How To Make A Missile Defense System More Effective

Similar documents
MEADS Open Architecture, 360 Missile Defense Capability Nears Test Phase

UNCLASSIFIED. For PEO Web Site. August Distribution A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. SS UNCLASSIFIED Page 1

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)

JLENS Overview. 9 May 2013 R AY T H E O N P R O P R I E TA R Y

The Boeing Company Strategic Missile & Defense Systems

COMBATSS-21 Scalable combat management system for the world s navies

PATRIOT MISSILE DEFENSE Software Problem Led to System Failure at Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

Seapower Capability Systems is Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems business area dedicated to the development and delivery of critical seapower

Mission Assurance for Unprecedented Missions

Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 Guided Missiles

Patriot System Performance. Report Summary

Nasams. Air Defence System.

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

GCC Missile Defense: A Threat

NOTE NATO Missile defence

The future of range instrumentation.

Lieutenant General Henry A. Obering III, USAF. Director, Missile Defense Agency. House Armed Services Committee

PAR-2000 GCA-2000 MPN-25 TASR MPN-14K MPN-26 (MACS) Gilfillan. Air Traffic Control

Holloman Air Force Base Mission and Flying Operations

STATEMENT BY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Delivering the most complete avionics modernization solution for H-60 and S-70 helicopters.

ELBIT SYSTEMS. Jefferies Global Industrials Conference - August Joseph Gaspar EVP & CFO

Using Spiral Development To Reduce Acquisition Cycle Times

An Overview of Romanian Command and Control Systems

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ARIES SAAS HELICOPTER CONTROL AND APPROACH RADAR

Fleet Ballistic Missile Eastern Range Operations Supporting Navy Testing and Deployment

Missile Defense Program Overview For The National Defense Industrial Association

primary SURVEILLANCE 3D RADAR

C-130 Recapitalization, Lockheed Martin Fleet Support Services

Electronic Warfare System Integrated Electronic Warfare System. Own the Enemy s Battlespace

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF ENHANCED AIR INSERTION OF THE BCT, SUCH AS BY VERTICAL ENVELOPMENT?

Rapheal Holder From Platform to Service in the Network Centric Value Chain October 23, Internal Information Services

Enabling Joint and Coalition Success: A Perspective from the System Provider RDML Jim Syring Program Executive Officer Integrated Warfare Systems

Edited extract from: Department of the Army Historical Summary, FY 1980 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1983, pp

Marine Air Command and Control System Handbook

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE N / Directed Energy and Electric Weapon System. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

United States Army Aviation & Missile Command Security Assistance Management Directorate IDEF

Nivel de Inglés Prueba de Suficiencia en Comprensión Lectora en Inglés Técnico

IAI/Malat Solutions for the Maritime Arena

Type selection of. DenMARK S new

UNCLASSIFIED PE D8Z

The key to C4ISR Interoperability. Partnering with Nations to achieve Connected Forces and NATO 2020 goals more efficiently

The Guidelines for U.S.-Japan Defense Cooperation April 27, 2015

RPAS for homeland security applications. Jean CARON Mission Air Systems Lima April 2012

TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #200

PEO MS OVERVIEW Tactical Missile Conference 2009

Advanced Electronics Company. Photonics Based ELINT for Interception and Analysis of Radar Signals

Position Descriptions. Aerospace

A Review of South Korean Missile Defense Programs

Venator -110 General Purpose Light Frigate Technical Brief

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

TechNet Land Forces South Small Business Opportunities. Carey Webster Director, Federal Information Solutions Deltek

Emerging Threats and Challenges for Homeland Air Security

CASSIDIAN Evolution of the Defence & Security business in EADS

3D LANZA FAMILY RADARS

Operation IMPACT (Injured Military Pursuing Assisted Career Transition)

Our long-term transformation strategy will exploit these tactical advances to achieve two key operational level objectives:

MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS. Delivering a Full Range of Integrated Planning Services

