Strategies for Continuous Mars Habitation with a Limited Number of Cycler Vehicles

Similar documents
Lecture L17 - Orbit Transfers and Interplanetary Trajectories

Does currently available technology have the capacity to facilitate a manned mission to Mars?

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

G U I D E T O A P P L I E D O R B I T A L M E C H A N I C S F O R K E R B A L S P A C E P R O G R A M

Name: Earth 110 Exploration of the Solar System Assignment 1: Celestial Motions and Forces Due in class Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2015

IAC-04-A Design of Low-Thrust Gravity-Assist Trajectories to the Outer Planets

Trajectory design for the Solar Orbiter mission

Can Hubble be Moved to the International Space Station? 1

Section 4: The Basics of Satellite Orbits

Interplanetary Travel. Outline. In This Section You ll Learn to...

Chapter 2. Mission Analysis. 2.1 Mission Geometry

IAC-10.C1.7.5 DIRECT TRANSCRIPTION OF LOW-THRUST TRAJECTORIES WITH FINITE TRAJECTORY ELEMENTS

WEIGHTLESS WONDER Reduced Gravity Flight

Astromechanics Two-Body Problem (Cont)

Overview of Mission Design for NASA Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission Concept IEPC

On the Preliminary Design of Multiple Gravity-Assist. Trajectories

Copyright 2015 ANSER. All rights reserved. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of ANSER

Version A Page The diagram shows two bowling balls, A and B, each having a mass of 7.00 kilograms, placed 2.00 meters apart.

The µtorque Momentum-Exchange Tether Experiment

Trajectory Design with STK/Astrogator. New Horizons Mission Tutorial

The University of Texas at Austin. Gravity and Orbits

The Gravitational Field

A = 6561 times greater. B. 81 times greater. C. equally strong. D. 1/81 as great. E. (1/81) 2 = 1/6561 as great.

VASIMR Human Mission to Mars

2. Orbits. FER-Zagreb, Satellite communication systems 2011/12

Astronomy 1140 Quiz 1 Review

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

Orbit Transfers for Dawn s Vesta Operations: Navigation and Mission Design Experience

Satellites and Space Stations

ADVANCED TOPICS IN ASTRODYNAMICS GRAVITATIONAL ASSISTED TRAJECTORIES

Orbital Mechanics. Angular Momentum

Planetary Orbit Simulator Student Guide

The Lunar L 1 Gateway: Portal to the Planets

Newton s Law of Universal Gravitation

EDMONDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASTRONOMY 100 Winter Quarter 2007 Sample Test # 1

Newton s Law of Gravity

Lecture L14 - Variable Mass Systems: The Rocket Equation

EN4 Dynamics and Vibrations. Design Project. Orbital Design for a Lunar Impact Mission. Synopsis

MISSION DESIGN AND OPERATIONS CONSIDERATIONS FOR NASA S LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER

Unit 8 Lesson 2 Gravity and the Solar System

astronomy A planet was viewed from Earth for several hours. The diagrams below represent the appearance of the planet at four different times.

The Space Shuttle: Teacher s Guide

TITAN EXPLORER ENTRY, DESCENT AND LANDING TRAJECTORY DESIGN

Penn State University Physics 211 ORBITAL MECHANICS 1

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

Orbital Mechanics. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design David L. Akin - All rights reserved

Mars Earth Return Vehicle (MERV) Propulsion Options

ORBITAL DISPERSION SIMULATION OF NEAR-EARTH OBJECT DEFLECTION/FRAGMENTATION BY NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS

A MONTE CARLO DISPERSION ANALYSIS OF A ROCKET FLIGHT SIMULATION SOFTWARE

The following questions refer to Chapter 19, (PAGES IN YOUR MANUAL, 7 th ed.)

