- long term public expenditure projections of for EU Member States Mandeep Bains* *The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission or its policy.
1. The projections exercise - institutional context and background. 2. The common demographic projection. 3. Ageing and expenditure on health and longterm care. 4. The main projections and the results. 5. Sensitivity of results.
To measure the budgetary implications: á pensions; á health and long-term care;? other age-related expenditures; and? revenues... but also the economic implications of ageing populations
l l l long-term public expenditure projections; comparable estimates; and for all Member States.
l l l health and long-term care expenditure separately; 2000-2050; and public expenditure only.
2000 2050 Fertility rate 1.5 1.7 Life expectancy male 75 80 female 81 85 Migration (millions) 660 630 Eurostat baseline scenario
Total population falls from 375 million in 2000 to 364 million in 2050. This fall in the population starts after 2020. Number of persons of working age (15 to 64) from 246 million in 2015 to 203 million in 2050.
Number of elderly persons (aged 65+) increases by 42 million in the coming decades. Number of very old (aged 80+) will triple from 14 million to 38 million.
250 Working age population 200 millions 150 100 Elderly population 50 Very elderly 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
2000 FEMALES 90+ 85-89 80-84 75-79 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 MALES 16,000,000 11,000,000 6,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 9,000,000 14,000,000
2050 FEMALES 90+ 85-89 80-84 75-79 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 MALES 16,000,000 11,000,000 6,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 9,000,000 14,000,000
But, big differences between countries: Large falls in population Italy (17%), Spain (11%) and Germany (8%) by 2050. Population growth in others: France (5%), the UK (4%), Luxembourg (29%) and Ireland (26%) by 2050.
BUT, there is considerable uncertainty over very long-term projections.
Public expenditure on health per head 20 United Kingdom Average expenditure per head expressed as a share of GDP per capita (%) 15 10 5 United Kingdom Spain France Austria Austria France Germany Belgium Finland Sweden Spain Netherlands Italy Denmark 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95+
Public expenditure on health per head Average expenditure per head expressed as a share of GDP per capita (%) 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Sw eden MALE Sw eden FEMALE 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95+ Age groups Belgium MALE Belgium FEMALE
Public expenditure on long-term care per head 100 90 Denmark Average expenditure per head expressed as a share of GDP per capita (%) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Sw eden Netherlands Finland Belgium Austria Italy 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95+ Age groups
Public expenditure on long-term care per head 100 Average expenditure per head expressed as a share of GDP per capita (%) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Denmark FEMALE Austria FEMALE 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95+ Age groups Denmark MALE Austria MALE
This pattern of expenditure across ages combined directly with the future population structure initially fuelled concerns about huge possible increases in expenditure. However, the situation is more complex.
For health expenditure: l l l the profiles can reasonably be expected to change over time; notably while people are living longer, they are also enjoying longer healthy lives ; and empirical research reveals that ageing has not been a significant driver of health expenditure.
For long-term care expenditure there are additional sources of uncertainty: l l l trends in disability; future changes in social models for care; and the share of institutional care versus care in the home.
So naïve projections made matching these expenditure profiles to future demographic projections would carry both significant upside and downside risks.
Using current age- and sex-specific expenditure estimates matched to future demographic projections despite their shortcomings!!
Two simple cost assumptions were used: 1. that expenditure per head grows at the same rate as GDP per capita each year; and 2. that expenditure per head grows at the same rate as GDP per worker (i.e. productivity) but the results over the long-term were quite similar.
