Course: Chemical Technology (Organic) Lecture 3 Gasification of Coal, Petrocoke And Biomass

Similar documents
Coal-To-Gas & Coal-To-Liquids

SKI Coal Gasification Technology. Feb. 23, 2012

Assignment 8: Comparison of gasification, pyrolysis and combustion

THE PRACTICAL, PROVEN PATH TO GREEN ENERGY. RTP rapid thermal processing from Envergent Technologies

Process Technology. Advanced bioethanol production and renewable energy generation from ligno-cellulosic materials, biomass waste and residues

Biomass Syngas Production Technology by Gasification for Liquid Fuel and Other Chemicals

Viresco Energy s Advanced Gasification Technology

How To Gasify Wood And Agriculture Biomass

Power Generation through Surface Coal Gasification

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 33: Combustion air calculation

Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology at a Glance

Concepts in Syngas Manufacture

Gasification, Producer Gas and Syngas

Fact Sheet Technology. Bergius-Pier Process (1)

Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming with CO 2 Capture

From solid fuels to substitute natural gas (SNG) using TREMP

Morris Argyle Assistant Professor Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. School of Energy Resources Symposium Casper, WY February 28, 2007

Coal Gasification & Fischer-Tropsch

Development of Coal Gasification System for Producing Chemical Synthesis Source Gas

How To Model Biomass

Syngas Purification Units

NITROGEN OXIDES FORMATION in combustion processes COMBUSTION AND FUELS

From Biomass. NREL Leads the Way. to Biofuels

Coal waste slurries as a fuel for integrated gasification combined cycle plants

Options for tar reforming in biomass gasification. Klas J. Andersson, Poul Erik Højlund Nielsen - IFC 2012

Gasförmige und flüssige synthetische Energieträger aus Biomasse Stand der Entwicklungen an der TU Wien. Hermann HOFBAUER, TU Wien

Biorefineries. International status quo and future directions. Ed de Jong / Rene van Ree

Biomass gasification development of attractive business cases

Impact of coal quality and gasifier technology on IGCC performance

AN OFFER TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DISPOSAL OF M6 PROPELLANT WASTE. Wrocław, POLAND,

Nitrogenous Fertilizer Plants

Metsä Fibre s Bioproduct mill

Overview of Integrated Coal Gasification Combined-cycle Technology Using Low-rank Coal

AMMONIA AND UREA PRODUCTION

Fischer-Tropsch Diesel from Solid Biomass

(205) (205)

MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY AND MATERIAL RECOVERY FROM WASTE. Tomáš Rohal, Business Development CEEI 10-Oct-2013

Nitrogenous Fertilizer Plants

Tutkimuksen merkitys menestyvässä liiketoiminnassa- Innovaatiosta tuotteeksi

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS NATURAL GAS PROCESSING. H. K. Abdel-Aal National Research Center (NRC), Cairo, Egypt

1.3 Properties of Coal

COKE PRODUCTION FOR BLAST FURNACE IRONMAKING

Lecture 35: Atmosphere in Furnaces

Technical Note: Conversion of fuel data to MWh

SIX REASONS TO DRY BIOGAS To A LOW DEWPOINT BEFORE COMBUSTION IN A CHP ENGINE STEVEN SCOTT MARKET DEVELOPMENT MANAGER ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES

6 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES

B0401 Abstract 029 Oral Presentation Session B04 Innovative Applications and Designs - Tuesday, July 1, :00 h

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

Introduction to our Business in Valmet. Marita Niemelä VP, Strategy Pulp & Energy 20 August 2014

Papapostolou 1, E. Kondili 1, J.K. Kaldellis 2

How To Run A Power Plant

IBP 2778_10 HIGH EFFICIENCY ON CO2 REMOVAL IN NATURAL GAS WITH UCARSOL SOLVENTS Thiago V. Alonso 1. Abstract. 1. Introduction

FLEXICOKING technology for upgrading heavy oil and utilization of by-products

Thermochemical Upgrading Workshop Coal to Liquids (F-T) Via Gasification

Outlook on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology

CONTENTS. ZVU Engineering a.s., Member of ZVU Group, WASTE HEAT BOILERS Page 2

Evolving Gasification technology to provide Innovative Low Carbon Solutions for the European Market

Michael Williams Gasification Technologies Council, 28 th October Smaller scale Fischer-Tropsch enables biomass-to-liquids

Chapter 2 Chemical and Physical Properties of Sulphur Dioxide and Sulphur Trioxide

