scales of Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facilities Management in Thailand

Toxic Municipal Waste Water Treatment

Overview of Best Available Technologies for Onsite Septic Systems and Management Considerations Presentation to NAHB

A NOVEL ION-EXCHANGE/ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF AMMONIA IN WASTEWATER

THE MARSHALL STREET ADVANCED POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY (CLEARWATER, FLORIDA) CONVERSION TO 4-STAGE BARDENPHO TO IMPROVE BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL

Georgia Department of Public Health. Georgia Onsite Sewage Management Systems. Background and Use of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in Georgia

Recycle treated effluent to meet looi of the facility's non-potable water needs. nutrient removal and activated carbon adsorption.

Alberta Onsite Wastewater Management Association Installer Training Program

Water and Wastewater. Sample Collection and Analysis

Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Facility

SMALL COMMUNITY TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION WHILE IN OPERATION USING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY

COURSE # 343 UNIT # 1: ADVANTEX WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. What you will learn in this lesson. Introduction to the listing

Small Wastewater Treatment Systems

COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

Guidance on applying for approval of installation of a commercial onsite wastewater system

Holistic Aeration and Chemical Optimization Saves Big Money from 1 MGD to 600 MGD. Trevor Ghylin, PE PhD

Nutrient removal from wastewater by wetland systems

Rehabilitation of Wastewater Treatment Plant of Sakhnin City in Israel by Using Advanced Technologies

Provided below is a description of the processes generating wastewater in a poultry plant and a typical pretreatment and full treatment system.

APPLICATION OF NATURAL TREATMENT SYSTEMS FOR WASTEWATER POLLUTION CONTROL IN THE EXPANSION AREA OF CALI, COLOMBIA

Module 16: The Activated Sludge Process - Part II Instructor Guide Answer Key

DANISH GUIDELINES FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTED WETLAND SYSTEMS Hans Brix

Experts Review of Aerobic Treatment Unit Operation and Maintenance. Bruce Lesikar Texas AgriLife Extension Service

A Guide to Specifying Reed Beds and Constructed Wetland Systems

Wastewater Nutrient Removal

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process Part III

THE NEW NSF 350 AND 350-1

ANAEROBIC/ANOXIC TANKS

Membrane Bioreactor Performance Compared to Conventional Wastewater Treatment

Minnesota. BMI Project No. M

On-site Treatmentt for Domestic Wastewater in Thailand Suwanna. K. Boontanon Mahidol Univ. 2

Engineers Edge, LLC PDH & Professional Training

MODELING WASTEWATER AERATION SYSTEMS TO DISCOVER ENERGY SAVINGS OPPORTUNITIES By Steven A. Bolles Process Energy Services, LLC

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

Operation and Maintenance of Onsite Waster Systems in Maryland. A growing challenge for the industry and regulators

Alberta Environment Standards for Advanced Waste Systems

Phosphorus Removal in Wastewater Treatment

Appendix 2-1. Sewage Treatment Process Options

Advanced Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems. Water and Wastewater Utility Operation and

Phosphorus Removal. Wastewater Treatment

BALANCING REDOX EQUATIONS. Each redox equation contains two parts -- the oxidation and reduction parts. Each is balanced separately.

CHAPTER 8 UPGRADING EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES

EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

Practice Tests Answer Keys

Saudi Aramco Project Development

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE RENDERING INDUSTRY. Gregory L. Sindt, P.E. Environmental Engineer Bolton and Menk, Inc.

Lance DeClue, REHS Environmental Health Specialist II County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health

During the past decade, the city of

Aeration Efficiency Guide

Report Naga City: Septage treatment and wastewater concept for Del Rosario

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN IN WASTEWATER 3. PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN REMOVAL MECHANISM 4. PROCESS REQUIREMENT AND CONTROL FACTOR

EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

Achilleas Papadopoulos & Simos Malamis & Kostas Moustakas & Christos T. Kiranoudis & Maria Loizidou

TREATMENT OF SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW

Report prepared by: Kelly Hagan and Mark Anderson Grand River Conservation Authority 400 Clyde Road Cambridge ON N1R 5W6

