ELEMENT 4 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Similar documents
CPED STAFF REPORT Prepared for the City Planning Commission

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST. Project Name: Site Plan No.:

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

Model Subdivision and Land Development (SALDO) Subdivision/ Land Development Presentation Overview. Why Subdivision and Land Development Regulations?

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Development Variance Permit Application Package

Corridor Goals and Objectives

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

PLANNING POLICY 3.3.5

Summary and Description of 2014 Enhancements to New Jersey Model Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipalities

SECTION ELEVEN: ACTIVITIES REQUIRING A CERTIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 1

SPECIAL USE PERMIT JCSA Groundwater Treatment Facility Staff Report for the November 5, 2001, Planning Commission Public Hearing

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

January 2015 BrowardNext Summary Survey Results for Focus Area Priorities. Ranking of Focus Area Importance

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

ORDINANCE NO

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CITY OF LONDON ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING EROSION AND STORM WATER CONTROL

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 5, 2015

Chapter 5.0. Stormwater Credits for Innovative Site Planning

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION

Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota. Land Use Goals:

EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP AND LAND USE INFORMATION

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

Definition of Tower from the Bradley County Zoning Resolution

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

FLOOD PLAIN DESIGNATION AND PROTECTION

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

Kirkland Zoning Code

Restoration. a brief look at

Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF NORTH SALEM WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW # OF THE YEAR 2012

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. PORT OF OSWEGO AUTHORITY Lead Agency, State Environmental Quality Review Act

CONFORMITY WITH PLANS; DRAINAGE.

March 17, Dear Mr. Sullins:

The Board of Zoning Appeals shall have the duty and power to:

Site Analysis. Floyd Zimmerman, FASLA. Summary CLIENT NEEDS. Supplemental Architectural Services 2000 AIA 1 SITE ANALYSIS SERVICES

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services SECOND DWELLING UNIT

Article 20. Nonconformities

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA)

Alternatives Analysis Outline for Protecting Buildings

22.01 SETTLEMENT 24/04/2014 C73

H 6042 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUMMARY OF ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

DOUGLAS COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION Section 5 RR - Rural Residential District 3/10/99. -Section Contents-

DRAFT Policy to Guide Discretion on Proposed Relaxations to Minimum Parking Requirements in Commercial Districts City-Wide 2014 June 05

REAL ESTATE DUE DILIGENCE CHECKLIST

City of Colleyville Community Development Department. Site/Landscape Plan Application Packet

VANDERBILT COMPARISON

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts. Design and Development Guidelines. Part Two.

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN MASTER PLAN

Appendix N: Bicycle Parking Ordinance

DEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES

CHAPTER VIII. HARDSHIP RELIEF

Technical Memorandum No. 1: Environmental Approach and Decision Making Criteria

Land Use Element. Introduction 2.3. A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3. A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3. A-2 Uses 2.

The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as Amended (NHPA)

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North

Attachment B Policy Audit Template

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015

sdci Seattle Permits Tip Tree Protection Regulations in Seattle CATEGORIES OF TREES AFFECTED IDENTIFYING TREE TYPES ON YOUR PROPERTY

Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance Chapter 14 Nonconformities

REPORTS SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENT 11 MAY 2015 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING OF COUNCIL

PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE

ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES. for SUBDIVISIONS OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

What do we already know about Bradford-on-Avon community area?

Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners

Local Area Plans. Ver.1.2 Paradise Point 1 of 16

PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FREEPORT, ILLINOIS: THIS DAY OF, A.D., 20. APPROVED: MAYOR PASSED: APPROVED: ATTEST: CITY CLERK

City Code of ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Chapter 55 Zoning

Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan. Draft Plan Concepts April 2016

Zoning Districts, Gwinnett County, Georgia

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC Rutherglen Cary, NC

BEACON AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT

Historic Preservation in Housing and Community Development. Linking Historic Preservation to Community Development Block Grant Objectives

The Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: May 19, 2015

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS AND APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE GENOME LAUNCH FACILITY PROJECT, DAVIS CAMPUS

Council Policy for New Telecommunication Facilities

Submit a copy of your license issued by the Department of Social and Health Services.