Gasification of Coal. Sunggyu Lee CONTENTS

Biomass Issues. John Christopher Madole Associates, Inc. presentation to the Minnesota Department of Commerce September 12, 2007

VALIDATION, MODELING, AND SCALE-UP OF CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION WITH OXYGEN UNCOUPLING

THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY FROM WOOD AND OTHER SOLID BIOMASS

Biomass gasification for second generation biofuels Bram van der Drift

Upgrading of Heavy Oils with FLEXICOKING. ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company Tim Hilbert

Natural Gas as a Chemical Industry Fuel and Feedstock: Past, Present, Future (and Far Future)

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 34: Calculation of calorific value of fuels

BUILDING THE BUSINESS CASE FOR LARGE-SCALE UTILIZATION OF FOREST RESIDUES AS FEEDSTOCKS FOR PRODUCTION OF ENERGY COMMODITIES:

Thermo Conversions Gasification (TCG) Technology

Biogas as transportation fuel

Simulation of Coal Gasification Process using ASPEN PLUS

ASimple Guide to Oil Refining

Petrochemical Industry Ethylene Plant

Dan Madden, PE, CEO Tim Lowe, PhD, VP Sales Hybrid Energy Technologies

Modular chemical conversions delivering clean energy

IGCC State-of-the-art report

Poultry Litter as Renewable Energy Resource Using SOFC Technology

Haldor Topsøe Catalysing Your Business

The Future of Coal-Based Power Generation With CCS UN CCS Summit James Katzer MIT Energy Initiative web.mit.edu/coal/

Valmet biotechnologies and pyrolysis status update. Joakim Autio Product manager, Pyrolysis systems Valmet

Executive Summary. Catalyst Testing Results

Waste a source of energy. Regional Solid Waste Management Plan Review: Engaging solutions for tomorrow. Incineration. Incineration

Case study: Velocys partnership with Waste Management, Ventech Engineers LLC and NRG Energy

AUTOMOTIVE GAS OIL. Robert Shisoka Hydrocarbon Management Consultancy

CHOREN. Development of integrated biomass supply chains in South East Asia. Tsukuba, 28 rd of October 2009

BIOMASS RESEARCH at ECN. Bram van der Drift

97 MW of Cat coal seam methane power in New South Wales, Australia

Balancing chemical reaction equations (stoichiometry)

A Comparative Assessment of Commercial Technologies for Conversion of Solid Waste to Energy

Stationary Fuel Cell Power Systems with Direct FuelCell Technology Tackle Growing Distributed Baseload Power Challenge

Study Plan. MASTER IN (Energy Management) (Thesis Track)

Bio-CNG plant. Spectrum Renewable Energy Limited, Kodoli, Kolhapur

CRG CONSERVE RESOURCES GROUP ECO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES. NEW State of the Art. Advanced OIL REFINERY TECHNOLOGY & PROCESSES

Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology Stoffliche Nutzung der Braunkohle

UOP Gas Processing. Realizing the Value of Your Natural Gas and Synthesis Gas Resources

Fluidized Bed Pyrolysis and Gasification Ongoing Activities in Finland

COAL GASIFICATION -ROUTES TO AMMONIA AND METHANOL

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENERGY SOURCES. Prepared by Sandra Vasa-Sideris, PhD, Southern Polytechnic State University, for use by students

C H A P T E R 3 FUELS AND COMBUSTION

Transcription:

Course: Chemical Technology (Organic) Module II Lecture 3 Gasification of Coal, Petrocoke And Biomass

Lecture 3 GASIFICATION OF COAL, PETROCOKE AND BIOMASS Gasification of coal, petrocoke, biomass and other carbonaceous materials to produce synthesis gas has gained significant economic and environmental importance in the recent years. Although the technology of gasification or partial oxidation of heavy feedstock is quite established for over half century, however the technology of gasification has undergone continuous developments over years to tackle higher ends of refinery bottoms, petrocoke, coal and biomass [Sukumar and Nair, 010] Gasification of coal to produce coal gas goes to the end of 18 th century when coal gas was used for heating and lighting. History of gasification is given in Table M-II 3.1.However with the availability of natural gas and petroleum products at cheaper rate the interest in coal gasification dwindled. However due to increasing cost of oil and gas and the availability of petrocoke and look for alternative feed stock for gasoline and petrochemical, interest was renewed in coal gasification. Coal gasification is now used by surface and underground gasification. Gasification of biomass is also getting interest during recent years because of availability of biomass in abundance India has estimated coal reserves of 53 billion tons and lignite around 8 billion tons and lignite around 8 billion tons. Indian coal is mainly non-coking anthracite and bituminous in nature with ash content of over 35percent. Gasification of coal offers as promising source of chemicals as well liquid fuel. The gasification of coal involves the conversion of coal to high content gas (CO and H ) Gasification technology offers the cleanest and most efficient way to convert low and/or negative value carbon based feed stock to syngas. Indian context of gasification is given in Table M-II 3.. Synthetic gas can ultimately replace natural gas for Industrial uses, electrical power generation and basic raw material to produce chemical and fuel oil. Commercial Success of Gasification Technology will depend on the advancement of technologies such as: Low cost oxygen production Syngas cleanup 69

