SPECIALLY DESIGNATED AREAS EFFECTS REPORT

Similar documents
Chapter 1: Purpose of and Need for Action

Revision of Land and Resource Management Plan for the Santa Fe National Forest;

NEZ PERCE-CLEARWATER FORESTS

Visitor information and visitor management

How To Understand National Park System

SAWTOOTH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA AND JERRY PEAK WILDERNESS ADDITIONS ACT

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Experience Summary. KINA MURPHY, M.S. Ecologist / Community Planner 9 Stone Ridge Road, Santa Fe, NM Cell: Education / Training

PhD, 2002 Colorado State University Human dimensions of natural resources. M.S., 2000 Colorado State University Human dimensions of natural resources

Transportation Research Needs in National Parks: A Summary and Exploration of Future Trends

The Taos Valley lies between the Sangre de Cristo Mountains and the Rio

Gunnison Basin Wild and Scenic Stakeholder Group Delta Performing Arts Center, 822 Grand Ave., Delta Colorado December 6, 2010, 7:00 p.m.

Environmental Assessment for Travel Management on the Magdalena Ranger District

825 Babock Court Raleigh, North Carolina March 7, 2014

APPENDIX B: TRAIL DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

Appendix K: Law Enforcement

File Code: Date: June 24, 2013 Subject: Mulberry River Watershed Improvement and Access Project

Public Survey for Phase I

Legislative Counsel s Digest: Sections 1-8 Section 9

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

Water Security in New Mexico: Vision for the Middle Rio Grande and Forested Watersheds. Anne Bradley Forest Conservation Program Manager

Decision Memo. Restore Act Land Acquisition

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 5, 2015

RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION

Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

6 Wilderness Preservation and Management

RESPONSE TO SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION OF FEBRUARY 27, 2012

Dear Mr. Lawrence, Thank you for your attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted,

Land and Resource Management Plan Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests

FINAL REPORT ON DOT WORKSHOP, Integrating Stream Restoration Principles & Transportation Maintenance

The Colorado College State of the Rockies Project:

2015 BEAR HUNTING REGULATIONS

Chapter 3 Planning Issues, Opportunities, and Constraints

U. S. Department of Energy. National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Area Office th Street Los Alamos, NM 87544

The Nature Conservancy Offering Protected Lands for Sale in the Adirondacks Sustainable Forestry to Continue

Appendix I: Recreation and Visitor Services Market Analysis for the Kobuk-Seward Peninsula Planning Area

Marchand Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests 2013 Flood: Long-term Recovery in a Changed Landscape

Tuolumne Wild and Scenic River

Wilderness Designations and Land Use Plans For California

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Photo by Jeff Thibodeau, Helios Land Design

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 131 FERC 62,175 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. United Water Conservation District Project No.

Upper Deschutes Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement

National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Hispanic-Serving Agricultural Colleges and Universities

September 25, Dear Concerned Citizen:

M E M O R A N D U M. April 15, Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Committee

Off-road Vehicle Regulation. discussion paper

Demand for Natural Gas*

COVER SHEET and NOTICE OF COMPLETION of DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

U.S. Department of Justice. March 11, 2014

Town of Snowmass Village. PO Box Or Delivered To: 1 P a g e

North Face. South Face. Figure Science Park Station Exteriors. Pg 1-3 MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

USDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents

Inter-agency communications and coordination in developing the SCORP should be substantially strengthened.

4. Priority Areas of Conservation

The Albert J. and Mary Jane Black Institute for Environmental Studies

APPENDIX B: COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES OF IDAHO SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED.

Proposed Modification and Establishment of Restricted Areas; Townsend, GA

Monitoring Campsite Proliferation And Site Management

Multiple Species Conservation Program County of San Diego. A Case Study in Environmental Planning & The Economic Value of Open Space

Summary of the Second College Grant Master Plan

Rio Hondo Application Workshops (RIO DAYS) (Apply to Rio Hondo College, assist students with FAFSA and Dream Act)

FWS Cultural Resource Management Planning

PROPOSAL FOR HOUSTON COUNTY BAN ON SILICA SAND MINING / PROCESSING ACTIVITY. Introduction and Assumptions

Investigators should attempt to answer the following questions:

CONTENTS ABSTRACT. KEYWORDS:. Forest ownership, forest conversion.

Phase II of Homestake Water Project

Federal Requirements for Statewide Transportation Plans

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

Untreated (left) and treated (right) Sierra Nevada forests in Amador County, CA. Photos: Sierra Nevada Conservancy

SMALL LOAN COMPANY LICENSE

King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction

Appendix B REFERENCES

Statement of Purpose: Perfect R.S rights providing public access to public lands while protecting private property rights.

Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping and to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for

DRIVER S LICENSE RESTORATION

III. Vision and Goals

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

Why should you care about the Arizona Water Settlements Act?

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Mantua Creek, Paulsboro, NJ. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the operating regulation

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

High Conservation Value Forests 3.1. Old Growth Forests. Management & Monitoring Framework

River Restoration Activities in the Rio Grande Canalization Flood Control Project. Upper Rio Grande Citizens Forum Elizabeth Verdecchia July 19, 2012

Industry Administration - A Summary of the Draft Concession Contract

& Comprehensive Plan Updates

New Mexico State Publications Program

Federal Lands Alternative Transportation Systems Study

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Farm Service Agency Washington, DC 20250

Lompoc City Council Agenda Item APPLICATION APPROVAL FOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE GRANTS FUNDS

Potential Economic Benefits to Santa Ana River Watershed of Forest Restoration. Barbara Wyse, Senior Economist

COLORADO PLATEAU COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT THREE TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between NAVAJO NATION

How To Get A Parkland Permit

Chapter 4. Consultation and Coordination

Proposal Brief: The Greater Grand Canyon Heritage National Monument February, Introduction

2d Session TRAIL OF TEARS NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL. Filed, under authority of the Senate of April 7, 2006

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

Transcription:

SPECIALLY DESIGNATED AREAS EFFECTS REPORT CAMINO REAL RANGER DISTRICT TRAVEL MANAGEMENT Carson National Forest Taos, Rio Arriba, Colfax, and Mora Counties New Mexico /s/ Kathryn Furr Sept 25, 2013 KATHRYN FURR Date East Zone NEPA Coordinator

Wilderness The Camino Real Ranger District (RD) contains a portion of the Pecos Wilderness Area (24,735 acres). The Wilderness Act and the Carson and Santa Fe forest plans under which the area is managed require these areas to be managed for high quality primitive recreational opportunities. Motor vehicle use within the wilderness is prohibited. Inventoried Roadless Areas The Pecos Addition Inventory Roadless Area (IRA) (20,058 acres) is located on the Camino Real RD. This IRA is identified in the Carson forest plan as Management Area 20 - Semi-Primitive. It is managed to preserve its natural landscape characteristics and for semi-primitive motorized and nonmotorized recreation opportunities. Travel by wheeled vehicles is restricted to designated roads or trails. There are approximately 3.5 miles of designated motorized trails within the IRA. An additional 4,400 acres identified in the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation II (RARE II) is located along Comales Canyon south of State Highway 518 near Sipapu Ski and Summer Resort. The Carson NF manages this area to maintain the integrity of the area under the 2000 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (66 FR 3244-3273; USDA 2001). There are no roads or trails designated for motorized use within this area. None of the alternatives propose any changes that would affect motorized use in this area. Arellano Canyon Proposed Research Natural Area The 620 acre Arellano Canyon Area, on the Camino Real RD is identified in the Carson forest plan as Management Area 19 - Special Areas (USDA 1986c). Until a decision is made about this proposed RNA, it is managed to preserve the area in an unmodified condition for research and education. No new roads may be constructed and all off-road vehicle travel within the study area is prohibited. There is one existing system road within the RNA. Wild and Scenic Rivers The National Wild and Scenic Rivers System was created by Congress in 1968 (Public Law 90-542; 16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.) to preserve certain rivers with outstanding natural, cultural, and recreational values in a free-flowing condition for the enjoyment of present and future generations. The Act is notable for safeguarding the special character of these rivers, while also recognizing the potential for their appropriate use and development. It encourages river management that crosses political boundaries and promotes public participation in developing goals for river protection. There are no waterways classified as wild and/or scenic on the Camino Real RD. Wild and Scenic River Eligibility The National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was passed by Congress in 1968 (Public Law 90-542; 16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.). It established a National Wild and Scenic Rivers System and prescribed the methods and standards through which additional rivers may be identified and added to the system. Eligible rivers are free-flowing and possess certain outstandingly remarkable values including scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values. There were no wild, scenic, or recreational rivers designated under the act on the Camino Real RD. 3

