UK Committee on Climate Change: Emission Scenarios & Targets Brian Hoskins Imperial College London Department of Meteorology 1
UK Climate Change Bill (Nov 2008) Commitment to reduce CO2 emissions by at least 60% (80%) from 1990 levels by 2050 Established system of legally binding carbon budgets Established the CCC as an independent body to provide expert advice on budget levels and the policies to reach them 2
Climate Change Committee: Responsibilities Recommend 2050 CO 2 target: 60%, 80%, or other First 3 CO 2 budgets: 2008-12, 2013-2017, 2018-2022 ( 26%) How much buy-in of credits allowed Whether & how international aviation & shipping should be included Budgets for CO 2 or all GHGs Identify implications of proposed budgets for Competitiveness Security of supply Fuel poverty Fiscal revenues The regions Ancillary environmental effects Annual reports on Progress against budgets www.theccc.org.uk Extent of borrowing/banking Other? 3
The First CCC Report, Dec 2008 Building a Low-Carbon Economy The UK's Contribution to Tackling Climate Change Pt. I: Setting the target 1. Setting 2. Meeting Contents Pt. II: Setting & meeting the first 3 budgets 3. Summary 4. C markets 5. Decarb elec 6. Building & industry 7. Transport Pt III: Extending the carbon budget framework? 8. International aviation & shipping 9. Non CO 2 GHG Pt IV: Wider economic & social considerations 10 Competitiveness 11. Econ costs & fiscal 12. Fuel poverty 13. Security 14. Nations Pt V: Synthesis & recommendations 4
IPCC A1B Surface Temperature & Precipitation Projections Dec-Feb and June-Aug: 2090s relative to 1980-99 5
CCC Climate Change Emission Scenario Criteria For the maximum temperature rise in the 21 st Century 1. The 50:50 level should be close to 2ºC 2. The probability of reaching 3-4ºC should be very low MAGICC model with a range of possible values for 3 crucial parameters: climate sensitivity, ocean diffusivity, & carbon cycle feedback Modelling runs performed by Jason Lowe (UK MetO Hadley Centre) 6
Kyoto GHG emissions trajectories designed by the CCC Peak in emissions around 2028 or 2016. Subsequent reductions in CO 2 emissions range from 1.5% to 4% per year. Other Kyoto gas emissions are reduced at consistent rates, with consideration of the ultimate emissions floor that might be reasonably reached. 80 70 60 80 70 GtCO 2 e 50 40 30 20 10 2028:3% 2028:1.5% A1B GtCO 2 e 60 50 40 30 20 10 2016:4% 2016:3%low 2016:3%high 2016:1.5% A1B 0 0 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 Year Peak 2028 CO 2 emissions reducing at 1.5% or 4%. Year Peak 2016 CO 2 emissions reducing at 1.5%, 3% or 4%. 2016:3% and 2016:4% were also given lower emissions floors 7
Some projected CO 2 e concentrations 700 650 2028:3%high 700 650 2016:3%high ppm CO 2 e ppm CO 2 e 600 550 500 450 400 350 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 Year 2016:3%low 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 Year 90th percentile central model estimate 10th percentile 90th percentile central model estimate 10th percentile ppm CO 2 e ppm CO 2 e 600 550 500 450 400 350 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 Year 2016:4%low 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 Year 90th percentile central model estimate 10th percentile 90th percentile central model estimate 10th pecentile 8
Examples of projected global mean temperatures 2016:1.5%high 2016:4%low C above pre-industrial 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 90th percentile central model estimate 10th percentile C above pre-industrial 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 90th percentile central model estimate 10th pecentile Year Year 9
Cumulative probability distributions of global mean temperature increase by 2100 Chance of exceeding... Probability of exceedence 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 2028:3% 2028:1.5% Probability of exceedence 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 2016:4% 2016:3% 2016:1.5% Global mean temperature increase by 2100 ( C) Global mean temperature increase by 2100 ( C) 10
Preferred trajectories: emissions target for 2050 CCC 2008 Emissions Kyoto gas emissions (GtCO 2 e) 2050 emissions cut, from trajectory 1990 2007 2050 1990 2007 2016:3% 36.1 48.1 23.9 34% 50% 2016:4% 36.1 48.1 19.6 46% 59% GtCO 2 e 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Broadly in line with the G8 commitment to halve emissions by 2050. 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2016:4% 2016:3%low 2016:3%high 2016:1.5% A1B Cumulative emissions perspective Years Gt CO 2 e Tt Ce 1990-2008 800 0.22 1990-2050 2420-2540 0.66-0.69 1990-2100 3000-3200 0.82-0.87 Year 11