Regolith-Derived Heat Shield for Planetary Body Entry and Descent System with In-Situ Fabrication

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

circular motion & gravitation physics 111N

Physics 2A, Sec B00: Mechanics -- Winter 2011 Instructor: B. Grinstein Final Exam

ORBIT DETERMINATION OF SATELLITES IN LUNAR ORBIT USING AN OPTIMAL SEQUENTIAL FILTER

TOPO Trajectory Operations Officer

DIN Department of Industrial Engineering School of Engineering and Architecture

Spacecraft Dynamics and Control. An Introduction

Maximizing Payload Mass Fractions of Spacecraft for Interplanetary Electric Propulsion Missions

Notes: Most of the material in this chapter is taken from Young and Freedman, Chap. 13.

Artificial Satellites Earth & Sky

Quasi-Synchronous Orbits

Educator Guide to S LAR SYSTEM El Prado, San Diego CA (619)

Mission Spacecraft and Operations Overview MAVEN Science Community Workshop December 2, 2012

To Uranus on Solar Power and Batteries

Spacecraft orbits and missions

Newton s Laws. Newton s Imaginary Cannon. Michael Fowler Physics 142E Lec 6 Jan 22, 2009

NASA Explorer Schools Pre-Algebra Unit Lesson 2 Student Workbook. Solar System Math. Comparing Mass, Gravity, Composition, & Density

Actuator Constrained Optimal Control of Formations Near the Libration Points

How To Understand The Theory Of Gravity

DIRECT TRANSCRIPTION OF LOW-THRUST TRAJECTORIES WITH FINITE TRAJECTORY ELEMENTS. Federico Zuiani

Orbital Mechanics and Space Geometry

Chang e-3 s Progress and Achievement 2/2014

1. Large ships are often helped into port by using two tug boats one either side of the ship. April 5, 1989 (Anchorage Daily News / Erik Hill)

Correct Modeling of the Indirect Term for Third-Body Perturbations

APOPHIS 2029 A UNIQUE MISSION OPPORTUNITY

Elements of Physics Motion, Force, and Gravity Teacher s Guide

USING MS EXCEL FOR DATA ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION

Look at Our Galaxy. by Eve Beck. Space and Technology. Scott Foresman Reading Street 2.1.2

Solar System Observations contains two components: Planetary Astronomy and Near Earth Object Observations.

SPACE EXPLORATION BYU Merit Badge PowWow Official Merit Badge Worksheet

HIGH AREA-TO-MASS RATIO AND SMALL LENGTH-SCALE SPACECRAFT FORMATION FLYING APPLICATIONS

Orbital Dynamics: Formulary

A Comparison of Methods for the Mars Sample Return Mission

Space Shuttle Mission SPACE SHUTTLE SYSTEM. Operation. Luca d Agostino, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Università di Pisa, 2010/11.

Lecture 19: Planet Formation I. Clues from the Solar System

Small Satellite LEO Maneuvers with Low-Power Electric Propulsion

4 Gravity: A Force of Attraction

Asteroid Deflection Theory: fundamentals of orbital mechanics and optimal control

Efficacy of the Dawn Vesta Science Plan

Astronomy 110 Homework #04 Assigned: 02/06/2007 Due: 02/13/2007. Name:

Lecture 13. Gravity in the Solar System

MINIMUM-TIME LOW-EARTH ORBIT TO HIGH-EARTH ORBIT LOW-THRUST TRAJECTORY OPTIMIZATION

MECH 5105 Orbital Mechanics and Control. Steve Ulrich Carleton University Ottawa, ON, Canada

Delimitation and Commercial Use of Outer Space. Sang-Myon Rhee Seoul National University March 28, 2011

The Two-Body Problem

Mission Design for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

From Aristotle to Newton

A Taxonomy for Space Curricula

Development of a Sun Synchronous. Conjunctions

Transcription:

Strategies for Continuous Mars Habitation with a Limited Number of Cycler Vehicles Damon Landau James M. Longuski October 2005 Prepared for Dr. Buzz Aldrin Starcraft Enterprises By Purdue University School of Aeronautics and Astronautics West Lafayette, IN 47907-2023