TOTAL HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE HEALTH CARE LONG-TERM CARE 2000 the range of increase in per cent of GDP between 2000 and 2050 2000 the range of increase in per cent of GDP between 2000 and 2050 2000 the range of increase in per cent of GDP between 2000 and 2050 B 6.1% 2.1-2.4 5.3% 1.3-1.5 0.8% 0.8 DK 8.0% 2.7-3.5 5.1% 0.7-1.1 3.0% 2.1-2.5 D (1) 5.7% 1.4-2.1 EL (1) 4.8% 1.6-1.7 E (1) 5.0% 1.5-1.7 F 6.9% 1.7-2.5 6.2% 1.2-1.9 0.7% 0.5-0.6 IRL (2) 6.6% 2.5 5.9% 2.3 0.7% 0.2 I 5.5% 1.9-2.1 4.9% 1.5-1.7 0.6% 0.4 NL 7.2% 3.2-3.8 4.7% 1.0-1.3 2.5% 2.2-2.5 A 5.8% 2.8-3.1 5.1% 1.7-2.0 0.7% 1.0-1.1 P (1) 5.4% 0.8-1.3 FIN 6.2% 2.8-3.9 4.6% 1.2-1.8 1.6% 1.7-2.1 S 8.8% 3.0-3.3 6.0% 1.0-1.2 2.8% 2.0-2.1 UK 6.3% 1.8-2.5 4.6% 1.0-1.4 1.7% 0.8-1.0 EU (w e ighte d average) (3) 6.6% 2.2-2.7 5.3% 1.3-1.7 1.3% 0.9-1.0
l l l increases in total public expenditure on care in the range of 1.7 to 3.9 per cent of GDP; largest increases for Member States with high spending on long-term care; and increases for long-term care of around 70% and of 30-40 % for health care.
l increases in the range of 0.7 to 2.3 percentage points of GDP; and l three Member States, (Germany, Ireland and Austria) see increases of around or above 2 percentage points of GDP.
l l l increases in the range of 0.2 to 2.5 percentage points of GDP; two distinct groups of Member States - countries with a tradition of formal care have high projected increases; but, other countries may not escape high actual increases in the future.
Baseline scenario High life expectancy scenario 2000 2050 2050 Life expectancy male 75 80 85 female 81 85 89 Eurostat
For health care: l the additional pressure is not very great - between 0.1 and 0.6 pp of GDP by 2050. For long-term care: l l for high-spending countries, the increase could be up to 1.2 pp by 2050; but much lower for for low-spending countries.
Increases in expenditure by 2050 Health care Long-term care Low cost growth variant +0.1 to +0.9 +0.3 to +1.7 Baseline +0.8 to +1.7 +0.4 to +2.2 High cost growth variant +1.6 to +2.7 +0.5 to +2.9
Other drivers of expenditure - historical 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Retrojection for BELGIUM assuming expenditure growth of GDP per capita Retrojection for BELGIUM assuming expenditure growth of GDP per worker Actual historical macro data for BELGIUM Actual historical data for the UK Retrojection for the UK assuming expenditure growth of GDP per capita 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 Public expenditure on health and long-term care - % GDP
Using past cost trends to project future expenditures - Belgium 8% 7% Projection using past trends to project future trends Public expenditure on health care % GDP 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% Baseline projection using GDP per capita cost assumption 1% 0% 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Using estimates of health expenditure related to proximity of death 8 7 SWEDEN Baseline scenario SWEDEN Death-costs scenario Public expenditure on health care % GDP 6 5 4 3 2 ITALY Baseline scenario ITALY Death-costs scenario NETHERLANDS Baseline scenario NETHERLANDS Death-costs scenario 1 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
A scenario of improving health for long-term care projections Public expenditure on long-term care % GDP 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% FINLAND baseline scenario ITALY baseline scenario BELGIUM - improving health FINLAND improving health UK baseline scenario UK improving health BELGIUM baseline scenario ITALY improving health 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
The baseline projections show that: l l the impact of ageing on public expenditure could be significant; for most countries increases in health expenditure are not large in relative terms, unlike increases in long-term care;
but, there are upside and downside risks... Î the impact of other cost drivers; Ï alternative models of the relationship between age and expenditure; and the sensitivity analyses show that these risks are significant.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_ finance/epc/epc_ageing_en.htm