Water Plants. A Case for Preserving Wisconsin s Aquatic Plants

Similar documents
How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Clean, Drain, Dry! Activity

Pledge Supporting NJ Wildlife Action Plan

Biodiversity Concepts

Pond Vocabulary Words and Meanings

Taking the Classroom Outside By Ashley Schopieray

Natural surface water on earth includes lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, estuaries, seas and oceans.

How To Manage Your Land

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

The Colorado River Delta

Ecosystems and Food Webs

A Manager s Definition of Aquatic Plant Control

Ecology 1 Star. 1. Missing from the diagram of this ecosystem are the

MINNESOTA S NATURAL HERITAGE

Controlling Invasive Plants and Animals in our Community

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

PROCEDURE. See: Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands (

Use: Cooperative farming as a habitat management tool to enhance and restore refuge grasslands

Lesson 4: What Makes Water Healthy?

Life in a Pond. Page 1 of 5. Grade Levels K-5

Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes. Method

Integration of Forestry & Wildlife Management

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

The concepts developed in this standard include the following: Oceans cover about 70% of the surface of the Earth.

Pest Control Methods and Tips

Grade Level Expectations for the Sunshine State Standards

Urban Waters and River Restoration. Pinja Kasvio, Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE RESTORE North Region Closing Seminar 14.8.

The Everglades & Northern Estuaries; St. Lucie River Estuary, Indian River Lagoon & Caloosahatchee Estuary. Water Flows & Current Issues

Did you know that many of

Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) in Virginia Beach, Virginia. The Resource Protection Area (RPA) and Buffers The First 100 Feet

TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...1 Purpose of a Comprehensive Plan...1 McKenzie County Comprehensive Plan...1 Definitions...2 Goal...2 Vision...

The Nature Conservancy Offering Protected Lands for Sale in the Adirondacks Sustainable Forestry to Continue

Non-consumptive use of wildlife. Non-consumptive Use. Non-consumptive Use

The St. Lucie River is 35 miles long and has two major forks, the North Fork and the South Fork. In the 1880s, the system was basically a freshwater

Wetland Vocabulary Organizer

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

American Forest Foundation (AFF) Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification

Section 401 Water Quality Certification

Land Protection Planning for the National Wildlife Refuge System

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS & BIOMES

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

MiCorps 101. Presented by Paul Steen. MiCorps Program Manager

Nipigon Bay. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER QUALITY PROTECTION AND RESTORATION PROGRAM AND LAND STEWARDSHIP INITIATIVES INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

NYS DEC s Regulation of Invasive Species Management Programs

Hiring a Consulting Forester Jeff Martin

New York Sea Grant Strategic Plan

7/8/2015. Phragmites.org 1. Clay Township Phragmites Management Program July SEMCOG and Ducks Unlimited survey around Lake St.

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

Life in the Bay Getting to know the Bay s plants and animals

Lesson 1. Objectives: ocus: Subjects:

Shoreland Property. a guide to environmentally sound ownership

13. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/ RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

3. Which relationship can correctly be inferred from the data presented in the graphs below?

Total Suspended Solids: The Hows & Whys of Controlling Runoff Pollution

WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ACT MEMO

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will invest $15 million for post-sandy cleanup and marsh restoration on Long Island

Discover Entomology. Discover Entomology. A Science, a Career, a Lifetime. A Science, a Career, a Lifetime

TOPIC BILL FORMAT CHANGES (underline = additions; strikethrough = deletions) RATIONALE

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY

Resources, Publications, Tools, Input from AWCC

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

SAMPLE VISION, MISSION AND PURPOSE STATEMENTS

Wetlands by Leslie Cargile

Phosphorus. Phosphorus Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management.

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC

ENDANGERED AND THREATENED

Species-of-the-Week. Blanding s Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) Species of Special Concern in Michigan

Public Land Management and Interdependent Collection of Programs

Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems

Chapter 3 Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

High Conservation Value Forests 3.1. Old Growth Forests. Management & Monitoring Framework

CORPORATE POLICY STATEMENT NO. 12 MANAGEMENT OF PEST ANIMALS

Laws of Minnesota 2009 Final Report

Compilation of Upper Mississippi River System Science Questions developed by the Long Term Resource Monitoring Program

Key Idea 2: Ecosystems

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Fisheries Management On Lake Vermilion In 2011

Myre-Big Island State Park

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

One Major Six Concentrations. Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Broken Arrow Public Schools AP Environmental Science Objectives Revised

Lesson 3: Fish Life Cycle

21st International Conference of The Coastal Society

Position Statement regarding Offshore Wind Proposals on Lake Huron. Lake Huron Centre for Coastal Conservation