Introduction The appeal of traveling to Mars in a safe, comfortable, and (consequently) massive interplanetary transfer vehicle has produced much interest in cycler and semicycler trajectories. These trajectories replace propulsive maneuvers at Earth, Mars, or both with gravity assists, thereby transferring the ΔV requirements of the transfer vehicle to a smaller taxi vehicle. Thus as the ratio of transfer vehicle to taxi mass increases, cyclers and semi-cyclers could become less expensive than traditional missions (i.e. architectures without gravity assists). Assuming that the crew transits between Earth and Mars are short (at most one year) and that Mars is to be continuously inhabited, significant trades develop between the number of transfer vehicles, the duration the crew is away from Earth, and the trajectory ΔV requirements. While the trade space of cycler or semi-cycler missions has been examined in some detail, 1 12 the combination of cyclers with semi-cyclers (e.g. cycler out and semi-cycler in) has received comparatively little attention. To initiate a detailed analysis of cycler/semi-cycler architectures, three scenarios are presented: 1) one outbound cycler vehicle with one inbound cycler, 2) two outbound cyclers with one inbound cycler, and 3) a single semi-cycler vehicle. Modeling Assumptions All of the trajectories in this report are calculated in a circular coplanar model of the solar system. While cyclers and semi-cyclers have been propagated in a more accurate model, 9,11,12 a circular coplanar analysis provides average results. All gravity assists are modeled as instantaneous rotations of the V vector, and the minimum flyby altitude is 300 km above the planet s surface. Single-vehicle semi-cyclers are constrained to have a total time of flight (TOF) of less than one synodic period (780 days). The ΔV is minimized in all cases. One outbound vehicle and one inbound vehicle The outbound (Earth-Mars) transfer is achieved by the one-synodic period cycler shown in Fig. 1 (the Aldrin cycler). 4 Because this cycler repeats every synodic period, only one outbound vehicle is required. This cycler is based on a 2:1 Earth:spacecraft resonant transfer that is extended from 2 years to 2.14 years TOF. (This cycler orbit retains the two-year period of the 2:1 resonant trajectory.) A deep space maneuver (DSM) of 0.11 km/s near apoapsis is required each synodic period to maintain the Aldrin cycler trajectory. We note that increasing this DSM to 0.92 km/s would lower the Mars V to 6.9 km/s and lower the Earth V to 5.1 km/s. 2

Fig. 1 Outbound Aldrin cycler with transit TOF of 147 days. There is an inbound version of the Aldrin cycler, but the departure V at Mars is relatively large (i.e. 9.3 km/s in Fig. 1), which leads to prohibitive taxi masses. One solution (to reduce taxi mass) is to replace the inbound cycler with a Mars-Earth semicycler, which departs Mars, flies by Earth, then returns to Mars. There is potential for the V to decrease significantly because the Mars encounters are no longer constrained to be flybys and the TOF is no longer constrained to one synodic period. In order to minimize the number of vehicles, the semi-cycler TOF should be less than 780 days (26 months) so the same inbound vehicle can be used every opportunity. (We note that semi-cyclers with TOF longer than 780 days exist, but require more vehicles and less ΔV.) A trajectory that has the same period as Mars (687 days) and a periapsis equal to Earth s orbit provides a good initial guess for a Mars-Earth semi-cycler. Because the spacecraft and Mars share the same orbital period, the spacecraft will encounter Mars after one revolution as long as Earth does not perturb the orbit. However, judicious use of Earth s gravity will lower the ΔV required from the spacecraft. The total ΔV for this trajectory comprises the departure maneuver from Mars orbit, any DSMs, and the arrival maneuver into a parking orbit for reuse. The optimized trajectory is presented in Fig. 2, where the Earth flyby altitude is 300 km and the total TOF is 780 days. We note that if aerocapture is available, the DSM can be removed with an increase in arrival V to 7.9 km/s. 3