Pursuant to Section 5(d)(1) of the act, the Secretary of Agriculture requires the Forest Service to evaluate rivers within its jurisdiction for their potential for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Evaluation of a river s potential as a wild and scenic river consists of the following 3-step process: 1. Determination of eligibility (inventory); 2. Potential classification - wild, scenic, or recreational (inventory); and 3. Determination of suitability (decision). In 1996, the Carson NF evaluated rivers on the Camino Real RD pursuant to the act. An eligibility and classification inventory was completed by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in wildlife, recreation, hydrology, and fisheries (USDA 1996). Fourteen of the 25 inventoried stream segments were considered eligible for designation in the National Wild and Scenic River System on the Camino Real RD. The eligible stream segments on the Camino Real RD and the outstandingly remarkable values for which they are noted are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Eligible Wild and Scenic River segments on the Camino Real RD River Name Rio Grande del Rancho Rio Grande del Rancho Rito de la Olla Middle Rio Pueblo Rito Alamitos Rito de la Presa & tributaries Rio Pueblo tributaries (La Cueva, Flechado, Gallegos,& Tio Maes) Rio Santa Barbara Rio Santa Barbara Rio Santa Barbara Warm Springs and Tierra Amarilla Cyn Arroyo Hondo Rio de las Trampas & Rio San Leonardo Rio Las Trampas Segment Reach Description From headwaters to Rito de la Olla From confluence of Rito de la Olla to forest boundary From headwaters to Rio Grande del Rancho From Rito Angostura to Osha diversion From headwaters to Alamitos diversion From headwaters to Rio Pueblo From La Presa to Osha diversion (near Camp Summerlife) From headwaters to Santa Barbara Campground From Santa Barbara Campground to concrete bridge on FR 116 From concrete bridge on FR 116 to forest boundary From headwaters to forest boundary From Serna Land Grant boundary to forest boundary From headwaters to their confluence From San Leonardo to forest boundary Length (miles) Outstandingly Remarkable Values 1 Class 2 S R G F W H C O 13-14 X X S 4-5 X X R 12-13 X X S 9-10 X H R 6-7 X W 13-17 X X R 7-10 X S 13-18 X X X X X X X W.5-1 X X X X R 1-2 X R 2-3 X X X W 1.5-2 X S 4-5 X X X X W 11-13 X X R

River Name Segment Reach Description Length (miles) Outstandingly Remarkable Values 1 Class 2 S R G F W H C O 1 S=Scenic, R=Recreational, G=Geologic, F=Fish, W=Wildlife, H=Historic, C=Cultural, O=Other 2 R= Recreational, W=Wild, S=Scenic The Carson NF amended its forest plan (amendment 12) to incorporate guidance on how to manage river segments deemed eligible through its forest-wide inventory (USDA 2002), but did not select eligible segments or identify which rivers the Forest Service would recommend to Congress for designation. Amendment 12 provides direction on protecting outstandingly remarkable values so as to not preclude an eligible river or river segment from eventually becoming a formal candidate for wild and scenic river designation. Before these waterways can be designated as components of the Wild and Scenic Rivers System, they must undergo a final suitability evaluation, including public involvement, and be designated by Congress. Environmental Consequences None of the alternatives propose any changes that would affect specially designated areas on the Camino Real RD. Motor vehicle use would continue to be prohibited in the Pecos Wilderness and the IRA along Comales Canyon. The existing motorized trails located within the Pecos Addition IRA and the existing road within the Arellano Canyon Proposed RNA would remain unchanged. The fourteen wild and scenic river segments and their outstandingly remarkable values would not be impacted by any of the travel management alternatives. 5

Literature Cited Behan, Jeffrey R.; Richards, Merton T.; Lee, Martha E. 2000. How do visitor density and anthropogenic change in front-country wilderness settings affect recreation benefits? In: Cole, David N.; McCool, Stephen F.; Borrie, William T.; O Loughlin, Jennifer, comps. 2000. Wilderness science in a time of change conference, Volume 4: Wilderness visitors, experiences, and visitor management; 1999 May 23-27; Missoula, MT. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-4. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. p. 63-68. USDA. 1986a. Environmental Impact Statement, Carson National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region. Albuquerque, NM. USDA. 1986b. Record of Decision for the Environmental Impact Statement, Carson National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region. Albuquerque, NM. USDA. 1986c. Carson National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (forest plan) as amended. USDA Forest Service, Carson National Forest. Taos, NM. USDA. 1996. Rivers or river segments on the Camino Real Ranger District evaluated for eligibility for possible inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic River System. Inventory. USDA. 2001 Roadless area conservation rule. 36 CFR Part 294. RIN 0596-AB77. Special Areas; Roadless Conservation. Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2001 / Rules and Regulations. USDA Forest Service. USDA. 2002. Decision Notice and Environmental Assessment for Carson Forest Plan Amendment 12: protection of eligible wild, scenic or recreational river areas. USDA Forest Service, Carson National Forest. Taos, NM. USDI 1982. National wild and scenic rivers system: final revised guidelines for eligibility, classification and management of river areas. Federal Register. Volume 47, Number 173. USDI National Park Service and USDA Forest Service. Washington, DC. September 1982.