Cost effective separation of Hydrogen from C Gasification is the process of converting organic part of solid fuel to combustible gases of high heat value by interaction with steam and oxygen. Gasification converts the low value fuel to high heat value gas. Typical gasification flow diagram is shown in Figure M-II 3.1. The feed for Gasification can be Gas (e.g., Natural gas) Liquid (e.g., Light or Heavy oils) Solid (e.g., Petroleum Coke, Coal, Lignite or Biomass). Table M-II 3.1: History of Gasification Period Technology Before 1700 Major fuels were Wood and Charcoal 1700-1750 Industrial revolutions Coal as fuel 1800-1900 Coal Pyrolysis Town gas supply, Water gas, Producer Gas 190 Cryogenic air separation Oxygen replaces air 196 Winkler Fluidized Bed Gasifier 1931 Lurgi Moving Bed Gasifier 1940 Koppers-Totzek Entrained Flow Gasifier 1950s Texaco and Shell develop Oil Gasification 1970s Oil crisis 1973 Texaco develops Slurry Process for Coal Gasification 1974 Shell and Koppers-Totzek Pressure Gasification JV 1981 High Temperature Winkler Gasification 1984 Lurgi Slagging Gasifier (together with British Gas) 1999 Shell/Krupp-Uhde develops Pressurised Entrained; Flow (PRENFLO) Gasifier Beyond 000 Shell Gasification, GE Quench/PHR/FHR, Siemens, Chinese, GPE, Plasma, Headwaters Source: Parthasarthi,009 Table M-II 3.: Gasification Indian Context 1940s Wood Gasification Wood FACT - Cochin 1945-1950 Lurgi Fixed Bed Coal Sindri 1960s Winkler Fluidized Bed Lignite Neyveli 1960s Texaco Naphtha FACT - Cochin 1970s Krupp-Koppers Entrained Bed Atm. Coal RamagundamTalcher 1970s Shell Fuel oil Sindri 1980s Shell Fuel oil NFL - Bhatinda,Panipat, Nangal 1980s Texaco Fuel oil GNFC - Bharuch Source: Source: Parthasarthi,009 70

Figure M-II 3.1: Typical Flow Diagram of Gasification process and its Products. Under Ground Coal Gasification (UCG) Under the process of UCG, gasification of coal happens in situ by controlled burning. About 350m3 of gas can be produced per tone of coal. Bye products of significant importance are hydrocarbon, phenols, anhydrous ammonia, and clean water. In UCG overcomes hazard of underground and open cast mining and ash/slag removal is not required as they remain in the cavities. Some of the advantages of UCG are tapping of energy from vast coal reserves which are not economically viable to mine, increased worker safety, low environmental impact, increased worker safety [Sawhney,008]. Surface Gasification Surface gasification involves reaction of coal with hot steam and controlled amount of air or oxygen under high temperature and pressure. Produces synthetic gas which can be used be the substitute of Natural gas, for power generation using low Btu gas as fuel, manufacture of chemicals and fertilizer and conversions to liquid fuel by GTL liquid. Process Steps in Gasification Various process steps involved in gasification are 71