Fig. 2 Inbound Mars-Earth semi-cycler with transit TOF of 203 days. Because the TOF is one synodic period and the Mars-arrival and departure V are similar in Fig. 2, this semi-cycler can be molded into a cycler trajectory. The resulting cycler is presented in Fig. 3, where the ΔV includes the cycler DSM and the taxi departure maneuver at Mars. This one-synodic-period cycler is fundamentally different than the Aldrin cycler as it is based on a 1:1 resonance with Mars while the Aldrin cycler is based on a 2:1 resonance with Earth. In fact, the local minimum of the DSM ΔV for the cycler in Fig. 3 is 1.5 km/s while the local minimum for the Aldrin cycler is 0.11 km/s. Because the taxi V in Fig. 3 is acceptable and the ΔV for the cycler is less than that of the semi-cycler, we suggest using this new cycler for the inbound crew transfers. The mission timeline is provided with the radial distance plot in Fig. 4. The crew departs Earth on February 21, 2016 and arrives at Mars 147 days later. Because Mars is to be continuously inhabited, the crew skips the return opportunity on April 19, 2018 and stays on Mars an extra 780 days until June 7, 2020, when they board the inbound cycler for a 173 day trip to Earth. The total mission duration (for the crew) is 4.8 years (58 months) with 3.9 years (47 months) on Mars. 4

Fig. 3 New inbound cycler trajectory with transit TOF of 173 days and one-synodic period repeat time. Fig. 4 Radial distances of outbound and inbound cyclers. Closed circles denote planetary encounters and the vertical lines denote dates of opposition. 5

Two outbound vehicles and one inbound vehicle The scenario with two outbound cyclers is similar to the single cycler case, except the repeat time on the cycler trajectory is two synodic periods, requiring an extra transfer vehicle to complete an Earth-Mars transfer during every opportunity. This two-synodic period cycler is based on a 3:2 Earth:spacecraft resonant trajectory (1.5 year period) followed by a near 1.5 year Earth-Earth transfer (as in Fig. 5). The trajectory shifts between the 3:2 and 1.5:1.5 resonances via Earth gravity assists. This sequence requires zero deterministic ΔV (even in the more accurate elliptical-inclined solar system as shown in Ref. 9) and is thus a ballistic cycler. (We note that a ballistic inbound version of this cycler exists, but the Mars departure V reach approximately 8 km/s every 15 years.) The return (Mars-Earth) crew transfer is achieved by the single inbound cycler vehicle (Fig. 3). The mission sequence is therefore 150 days to Mars, 1,366 days (45 months) on Mars, then 173 days back to Earth. The total trip time is 4.6 years with 3.7 years on Mars. This sequence is provided in more detail in Fig. 6. Fig. 5 Outbound cycler trajectory with two-synodic period repeat time. 6

Fig. 6 Radial distances for two outbound cyclers and one inbound cycler. Closed circles denote arrival or departure flybys, open circles denote gravity assists, and vertical lines denote dates of opposition. One outbound and inbound vehicle We note that in Fig. 4 and Fig. 6, the outbound vehicle arrives at Mars a few months after opposition, while the inbound vehicle departs Mars a few months before opposition. As a result, the population on Mars is lower for several months each synodic period between the times that one crew departs and another one arrives. A possible solution is to squeeze the Mars departure and arrival dates together so that the new crew arrives shortly before the previous crew departs. In this scenario, only one vehicle is required because the outbound and inbound transits may be performed by the same vehicle. Moreover, if the Mars arrival and departure occur on the same day, there is a possibility to replace the parking orbit at Mars with a gravity assist that sends the transfer vehicle back to Earth. Such trajectories that depart Earth, flyby Mars, then arrive back at Earth are called Earth-Mars semi-cyclers, as opposed to Mars-Earth semi-cyclers, which have a Mars-Earth-Mars sequence. The trajectory in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 begins at Earth (say in a parking orbit) takes 356 days to reach Mars, then returns to Earth 356 days after a Mars flyby. Because the total TOF is less than one synodic period, a single transfer vehicle may be reused to provide trips to Mars every synodic opportunity. From Fig. 7 we see that this trajectory is reminiscent of a bi-elliptic transfer, where the vehicle follows a Hohmann transfer to a perihelion of about 0.8 AU, then a DSM pushes the aphelion to just above the orbit of Mars. A Mars gravity-assist rotates the line of apsides of this second ellipse, and the 7