Marine Corps Tank Employment MCWP 3-12 (CD) Appendix F. Scout and TOW Platoons

Vice Admiral James D. Syring. Director, Missile Defense Agency. Senate Armed Services Committee. Subcommittee on Strategic Forces

Implementation of the DoD Management Control Program for Navy Acquisition Category II and III Programs (D )

U.S. Coast Guard Command, Control, Communication, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Modernization

Forecast to Industry 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #145

DRONE DETECTION RADAR

UDENRIGSMINISTERIET, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF DENMARK TECHNICAL MODERNISATION PLAN OF THE POLISH ARMED FORCES

3D LANZA RADAR FAMILY

Overview of Sensors and Detection Systems for Wildlife Hazard Management

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 22 R-1 Line #163

Major Contracts on Schriever Air Force Base

ARTAMIS Mission System. Mike Bell Lockheed Martin MST Tel: Fax:

Military Reliability Modeling William P. Fox, Steven B. Horton

AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration

Sea Eagle FCCT. Naval Electro-Optical Fire Control System

CUSTOMER KEYNOTE Hal Buddenbohm

The DoD CIO Charter:

Northrop Grumman Corporation

WATCHKEEPER X UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS)

Department of Defense. SUBJECT: Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS)

Rapid Prototyping: Leapfrogging into Military Utility

LaserLight Networks Inc.

120mm Mid Range Munition (MRM) ARDEC S&T Effort

Dr. David Burns Director for Science and Technology Advanced Technology Missile Defense Agency

AeroVironment, Inc. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Overview Background

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Sotas The world class multi-media vehicle system by Courtesy of Comonwealth of Australia

MODELING AND SIMULATION

Northrop Grumman ecatalog/purchasing Card Supplier Enablement Guide Global Procurement Services

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #165

FUSION PROCESSOR SIMULATION (FPSIM)

Transcription:

CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE MEADS Program Update February 2014 MEADS International, Inc. P.O. Box 691749 Orlando, FL 32869-1749 www.meads-amd.com G:/Communications/M014-3494 released via DVIDS 6 November 2013 CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE M014-3494-1

What Is MEADS? Tri-national air and missile defense (AMD) program for German, Italian, and US forces Designed to replace Patriot, Hawk, and Nike Hercules $3.4B EUSD contract signed 28 September 2004 Tri-national contractor team includes Lockheed Martin, MBDA Deutschland, and MBDA Italia Germany 25.0% Italy 16.7% US 58.3% MEADS co-development model lends itself to incorporation of new partners G:/Communications/M128-2242, per POF-2505-27015-OL, 3 March 2009 M014-3494-2

TARGET SET Key System Requirements TRANSPORTABILITY & MOBILITY OPERATING CONCEPTS Next-generation threats Tactical ballistic missiles/uavs Cruise missiles and aircraft Conventional/unconventional DEGREE OF PROTECTION Strategic and tactical airlift Continuous air and missile defense coverage for maneuver force Cross-country mobility INTEROPERABILITY Maneuver force protection Area defense Homeland defense Weighted asset protection NETTED DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE 360-degree coverage Defended area ABTs, TBMs Designed for coalition warfare Operational with a range of systems Dramatic improvement in combat effectiveness and situational awareness Plug-and-fight Open architecture Non-proprietary software Operational flexibility MEADS is the solution for challenging requirements not addressed in any single previous AMD system G:/Communications/M059-2367 per T-POF-3613-28295-OL 22 September 2009 and POF-2505-28440-OL 15 October 2009 M014-3494-3

HEU/C2 Systems (EO Only) Ground-Based ADS MEADS External Interfaces for Interoperability Airborne C3 Systems NATO ACCS JLENS MEADS Interfaces HEU/C2 Systems (EO & FO) Ground-Based ADS TOCs JTAGS/M3P Naval ADS SR TOC IRIS-T MFCR MEADS Plug-and-Fight Network Launcher Launcher Launcher Demonstrated interoperability with the NATO Air Command and Control System during JPOW G:/Communications/M059-2367 per T-POF-3613-28295-OL, 22 September 2009 M014-3494-4