Oasis Clearwater ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERS

5.1.3 Model of biological phosphorus removal

March 4, Principal Investigator: John Todd, Ph.D. Ocean Arks International

Protecting Lakes from Urban Water Pollution with Sewerage Systems

Virginia Street Tree Box Filters Demonstration Project

Anish Jantrania (photo) and Allen Knapp

Northport/Leelanau Township Wastewater Treatment Facility

E nv i ro n m e nta l. Biotec 5-7. Sustainable, Reliable, Affordable

NAJAFGARH DRAIN-SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

Unit 1. Physical, chemical and biological Characteristics of Wastewater

NPDES Permit No. IL Notice No. SKT: bah. Public Notice Beginning Date: April 9, Public Notice Ending Date: May 9, 2014

Keywords: Reduction, nitrate, phosphorus, RO-reject wastewater, laboratory scale, pilot scale, effluent quality

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT AND UTILITY PLAN NEW WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY TOWN OF MEAD FOR A FOR THE

Biological Wastewater Treatment

Application Form 2E. Facilities Which Do Not Discharge Process Wastewater

TALLINN WATER TREATMENT AND SEWERAGE Tuuli Myllymaa

ACTIFLO Process For Wet Weather and Wastewater Treatment

St. John s Harbour Clean-Up Phase 2. Project Description


Improving on-site domestic wastewater treatment systems - West Coast Lagoons Project

COD/BOD 5 Reduction with ROTAMAT Fine and Micro Screens


TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Location of the system. Percolation tests for drainage fields. Cesspool sizing. Suggested Information notices

Phosphorus Removal. P.F. Strom, 2006; do not copy without written permission.

Facility Classification Standards

SUMMIT COUNTY COMBINED GENERAL HEALTH DISTRICT

Iowa DNR Wastewater Treatment Technology Assessment No

Advanced Designs for Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems Recommended Standards and Guidance Document Single Pass Sand Filter

Transcription:

CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 7A Barbados Avenue, Kingston 5, Jamaica, Tele: (876) 754-2154/5 Fax: (876) 754-2156 E-mail: mail@fcsconsultants.com SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AT BRAMPTON FARMS, ST. CATHERINE FCS # 0853/76/C ENGINEERING REPORT Prepared for: GORE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED 2C BRAEMAR KINGSTON 10 JUNE 2009

Table of Contents Overview...2 Sewage Treatment Design...2 Design References...2 Design Criteria...2 Sewage Treatment Plant Components...3 Biochemical Processes...4 Conclusion...8 APPENDIX...9 1

Overview This engineering report describes the sewerage treatment designs for the proposed sewage treatment plant at Brampton Farms St. Catherine. This sewage treatment plant is intended to serve two (2) housing developments; one at The Whim consisting of 1380 houses and the other at Brampton Farms consisting of approximately 900 houses. The Whim development will be constructed first with the Brampton Farms development to follow shortly after. The proposed capacity of the sewage treatment plant will be 2771m 3 /day. This is based on 1.17 of the expected sewage generated by both. Sewage Treatment Design Design References The sewage treatment design was prepared with reference to the developers manual Volume 3 Section 4 Minimum Requirements for Waste Water Treatment Systems and Excreta Management in Jamaica provided by the Ministry of Health & Environment Environmental Health Unit; EPA Technology Assessment: Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment - EPA/832-R- 93-008, and Waste Stabilization Ponds and Constructed Wetlands Design Manual by UNEP-IETC with the Danish International Development Agency (Danida). Design Criteria The basic criteria used in the design is that influent to the treatment plant is typical of medium strength domestic sewage. The treatment plant effluent will meet NEPA 2004 standards for direct discharge. Table 1: Sewage Treatment Plant Wastewater Characteristics Parameter Units Influent Effluent COD mg/l 500 100 BOD mg/l 250 20 TSS mg/l 220 20 TKN mg/l 40 10 P mg/l 8 4 FC MPN/100ml 10 7-10 8 200 2

