AFRL-RZ-WP-TM-2007-2138

Similar documents
Overview Presented by: Boyd L. Summers

An Oil-Free Thrust Foil Bearing Facility Design, Calibration, and Operation

AFRL-RX-WP-TP

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. Fiscal Year 2013 Expenditure Plan Lacks Key Information Needed to Inform Future Funding Decisions

Asset Management- Acquisitions

Using the Advancement Degree of Difficulty (AD 2 ) as an input to Risk Management

Integrated Force Method Solution to Indeterminate Structural Mechanics Problems

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

Report Documentation Page

Addressing the Real-World Challenges in the Development of Propulsion IVHM Technology Experiment (PITEX)

DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY

DCAA and the Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Program

Issue Paper. Wargaming Homeland Security and Army Reserve Component Issues. By Professor Michael Pasquarett

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

PROBLEM STATEMENT: Will reducing the ASD for Kadena AB F-15 C/Ds increase the CPFH for this Mission Design Series (MDS)?

EAD Expected Annual Flood Damage Computation

Achieving QoS for Aeronautical Telecommunication Networks Over Differentiated Services

Microstructural Evaluation of KM4 and SR3 Samples Subjected to Various Heat Treatments

DEFENSE BUSINESS PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION BOARD

IISUP-. NAVAL SUPPLY SVSTE:MS COMMAND. Ready. Resourceful. Responsive!

Pima Community College Planning Grant For Autonomous Intelligent Network of Systems (AINS) Science, Mathematics & Engineering Education Center

TITLE: The Impact Of Prostate Cancer Treatment-Related Symptoms On Low-Income Latino Couples

RT 24 - Architecture, Modeling & Simulation, and Software Design

THE MIMOSA OPEN SOLUTION COLLABORATIVE ENGINEERING AND IT ENVIRONMENTS WORKSHOP

In June 1998 the Joint Military Intelligence. Intelligence Education for Joint Warfighting A. DENIS CLIFT

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE *

NAVSUP FLC NORFOLK PHILADELPHIA OFFICE

John Mathieson US Air Force (WR ALC) Systems & Software Technology Conference Salt Lake City, Utah 19 May 2011

Assessment of NASA Dual Microstructure Heat Treatment Method Utilizing Ladish SuperCooler Cooling Technology

Military Health System Conference

Simulation of Air Flow Through a Test Chamber

mini w Requirements Analysis Defense Commissary Agency Credit Card Program Logistics Management Institute Credit Card Terminals and Printers v / i

Mobile Robot Knowledge Base

Cancellation of Nongroup Health Insurance Policies

Mr. Steve Mayer, PMP, P.E. McClellan Remediation Program Manger Air Force Real Property Agency. May 11, 2011

FIRST IMPRESSION EXPERIMENT REPORT (FIER)

CAPTURE-THE-FLAG: LEARNING COMPUTER SECURITY UNDER FIRE

What Makes a Message Stick? - The Role of Content and Context in Social Media Epidemics

Guide to Using DoD PKI Certificates in Outlook 2000

Advanced Micro Ring Resonator Filter Technology

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

An Application of an Iterative Approach to DoD Software Migration Planning

A GPS Digital Phased Array Antenna and Receiver

ADVANCED NETWORK SECURITY PROJECT

AUSTRALIAN INNOVATIONS

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Monitoring of Arctic Conditions from a Virtual Constellation of Synthetic Aperture Radar Satellites

Aircraft Cleanability and Corrosion Issues 26 February Craig Matzdorf NAVAIR

Award Number: MIPR 3GD3DJ3078. TITLE: Outcome Analysis Tool for Army Refractive Surgery Program. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Kraig S. Bower, M.D.

Army Environmental Policy and ISO 14001

Dr. Gary S. E. Lagerloef Earth and Space Research, 1910 Fairview Ave E

CERT Virtual Flow Collection and Analysis

Graduate Level Credit for Resident EWS Students. Natasha McEachin CG 1

"OTHER TRANSACTIONS" (OT) GUIDE FOR PROTOTYPE PROJECTS

Interagency National Security Knowledge and Skills in the Department of Defense

A Manager's Checklist for Validating Software Cost and Schedule Estimates

UMass at TREC 2008 Blog Distillation Task

Non-Autoclave (Prepreg) Manufacturing Technology

GAO ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. DOD and VA Should Remove Barriers and Improve Efforts to Meet Their Common System Needs

