Hamilton County Rain Garden Infiltration Studies



Similar documents
Caltrans non-standard Special Provisions Pervious Concrete. David Akers Feb 28, 2012

APPENDIX B DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR APPROVED TREATMENT METHODS

Underground Injection Control Storm Water Information

APPENDIX F. RESIDENTIAL WATER QUALITY PLAN: ALLOWABLE BMP OPTIONS

Soakage Trenches. A better way to manage stormwater. Thinking Globally and Acting Locally

Rain Gardens: Designing your Landscape to Protect Aquatic Resources. Curtis Hinman WSU Extension Faculty Watershed Ecologist

Drainage A Crucial Component for Athletic Field Performance. Part Three: Sub-Surface Installed Drainage Systems

DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS

C.3 Workshop Track 2: Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures

9.00 THE USE OF HUNTER LAND DRAINAGE PERFORATED PIPES. Hunter Underground Systems

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER S WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT

How to Build a Rain Garden at Your Home

Stormwater/Wetland Pond Construction Inspection Checklist

Retention/Irrigation. Design Considerations. Soil for Infiltration Area Required Slope Environmental Side-effects

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGNS BIOSWALE/HYBRID DITCH

Updates on Pervious Pavement Design and Construction. Jason T. Peterein, P.E. June 19, 2012

Tree Pits Operation & Maintenance Guide

Green Infrastructure for Single Family Residences

Storm Drain Inlet Protection - IP

Storm Drain Inlet Protection for Construction Sites (1060)

1 yard per sq. 2 Depth. Color is a personal choice. Dye fades due to sunlight. Although color remains, fading begins to occur

CHAPTER 17: STORM SEWER STANDARDS Introduction Administration Standards 17.1

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

BMP 6.4.6: Dry Well / Seepage Pit

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION GUIDE

piles of debris that accumulate after a rain such as leaves, trash, twigs, etc., water stains on fences and buildings, or salts extruded on bricks,

GREEN ROOFS. Location. Design SMALL COMMERCIAL GUIDE CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT

BMP #: Dry Wells / French Drains

Permeable Pavement Operation & Maintanence Guide

ARTICLE 16 Retention Best Management Practices

Appendix D.1. Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils

Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements

Guidelines for Control of Water Runoff on Small Lots. Revised 6/09

(Source: Center for Neighborhood Technology)

Construction Site Inspection Checklist for OHC By making use of some simple Best Management Practices (BMPs) a construction site operator can

POLLUTION PREVENTION FACT SHEETS: CATCH BASINS. Description

Permeable Pavement Construction Guide

Storm Drain Inlet Protection for Construction Sites (1060)

Abstract.

Soil depth: meters Type of restrictive layer:

A perforated conduit such as pipe, tubing or tile installed beneath the ground to intercept and convey ground water. or structures.

BMP-7. A sediment filter or an excavated impounding area around a storm drain drop inlet or curb inlet.

CASFM Stormwater Quality Field Trip June 23rd, 2011

PRIVATE TREATMENT CONTROL BMP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE VERIFICATION FORM BIORETENTION FACILITIES, VEGETATED SWALES & HIGHER RATE BIOFILTERS

AquaPaver & SF-Rima Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers

General Approach. Structure Components. Is all lumber the same? Lumber Grades. Rafters Girders / Beams Columns. Sketch general structural layout

GUIDELINES FOR SOIL FILTER MEDIA IN BIORETENTION SYSTEMS (Version 2.01) March 2008

PART V BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

5.4.8 Permeable Pavement

Permeable Pavement Treatment Capacity

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas

VA DEQ STORMWATER DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 7 PERMEABLE PAVEMENT. VERSION 2.0 January 1, 2013 SECTION 1: DESCRIPTION

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

SECTION 5: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN

Section 2100-Trenching and Tunneling

Civil. 2. City of Seattle Supplement to the Specification for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, most current addition.

SOAK UP YOUR STORMWATER

PP-1. Introduction Permeable Pavement (PP) Permeable Pavement (PP)

Other variations of permeable pavement that are DDOE-approved permeable pavement surface materials are also encompassed in this section.

Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement (PICP) A Low Impact Development Tool Training for Schools and Universities

Appendix A: BMP Fact Sheets

Part 7 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRICS

SC-07 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

Modular Geo-Void Systems Total Water Management

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

NJ Subsurface Drainage

Variations: permeable interlocking pavers, concrete grid pavers, plastic reinforced grid pavers

Foundation Drainage. Gable Roof Runoff. Hip roof Runoff. By: Brent Anderson, P.E. Moisture Control Engineering Leader STRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGIES

How to build raised beds page

SE-10 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. Objectives

LID-01 Permeable Paving Systems

ON-SITE STORMWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM (OSDS) DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MINIMUM GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS

The Great Soil Debate: Understanding competing approaches to soil design ASLA Annual Meeting September 20, 2009

Preventing Basement Flooding

Local Road Assessment and Improvement Drainage Manual

Virginia Street Tree Box Filters Demonstration Project

Operations and Maintenance Guidelines for Coal Ash Landfills Coal Ash Landfills are NOT the Same as Subtitle D Solid Waste Landfills

Minimizes sediment and debris from entering storm drains that lead to waterways and watercourses.

2014 Low Impact Development Project Performance Monitoring Report

Understanding and Living With Your Septic System

Rational Method Hydrologic Calculations with Excel. Rational Method Hydrologic Calculations with Excel, Course #508. Presented by:

Table 4.9 Storm Drain Inlet Protetion Applicable for

2J-1 General Information for Permeable Pavement Systems

Dave Laurie, CTR. Sales Manager, Commercial Sales DESIGNED TO CONNECT

Onsite Wastewater Concepts, Materials, Regulations & The Application Process Part I

UNDER DRAINAGE AND FILTER DESIGN

Post-Construction Stormwater Management Checklist* (5,000 SF or Greater)

Fairlington Community Center

Riprap-lined Swale (RS)

Solutions Library Solution 4: Permeable Pavement

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

Managing runoff in urban areas offers

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS

Outlet stabilization structure

How To Remove Stormwater Contaminants From A Bioretention Basin

Transcription:

Hamilton County Rain Garden Infiltration Studies

RAIN GARDEN SOILS IN HAMILTON COUNTY Dave Dyke, Commercial Horticulture Educator, OSUE, Hamilton County Following are: 1 ) A discussion of recommendations 2) A summary of infiltration rates observed in an OSU Extension Rain Garden Infiltration Study of gardens in Hamilton County.

Discussion of recommendations Most engineered soils for rain gardens are specified to be 50% or better sand. A soil does not exhibit sandy characteristics until it is 60% or more sand. There are a few problems with that. 1) Most of our plant materials for this area do not do as well in a very sandy soil as they would in a good loam soil. 2) Not all sand is created equal. If sand is used, it should be a course or medium sharp sand. Rounded river sand, as any horticulturist knows, should never be used for a soil mix. 3) Rain gardens are designed to capture an inflow of water. That means that soil particles will be entering the system. When silt or clay particles enters into a system that utilizes a very sandy mix those particles will change the ratio of sand in the mix clogging the spaces between the sand particles and reducing the infiltration rate of the mix. (I can show you an installation that started with 85% sand a couple of years ago and that is now a wetland due to the inflow of soil particles). 4) Sandy soils do not aggregate well, if at all. A good loam soil, or even a clayey soil, will aggregate over time and its infiltration rate will remain to be adequate, or improve. 5) Many sandy mixes provide an infiltration rate that is far too rapid. If the installation has an underdrain, the water will simply flow through the plant growth medium and into the underdrain and on out of the system (if the design permits). The too rapid infiltration of water can also result in flow through of nutrients into the water table or storm water system.

Discussion of recommendations Having said all of the above, the bottom line is that the infiltration rate of any rain garden system is ultimately defined by what is under and around the plant growth medium. If the medium permits an infiltration rate of 50 inches/hour but the soil under it has an infiltration rate of 3 inches/hour and there is no underdrain, then the effective infiltration rate will be 3 inches/hour unless an underdrain is installed. If that is the case, the water will infiltrate at the rate of 50 inches/hour which is way too rapid. I m over simplifying things a bit but I am working my way towards the real bottom line and my research.

A summary of infiltration rates observed in an OSU Extension Rain Garden Infiltration Study of gardens in Hamilton County Much literature states that the optimum infiltration rate of a rain garden should be from 0.5 1.0/inch/hour to 6 to 8 inches/hr. Below is a summary of the infiltration rates we found at 6 rain garden installations in the Cincinnati area in the last half of 2011. Note that all but the zoo new entrance garden had virtually identical construction. The new entrance had 18 inches of plant growth substrate over an 18 inch layer of gravel. All others had a underdrain of perforated drain tile at the bottom of the installation. The unamended clay urban complex soil in the Brazee garden actually provided what could be considered ideal infiltration.