Sewage Treatment Plant Components The sewage treatment plant consists of the following components: 1. Grit removal chamber 2. Anaerobic Ponds 3. Distribution box 4. Constructed Wetlands (Scirpus, Typha, phragmites) 5. Chlorination chamber Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Table 2: Sewage Treatment Plant Components Brampton Farms Sewage Treatment Plant Anaerobic Pond, Constructed Wetland and Chlorination Chamber Qty Unit 1 Headworks including grit removal structure 2 Average Daily flow 2771 m 3 3 Hydraulic retention time for Anaerobic Ponds 1.5 Days 4 Required pond capacity 4,157 m 3 /d 5 Number of ponds 2 No. 6 Dimensions of each pond, Depth 4 m 7 Width (mid depth) 16.6 m 8 Length(mid depth) 34 m 9 Volume of each pond 2,257 m 3 10 Total pond volume 4,514 m 3 11 Effluent from septic tank flows into a distribution box that spreads flow into four constructed wetlands 12 Constructed Wetland loading rate 90 L/m 2 13 Constructed Wetland size Required 30,788.89 m 2 14 Constructed Wetland depth 0.7 m 15 Voids in bed 0.38 16 pore volume 8189.84 m 3 17 Retention Time (required) 2.96 Days 18 Number of wetland trains 4 19 Area of each bed (required) 30,788.89 m 2 20 Length 161 m 21 Width 48 m 22 L/W 3.35 # 23 Total Constructed Wetland area (provided) 30,912 m 2 24 Contact Chlorine chamber HRT 25 min 25 Volume required 48 m 3 26 D 0.9 m 27 W 2 m 28 L 27 m 3

Biochemical Processes Anaerobic Ponds Anaerobic ponds are commonly 2 5 m deep and receive wastewater with high organic loads. The retention time is generally 1-1.5 days although they can be designed with up to 6 days retention. In anaerobic ponds, BOD removal is achieved by sedimentation of solids, and subsequent anaerobic digestion in the resulting sludge. The removal rates for anaerobic ponds are temperature dependent. The Brampton Farms site is expected to have a minimum air temperature of 23 o C. As such the permissible loading rate for BOD is 330 g/m 3 day with a removal rate of 66%. The anaerobic ponds require a minimum hydraulic retention time of 1 day; approximately 1.6 days have been provided at this site. Based on the removal efficiency of the proposed pond the COD and BOD will be reduced to 180 and 85mg/l respectively. The ponds will also remove the majority of the TSS and fecal coli form by about 1 log. Figure 1: Anaerobic Pond Design formula Table 3: Constructed Wetland Waste Water Characteristics Parameter Units Influent Effluent COD mg/l 190 <100 BOD mg/l 85 20 TSS mg/l 110 20 TKN mg/l 45 10 P mg/l 8 4 FC MPN/100ml 1.9x10 6 1.9x10 4 4

Constructed Wetlands Constructed wetlands are engineered systems designed and constructed to utilise wetland vegetation to assist in treating wastewater in a more controlled environment than occurs in natural wetlands. The type of wetland chosen for sewage treatment at this site is subsurface flow. In subsurface flow systems, water flows though a porous media such as gravels or aggregates, in which the plants are rooted Subsurface flow systems are most appropriate for treating primary wastewater, because there is no direct contact between the water column and the atmosphere. There is no opportunity for vermin to breed, and the system is safer from a public health perspective. The environment within the subsurface flow bed is mostly either anoxic or anaerobic. Oxygen is supplied by the roots of the emergent plants and is used up in the Biofilm growing directly on the roots and rhizomes, being unlikely to penetrate very far into the water column itself. Subsurface flow systems are good for nitrate removal (denitrification), but not for ammonia oxidation (nitrification), since oxygen availability is the limiting step in nitrification. This constructed wetland is designed to have a minimum hydraulic retention time of 3 days; this is required to reduce the oxygen demand and nutrient levels to NEPA standards. The reeds in the constructed wetland should be planted with one reed per square foot to ensure an adequate plant density. The BOD removal follows the 1 st order plug flow reaction L t =Le -kt where L t is the concentration of BOD at any time. The reaction constant k T = k 20 Ө (T-20) where k 20 = Rate Constant at 20 o C k 20 = = 1.104 Ө = 1.06 k T = 1.31 5