MEADS Design and Development Program History 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Total Funding $3.5B Award SRR Requirements reviewed, updated, and revalidated Joint Project Optic Windmill (JPOW) PDR CDR 1 st Flight President s budget does not provide Post-CDR fund increase 1 Intercept Flights Joint Project Optic Windmill (JPOW) 2 2014 System Demos Program restructured into 2 phases with additional time and money needed for Post-CDR Phase Hardware designs approved; proceed with fabrication and testing 360º Launch (LMCT) 360º ABT Intercept (FT-1) 360º TBM/ ABT Dual- Intercept (FT-2) TOC SR MFCR Launcher All major end items built; first-ever 360-degree dual-intercept by an AMD system successfully conducted in November 2013 G:/Communications/M037-1800 per NAMEADSMA Letter OC-2505-25122-OL 3/10/2008, press sources, and cleared photos First Launch First Intercept Dual Intercept M014-3494-5

MEADS Launcher High firepower and mobility 360-degree launch capability 8 ready-to-fire missiles per launcher Can self-load flatracks using Palletized Handling System Partial missile reload Launcher demonstrated unprecedented over-the-shoulder launch of PAC-3 MSE at White Sands Missile Range in 2011, 2012, and 2013 G:/Communications/M014-3494 per T-POF-3613-28295-OL 22 September 2009; CO-32-11061-OL 23 October 2001; POF-5100-33208-OL 7 October 2011; and POF-5100-33088-OL, 4 November 2011 M014-3494-6

MEADS Missile (PAC-3 MSE) Hit-to-kill missile Increased performance, greater altitude and range compared to PAC-3 Threat-driven upgrades to defeat the advancing threat set Leverages improved acquisition capability and detection range of MEADS radars 360-degree dual-intercept success in November 2013 after successful intercept tests in 2010, 2011, and 2012 at White Sands Missile Range G:/Communications/M012-3107 per MSE Product Card, PA-4370-33505-OL 29 February 2012, and POF-5100-34310-OL 31 October 2012 M014-3494-7

MEADS Battle Manager Network-centric open architecture Controlling node on network Plug-and-Fight for sensors/shooters Integrated Engagement and Force Operations Enhanced Maneuver Force Protection Interoperable with coalition, legacy, and future systems Battle manager supported three successful flight tests, including 360-degree dual-target intercept test in November 2013 G:/Communications/M014-3494 per T-POF-3613-28295-OL 22 September 2009; CO-2500-21269-OL 12 July 2006, POF- 5100-32244-OL, 8 April 2011;POF-5100-32952-OL, 29 September 2011; and POF-5100-33088-OL, 4 November 2011 M014-3494-8

MEADS Multifunction Fire Control Radar Pulse Doppler multifunction phased array X-band High reliability digital design Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) 360-degree coverage Digital beamforming 0, 15, and 30 rpm rotation IFF subsystem Interceptor communication link MEADS MFCR detected, tracked, and guided a PAC-3 MSEs in successful dual intercept of ABT and TBM threats G:/Communications/M014-3494 per PA-4320-35004-OL 12 June 2013, CO-32-11061-OL 23 October 2001, and PA-4320-34351-OL 31 October 2012 M014-3494-9

MEADS Surveillance Radar 360-degree coverage Pulse Doppler radar Active phased array antenna Digital beamforming IFF subsystem 0 and 7.5 rpm rotation Successfully demonstrated in dual intercept at White Sands Missile Range against Lance missile and ABT targets G:/Communications/M014-3494 per GM Communication 26 September 2011 and CO-2500-21269-OL, 12 July 2006 M014-3494-10

