Trends in Poverty. 1 in 5 people POVERTY. In Marion County are in. Marion County, Indiana. 2000 to 2012

Similar documents
Florida s Families and Children Below the Federal Poverty Level

Key Facts About Poverty and Income in Texas

Demographic Profile of Wichita Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries Q3 2015

Educational Attainment in the United States: 2015

Demographic Analysis of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Using 2010 Census and 2010 American Community Survey Estimates

Technical Report 1: Regional Demographic Profile

Demographic Profile of Wichita Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries Q2 2014

King County s Changing Demographics

Educational Attainment

Women, Wages and Work A report prepared by the UNC Charlotte Urban Institute for the Women s Summit April 11, 2011

Moving Beyond the Gap

Lloyd Potter is the Texas State Demographer and the Director of the Texas State Data Center based at the University of Texas at San Antonio.

Parental Educational Attainment and Higher Educational Opportunity

Adecade into the 21st century, Michigan s longbruised

SalarieS of chemists fall

COLLEGE ENROLLMENT AND WORK ACTIVITY OF 2014 HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES

The goal is to transform data into information, and information into insight. Carly Fiorina

Educational Attainment. Five Key Data Releases From the U.S. Census Bureau

State Program Title: Public Health Dental Program. State Program Strategy:

Data Center --> County Data: Education

Selected Socio-Economic Data. Baker County, Florida

Women s Participation in Education and the Workforce. Council of Economic Advisers

Who is making ends meet in the Portland region?

2014 Demographics PROFILE OF THE MILITARY COMMUNITY

Michigan Department of Community Health

Projections and Characteristics of the 60+ Population

May Minnesota Undergraduate Demographics: Characteristics of Post- Secondary Students

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

In 2013, 75.9 million workers age 16 and older in the. Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers, Highlights CONTENTS

City of Toledo. Community Profile. Consolidated Plan FY

Allen Elementary School

Broome County Community Health Assessment APPENDIX A

Young Black America Part Four: The Wrong Way to Close the Gender Wage Gap

in children less than one year old. It is commonly divided into two categories, neonatal

The Gender Wage Gap by Occupation 2014

College Enrollment, Persistence, and Graduation: Statewide Results

HOUSINGSPOTLIGHT FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING? Characteristics of Households Assisted by HUD programs. Our findings affirm that

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE STATUS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Childhood Lead Poisoning

The Gender Wage Gap by Occupation 2015

Near Eastside Neighborhood Indianapolis, IN

Undergraduate Degree Completion by Age 25 to 29 for Those Who Enter College 1947 to 2002

TheHow and Why of Having a Successful Home Office

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Georgia. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

POVERTY IN MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Department of County Human Services Community Services Division. Prepared by Kristina Smock Consulting April 2014

UNINSURED ADULTS IN MAINE, 2013 AND 2014: RATE STAYS STEADY AND BARRIERS TO HEALTH CARE CONTINUE

Educational Attainment of Veterans: 2000 to 2009

Wealth and Demographics: Demographics by Wealth and Wealth by Demographics using the Survey of Consumer Finances. *** DRAFT March 11, 2013 ***

CENTER FOR LABOR MARKET STUDIES

Educational Attainment of the Population 25 Years and Over, by Selected Characteristics: 2011

Population, by Race and Ethnicity: 2000 and 2010

Denver County Births and Deaths 2013

The Changing Population of Texas. BP Business Leaders November 8, 2012 Austin, TX

Urban vs. Rural: Summer. A Look at Indiana State Students from Urban and Rural Areas in Illinois using MAP Works Results

Population, by Race and Ethnicity: 2000 and 2011

Who Receives Unemployment Insurance?

Women in the Workforce

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 9, 2015 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Real Mean and Median Income, Families and Individuals, , and Households, (Reported in $2012).