transfer vehicle again drops to a perihelion of 0.8 AU before a second DSM lowers aphelion back to 1 AU. This trajectory was optimized to minimize the sum of the departure maneuver at Earth, any DSMs, and the injection maneuver into a parking orbit. The Mars flyby occurs at an altitude of 1,040 km. Fig. 7 Earth-Mars semi-cycler trajectory with one-synodic-period repeat time and 356-day transits between Earth and Mars. From Fig. 8 we note the Mars arrival and departure date occurs at opposition. The crew sequence begins on June 27, 2016 with a 356-day transfer to Mars. The crew remains on Mars for 780 days from June 7, 2016 until August 6, 2018. Then the crew departs Mars for another 356-day transfer to arrive at Earth on July 28, 2019. Here the total duration is 4.1 years with 2.1 years on Mars. We note that the transfer TOF can be reduced from 356 days to 300 days with an additional 0.3 km/s of ΔV, or reduced from 356 days to 265 days for an extra 1.5 km/s ΔV. This trade in transfer TOF reduces the total mission duration, but the Mars stay time remains constant at 2.1 years. On the other hand, the transfer TOF could be extended to 390 days, which would place the trajectory flight time at 780 days, or one synodic period. If the Earth departure and arrival maneuvers are replaced with gravity assists, then the semi-cycler becomes a cycler with 390-day Earth-Mars transits. Though this transit TOF is relatively long, only one cycler vehicle is required. Comparatively, if only one vehicle travels along the trajectory in Fig. 1 or Fig. 3, then either the inbound or outbound TOF would exceed 600 days. We do not investigate this cycler further in this report because the transfer times exceed one year and the ΔV is much greater than the DSMs of the other cyclers. 8

Fig. 8 Radial distance plot of the Earth-Mars semi-cycler in Fig. 7. denotes departure, denotes arrival, and denotes flyby. Vertical lines are dates of opposition. Discussion For a preliminary comparison of these three scenarios we examine the ΔV, flight time, and number of vehicles required by each. The one outbound vehicle with one inbound vehicle scenario only requires two transfer vehicles and is very similar to the Aldrin cycler. By starting with a different inbound seed trajectory, the undesirable launch V of 9.3 km/s with the inbound Aldrin cycler is reduced to 3.9 km/s with an extra 1.8 km/s of DSM ΔV required from the transfer vehicle each synodic period. While the DSM for the inbound cycler is relatively large, the ΔV is still less than that of Mars-Earth semi-cyclers. For the inbound cycler one complex (i.e. not off the shelf ) transfer vehicle and one complex propulsion system must be developed and maintained. (We postulate that building and maintaining the propulsion systems could be just as expensive as the transfer vehicles.) Because the outbound cycler requires periodic adjustments (DSMs) to maintain its orbit and perhaps to mollify the extreme taxi entry speeds, a complex propulsion system is required for the outbound transfer vehicle part of the time (perhaps three missions out of a seven mission cycle). Thus, the one outbound and one inbound vehicle scenario requires two reusable transfer vehicles and at least one, but probably two, reusable propulsion systems. Another option is to replace the outbound transfer vehicle and propulsion system with two transfer vehicles and no (complex) propulsion systems. (An off-the-shelf 9