Midland Park Architectural Review and Approval Guidelines Background (Revised March 2016)

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MONITORING AND FOLLOW-UP

Civil Engineering and Architecture (CEA) Detailed Outline

Transcription:

ELEMENT 4 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goal 1 To create a long-range development pattern which directs growth into developable areas and away from environmentally sensitive areas, in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding community. Objective 1A Establish and develop appropriate land uses on campus. (See Figure 4.1) Policy 1A-1 Concentrate academic, and support facility development within the core campus, in order to compose a dense build-out of the campus. This will strengthen the sense of campus and provide an environment strongly supportive of pedestrian traffic. Policy 1A-2 Develop a variety of courtyard experiences and a central quadrangle to provide attractive outdoor areas that will encourage and foster the development of a rich academic life on campus. Policy 1A-3 Create academic zones, fostering interdisciplinary strengths. Policy 1A-4 Complete a housing district along the north and west areas of campus, containing low-rise student housing for the Honors College. Policy 1A-5 Locate unforeseen facilities (arising from grant awards or other circumstances) according to schematic sites and zones as delineated on the master graphic, Figure MP.1. Amendments to the adopted campus master plan that alone, or in conjunction with other plan amendments, exceed the thresholds established in s.1013.30(9), F.S., shall be reviewed and adopted pursuant to s.1013.30(6)-(8), F.S. Further, amendments that do not exceed these thresholds shall be consolidated into a single annual submission and submitted through University Architect to the Board of Trustees for approval per Policy and Procedure UAVP #22. Policy 1A-6 Encourage careful use of the University's existing land resources and minimize deviations from the land use plan by continuing the management and review procedures of the President and the Executive Committee assisted by the University Architect and Vice President s Office (UAVP). Page 4-1

4 Policy 1A-7 Proposed amendments to the adopted campus master plan which do not exceed the thresholds established in s.1013.30(9), F.S., and which have the effect of changing land use designations or classifications, or impacting off-campus facilities, services or natural resources, shall be submitted to the host local government for a courtesy review. Policy 1A-8 Annually, the President and the Executive Committee assisted by the University Architect and Vice President s Office (UAVP) will coordinate land use and development decisions with the current schedule of capital improvements. Policy 1A-9 As new facilities are identified, utilize the floor area ratios (F.A.R.) in Table 4.1 to guide the density of various land uses to maintain the intent of the master plan. Policy 1A-10 Coordinate land use and development discussions with the schedule of capital improvements for the Campus and the University. Policy 1A-11 Provide development of facilities on the campus. No additional property is required during this planning period. Policy 1A-12 Development density for the residential land use shall average 150 beds per housing acre. Page 4-2

4 TABLE 4.1 Maximum Permitted F.A.R. Land Use No. of Acres Average F.A.R. Maximum F.A.R. Academic 15.4 1.5 2.0 Support 2.0 1.0 2.0 Residential* 1.5 0.8 1.0 Recreational 13.4 0.1 0.1 Open Green spaces 44.10 0.1 0.1 Utilities 1.8 0.8 1.0 Parking 20.02 0.1 0.1 Circulation/Service Corridors 5 0.1 0.1 Easements 7.09 0.0 0.0 Source: PGAL recommendations Floor area ratio (FAR) may be defined as the total building area (in square feet) divided by the total area of the building zone (in square feet) Residential density to average 150/acre defined as beds per housing acre Objective 1B Coordinate future land uses with appropriate topography and soil conditions. Policy 1B-1 The University Architect and Vice President s Office (UAVP) will coordinate future land uses and the design of all future construction projects with appropriate topography and soil conditions in continuation of BOT standard practices. Policy 1B-2 The University Architect and Vice President s Office (UAVP) shall review all future construction projects for consistency with existing topographic and soil data. Policy 1B-3 The University shall maintain a data base of existing topographic and soil conditions, which will be updated with as-built and survey data developed for future construction projects. Objective 1C Coordinate future land uses with the availability of facilities and services. Page 4-3

4 Policy 1C-1 The University Architect and Vice President s Office (UAVP) will coordinate future land uses with the availability of facilities and services to ensure that utilities and infrastructure (except transportation facilities) will be provided at adopted levels of service prior to occupancy. The University Architect and Vice President s Office (UAVP) shall review and evaluate all future construction projects to ensure that adequate provisions for infrastructure and utilities have been incorporated into the design by documenting: The provision and maintenance of necessary utility easements, corridors, and points of connection; The provision of adequate supply lines to accommodate future development and facility expansion; and The provision of open space and convenient and safe traffic flow and parking at established levels of service. Policy 1C-2 The University will continually monitor the adequacy of storm water management facilities and policies, open space, and the safety and convenience of on-campus traffic flow to maintain adopted levels of service. Amendments to the adopted plan will be pursued, if necessary, to implement required changes. Policy 1C-3 Provisions for storm water management, open space, and safe and convenient on-campus traffic flow, considering needed vehicle parking, are included in the development density guidelines also known as Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and should be provided at the adopted level of service as part of each facility development. Refer to Table 4.1 for building densities, to Element 9 for related storm water policies, to Element 3 and Element 8 for open space policies, and to Element 11 for parking related policies. Objective 1D Ensure the availability of suitable land on-campus for future utility needs. Policy 1D-1 The University shall designate a site at the south west end of the core campus for the construction of a central utilities plant to serve all academic buildings. A separate utilities plant site along the north edge of the campus is to serve all housing facilities. (See MP-1 and Figure 4.1) Page 4-4