Best Practices for Researching and Documenting Lessons Learned

Ultra-low Sulfur Diesel Classification with Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Partial Least Squares

A Comparison of Flow-Through Versus Non-Flow- Through Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Systems for NASA s Exploration Missions

An Overview of Romanian Command and Control Systems

Award Number: W81XWH

Algorithmic Research and Software Development for an Industrial Strength Sparse Matrix Library for Parallel Computers

Small PV Systems Performance Evaluation at NREL's Outdoor Test Facility Using the PVUSA Power Rating Method

Intelligence Community Public Key Infrastructure (IC PKI)

Elastomer Compatibility Testing of Renewable Diesel Fuels

DoD Software Migration Planning

Regional Field Verification Operational Results from Four Small Wind Turbines in the Pacific Northwest

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, DC

Secure Autonomous Automated Scheduling (SAAS) Phase 1 Final Report

A New Empirical Relationship between Thrust Coefficient and Induction Factor for the Turbulent Windmill State

Simulation and Analysis of Three-Phase Rectifiers for Aerospace Power Applications

NASA s Intelligent Synthesis Environment Program Revolutionizing the Agency s Engineering and Science Practice

LMI. Improving EDI Data Quality. Logistics Management Institute. W. Michael Bridges Charles D. Guilliams MT403LN1

Is Indemnification a Barrier to Public-Private Partnerships?

NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY NATIONAL WAR COLLEGE

GAO VA HEALTH CARE. Report to the Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Veterans Affairs, House of Representatives

E X A D A T A NEW EXPLOSIVES ACCIDENT DATABASE

Cyber Security Training and Awareness Through Game Play

A DOCTORAL PROGRAM WITH SPECIALIZATION IN INFORMATION SECURITY A High Assurance Constructive Security Approach

GAO ARMY WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Army Faces Challenges in Managing Working Capital Fund Cash Balance during Wartime Environment

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel CommandFort Detrick, Maryland

OPTICAL IMAGES DUE TO LENSES AND MIRRORS *

CFD SUPPORT FOR JET NOISE REDUCTION CONCEPT DESIGN AND EVALUATION FOR F/A 18 E/F AIRCRAFT

Optical Blade Position Tracking System Test

Information Technology

I N S T I T U T E F O R D E FE N S E A N A L Y S E S NSD-5216

By Kent Hughes Butts and Arthur L. Bradshaw, Jr. Army Recognizes Importance of Variables Affecting Regional Stability

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT)

Dynamic IR Scene Projector Based Upon the Digital Micromirror Device

CAT VIII WORKING DRAFT

Jack of All Trades, Master of None: Combat Engineer Officer Assignments in the Marine Corps. EWS Contemporary Issue Paper

Multiple Network Marketing coordination Model

Obsolescence Considerations for Materials in the Lower Sub-Tiers of the Supply Chain

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Fellowships, Scholarships, Training With Industry (TWI), and Grants for DoD Personnel

Marine Corps Civilian Law Enforcement: A Necessary Evil. Captain WA Carr Jr

THE FLATWORLD SIMULATION CONTROL ARCHITECTURE (FSCA): A FRAMEWORK FOR SCALABLE IMMERSIVE VISUALIZATION SYSTEMS

Transcription:

AFRL-RZ-WP-TM-2007-2138 ADVANCED PROPULSION CONCEPTS AND COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES Jeffrey S. Stutrud Combustion Branch Turbine Engine Division JULY 2007 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. See additional restrictions described on inside pages STINFO COPY AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY PROPULSION DIRECTORATE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OH 45433-7251 AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