system would perform small flyby targeting maneuvers.) The inbound transit is achieved by the inbound cycler in Fig. 3. In this scenario, three reusable transfer vehicles and one reusable propulsion system are required. The mission timeline is very close to that of the one outbound and one inbound vehicle scenario, so there is little difference in the time that the crew is away from Earth. The ΔV required from the transfer vehicles is less with two outbound cyclers than with only one, and the mass requirements of the taxis (e.g. upper stage and heatshield) are much less. The single inbound and outbound vehicle concept is a stark shift from the other two cycling scenarios. The key benefit is that only one transfer vehicle and propulsion system must be built and maintained. Also, the total time a crew is away from Earth is only 3.6 to 4.1 years compared to 4.6 to 4.8 years with the cyclers. However, in this scenario the ΔV far exceeds that of the cycler trajectories. The reduction in number of vehicles and mission duration must be balanced against the additional ΔV (with larger propulsion systems and more propellant mass) necessary to transport a crew to Mars and back each synodic opportunity. References 1 Rall, C. S., and Hollister, W. M., Free-Fall Periodic Orbits Connecting Earth and Mars, AIAA Paper 71-92, Jan. 1971. 2 Aldrin, E. E., Cyclic Trajectory Concepts, SAIC presentation to the Interplanetary Rapid Transit Study Meeting, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Oct. 1985. 3 Friedlander, A. L., Niehoff, J. C., Byrnes, D. V., and Longuski, J. M., Circulating Transportation Orbits between Earth and Mars, AIAA Paper 86-2009, Aug. 1986. 4 Byrnes, D. V, Longuski J. M, and Aldrin B., Cycler Orbit Between Earth and Mars, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 30. No. 3, May June 1993, pp. 334 336. 5 Bishop, R. H., Byrnes, D. V., Newman, D. J., Carr, C. E., and Aldrin, B., Earth-Mars Transportation Opportunities: Promising Options for Interplanetary Transportation, The Richard H. Battin Astrodynamics Conference, AAS Paper 00-255, College Station, TX, March 20 21, 2000. 6 Aldrin, B., Byrnes, D. V., Jones, R., and Davis, H., Evolutionary Space Transportation Plan for Mars Cycling Concepts, AIAA Space 2001 Conference and Exhibition, AIAA Paper 2001-4677, Albuquerque, NM, Aug. 28 30, 2001. 7 Chen, K. J., McConaghy, T. T., Okutsu, M., and Longuski, J. M., A Low-Thrust Version of the Aldrin Cycler, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AIAA Paper 2002-4421, Monterey, CA, Aug. 5 8, 2002. 8 Chen, K. J., Landau, D. F., McConaghy, T. T., Okutsu, M., Longuski, J. M., and Aldrin, B., Preliminary Analysis and Design of Powered Earth-Mars Cycling Trajectories, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AIAA Paper 2002-4422, Monterey, CA, Aug. 5 8, 2002. 9 McConaghy, T. T., Yam, C. H., Landau, D. F., and Longuski, J. M., Two-Synodic- Period Earth-Mars Cyclers with Intermediate Earth Encounter, AAS Paper 03-509, AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Big Sky, MT, August 4 7, 2003. To appear in the Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 10 Russell, R. P., and Ocampo, C. A., A Geometric Analysis of Half and Full- Revolution Return Trajectories via Planetary Flybys, AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics 10

Specialist Conference, AAS Paper 03-508, Big Sky, MT, Aug. 3 7, 2003. To appear in the Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 11 Landau, D. F. and Longuski, J. M., A Reassessment of Trajectory Options for Human Missions to Mars, AIAA Paper 2004-5095, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Providence, RI, August 16 19, 2004. 12 Chen, K. J., McConaghy, T. T., Landau, D. F., and Longuski, J. M., and Aldrin, B., Powered Earth-Mars Cycler with Three Synodic-Period Repeat Time, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 42, No. 5, September October 2005. 11