Appendix A: Land Protection Plan

9.0 PUBLIC HEALTH (MOSQUITO ABATEMENT)

Thunder Bay. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Multiple Species Conservation Program County of San Diego. A Case Study in Environmental Planning & The Economic Value of Open Space

A Functional Classification System for Marine Protected Areas in the United States

Environmental Law Primer. Adapted from Vermont Law School s Environmental Law Primer for Journalists

AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES POSSESSION RULES

TESTIMONY OF DR. STEVEN BRADBURY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

How To Preserve Trees

Appendix B: Cost Estimates

Living on the Fox River

Transcription:

Water Plants A Case for Preserving Wisconsin s Aquatic Plants

A Tapestry of Life The core of life in all fresh water lakes is cradled in the shallow waters near shore. Much of a lake ecosystem depends on what happens in this shallow water. When parts of the lake, such as plants or wood, are removed from this shallow area, it is like removing a house in the neighborhood. The residents that once lived there can no longer return, and when enough homes are removed, and enough residents lost, the interactions that make the neighborhood a viable community cease, and the community fails. A community of aquatic plants is part of what makes a healthy lake ecosystem. We are beginning to see aquatic plants in a new light, for their beauty and ability to protect and nourish a lake. These plants are the binding thread in a watery tapestry of life. Attitudes Toward Plants Two forces have converged that reflect our changing attitudes toward aquatic plants in Wisconsin. One is a growing realization of the importance of a strong, diverse community of aquatic plants in a healthy lake ecosystem. The other is a rising concern with the spread of aquatic invasive plants, such as Eurasian water-milfoil. These two forces have been behind the changes in our aquatic plant management laws and the evolution of stronger support for the control of invasive aquatic plants. To some, these two issues may seem in opposition. However, on a closer look, they actually strengthen the case for developing an aquatic plant management (APM) plan as part of your total lake management picture. In the southern part of Wisconsin, plant management often consists of maintenance and restoration, while in northern Wisconsin, planning revolves around prevention and is closely linked with the local economy. Often lake property owners are told that a weedy lake can lower their property value. However, studies suggest that lakes with better water quality have higher property values, and plants help maintain high water quality. Aquatic plant planning may sound like a lot of work, but a solid plan can have long-term benefits for your lake and your community. Without a plan, you will still have the work, but not the benefits of measurable outcomes to guide you toward meeting your goals.

The Role of Aquatic Plants Aquatic plants create a thriving habitat for animals. Plant roots create networks that stabilize sediments at the water s edge. Plants are essential to the spawning success of many fish species. Plants provide refuge for near shore animals. Plants provide habitat for many non-game fish species that are often invisible to most people. Plants photosynthesize, creating life-giving oxygen to the animals that live in the littoral zone. Submersed plants absorb phosphorus and nitrogen over their leaf surface and through their roots, making nutrients less available for nuisance algae. Native aquatic plants can limit aquatic invasive plant growth. Plants, fruits and tubers provide food for mammals, waterfowl, insects and fish. Plant beds provide cover and nesting for marsh birds, songbirds and waterfowl.

A Plan for Plants A Balancing Act To promote the long-term sustainability of our lakes, the state of Wisconsin endorses the development of aquatic plant management (APM) plans, and supports creating them through various grant programs. You may wonder why you should be required to get a permit and have a plan before removing certain aquatic plants from public waters. Keeping the aquatic plant community healthy, while removing the invasive plants, is a difficult and challenging task. It is for that reason a well thought out plan is critical. Before a permit may be issued, the state requires the development of a longterm, integrated APM plan to identify important plant communities and guide the management of nuisance aquatic plants in lakes, ponds or rivers. In deciding to manage aquatic plants that grow in our waters, we are manipulating an ecosystem that belongs to the public. Our actions can affect not only the lake, but all people who use it.