Infiltration rates Determined by using a Turf-Tech International double ring infiltrometer Inner ring 2.5 inch diameter outer ring 4.5 inch diameter Dave Dyke

Methodology There were 6 sampling locations in each garden. (Except for the zoo entrance garden 2 locations) Two were on the center line and 2 were to the right and left of the center line. Locations were randomly selected to try to get comprehensive coverage of each garden. The infiltration rate is expressed in inches/hour. The infiltration rate was determined by removing the mulch from a small area, inserting the double ring infiltrometer into the soil, and then completely filling the infiltrometer with water and then allowing it to drain into the soil 3 times. (Except for the Brazee garden which was close to saturation following 2 3 inches of rainfall the preceding 72 hours.) The infiltration rate was determined by the amount of time that was required to infiltrate 3 inches of water from the center ring, or in sites with an infiltration rate of less than 1 inch/hour, the amount of water that infiltrated in 1 hour.

Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden Education Center

10% Compost Dave Dyke 30% Pine Fines 60% Shredded Topsoil

Dave Dyke

Dave Dyke Cincinnati Zoo Infiltration Data, October 7, 2011 Location 1: Education Center Rain Garden Area Soil Moisture Infiltration Rate RG A Center 79% 59.34 /hr RG A Left 97% 19.96 /hr RG B Center-right 31% 42.52 /hr RG B Left 82% 10.83 /hr RG C Center-upper end 100% 15.81 /hr RG C Center-lower end 90% 10.83 /hr Average 80% 26.55 /hr

Zoo Entrance Garden The garden consists of an 18" layer of gravel with perforated drain tile covered with geo texile fabric, which is covered with approximately 18 inches of soil mix (60% shredded top soil, 30% pine fines, 10% compost) Area Soil Moisture Infiltration Rate Center Left 44% 20.00 /hr Center Right 85% 39.00 /hr Averages for Site 65% 29.50 /hr Dave Dyke

Brazee Rain Garden, Oakley Dave Dyke

Plant Growth July of 2 nd year Dave Dyke

Brazee Rain Garden Building feeding the rain garden =12,172 sq ft Blacktop area that drains into it is 6775 sq ft Total sq ft = 18,947 The rain garden is 2885 sq ft (15.2% of area feeding the rain garden). The Runoff Curve Number or SCS number was used to calculate the total garden area. There is a small stormtech system that receives a very small percentage of the runoff. Soil is about 30 deep. The under drain is 36 inches deep is 6 perforated pipe set in a bed of #57s washed gravel. The soil was not modified except for 6 inches of topsoil added on top of the under drain trench.

Brazee Rain Garden Unusual because: The soil has not been amended Initial infiltration rate was calculated at about 2 inches / hour Ponding depth is about 3 feet Greatest depth of water in garden to date: 2 ft which drained in 12 hours! Soil is very clayey

Dave Dyke Brazee Infiltration Study

Brazee Infiltration Data, November 17, 2011 Zone Location Infiltration Rate 1 Approx 2 ft east of center line 0.75 /hr 2 Center line 12.44 /hr 3 Approx 2 ft west of center line 26.40 /hr 4 Approx 2 ft east of center line 4.26 /hr 5 In center of L 0 /hr* 6 2 ft to south of center line, near end of short end of L Average 0 /hr* 7.31 /hr *Although 0 infiltration was measured, no standing water was present in spite of 2 3 inches of rainfall in the preceding 72 hours (ending approximately 24 hours prior to testing). Dave Dyke

Infiltration Study Immanuel Church Site Basin Subgrade Profile: -Geomembrane liner along bottom and sides of basin -Mirafi 140N series non-woven geotextile filter on top of aggregate layer -12 #57 Aggregate -24 Bioinfiltration Soil Mix: Sand 50 : Compost 40 : Topsoil 10-3 Mulch Underdrain: -6 diameter SDR-35 PVC perforated pipe -Underdrain sits at bottom of aggregate layer, maintaining a 0.5% slope from the cleanout to the overflow structure Dave Dyke

Immanuel Church Site Basin Tributary Drainage Area Footprint Aggregate Layer Storage Bio-Soil Layer Storage Ponding Storage Total Storage Bio-Soil Mix Sand: 50% Compost: 40% Topsoil: 10% 8,600 SF 320 SF 107 CF 173 CF 490 CF 770 CF