Poverty. Worth County Estimates. Poverty Status of Individuals. Families at Selected Ratios of Income to Poverty Level

POVERTY IN THE LESBIAN, GAY, AND BISEXUAL COMMUNITY

Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their Child Support: 2011

I. HEALTH ASSESSMENT B. SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

The Youth Vote in 2012 CIRCLE Staff May 10, 2013

A SNAPSHOT OF ALPENA COUNTY

The Non-English Speaking Population in Hawaii

Statistical Profile of Unmarried Women: Virginia 1

Statistical Profile of Unmarried Women: North Carolina 1

Iowa School District Profiles. Central City

Statistical Profile of Unmarried Women: Florida 1

The Status of Women in Cumberland County, North Carolina

Statistical Profile of Unmarried Women: Colorado 1

SINGLE MOTHERS SINCE 2000: FALLING FARTHER DOWN 1

Administrative Council July 28, 2010 Presented by Nancy McNerney Institutional Effectiveness Planning and Research

A Geographic Profile of. Chicago Lawn, Gage Park, West Elsdon and West Lawn. Neighborhoods Served by. The Southwest Organizing Project

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Massachusetts. Philadelphia, PA: Institute

The Changing Population of Texas and San Antonio. Masters Leadership Program October 10, 2012 San Antonio, TX

Recovery or Bust: Georgia s Poor Left Behind Melissa Johnson March 4,

The Status of Women in Guilford County, North Carolina

Retirement Readiness in New York City: Trends in Plan Sponsorship, Participation and Income Security

Demography. Focus on the three contributors to population change: Fertility, mortality, and migration

Office for Oregon Health Policy and Research. Health Insurance Coverage in Oregon 2011 Oregon Health Insurance Survey Statewide Results

Who Is Working For Minimum Wage In Ontario? By Sheila Block

School, Work, and the Transition to Adulthood of Youth in the San Joaquin Valley

Public Housing and Public Schools: How Do Students Living in NYC Public Housing Fare in School?

State of Working Britain

AMERICA'S YOUNG ADULTS AT 27: LABOR MARKET ACTIVITY, EDUCATION, AND HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION: RESULTS FROM A LONGITUDINAL SURVEY

Prepared by: Andrew Sum Ishwar Khatiwada With Walter McHugh. Center for Labor Market Studies Northeastern University

Recession Affects Black Women

High School Dropout Rates

How To Write A File In A Wordpress Program

Enrollment under the Medicaid Expansion and Health Insurance Exchanges. A Focus on Those with Behavioral Health Conditions in Indiana

POVERTY IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA

Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060 Population Estimates and Projections

Educational Attainment in Hawaii

New Jersey Kids Count 2014 The State of Our Children

Summary of Census Data Indicator Number Percentage People living below 100% of the poverty line

Public Health Improvement Plan

High School Dropouts in Chicago and Illinois: The Growing Labor Market, Income, Civic, Social and Fiscal Costs of Dropping Out of High School

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Connecticut. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Transcription:

Trends in Poverty Marion County, Indiana 2000 to 2012 1 in 5 people In Marion County are in POVERTY

What does it mean to be in poverty? Poverty is a term used loosely to describe individuals who are extremely poor. The US Census Bureau creates poverty thresholds the dollar amounts used to determine poverty status for counting the number of people in poverty. Poverty thresholds are based on the size of family and ages of the family members. A family of four with an income of $23,492 or less in 2012, for example, was considered in poverty. The US Department of Health and Human Services uses these thresholds to establish poverty guidelines for setting eligibility for federal programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women Infant and Children, Children s Health Insurance Program, Job Corp, and several others. Summary of Findings Poverty is on the rise across the board, but some segments of the population are disproportionately affected. This report looks at the disparities in poverty by age, race, gender, education levels, and geography. Some key findings for poverty rates in Marion County: 194,163 people in Marion County are in poverty. Marion County s poverty rate is increasing faster than the rate for Indiana and the US. Hispanics in Marion County are much more affected by poverty than other race/ethnic groups, and their poverty rate is increasing the fastest. They also are more affected than Hispanics in the state and nation. While African Americans too are disproportionately affected by poverty, the rate is slightly lower in Marion County than the state. The rate for single mom parent families is 4 times higher than married couple families with children. 74,401 children under 18 (32.8% of all children) in Marion County are in poverty. The child poverty rate in Marion County has doubled since 2000, a rate that is growing faster than the state and US. Getting a high school diploma cuts in half your chances of being in poverty. The poverty rate for those without a high school diploma is 6.5 times higher than those with a bachelor s degree. The poverty rate even for those with degrees is increasing. The rate in the high-poverty neighborhoods are 7 times higher than the low-poverty neighborhoods. Crime rates are 5 times higher in high-poverty neighborhoods than in the low-poverty neighborhoods. Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 1 of 15