Feed Preparation: Wet feed system or dry feed system may be used in gasification. Wet feed system employ grinding and slurring with water and pumping to gasifier while dry system consist of grinding of the feed and employ lock hopers to pressurize the feed Gasification: Gasification is carried out at temperature between 900-1100 o C. carbon react with oxygen and steam to raw synthesis gas( CO and H) and some minor by products which is removed to produce clean synthesis gas which can be used as fuel, for generation of steam and electricity or may be used as chemical feed stock. Syn gas cooling: High temperature syn gas produced from gasification is cooled Air Separation Unit: The process produces oxygen for gasification. The process is based on cryogenic separation of air. The process involves liquefaction of air and fractionation to get oxygen, nitrogen and other gases. Acid Gas Removal: This involves removal of impurities like H S, COS, NH 3 and HCN by absorption using various commercial solvent like mono-ethanol amine (MEA), methyl diethanol amine (MDEA), methanol rectisolvent and Selexol [Handa and ganesh, 011]. The solvent is regenerated by stripping the acid gases and recycle. Slag Handling System: The gasifier may be either slagging or non slagging. Gasification in Petroleum refinery [Handa and Ganesh,011]: With increasing use of heavier crude and processing of heavy residue has resulted in increased production of tar, petroccoke and asphalt by various residues upgrading technologies processes like visbreaking, coking and deasphalting. These residues can be gasified for production of hydrogen, syn. gas, electricity ammonia and chemicals.. During recent years petrocoke gasification is getting interest by petroleum refiners for production of syn. gas which can be further process to separate hydrogen or can be used for production of useful chemicals. 7

Gasifier Configurations Various types of gasifier used are mention in Table M-II 3.3 and shown in Figure M-II 3. below: Table M-II 3.3: Various Type of Gasifier Fixed bed Fixed bed involves an upward flow of reaction gas through a relatively stationary bed of hot coal. The gas velocity is low. Moving bed gasifier Moving bed gasifier operates counter currently where the coal inter the gasifier at the top and moves downward and slowly heated with the product gas. Gasification takes place in the gasification zone. Fluidised bed gasifier e.g., Winkler/KBR/U- GAS Entrained flow gasifier Fluidised bed operates at higher gas velocities than fixed bed and uses smaller particle. The gasifier operates at atmospheric pressure and moderate and uniform temperature. Entrained bed operates with parallel flows of reaction gas and pulverized coal which minimize the reaction time and maximize throughput of product.. The residence time is few seconds. Ash is removed as molten slag Source: Vorres, K.S. Coal gasification Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology vol 6,p.760 Gasification Reactions: C H n m n O nco m H 1 n Where for gas as pure methane m=4 and n=1 hence m/n=4 For oil m/n hence m=, n=1 For coal m/n 1 hence m=1,n=1 4 It is exothermic and produces a gas containing mainly CO and H. The raw synthesis gas contains small quantities of CO, H O and H S and impurities, such as CH 4, NH 3, COS, HCN, N, Argon and ash, the quantities being determined by the composition of the feedstock, the oxidant and actual gasification temperature (1300-1400 o C). A small amount of unconverted carbon is also present and ranges from 0.5 to 1.0 by percent wt in liquid feedstock or 50-00 ppm 73

wt in gaseous feedstock. The various reactions can be summarized as follows [Chemical Industry Digest. Annual-January 010, Page- 148]: Combustion C 1 O CO, H 111MJ Kmol CO 1 O CO, H 83 MJ Kmol H 1 O H O, H 4 MJ Kmol Steam Reforming Reaction CH H O CO H H 06 MJ 4 3, Kmol Boudourard Reaction C CO CO, H 17 MJ Kmol Water Gas Reaction C H O CO H, CO H, H 131MJ Kmol Water Shift Reaction CO H O CO H, H 41MJ Kmol Methanation Reactions C H CH, 4 H 75 MJ Kmol 74

Figure M-II 3.: Various Type of Gasifier Commonly Used Source: Parthasarthi,009 75

Figure M-II 3.3: Fluidised bed gasifier Source: Parthasarthi,009 NEW GASIFIER DESIGNS [Parthasarthi,009] GE Global/ Unmixed Fuel Processor (UOP): Elimination of Air Separation Unit (ASU) High Temperature Syngas Clean up Higher efficiency Lower cost 76

KBR Transport Gasifier (TRIG TM ) [Parthasarthi,009} Low rank, high-ash, high-moisture coal compatible For power generation, air can be employed as the oxidant Lower cost predicted Higher availability predicted Non-slagging, and refractory issues should therefore be minimal Higher predicted efficiency Lower emissions (due to higher efficiency) Large scale up of the technology still required, by a factor of ~30 By 010, this technology will be operating at the scale of E-Gas which has >0 years experience already in 007. Lower temperatures and short gas residence time may lead to some methane formation, which is detrimental in chemical applications. Ash disposal problem if carbon conversion predictions are not met in commercial apparatus. Catalytic Coal Gasification Bluegas TM {Parthasarthi,009} Elimination of oxygen plant For SNG objective, little or no catalytic methanation required High thermodynamic efficiency potential Catalyst cost and recoverability Carbon conversion and methane production yields in the gasifier Cost of applying the catalyst effectively to the coal Inherently must be done in a fluidized bed which have not been scaled up to larger capacities of entrained gasifier (yet) Interactions of catalyst with coal ash Separation costs of syngas and methane cryogenic process Excess steam requirements Unsuitable for chemical synthesis processes due to CH 4 reforming requirement. 77