Immanuel Church Infiltration Data, July 29, 2011 Test Area Soil Moistur e % Time Elapsed @ 1" (m:sec) Time Elapsed @ 2" (m:sec) Time Elapsed @ 3" (m:sec) Total Minutes Elapsed in/min in/hr 1 69 N/A 1:34 6:22 6.366 0.471 28.28 2 49* N/A 4:33 7:33 7.550 0.397 23.85 3 51 2:00 4:00 6:08 6.133 0.489 29.35 4 79 1:02 2:39 4:27 4.450 0.674 40.45 5 78 N/A N/A 4:05 4.083 0.735 44.09 6 83 N/A 2:00 3:45 3.750 0.800 48.00 Average 68 35.67 *Soil moisture level just to the west of test area 2 was 49% and soil moisture level just to the east of test area 2 was 29%. Dave Dyke

St. Francis Site Basin Subgrade Profile: -Mirafi 140N series non-woven geotextile filter fabric along bottom, sides and top of aggregate layer -15 #57 Aggregate -24 Bioinfiltration Soil Mix -3 Mulch Overflow Pipe Dimensions: -12 diameter PVC pipe Underdrain Pipe Dimensions: Dave Dyke -6 diameter SDR-35 PVC perforated pipe -Pipe is laid solidly in aggregate layer, maintaining a 0.5% slope from the cleanout to the overflow structure, with the top of the underdrain near the top of the aggregate layer. (~ 8-9 of #57s below the underdrain pipe.)

St. Francis Site Northern Basin Southern Basin Tributary Drainage Area 96,408 SF 18,984 SF Footprint 3,816 SF 3,241 SF Aggregate Layer Storage 1,574 CF 1,337 CF Bio-Soil Layer Storage 2,061 CF 1,750 CF Ponding Storage 9,444 CF 8,466 CF Total Storage 13,078 CF 11,553 CF Bio-Soil Mix Sand: 50% Compost: 50% Topsoil: 0% Sand: 50% Compost: 40% Topsoil: 10% Dave Dyke

St. Francis Upper Rain Garden Dave Dyke

St. Francis Lower Rain Garden Dave Dyke

Test Area St. Francis Infiltration Data, July 29, 2011 Soil Moisture % Time Elapsed @ 1" (m:sec) Upper Basin Time Elapsed @ 2" (m:sec) Time Elapsed @ 3" (m:sec) Total Minutes Elapsed in/min in/hr 1 37 N/A 1:38 2:36 2.600 1.154 69.23 2 10 N/A 0:24 0:42 0.700 4.285 257.14 3 56 0:30 1:35 2:51 2.850 1.053 63.16 4 20 N/A 0:46 1:26 1.433 2.094 125.61 5 83 N/A 1:20 2:15 2.250 1.333 80.00 6 64 0:46 1:34 2:27 2.450 1.225 73.47 Average 45 111.44 Dave Dyke Sand: 50% Compost: 50% Topsoil: 0%

St. Francis Infiltration Data, July 29, 2011 Test Area Soil Moisture % Time Elapsed @ 1" (m:sec) Lower Basin Time Elapsed @ 2" (m:sec) Time Elapsed @ 3" (m:sec) Total Minutes Elapsed in/min in/hr 1 116 N/A 3:15 5:05 5.083 0.590 35.41 2 114 N/A 4:17 6:37 6.617 0.453 27.20 3 46 2:05 6:29 10:02 10.033 0.299 17.94 4* 68 N/A 2:58 N/A N/A 0.071 4.25 5 78 N/A 1:50 3:03 3.050 0.984 59.02 6 23 1:36 3:22 5:07 5.117 0.586 35.18 Average 67.5 29.74 *14:19 @ 1.125"; 16:03 @ 1.250"; 26:58 @ 2"; 30:00 @ 2.125" Dave Dyke Sand: 50% Compost: 40% Topsoil: 10%

Summary of Infiltration Rates at 6 Bio-infiltration Sites Site Brazee Zoo Education Center Zoo New Entrance Immanuel Church St. Francis Upper (North) St. Francis Lower (South) Bio-Soil Urban complex (existing clay & gravel) 60 shredded top soil : 30 pine fines : 10 compost 60 shredded top soil : 30 pine fines : 10 compost 50 Sand : 40 Compost : 10 Topsoil 50 Sand : 50 Compost 50 Sand : 40 Compost : 10 Topsoil Average infiltration rate (in/hr) 7.31 26.55 29.50 35.67 111.44 29.74 Dave Dyke