How Does Marion County Compare? On the whole, there is not a statistically significant difference in poverty from 2011 to 2012. Looking at how poverty has changed in the past twelve years since 2000, however, reveals some interesting trends and disparities. Marion County s poverty rate is getting worse faster than Indiana and the US. Note: There was no statistical difference from 2011 to 2012 on any of the populations shown. Marion County 2012 Poverty Rate Total population 21.5 7-Year Change from 2005 to 2012 12-Year Change from 2000 to 2012 How does Marion Co Compare to the US? (2012) How does Marion Co compare to Indiana? (2012) +45% +89% +35% +38% White (non-hispanic) 13.9 RACE/ETHNICITY +46% +82% +26% +13% Black 31.4 +24% +54% +12% NSD Asian 17* N/A NSD NSD NSD Hispanic 42 +48% +109% +65% +46% Under 18 32.8 AGE +53% +106% +45% +46% 18 to 64 18.9 +43% +85% +28% +28% 65+ 10.9 +49% +36% +15% +51% *Medium Confidence; NSD: No Statistical Difference Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 2 of 15

Marion County 2012 Poverty Rate Male 20.3 Change from 2005 to 2012 Change from 2000 to 2012 How does Marion Co compare to US? (2012) How does Marion Co compare to Indiana? (2012) GENDER +50% +101% +39% +42% Female 22.7 +42% +80% +32% +35% Population 25 and older 16.1 EDUCATION ATTAINMENT +52% N/A +32% +40% With no diploma 36.5 +49% N/A +29% +34% With HS diploma only 17.8 +50% N/A +24% +46% Some college or Assoc. Degree 14.1 +66% N/A +31% +38% +87% +24% +37% Bachelor or higher 5.6 N/A All families with related children 25.9 FAMILY TYPE +46% +86% +38% +38% Married couple families with related children 10.6* +112% 151% NSD +39% Single mom families with related children 44.5 *Medium Confidence; NSD: No Statistical Difference +19% +49% NSD NSD See Appendix for the number of people in poverty by population type. Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 3 of 15

Year US Indiana Marion County 2000 12.4 9.5 11.4 2005 13.3 12.2 14.8 2010 15.3 15.3 20.6 2011 15.9 16.0 21.1 2012 15.9 15.6 21.5 In the twelve years from 2000 to 2012, Marion County s poverty rate moved from being less than the US rate to well ahead of it. Now, 1 in 5 people (21.5%) in Marion County are in poverty, a rate that has doubled since 2000 when 1 in 10 (11%) were in poverty. The poverty rate in Marion County well outpaced the state and nation; it increased 45% from 2005 to 2012 compared to a 28% increase in Indiana and 20% in the US. The difference is even greater looking at the 12-year trend, with increases of 89% in the county, 64% in Indiana, 28% in the US. POVERTY BY RACE AND ETHNICITY The poverty rate is higher in Marion County than in Indiana and the US for Hispanics, Asians, and Non- Hispanic whites. Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 4 of 15

At 4 out of 10 in poverty, Hispanics are much more affected by poverty than Non-Hispanics, and the situation is worsening. o They have by far the highest poverty rate (42%), followed by African Americans (31%). o The poverty rate for Hispanics in Marion County (42%) exceeds the rate for Hispanics in the state (29%) and the nation (25%). o The poverty rate is increasing faster for Hispanics than any other group. The rate doubled from 20% in 2000 to 42% in 2011. At 3 out of 10 in poverty, African Americans in Marion County also are disproportionately affected by poverty. o They have a poverty rate of 31%, which is slightly higher than the African American poverty rate in the nation (28%). There is no statistically significant difference between the rates for Marion County and Indiana. POVERTY BY AGE Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 5 of 15

74,401 children under 18 (32.8% of all children) in Marion County are in poverty. At 32.8% in 2012, the child poverty rate in Marion County has doubled since 2000, a rate that is growing faster than the state and US. The Marion County child poverty rate is triple that of seniors (10.9%) and 1.7 times that of people age 18 to 64 (18.9%). Children in Marion County are much more likely to be in poverty (32.8%) than their peers in the state (22.4%) and the US (22.6%). Though the gap is much narrower, seniors in Marion County also are more likely to be in poverty (10.9%) than seniors in the state (7.2%). POVERTY BY GENDER Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 6 of 15