L e = L i e (-k T t) The average temperature for this site is 23 degrees Celsius. COD removal is at the same rate as BOD removal and COD is generally twice the BOD concentration. The expected BOD concentration (C e ) will be approximately 1.7mg/l The TSS will be removed within the first few metres of the wetland (EPA/832-R- 93-008). The removal of TSS can be predicted by TSS e = TSS i [0.1058 +0.0011(100*Q/A s )] Where Q is the average daily flow rate through the wetland and A s is the required surface area. The total area required for a wetland with 3 day retention time is 1,520 m 2 while 30,900 m 2 has been provided. The nitrogen entering wetland systems can be measured as organic nitrogen and ammonia (expressed as TKN), or as nitrate, or a combination of both nitrogen measurements. The organic N entering a reed bed is typically associated with particulate matter such as organic wastewater solids. Decomposition and mineralization processes in the wetland will convert a significant part of this organic N to ammonia (EPA/832-R-93-008). Nitrogen removal by wetland plants ranges from 0.2 to 2.25 g/(m 2.day). Using a removal rate of 1.1 g/(m 2.day) over the total area (30, 912 m 2 ) the effluent concentration should be about 9 mg/l. Hydraulic retention time = 3 days Total daily nitrogen load; 45g x 2771m 3 3 = 41565g Removal by plant uptake; 1.1g x30912 m 2 =33211 g/ Effluent concentration; (41565-33211) g/day (2771 m 3 3) = 9.0 g/m 3 Phosphorous removal by wetland plants ranges from 0.05 to 0.5 g/m 2 /day. Using an average of 0.25/m 2 /day, the phosphorous will be below acceptable levels within 6

the 3 days of retention. Phosphorous reduction will occur via plant uptake and sedimentation of PO4. Alternatively Nitrogen and Phosphorous removal can also be predicted by the following formula developed in North America. The removal is temperature sensitive but there are no published values for adjusting the rate constant. Where C* the background concentration, 0.02 for TP Q = 2771 3 m 3 /day k 20 = 12 m/yr for TP Required surface area for phosphorus removal, A s = 19,544 m 2. Fecal coliform levels are expected to have a 1.5 log reduction in 3 days. Chlorination for 25 minutes in a contact chamber will reduce FC to acceptable levels. Discharge from the chlorination chamber will be to the Fraser s Gully 7

Conclusion Anaerobic Ponds are suitable for primary treatment of domestic and municipal sewage. They are easily maintained with low energy requirements. Constructed wetlands are an eco-friendly alternative for secondary and tertiary domestic and municipal wastewater treatment. Constructed wetlands are practical alternatives to conventional treatment of domestic sewage. When the same biochemical and physical processes occur in a more natural environment, instead of reactor tanks and basins, the resulting system often consumes less energy, is more reliable, requires less operation and maintenance and, as a result costs less. The chosen system, anaerobic ponds followed by constructed wetlands, incorporates natural biochemical processes which are time and temperature dependent. As such it is suitable for subtropical regions such as Jamaica. The sewage treatment plant as designed is expected to meet the effluent standards required by NEPA. Prepared By Lise M. Walter, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer 8

APPENDIX 1. Estimate of Water Usage Formatted: Bullets and Numbering 2. Layout of Sewage Treatment Plant

Gore Whim and Brampton Water Demand Estimate Item Description Qty Unit 1 Number of residential lots 2,250 No 2 Estimate of the number of persons per lot 4.50 No 3 Population Estimate 10,125 No 4 Average per capita consumption per household resident 227 Liters 5 Estimate of domestic water use 2,298,375 Liters 6 7 Commercial and Light Industry 8 Commercial and shopping area 78,768.00 m 2 9 Usage per unit area commercial space 14.68 L/m 2 10 % Area used for commercial floor space 20% 11 Estimate of floor space 15,753.60 m 2 12 Water for commercial and light Industry 231,265 L 13 14 Basic School 15 Student Population 250 No 16 Staff Population 25 No 17 Total Basic School population 275 No 18 19 Primary School 20 Student Population 1,800 No 21 Staff Population 144 No 22 Total primary school population 1,944 No 23 24 Per Capita demand for each head of school population 57 Liters/day 25 Estimate of Basic School demand 15,675 Liters/day 26 Estimate of Primary School demand 110,808 Liters/day 27 28 Other water use (5% domestic use) 114,918.75 Liters 29 Average day demand 2,771,041.46 Liters 30 2,771 m 3 /d 31 sewage generation factor 0.85 32 Average daily sewage generation 2355 m 3 /d 33 Safety factor 1.17 34 Required STP capacity 2771 m 3 /d 10

11