An Investment for the Future Many lakes develop annual APM budgets that range from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars to improve recreational conditions on lakes. With such a large investment, it makes sense to have a well thought out plan to assure the money is spent wisely, and the lake and its users benefit. It is wise to create a plan that provides a framework for management into the future, with flexibility to adjust to annual changes in the plant community. We are experiencing a rapid change in scientific efforts to understand and manage aquatic invasive plants wisely and effectively. Permit costs may seem high at the local level, but they provide only a small portion of the total cost of aquatic plant management. The permit dollars assist in supporting Wisconsin s aquatic plant program and the specialists who work with communities to manage aquatic plants. These specialists must stay abreast of the latest research efforts to manage invasive plants, and are involved in bringing this information to the local level. Through permit fees, you re investing in your lake s future, and like any investment, it requires initial finances to promote a good return. Lake communities support, and investment of time, talents and dollars, is fundamental to ensure that Wisconsin s fresh water lakes remain rich, diverse centers of aquatic life for generations to come. Laws Wisconsin recognizes that aquatic plants are an important resource, fundamental to the ecological health of our waterways. In recent years, the state passed laws that represent some of the most significant changes to the Wisconsin s aquatic plant management in decades. Section 23.24 of the Wisconsin State Statutes, relating to aquatic plants, required the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to establish a program to Protect and develop diverse and stable communities of aquatic plants, regulate how aquatic plants are managed, and provide education and conduct research on invasive aquatic plants. The law also allows the department to require an APM plan. Plants on the Move In addition to having an APM plan, all persons using our state waters need to comply with the current state rules which prohibit the transporting of aquatic invasive species on boat trailers and other equipment. Please be aware that laws are continuously being updated. Several counties have already adopted stronger ordinances which prohibit the transport of any aquatic plants.

Do No Harm It is important to remember that plant communities can vary from lake to lake and from year to year. There are many techniques used for the management of aquatic plants that take these variations into consideration. Most native water plants do not need to be managed, they do just fine with little or no human assistance. The same could be said for invasive plants that are not preventing us from using the water. One of the key principles of APM in Wisconsin is to do no harm to the lake ecosystem. When Management is Used Often, management means protecting native plants by selectively hand pulling invasive plants that are found growing among the natives. Sometimes more intensive management may be needed, such as using harvesting equipment, herbicides or biological control agents on invasive plants. These methods require permits and extensive planning. Anyone doing APM should be aware that a permit may be needed to remove, add or control aquatic plants. Groups that may get involved in APM include lake associations, lake districts, contractors offering herbicide or harvesting services, lake management consultants, persons planning plant restoration projects, those proposing water drawdowns for plant control, or others managing, controlling or planting aquatic plants. While limited and small scale manual removal on individual properties is generally permitted, it is widely accepted that a lake will be much better off if all plants (native and invasive) are considered on a whole lake scale. Whole lake planning is routinely accomplished by lake organizations or units of government charged with the stewardship of individual lakes. One plant with special protection in Wisconsin is wild rice. Wild rice in public waters may not be damaged or removed, unless by special permit and review under state legal obligations to uphold treaty rights.

Wisconsin s Philosophy The waters of Wisconsin belong to all of us. Their management becomes a balancing act between the rights and demands of the public that do not live on the water and those who own property on the water s edge. This body of law, called the Public Trust Doctrine, dates back hundreds of years in North America and thousands of years in Europe. Its basic philosophy, with respect to the ownership of waters, was adopted by the American colonies. The US Supreme Court has found that the people of each state hold the right to all their navigable waters for their common use, such as fishing, hunting, boating and the enjoyment of natural scenic beauty. In deciding to manage aquatic plants, we should keep in mind this great trust and tradition our actions affect all people who use the waters. The impacts of humans on our state s waters over the past five decades have caused Wisconsin to evolve a certain philosophy toward aquatic plant management. This philosophy stems from the recognition that aquatic plants have value in the ecosystem, as well as from the awareness that, sometimes, excessive growth of aquatic plants can lessen our recreational opportunities and our aesthetic enjoyment of lakes. Balancing these sometimes competing objectives is a complicated task. The state is entrusted with the responsibility of managing the fish and wildlife resources, and their sustainable use, to benefit all Wisconsin citizens. Aquatic plants are also recognized as a natural resource to protect, manage, and use wisely. To assure we do not harm the lake ecology, it is important that plant management is undertaken as part of a long-range and holistic plan.

Wisconsin Lakes Partnership UW-Extension Lakes College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point 800 Reserve Street Stevens Point, WI 54481 www.uwsp.edu/cnr/uwexlakes 715-346-2116 uwexlakes@uwsp.edu Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 101 S. Webster Street PO Box 7921 Madison, WI 53707-7921 www.dnr.state.wi.us 608-261-6423 Carroll.Schaal@wisconsin.gov Wisconsin Association of Lakes 4513 Vernon BLVD, Suite 101 Madison, WI 53705-4964 www.wisconsinlakes.org 608-661-4313, 800-542-LAKE (5253) info@wisconsinlakes.org UW-Extension Publication AI-3867 DNR Publication WT-897 Photos by J. Klosiewski, R. Korth, F. Koshere, A. Kowalski, T. Lyden Cover photo by R. Korth Edited by E. Henegar, R. Korth, F. Koshere, A. Kowalski, Susan Knight Designed by A. Kowalski, UW-Extension Lakes