2013 Key Milestones March Participate in JPOW Network Risk Reduction Test #2 at GAFADC Resolve FY13 funding for MEADS April Complete Syracuse MFCR integration and return to WSMR Ship Launcher #2 to Dallas for power transfer test and HWIL prior to FT-2 May Begin formal ground tests/tracking tests at WSMR for FT-2 June Participate in JPOW 2013 at DePeel AFB, Netherlands July Conduct initial GT-15 tests at WSMR in preparation for FT-2 November Conduct Flight Test #2 at WSMR (Dual Engagement) Interface LFS (SR), MFCR (sim), and Launcher (sim) to IBCS at WSMR G:/Communications/M063-3374 per PA-4370-35225-OL 6 September 2013 Key milestones accomplished; costs on track M014-3494-11

Dual-Engagement Intercept Test November 2013 Objectives expanded on successful November 2012 intercept test 360-degree acquisition and dedicated tracking of a TBM and lowflying ABT separated by more than 125 degrees in azimuth MEADS-generated firing solutions MFCR-to-Interceptor uplink/downlink functions during engagement Required MFCR track accuracy for interceptor seeker handover MEADS capability to simultaneously intercept a TBM and ABT PAC-3 MSE QF-4 Drone Lance Missile Intercept Point Intercept Point Shoot-Shoot Launcher with Certified Missile Round Tactical Operations Center Multifunction Fire Control Radar Surveillance Radar Launcher with Certified Missile Round First 360-degree dual engagement by an Air and Missile Defense System G:/Communications/M063-3374 per PA-4370-35225-OL 6 September 2013 M014-3494-12

Successful 360-Degree Dual-Intercept Flight Test 6 November 2013 G:/Communications/M122-3296 per POF-5100-33740-OL 25 April 2012, PA-4370-33623-OL 5 April 2012, PA-4320-35270-OL 28 October 2013, PA-4320-35004-OL 12 June 2013, and via DVIDS 6 November 2013 First-ever 360-degree dualintercept test met all objectives MEADS equipment performed flawlessly M014-3494-13 M113-2442-13

How MEADS Saves Our Defense Budget Typical Weapon System Acquisition Cost (30%) Acquisition Cost MEADS Operations & Support (O&S) Cost (70%) MEADS O&S Cost Savings MEADS O&S Cost O&S costs represent >70% of the total life cycle cost for major weapons programs (http://www.gao.gov/products/gao-12-340) These costs occur once the system is procured and fielded, and continue to rise Personnel costs Maintenance Facilities Acquisition costs represent <30% of the total life cycle cost 10% for RDT&E 20% for procurement MEADS dramatically reduces O&S costs Savings result from two-level maintenance, high reliability, automated fault detection, prognostics, and fewer system elements Substantial reduction in deployed personnel and equipment, and airlift demand Up to 8 times the defended area with far fewer system assets Significant weapon system cost reductions require cutting O&S costs G:/Communications/M014-3494 per POF-5100-30913-OL, 10 September 2010; and public domain sources M014-3494-14

Summary MEADS provides superior battlefield capabilities with unprecedented flexibility 360-degree capability against entire threat suite Hit-to-kill PAC-3 MSE missile with increased performance, altitude, and range Enhanced strategic transportability and tactical mobility Open architecture with plug-and-fight capability Tailored/scalable battle elements with coalition interoperability MEADS program has demonstrated significant progress Designs approved in 2008 CDR completed August 2010 Successful 360-degree over-the-shoulder flight test in November 2011 Successful intercept test in November 2012 Successful 360-degree dual-intercept test in November 2013 MEADS is a proven example of transatlantic burden-sharing and provides Smart Defense procurement options G:/Communications/M122-3296 per POF-2505-28192-OL 3 September 2009, POF-5100-30913-OL 10 September 2010, POF-5100-33088-OL 4 November 2011, POF-5100-33208-OL 2 December 2011, PA-4370-33834-OL 30 May 2012, and PA-4370-33623-OL 5 April 2012 M014-3494-15