NOTICE AND SIGNATURE PAGE Using Government drawings, specifications, or other data included in this document for any purpose other than Government procurement does not in any way obligate the U.S. Government. The fact that the Government formulated or supplied the drawings, specifications, or other data does not license the holder or any other person or corporation; or convey any rights or permission to manufacture, use, or sell any patented invention that may relate to them. This report was cleared for public release by the Air Force Research Laboratory Wright Site (AFRL/WS) Public Affairs Office and is available to the general public, including foreign nationals. Copies may be obtained from the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (http://www.dtic.mil). AFRL-RZ-WP-TM-2007-2138 HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND IS APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASSIGNED DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT. *//Signature// JEFFREY S. STUTRUD Program Manager Combustion Branch //Signature// ROBERT D. HANCOCK, Ph.D. Chief Combustion Branch //Signature// JEFFREY M. STRICKER Chief Engineer Turbine Engine Division This report is published in the interest of scientific and technical information exchange, and its publication does not constitute the Government s approval or disapproval of its ideas or findings. *Disseminated copies will show //Signature// stamped or typed above the signature blocks.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) July 2007 Final 14 June 2004 31 December 2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE ADVANCED PROPULSION CONCEPTS AND COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES 6. AUTHOR(S) Jeffrey S. Stutrud (AFRL/RZTC) 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER FA8650-04-3-9009 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 62203F 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 3066 5e. TASK NUMBER 08 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 3066WBI1 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Combustion Branch (AFRL/RZTC) Turbine Engine Division Air Force Research Laboratory, Propulsion Directorate Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-7251 Air Force Materiel Command United States Air Force 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Air Force Research Laboratory Propulsion Directorate Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-7251 Air Force Materiel Command United States Air Force 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES PAO Case Number: AFRL/WS 07-1889, 17 Aug 2007. Wright Brothers Institute 5100 Springfield Pike, Suite 500 Dayton, OH 45431 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY ACRONYM(S) AFRL/RZTC 11. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER(S) AFRL-RZ-WP-TM-2007-2138 14. ABSTRACT This technical memorandum summarizes the activities of a cost-shared project order entitled Advanced Propulsion Concepts and Component Technologies dated 14 June 2004 under an AFRL MOU/PIA (Memorandum of Understanding/Partnership Intermediary Agreement) dated 17 March 2003 with the Wright Brothers Institute (WBI) located in Dayton, Ohio. The program was structured as a one year effort to develop a plan for cooperative research partnered with The Ohio State University. An optional four year follow-on effort may be pursued to conduct the proposed research. The objective and scope of this research was to define and investigate advanced propulsion concepts and component technologies that could provide improvements in gas turbine engines and advanced propulsion systems for manned and unmanned systems to enhance the mission of PR. This could include technologies associated with gas turbine engines, combined cycle engines, near-constant temperature cycle turbine engines, and pulsed detonation engines or other related areas of interest to the Air Force. 15. SUBJECT TERMS small turbojet engine, component development, advanced propulsion concepts 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON (Monitor) OF ABSTRACT: OF PAGES SAR 10 a. REPORT Unclassified b. ABSTRACT Unclassified c. THIS PAGE Unclassified Jeffrey S. Stutrud 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code) N/A Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18 i

Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 1 Program Milestones and Events... 2 Conclusion... 3 iii

Executive Summary The objective of this effort was to define and investigate advanced propulsion concepts and component technologies through a cost-shared collaboration between the Air Force Research Laboratory Propulsion Directorate, The Ohio State University and the Wright Brothers Institute. These concepts and technologies are intended to enhance the mission of the Propulsion Directorate. This program did not progress beyond the planning stages due to the competitive ranking of this effort with other Propulsion Directorate programs. Introduction This technical memorandum summarizes the activities of a cost-shared project order entitled "Advanced Propulsion Concepts and Component Technologies" dated 14 June 2004 under an AFRL MOU/PIA (Memorandum of Understanding/Partnership Intermediary Agreement) dated 17 March 2003 with the Wright Brothers Institute (WBI) located in Dayton, Ohio. The Air Force Research Laboratory headquarters (AFRL) provided $100K seed money to establish this project order to be administered by WBI and would team the Propulsion Directorate (AFRL/PR) with The Ohio State University (OSU) to analyze and investigate advanced propulsion concepts and their associated component technologies. OSU has expertise in a wide variety of advanced propulsion technologies that are critical to the Air Force. As designed, this program would improve the rapid development and evaluation of advanced propulsion systems and components for the Air Force. The goal of this program was to combine AFRL and OSU resources to develop, evaluate, and eventually transition advanced propulsion technologies to the various operational command elements of the Air Force. The program was structured as a one-year effort to develop a plan for research with the possibility of a four-year follow-on effort to conduct the proposed research. The objective and scope of this research was to define and investigate advanced propulsion concepts and component technologies that could provide improvements in gas turbine engines and advanced propulsion systems for manned and unmanned systems to enhance the mission of PR. This could include technologies associated with gas turbine engines, combined cycle engines, near-constant temperature cycle turbine engines, and pulsed detonation engines or other related areas of interest to the Air Force. The overall financial contribution of the Air Force for the full five-year effort would be $500K. In this 50/50 partnership, OSU would contribute an additional $500K. As the Air Force programmed financial contribution decreased over the programs life, the OSU contribution would increase, resulting in a fairly constant level of effort. OSU in-kind contributions were permitted in-lieu of monetary contributions. The WBI Principle Investigator was Dr. Meyer J. Benzakein, former General Electric Company general manager for Advanced Engineering responsible for research and development activities on all new commercial and military product lines at General Electric Aircraft Engines. Currently Dr. Benzakein is the chair of Aerospace Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at The Ohio State University and WBI Professor. 1