Coal Gasification in fertilizer Industry: Coal gasification fro production of synthesis gas and ammonia has being used many part of the world where large quantity of coal is present. However, higher energy consumption in coal based ammonia plant has been major constrain. Relative energy consumption per tonne of ammonia is given below [ Murthy and Patnaik, 001]. Gas Naphtha Fuel oil Coal 1.1 1.15 1.45 There has been extensive research for improvement of coal gasification technology to improve the efficiency and reduce the cost. Rapid Thermal Processing (RTP TM ) Process for Conversion of Biomass to Liquid Fuels RTP TM is fully heat integrated technology that yields over 70percent liquid products from typical biomass feed stocks. It is a fast thermal process where biomass is rapidly of heated in the absence of oxygen. The biomass is vaporized and the vapour cooled to generate high yields of pyrolysis oil. Typical yield of various biomass is given in Table M-II 3.4. Chemical and biochemical conversion of biomass to biofuel is shown in Figure M-II 3.4 and Figure M-II 3.5 respectively. Table M-II 3.4: Typical Yield of Various Biomass Biomass Feed stock Typical Pyrolysis oil yield,wt% of dry feed stock70-75 \ Hardwood 70-80 Softwood 70-80 Hardwood bark 60-65 Soft wood bark 55-65 Corn fiber 65-75 Bagasse 70-75 Waste Paper 60-80 Source: Reno et al., 011 78

Figure M-II 3.4: Chemical Conversion Route of Biomass to Biofuels Biomass Hydrol ysis Anaerobic digestion Fermentable sugar Residue Ferment ation Bio-oil Ethanol Butanol Hydrogen Biogas Purification SNG CH 4 Figure M-II 3.5: Biochemical Conversion Route of Biomass to Biofuels Source: Hamelinck and Faaij, 006 Co-gasification of Coal and biomass for methanol synthesis: Cogasification of coal and biomass combined with power and methanol production can be of considered as a potential fuel-base for gasification and further production of synthesis gas and methanol. Some of the advantage of integrated biomass-coal cogasification system is possible continuous operation of the coal gasification reactor, lower costs of electric-energy production [Chemielniak & Sciazko, 003] REFRENCES 1. Chemical Industry Digest. Annual-January 010, p.148.. Chemielniak, T., Sciazko, M., Co-gasification of biomass and coal for methanol synthesis Applied Energy Vol. 74,003, p.393 3. Furimsky, E., Gasification in Petroleum refinery of 1st century Oil & Gas science and Technology- Rev IFP, Vol. 54, No5, 1999, p.597 4. Hamelinck, C.N., Faaij A.P.C., Outlook for Advance Biofuels, Energy Policy. 34, 006, 368-383. 79

5. Handa, S.K., Ganesh, C., Gasification technology- status and challenges Compendium of 16 th refinery Technology meet on Feb 17-19,011 held at Calcutta, Organised by Centre for high Technology and Indian oil Corporation New Delhi 6. Murthy, G.G.K., Patnaik, L.N., Coal gasification in fertliser industry-a future perspective Chemical weekly, June 001,p.163 7. Parthasarthi Deb, Clean coal technology Conference 10 th November 009 PDU, GandhiNagar, Gujarat 8. Reno, M.E., Streff, M., Hird, A, Ray, A. Conversion of biomass to fuel as an environmental impact reduction opportunity for the pulp and paper Industry In paper International, April- June 011, p.18 9. Sawhney, P., Meeting of Indo-US working group on Coal April, 008 10. Sukumarannair, M.P. Harness gasification for integrated chemical complex Chemical Industry digest Annual-January 010, p.144 11. Tirodkar, R.B., Belgaonkar, V.H., Use of Chemicals derived from coal in surface coating industry Chemical Business April 0-May 4,1991, p.35 1. Vorres, K.S., Coal gasification, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 6, p.760 80