Poverty rates for females is higher than for males by about 2 to 3 percentage points in the US, Indiana, and Marion County, with females above the rate for the total population and males below. The difference between the two is about the same in 2012 as it was in 2000. Related to this gender disparity is that single-parent families with children have a much higher poverty rate than other families, and single-headed families with children are headed by the mother 80% of the time. Of all families with children, in Marion County 9.7% are single-parent headed by the father, and 38.8% are single parent headed by the mother. Following the trend in the state and nation, single mom families with children in Marion County have a much higher poverty rate (45%) than married couple families with children (11%). Single-mom families with children have a higher poverty rate in Marion County (45%) than the state (44%) and the nation (42%). African American families with children are more likely to be headed by single moms than other families 60% of black families with kids in Marion County were headed by single moms compared to 29% of white families with kids and 39% of all families with kids. Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 7 of 15

POVERTY BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT The poverty rate is higher in Marion County than the state and nation for all education levels. Looking at how Marion County has changed from 2000 to 2012, we see that: Not surprisingly, people without a high school diploma have the highest poverty rate (37%), which has increased twelve percentage points from 2005 to 2012. This is 5.5 times higher than the poverty rate for those with a bachelor s degree or higher. Although the overall percentages are small, poverty is increasingly affecting those with higher educational attainment as well, perhaps reflecting the impact of the Great Recession of 2007 2009. The poverty rate for those with some college or associate s degree increased from 8.5% to 14.1% from 2005 to 2012, and the rate for those with a bachelor s degree or higher increased from 3% to 5.6%, compared to the poverty rate of the total population 25 and over, which increased from 11% to 16.1%. The poverty rate for those with bachelor s degree or higher is greatest in Marion County (5.6%) followed by the nation (4.5%) and the state (4.1%). Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 8 of 15

The poverty rate for those with some college or associate s degree is highest in Marion County (14.1%) followed by the nation (10.8%) and the state (10.2%). Not only is the poverty rate for these two education levels in Marion County higher than those same groups in the state and nation, but the poverty rate for those groups is increasing faster in Marion County. THE GEOGRAPHY OF POVERTY Several neighborhoods are disproportionately affected by poverty. The following map of poverty by ZIP codes reveals where the highest concentrations are located. The six ZIP codes with the highest poverty rates are highlighted in red, and the six with the lowest are highlighted in blue. The Near Eastside, Downtown, and Martindale Brightwood are the hardest hit areas in the county with rates from 33.4 to 36.9 percent. Highest Poverty (2012) ZIP Approximate Area 2012 Poverty Rate 46201 Near Eastside 36.9 46204 Downtown 33.6 46218 Martindale 33.4 Brightwood 46225 Near Southside 32.5 Garfield Park 46202 Area west, north, and 29.8 east of downtown 46208 Crooked Creek 28.8 Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 9 of 15

Comparing the six ZIP codes with the lowest poverty rates to the six with the highest and those ZIPs that fall in between reveals: The poverty rate of the areas that are the worst off is nearly 7 times the rate of those with the lowest poverty and 3.7 times those in the mid-range. The trend is similar for unemployment with the high poverty areas three times that of the lowpoverty areas and double the others. One of the greatest differences is in the crime rate, which is five times higher in the high poverty areas than it is in the low poverty areas. Education is clearly linked to poverty, and the effects of educational attainment on reducing poverty are clear. The low-poverty areas distance themselves from the middle- and high-poverty areas with both low percentage of people with no diploma and a high percentage of people with a bachelor s degree. Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 10 of 15

Comparing ZIP Codes in Marion County by Level of Poverty (2007-2011, 5-year estimates) 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 % in Poverty % Unemployed Crime Rate per 100 % No Diploma % Bachelor's or Higher Top 6 ZIPs 4.8 5.5 3.63 5.5 42.0 Middle 25 ZIPs 17.8 10.4 7.43 15.6 26.2 Bottom 6 ZIPs 32.9 17.5 16.8 23.1 20.9 Top 6 ZIPs Middle 25 ZIPs Bottom 6 ZIPs The following map by census tract 1 reveals more specifically where the pockets of poverty are located within the county. The red areas outlined on the map reflect the high poverty ZIP codes. Within these, there emerge areas with lower poverty rates amongst areas with higher rates. This is in part due to the infill of housing and areas in and near downtown that are experiencing transition. Lower income populations are being displaced by higher incomes occupying new developments. 1 Census tracts are small subdivisions of a county, with a population size generally around 4,000 people, used for reporting statistics from the US Census Bureau. Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 11 of 15