Some 50:50 2C Scenarios Bexamples of oelow 2 C in 2100 with greater than 50% chance of remaining below this Jason Lowe Peak emissions in 2014, 2016, 2020 Reduction rates at least 3% per year Later peak needs stronger post-peak reduction rates and/or lower/zero long-term emissions 12
Prob(T>2C) vs. cumulative emissions Jason Lowe Prob (T>2C) Cumulative emissions, 2000-2050 (GtCO2e) 13
Cumulative Carbon Perspective Summary. Myles Allen Likely & very likely confidence intervals on peak CO 2 -induced warming, A09 (left and lower axes). Likely & very likely intervals on probability of temperatures >2 o C, M09 (right and upper axes). Very likely interval on peak o C/TtC from Matthews et al (2009). Likely interval on 1750-2500 emissions giving 2 o C, Zickfeld (2009) UKCCC recommended budget: 2,100 GtCO 2 e over 1990-2050. 0.96 TtC 1750-2500. 50% chance of exceeding 2 o C. WBGU recommended budget: 750GtCO 2 over 2010-2050 0.75 TtC 1750-2500. 30% chance of exceeding 2 o C. 14
Preferred trajectories: emissions target for 2050 CCC 2008 Emissions Kyoto gas emissions (GtCO 2 e) 2050 emissions cut, from trajectory 1990 2007 2050 1990 2007 2016:3% 36.1 48.1 23.9 34% 50% 2016:4% 36.1 48.1 19.6 46% 59% GtCO 2 e 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Broadly in line with the G8 commitment to halve emissions by 2050. 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 Year 2016:4% 2016:3%low 2016:3%high 2016:1.5% A1B Cumulative emissions perspectiveb Years Gt CO 2 e Tt Ce 1990-2008 800 0.22 1990-2050 2420-2540 0.66-0.69 1990-2100 3000-3200 0.82-0.87 2.1-2.6 tco 2 e per capita in 2050 15
UK CO 2 e emission targets 900 800 700 600 Including aviation and shipping Interim 42% below 1990 in 2020 (31% below 2005) 34% below 1990 in 2020 (21% below 2005) 500 400 300 200 100 Intended if Copenhagen successful 2050 Target MtCO2e emissions Interim (no IAS) Interim budgets accepted by UK Government & Parliament MtCO2e emissions Intended (no IAS) Total including IAS 0 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 Year 16
Meeting required reductions in UK Reducing power sector emissions: Renewables (Wind, solar, tidal and marine, biomass), nuclear, CCS Application of power to transport and heat Reducing transport emissions: Fuel efficiency Electric/plug-in hybrids Bio fuels (first vs. second generation) Reducing heat emissions: Energy efficiency Lifestyle change Electric heat (e.g. heat pumps, storage heating) Biomass boilers CCS in industry 17
UK sectoral CO 2 emissions for 80% reduction at 2050 (MARKAL) 18
Feasible emissions reductions in UK Power Sector CCC 2008 Carbon-intensity of electricity (gco 2 /kwh) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Total electricity generation (TWh) Renewable and nuclear Preparation for CCS Required policies - EU ETS development - CCS demonstration - Price/non-price policies to drive renewables Carbon-intensity Total generation 19
Meeting carbon budgets The need for a step change Progress report to Parliament Committee on Climate Change, October 2009 www.theccc.org.uk 20
Focus of report Monitoring framework: forward indicators as well as emission results Impact of recession: distinguishing cyclical from underlying trends Fine tuning estimates of feasible emissions reductions Trends over last five years (2003-2007) compared with reductions now required 21
Future UK CO2 emissions MtCO 2 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 Total CO 2 emissions Historic Extrapolation Required path 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 CO 2 emissions fell 0.5% annually 2003-07 Cuts of 2-3% p.a. are required through first three budgets A major shift in the pace of reduction is therefore required across all sectors Need for a step change in rate of emissions reduction 22
Overall Conclusions of October Report Recession induced emissions reductions could: Produce over rosy impression of progress Undermine long-term progress through lower carbon price Recent progress (2003-2007) far slower than we now require Step change essential 23
Future work of UK CCC Report on Aviation (2050 back to 2005) Reconsider targets & set 2023-2027 GHG target Non CO2 GHGs Incorporation of International Aviation & Shipping Annual Progress Report to Parliament on attainment of targets 24