Program Milestones and Events In December 2004, as a means of introduction to the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), Dr. Benzakein, the Wright Brothers Institute (WBI) Professor, chair of Aerospace Engineering at the Ohio State University (OSU) and principle investigator for this collaboration project order, gave a presentation to the assembled members of AFRL entitled, "New Product Introduction - The commercial experience at GE (General Electric) and how it can be applied to military engine development. The presentation discussed the disciplines associated with new product introduction at GE reviewing the THRUPUT initiatives of the late 1990's. These initiatives reduced engine development cycle from 60 to 24 months. In February 2005, PR hosted an Ohio Center for Advanced Propulsion and Power (OCAPP) meeting to present OCAPP capabilities to AFRL in the areas of acoustics, bearings, combustion, materials, sensors and turbo-machinery. Discussions were also held on the development of a Propulsion Center of Excellence at OSU. During March 2005, meetings were scheduled for Dr. Benzakein with technology leaders from the Propulsion Directorate (PR). The purpose of these meetings was to lay the ground work for the development of a plan where the OSU efforts, along with OCAPP studies, could be used to develop and evaluate advanced propulsion concepts that could provide improvements for gas turbine engines and advanced propulsion systems for manned and unmanned applications that would be of interest to PR. At these meetings PR personnel discussed current technology needs. In April 2005, as a result of those meetings, Dr. Benzakein drafted and submitted to the Combustion Branch (PRTC) potential areas of interest for consideration as Task II program elements. Whereas these six topics did not provide the technology push desired by PR, PRTC recommended that a customer need-based program be proposed that would concentrate on the development of a small engine in a lower thrust class or less then 50 HP class. Such a program could both benefit student researchers at OSU and the Air Force. In June 2005, a meeting was scheduled at the WBI offices to discuss the possibilities of a customer need-based program. Choices of a small gas turbine or a small diesel engine were discussed at the meeting. Professors Benzakein, Haritonidis and Rizzoni attended from OSU. Dr. Barthelemy attended for WBI. AFRL attendees included PRP and PRT representatives. As a result, it was decided that the University would reexamine the different possibilities. As a follow up to this meeting, Professors Benzakein and Haritonidis conducted a site visit to Turbine Technologies LTD in Chetek, Wisconsin. Turbine Technologies is the designer and producer of a small turbojet engine in the desired class. The SR-30 engine was designed by Turbine Technologies as a teaching and or training tool for academic institutions. OSU currently owns and operates a SR-30 for tutorial purposes. In late June 2005, Dr. Benzakein submitted a preliminary proposal to use the SR-30 as a development vehicle in a multiphase program which was critiqued by PRTC. PRTC stated that the Air Force has no particular interest in a program to characterize the SR-30 and stated that many academic organizations, as well as the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT), have already performed this work. 2

In late July 2005, PRTC again suggested a customer need-based program such as the proposed engine systems under development for the Air Combat Command or Air Armament Command. PRTC discussed ways to strengthen the draft proposal and asked Dr. Benzakein to submit a formal proposal through WBI. Conclusion The Task II proposal, entitled Cooperative Proposal for Advanced Propulsion Concepts was received 30 September 2005 from WBI. This proposal focused on upgrade of the OSU owned SR-30 and characterization of the engine including life cycle prediction of the different engine components. Engine simulation computer codes and performance characterization computer codes to correlate engine data, including noise and species emission data would also be developed. The final objective of the proposed research was to provide an optimized SR-30 engine through the parametric studies of the baseline engine and redesign of the engine components to provide a potential product for an Air Force command element and or possible marketing by Turbine Technologies. After review of the proposal by Air Force personnel and management it was decided not to proceed with Task II of the project order. The rationale for not exercising the four optional years of the project order is based upon an internal funds competition ranking of this effort against other obligations for the subject fiscal years under the current fund allocations. The program s goal, to evaluate and improve Turbine Technologies SR-30 for deployment in some future customer platform, is very high risk and the value of this program for the Air Force is unclear. The risk assessment is also based on the lack of letters of support from industry or proposed customer. The program ended 31 December 2005 with the completion of Task I. 3