IMPLICATIONS It is evident from the data that there are disparities when it comes to poverty some populations have a substantially higher poverty rate, and those in poverty are disproportionately impacted by other social issues such as crime. When developing programs and services, it is important to consider the populations with higher poverty rates (single moms, Hispanics, African Americans) and the unique needs of those populations. By looking at poverty geographically, social service providers can target their programs to the communities most in need of services. Looking at the disparities allows funders, service providers, and others to determine where and for which populations programs can have the greatest impact on improving poverty. It is evident that education is one of the keys to ending the cycle of poverty. The poverty rate for people without a high school diploma is 36.5%. That rate is cut in half of those that have high school diploma (17.8%). The rate drops even further by gaining some college experience or associate s degree. The rate for those without a diploma is 6.5 times higher than those with a bachelor s degree. Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 12 of 15

Helping individuals get on the track toward self-sufficiency involves many factors. It is essential to consider the comprehensive needs of individuals and their families their health, safety, and basic needs to name a few - but it is clear that education must be at the core of the solution. Data Sources: US Census Bureau: American Community Survey 1-year estimates (2005, 2011, 2012); 2000 Decennial Census; 2007-2011 5-year estimates (ZIP code-level data); Indianapolis Marion County Police Department; SAVI Community Information System (www.savi.org) Data Notes: Crime rates not included for Speedway, Beech Grove, Airport, or Lawrence. ZIP code data is reported by ZIP code tabulation area, which differs slightly from the US Postal Service deliniations. Authors: Sharon Kandris (contact) SAVI Director and Director of Community Informatics The Polis Center at IUPUI skandris@iupui.edu (317) 278-2944 Jay Colbert GIS Project Manager The Polis Center at IUPUI Produced: September 20, 2013 Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 13 of 15

Appendix: Number of People in Poverty (2012) Number in Poverty United States Indiana Marion County Margin of Error Number in Poverty Margin of Error Number in Poverty Margin of Error Total population 48,760,123 +/-231,580 990,325 +/-21,187 194,163 +/-11,652 White (non-hispanic) RACE/ETHNICITY 21,214,986 +/-143,857 635,369 +/-14,990 73,561 +/-6,148 Black 10,665,149 +/-81,670 187,175 +/-7,839 75,698 +/-6,992 Asian 1,981,423 +/-43,693 22,256 +/-3,113 3,099 +/-1,315 Hispanic 13,157,055 +/-107,759 114,605 +/-8,328 37,225 +/-4,935 AGE Under 18 16,396,863 +/-120,995 349,524 +/-12,182 74,401 +/-6,905 18 to 64 28,394,381 +/-122,305 579,616 +/-11,902 109,308 +/-6,028 65+ 3,968,879 +/-28,246 61,185 +/-3,738 10,454 +/-1,364 GENDER Male 21,910,739 +/-120,540 445,526 +/-11,581 88,055 +/-6,830 Female 26,849,384 +/-128,640 544,799 +/-13,497 106,108 +/-6,439 Population 25 and older EDUCATION ATTAINMENT 25,087,780 +/-99,712 483,432 +/-11,351 94,389 +/-5,721 With no diploma 7,672,024 +/-61,763 138,438 +/-6,977 31,999 +/-3,555 With HS diploma only Some college or Assoc. Degree 8,195,271 +/-47,471 179,553 +/-5,767 29,910 +/-2,720 6,493,555 +/-35,183 124,634 +/-4,997 22,990 +/-2,614 Bachelor or higher 2,726,930 +/-30,641 40,807 +/-3,209 9,490 +/-1,744 All families with related children Married couple families with related children Single mom families with related children FAMILY TYPE 6,970,661 +/-36,991 148,611 +/-6,070 28,308 +/-2,985 2,077,791 +/-20,552 38,906 +/-2,796 5,946 +/-1,241 4,146,048 +/-26,678 91,518 +/-4,996 18,824 +/-2,485 Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2012, 1-year estimates Produced by The Polis Center at IUPUI Page 14 of 15