4 Policy 1D-2 The University shall designate a utility corridor connecting the central utility plant with the campus core and following the alignment of the Loop Road coordinated with the proposed utility systems as discussed in Element 10 and the proposed roadways discussed in Element 11. Objective 1E Protect any identified historic and archaeological resources on campus from the adverse impacts of development. Policy 1E-1 The University shall maintain an inventory and evaluation of all archaeological and historic properties under University ownership that appear to qualify for the National Register of Historic Places. Policy 1E-2 The University shall consult and coordinate with the Department of State's Division of Historical Resources and the Town of Jupiter Historic Resources Board prior to any land clearing, ground disturbing, or rehabilitation activities which may disturb or otherwise affect any property which is included, or eligible for inclusion, in the National Register of Historic Places. Policy 1E-3 The University shall consider the effects of such an undertaking identified in the above Policy on any historic property that is included, or eligible for inclusion, on the National Register for Historic Places. The University shall afford the State Division of Historical Resources a reasonable opportunity to comment on such an undertaking. Policy 1E-4 Prior to a historic property being demolished or substantially altered in a way that adversely affects its character, form integrity or archaeological or historical value, the University shall consult with the Department of State's Division of Historical Resources to avoid or mitigate any adverse impacts, or to undertake any appropriate archaeological salvage excavation or recovery action. Objective 1F To protect any identified natural resources on the campus from the adverse impacts of development. Page 4-5

4 Policy 1F-1 As part of the design process for any programmed improvement and prior to approval and acceptance of the design by the University, FAU shall require that geotechnical testing be conducted to determine relevant soil characteristics of the site and to ensure that the design(s) reflect consideration of these conditions. Policy 1F-2 The University shall require the integration of natural topographic and other physical features in project designs in order to develop University property in harmony with its natural environment. Policy 1F-3 The University shall adopt and adhere to the Conservation Element policies regarding environmental management, and shall require adherence to these standards by all parties performing design and construction of facilities on University property. Policy 1F-4 The University shall ensure that appropriate methods of controlling erosion and sedimentation to help minimize the destruction of soil resources be used during site development and use. Such methods shall include, but not be limited to: Phasing and limiting the removal of vegetation; Minimizing the amount of land area that is cleared; Limiting the amount of time bare land is exposed to rainfall; Use of temporary ground cover on cleared areas if construction is not imminent; and Special consideration shall be given to maintaining vegetative cover on areas of high soil erosion potential (i.e., banks of streams, steep or long slopes, storm water conveyances, etc.). Goal 2 To coordinate University land use patterns with the host community. Objective 2A Limit the possibility that land use compatibility problems and constraints will arise between the University and the host community. Page 4-6

4 Policy 2A-1 The University's Vice President of the John D. MacArthur Campus, University Architect, or designee will periodically meet (at least annually) with the Town of Jupiter and Abacoa to eliminate or minimize land use compatibility problems and constraints (See also Element 12, Intergovernmental Coordination). Policy 2A-2 FAU will utilize and abide by the procedures established under Intergovernmental Coordination Element 12, Objective 1A for a reciprocal review process between the University and the host community to monitor development activities as a means of minimizing compatibility problems and constraints. Policy 2A-3 The University Architect and Vice President s Office (UAVP) will review each proposed project prior to initiation to ensure that it will not create incompatible land uses either on campus or with the adjacent community land use. Objective 2B Minimize on-campus conflicts with the host community's land uses within the context area, and minimize off-campus constraints that limit future development on campus. Policy 2B-1 New development for academic, and support uses shall be located in or near the central campus core area. New development for residential use shall be located along the north and west edge of the campus. Policy 2B-2 FAU will utilize and abide by the procedures established under Intergovernmental Coordination Element 12, Objective 1B for a reciprocal review process between the University and the host community to monitor development activities as a means of minimizing on-campus land use conflicts and off-campus constraints that limit future development. Policy 2B-3 FAU will utilize the on-campus land uses delineated on Figure 4.1 and the off-campus land uses delineated on Figure 3.4 in the reciprocal preview process to minimize conflicts between the University and host community developments. Page 4-7